Enhancing endurance performance with combined imagined and actual physical practice.

PURPOSE: The perception of effort exerts influence in determining task failure during endurance performance. Training interventions blending physical and cognitive tasks yielded promising results in enhancing performance. Motor imagery can decrease the perception of effort. Whether combining motor imagery and physical training improves endurance remains to be understood, and this was the aim of this study. METHODS: Participants (24 ± 3 year) were assigned to a motor imagery (n = 16) or a control (n = 17) group. Both groups engaged in physical exercises targeting the knee extensors (i.e., wall squat, 12 training sessions, 14-days), with participants from the motor imagery group also performing motor imagery. Each participant visited the laboratory Pre and Post-training, during which we assessed endurance performance through a sustained submaximal isometric knee extension contraction until task failure, at either 20% or 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction peak torque. Perceptions of effort and muscle pain were measured during the exercise. RESULTS: We reported no changes in endurance performance for the control group. Endurance performance in the motor imagery group exhibited significant improvements when the intensity of the sustained isometric exercise closely matched that used in training. These enhancements were less pronounced when considering the higher exercise intensity. No reduction in perception of effort was observed in both groups. There was a noticeable decrease in muscle pain perception within the motor imagery group Post training. CONCLUSION: Combining motor imagery and physical training may offer a promising avenue for enhancing endurance performance and managing pain in various contexts.

Effects of prolonged local vibration superimposed to muscle contraction on motoneuronal and cortical excitability.

Introduction: Acute effects of prolonged local vibration (LV) at the central nervous system level have been well investigated demonstrating an altered motoneuronal excitability with a concomitant increase in cortical excitability. While applying LV during isometric voluntary contraction is thought to optimize the effects of LV, this has never been addressed considering the acute changes in central nervous system excitability. Materials and Methods: In the present study, nineteen healthy participants were engaged in four randomized sessions. LV was applied for 30 min to the relaxed flexor carpi radialis muscle (VIBRELAXED) or during wrist flexions (i.e. intermittent contractions at 10% of the maximal voluntary contraction: 15 s ON and 15 s OFF; VIBCONTRACT). A control condition and a condition where participants only performed repeated low-contractions at 10% maximal force (CONTRACT) were also performed. For each condition, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited by corticospinal tract electrical stimulation were measured before (PRE) and immediately after prolonged LV (POST) to investigate motoneuronal and corticospinal excitability, respectively. We further calculated the MEP/CMEP ratio as a proxy of cortical excitability. Results: No changes were observed in the control nor CONTRACT condition. At POST, CMEP decreased similarly in VIBRELAXED (-32% ± 42%, p < .001) and VIBCONTRACT (-41% ± 32%, p < .001). MEP/CMEP increased by 110% ± 140% (p = .01) for VIBRELAXED and by 120% ± 208% (p = .02) for VIBCONTRACT without differences between those conditions. Discussion: Our results suggest that LV to the flexor carpi radialis muscle, either relaxed or contracted, acutely decreases motoneuronal excitability and induces some priming of cortical excitability.