RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The revised Lublin classification offers a framework for categorizing multiple sclerosis (MS) according to the clinical course and imaging results. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is often delayed by a period of uncertainty. Several quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) markers are associated with progressive disease states, but they are not usually available in clinical practice. METHODS: The MAGNON project enrolled 629 patients (early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), n = 51; RRMS with suspected SPMS, n = 386; SPMS, n = 192) at 55 centers in Germany. Routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at baseline and after 12 months were analyzed using a centralized automatic processing pipeline to quantify lesions and normalized brain and thalamic volume. Clinical measures included relapse activity, disability, and MS phenotyping. Neurologists completed questionnaires before and after receiving the qMRI reports. RESULTS: According to the physicians' reports, qMRI results changed their assessment of the patient in 31.8% (baseline scan) and 27.6% (follow-up scan). For â¼50% of patients with RRMS with suspected SPMS, reports provided additional information that the patient was transitioning to SPMS. In >25% of all patients, this information influenced the physicians' assessment of the patient's current phenotype. However, actual changes of treatment were reported only in a minority of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The MAGNON results suggest that standardized qMRI reports may be integrated into the routine clinical care of MS patients and support the application of the Lublin classification as well as treatment decisions. The highest impact was reported in patients with suspected SPMS, indicating a potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , AlemaniaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) and tailored health literacy (HL) follow-up with usual care on hospitalization, costs, HL, self-management, Quality of life (QOL), and psychological stress in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A RCT was undertaken in Norway between March 2018-December 2020 (n = 127). The control group (CG, n = 63) received usual care. The intervention group (IG, n = 64) received tailored HL follow-up from MI-trained COPD nurses with home visits for eight weeks and phone calls for four months after hospitalization. Primary outcomes were hospitalization at eight weeks, six months, and one year from baseline. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03216603) and analysed per protocol. RESULTS: Compared with the IG, the CG had 2.8 higher odds (95% CI [1.3 to 5.8]) of hospitalization and higher hospital health costs (MD= -6230, 95% CI [-6510 to -5951]) and lower QALYs (MD=0.1, 95% CI [0.10 to 0.11]) that gives an ICER = - 62,300. The IG reported higher QOL, self-management, and HL (p = 0.02- to <0.01). CONCLUSION: MI-trained COPD nurses using tailored HL follow-up is cost-effective, reduces hospitalization, and increases QOL, HL, and self-care in COPD. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Tailored HL follow-up is beneficial for individuals with COPD and the healthcare system.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Automanejo , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Hospitalización , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicologíaRESUMEN
Booster vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are recommended 6-12 months after the last dose or infection in elderly and high-risk groups. The present analysis aims to evaluate whether an interval shorter than 12 months is required in multiple sclerosis patients receiving ofatumumab. Neutralizing antibody status over 1 year in patients receiving booster vaccination in the non-interventional, multicenter KYRIOS study under continued ofatumumab treatment was analyzed. Fifteen patients were included. At the time of the first booster vaccination, ten patients were seropositive for neutralizing antibodies, four patients were seronegative, and for one patient, no baseline levels were available. All patients who were seropositive at baseline showed >2-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titers after the first booster and two patients (20%) showed a >10-fold increase. Among seronegative patients, three (75%) had a >10-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titers. Seropositivity was maintained in almost all patients until month 12. One initially seronegative patient had less than 2-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titers after the booster vaccination and can be considered a non-responder. Most patients with continued ofatumumab treatment are able to maintain permanent seropositivity and therefore presumably constant protection against severe courses of COVID-19 if repeated booster vaccinations are applied.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Anciano , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas de ARNm , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence on SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination under siponimod treatment is rare. METHODS: AMA-VACC is a prospective, open-label clinical study on SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination during ongoing siponimod treatment (cohort 1), during siponimod interruption (cohort 2), or during treatment with other disease-modifying therapies or without therapy (cohort 3). SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T-cell reactivity were measured six months after the initial vaccination and one month after the booster. RESULTS: 41 patients were recruited into cohort 1 (n = 17), cohort 2 (n = 4), and cohort 3 (n = 20). Seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies was reached by 50.0%, 100.0%, and 90.0% of patients at month 6 and by 81.3%, 100.0%, and 100.0% one month after booster (cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Antibody levels in cohort 1 increased after the booster compared to month 6 but remained lower compared to cohorts 2 and 3. T-cell responses were seen in 28.5%, 25.0%, and 73.7% at month 6 and in 28.6%, 50.0%, and 83.3% after the booster (cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively). In cohort 1, the extent of T-cell response was lower at month 6 compared to cohorts 2 and 3 but reached almost similar levels after the booster. CONCLUSIONS: The antibody and T-cell responses support SARS-CoV-2 (booster) vaccines in siponimod-treated patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few data exist on how ofatumumab treatment impacts SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination response. METHODS: KYRIOS is an ongoing prospective open-label multicenter study on the response to initial and booster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination before or during ofatumumab treatment in relapsing MS patients. The results on the initial vaccination cohort have been published previously. Here, we describe 23 patients who received their initial vaccination outside of the study but booster vaccination during the study. Additionally, we report the booster results of two patients in the initial vaccination cohort. The primary endpoint was SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response at month 1. Furthermore, serum total and neutralizing antibodies were measured. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached by 87.5% of patients with booster before (booster cohort 1, N = 8) and 46.7% of patients with booster during ofatumumab treatment (booster cohort 2, N = 15). Seroconversion rates for neutralizing antibodies increased from 87.5% at baseline to 100.0% at month 1 in booster cohort 1 and from 71.4% to 93.3% in booster cohort 2. Of note, 3 of 4 initially seronegative patients in booster cohort 2 and one seronegative patient in the initial vaccination cohort seroconverted after the booster during ofatumumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Booster vaccinations increase neutralizing antibody titers in ofatumumab-treated patients. A booster is recommended in ofatumumab-treated patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving ofatumumab mount an immune response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. METHODS: KYRIOS is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, prospective clinical study on immune responses in MS patients after initial or booster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination prior to (cohort 1) or during (cohort 2) ofatumumab treatment. We report one-week and one-month results of the initial vaccination. A comparison with patients vaccinated while receiving beta-interferon, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide or no treatment was included (cohort 3). RESULTS: In total, 11 patients received their initial vaccination during the study. The primary endpoint of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells at month 1 was reached by 80.0% of patients in cohort 1 (N = 6) and 100.0% in cohort 2 (N = 5). T-cell reactivity peaked at week 1. All cohort 1 patients reached seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies at week 1 and month 1. In cohort 2, neutralizing antibodies increased in all patients and exceeded the cut-off for seropositivity in 40.0% of patients at week 1 and 25.0% at month 1. Immune responses in cohort 3 were comparable to cohort 1. CONCLUSION: Presence of T-cell response and increase in levels of neutralizing antibodies, although less pronounced compared to controls, suggest that MS patients receiving ofatumumab are able to mount an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.
RESUMEN
Background: Systematic data are lacking on the immune response toward SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in SPMS patients on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Objective: The AMA-VACC clinical trial was designed to characterize immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in siponimod-treated SPMS patients. Design: AMA-VACC is an ongoing three-cohort, multicenter, open-label, prospective clinical study. Methods: The study included patients at risk for SPMS or patients with SPMS diagnosis. Patients received SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine as part of their clinical routine during ongoing siponimod treatment (cohort 1), during siponimod treatment interruption (cohort 2), or while on dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, beta-interferons, teriflunomide, or no current therapy (cohort 3). SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses were measured 1 week and 1 month after the second dose of vaccination. Results: In total, 17 patients, 4 patients, and 20 patients were recruited into cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The primary endpoint of seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies at week 1 was reached by 52.9%, 75.0%, and 90.0% of patients in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For 64.7% of patients in cohort 1, all patients in cohort 2, and 95% of patients in cohort 3, seroconversion was observed at either week 1 or month 1 or both time points. After 1 week, 71.4% of cohort 1, 75.0% of cohort 2, and 85.0% of cohort 3 were positive for either SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies or SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells or both. After 1 month, the rates were 56.3%, 100.0%, and 95.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The study shows that the majority of siponimod patients mount humoral and cellular immune response under continuous siponimod treatment. The data do not sufficiently support interruption of treatment for the purpose of vaccination. Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT 2020-005752-38 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04792567 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).
RESUMEN
Migraine affects about 12% of the worldwide population causing substantial personal and societal burden. Yet, migraine remains underdiagnosed and untreated. EPISCOPE was a web-based survey among a German migraine patient cohort to characterize the medical care and prophylactic treatment status aiming to identify unmet needs. Potential migraine patients were identified via an ID Migraine screener. Their socioeconomic background, medical care experience, acute medication use, as well as use and experience of migraine prophylaxis was assessed by a questionnaire. Data of 29,011 participants was collected. 21,504 participants were identified as migraine patients. Patients with a higher number of monthly migraine days experienced better medical care. However, even among chronic migraine patients, 54% were not consulting a physician, 30% did not feel well-informed about medication overuse and 48% had never tried prophylactic migraine treatment. Among patients receiving prophylactic migraine treatment, up to 33% were not satisfied with their prophylaxis due to insufficient efficacy. Taken together, EPISCOPE describes the largest German migraine patient cohort so far. The survey provides detailed and valuable insight into the current medical care and prophylactic treatment situation in a highly developed European country and identifies reasons why the medical care of migraine patients is still insufficient.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Atención al Paciente , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Tumor microenvironment-targeted therapies are emerging as promising treatment options for different cancer types. Tumor-associated macrophages and microglia (TAMs) represent an abundant nonmalignant cell type in brain metastases and have been proposed to modulate metastatic colonization and outgrowth. Here we demonstrate that targeting TAMs at distinct stages of the metastatic cascade using an inhibitor of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), BLZ945, in murine breast-to-brain metastasis models leads to antitumor responses in prevention and intervention preclinical trials. However, in established brain metastases, compensatory CSF2Rb-STAT5-mediated pro-inflammatory TAM activation blunted the ultimate efficacy of CSF1R inhibition by inducing neuroinflammation gene signatures in association with wound repair responses that fostered tumor recurrence. Consequently, blockade of CSF1R combined with inhibition of STAT5 signaling via AC4-130 led to sustained tumor control, a normalization of microglial activation states and amelioration of neuronal damage.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/metabolismo , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos , Animales , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Genes fms , Activación de Macrófagos , Melanoma , Ratones , Receptores del Factor Estimulante de Colonias/metabolismo , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/genética , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Microambiente Tumoral , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
Chordomas are rare bone tumors with few therapeutic options. Here we show, using whole-exome and genome sequencing within a precision oncology program, that advanced chordomas (n = 11) may be characterized by genomic patterns indicative of defective homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair and alterations affecting HR-related genes, including, for example, deletions and pathogenic germline variants of BRCA2, NBN, and CHEK2. A mutational signature associated with HR deficiency was significantly enriched in 72.7% of samples and co-occurred with genomic instability. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib, which is preferentially toxic to HR-incompetent cells, led to prolonged clinical benefit in a patient with refractory chordoma, and whole-genome analysis at progression revealed a PARP1 p.T910A mutation predicted to disrupt the autoinhibitory PARP1 helical domain. These findings uncover a therapeutic opportunity in chordoma that warrants further exploration, and provide insight into the mechanisms underlying PARP inhibitor resistance.