Cannabis Co-Use Among Black Individuals with Chronic Pain Who Use Opioids: Associations with Other Substance Use and Pain Related Outcomes.

Background Black individuals with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain tend to experience worse pain and opioid use-related outcomes, including other substance co-use, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Co-using cannabis with opioids could instigate a cascade of pain-related vulnerabilities and poor outcomes. Here, we test associations between cannabis/opioid co-use and pain-related outcomes among Black individuals with chronic MSK pain. Methods Black adults with chronic MSK pain who use opioids (N=401; 51.62% female, Mage=35.90, SD=11.03) completed online measures of pain intensity/interference, emotional distress, opioid dependence, and risky use of other substances. Results Compared with opioid use alone, opioid and cannabis co-use was associated with elevated anxiety and depression symptoms, opioid dependence, and risky substance use, but not pain. Conclusions Black individuals with chronic MSK pain who co-use opioids and cannabis warrant targeted interventions that address their needs. Tailored interventions could help address disparities in pain-related outcomes and opioid morbidity and mortality rates.

"I Wish I Had That!": A Qualitative Analysis of Psychosocial Treatment Preferences Among Young Adults With Recent Concussion and Anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: To assess psychosocial treatment preferences and factors that may affect treatment participation among young adults with a recent concussion and co-occurring anxiety. DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured individual qualitative interviews, followed by thematic analysis using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. SETTING: Academic medical center in the US Northeast. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen young adults (18-24y) who sustained a concussion within the past 3-10 weeks and reported at least mild anxiety (≥5 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes include preferences for program content (eg, topics and skills), delivery modality, format, and barriers and facilitators to participation. RESULTS: We identified 4 domains characterizing participants' perceptions of and preferences for treatment. (1) Program content: Participants preferred a program early after injury that included psychoeducation and coping skills (eg, activity pacing, deep breathing, mindfulness). (2) Therapeutic processes: Participants preferred a person-centered approach in which clinicians normalized anxiety postconcussion and reassured them of recovery. (3) Program logistics: Participants endorsed that a brief, virtual program would be acceptable. They preferred access to program components through multiple modalities (eg, audio, video) and accommodations to manage concussion symptoms. (4) Barriers and facilitators to participation: Barriers included acute concussion symptoms (eg, screen sensitivity), time constraints, and forgetting sessions. Facilitators included a program that is flexible (format, scheduling), personalized (self-chosen mode for reminders, measure of accountability), and accessible (ie, advertising through health care professionals or social media). CONCLUSIONS: Participants need psychosocial support that normalizes their experiences and provides education and coping tools. Treatments should be accessible, flexible, and person centered. Psychosocial treatments meeting these preferences may help optimize the recovery of young adults with recent concussion and anxiety.

"I completely shut down": A mixed methods evaluation of the fear-avoidance model for young adults with a recent concussion and anxiety.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The fear-avoidance model is a well-established framework for understanding the transition from acute to chronic pain. However, its applicability to concussions is not yet well understood. Here, we conduct the first mixed methods analysis of the fear-avoidance model in young adults with a recent concussion and co-occurring anxiety and assess the model's alignment with their lived experience. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: We conducted a mixed methods analysis using a cross-sectional parallel design. Seventeen participants completed questionnaires corresponding with the elements in the fear-avoidance model (e.g., pain catastrophizing, avoidance, disability, anxiety, depression, etc.) and participated in semistructured interviews probing their experiences following their concussion between March 2021 and February 2022. We calculated bivariate correlations for quantitative data and analyzed the qualitative data using hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Quantitative results demonstrated strong and medium-sized correlations among theorized relationships within the fear-avoidance model (rs = .40-.85) with the majority being statistically significant. Qualitative results provided substantial convergent and complementary support (e.g., bi-directionality of some relationships, associations between nonadjacent model components, centrality of anxiety in symptom persistence) for the application of the fear-avoidance model to concussions. Findings highlighted additional factors (social factors and post-injury endurance patterns) relevant to this population. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: The fear-avoidance model is a useful lens for understanding the lived experience of young adults with a recent concussion and co-occurring anxiety. Psychosocial treatment for this population would benefit from focusing on the interplay of concussion symptoms, anxiety, depression, disability, and pain-related fear, offering adaptive confrontation strategies, and addressing the interpersonal impact of concussion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Advancing Methodological Rigor for Psychosocial Aspects of Neuropalliative Care Interventions.

Background: Neurological disorders (NDs) have unique biopsychosocial-spiritual features that impact patients and their families. As a result, the subspeciality of neuropalliative care (NPC) emerged within the past decade and has grown exponentially in research and practice. Given the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes associated with NDs, psychosocial components (eg, coping skills) of NPC interventions are essential for improving the quality of life for patients and families. However, psychosocial components of NPC interventions warrant more rigorous testing to improve their evidence base and their likelihood of implementation and dissemination. Aim: In this commentary, we provide methodological recommendations with the goal of improving scientific knowledge and rigor for psychosocial components of multicomponent NPC interventions in clinical trials. Results: We emphasize the need for transparent reporting of psychosocial intervention components; using established models of intervention development to guide the development and testing of multicomponent NPC interventions; identifying mechanisms of action for psychosocial outcomes; and choosing psychometrically sound measures for mechanisms and outcomes. Conclusions: Given the importance of psychosocial care to the holistic NPC model, rigorous testing of psychosocial components of NPC interventions is a high priority for clinical investigators to advance the evidence base and practice of NPC.

Mindfulness, coping, and optimism as mechanisms of change in the 3RP-NF intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis (NF) is chronic neurogenetic condition that increases risk for poor quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Given the lack of biomedical treatments, we developed the "Relaxation Response Resiliency for NF" (3RP-NF) program to improve psychosocial outcomes among adults with NF. OBJECTIVE: To move toward effectiveness testing, we must understand mechanisms that explained treatment effects. We tested whether our hypothesized mechanisms of change-mindfulness, coping, and optimism-mediated improvements in quality of life, depression, and anxiety among adults in the 3RP-NF program (N = 114; ages 18-70; 72.80% female; 81.58% White). METHODS: We conducted mixed-effects models to assess whether these mechanisms uniquely mediated outcomes. RESULTS: Improvements in quality of life were most explained by coping, (b = 0.97, SE = 0.28, CI [0.45, 1.56]), followed by mindfulness (b = 0.46, SE = 0.17, CI [0.15, 0.82]) and optimism (b = 0.39, SE = 0.12, CI [0.17, 0.65]). Improvements in depression and anxiety were most explained by mindfulness (b = -1.52, SE = 0.38, CI [-2.32, -0.85], CSIE = -0.26; b = -1.29, SE = 0.35, CI [-2.04, -0.67], CSIE = -0.23), followed by optimism (b = 0.39, SE = 0.12, CI [0.17, 0.65]; b = -0.49, SE = 0.20, CI [-0.91, -0.13]), but were not explained by coping (b = 0.22, SE = 0.43, CI [-0.62, 1.07]; b = 0.06, SE = 0.46, CI [-0.84, 0.97]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting mindfulness, coping, and optimism in psychosocial interventions may be a promising way to improve the lives of adults with NF.

Integrating Psychosocial Care into Orthopedic Settings: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives.

Introduction: Approximately 50% of persons with orthopedic injuries experience psychosocial distress (e.g., depression, anxiety), which can predict chronic pain and disability. Offering psychosocial services in orthopedic settings can promote patient recovery. This study explores health care professionals' perceptions of and recommendations regarding integrated psychosocial care for orthopedic settings. Methods: We conducted 18 semi-structured focus groups with 79 orthopedic health care professionals (e.g., surgeons, residents, nurses) across three Level I Trauma Centers. This secondary data analysis used the evidence-based Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework to structure hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative data analysis. Results: Orthopedic health care professionals identified potential benefits to psychosocial service integration across all dimensions of integration (i.e., clinical, professional, organizational, system, functional, and normative). These benefits included increased patient satisfaction with care, decreased burden on medical providers to manage patient distress, and decreased healthcare utilization costs. They also identified barriers (e.g., fast-paced clinic flow, mental health stigma) and offered recommendations to address barriers across dimensions of integration. Conclusion: Integrated psychosocial care for orthopedic trauma patients has the potential to improve patient recovery and long-term physical and mental health outcomes. This work identifies strategies to inform the development and implementation of initiatives to integrate psychosocial services within orthopedic settings.

"Alone in the dark": A qualitative study of treatment experiences among young adults with a recent concussion and anxiety.

PURPOSE: Young adults with anxiety are vulnerable to developing persistent symptoms following concussions. In order to develop psychosocial interventions to prevent persistent post-concussion symptoms, we need to understand patients' 1) experiences with treatments offered by health care providers; 2) experiences with attempted concussion management strategies; and 3) needs after their injury. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 17 young adults with recent (≤ 10 weeks) concussions who have at least mild anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 ≥ 5). We used a hybrid deductive-inductive approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Findings provide insight into recommended treatments (e.g., active/avoidant strategies, accommodations, referrals), attempted strategies (e.g., lifestyle changes, pacing, relationships, acceptance-based coping skills), and patient needs (e.g., education, accommodations, referrals for cognitive and emotional skills). Participants frequently expressed that treatment recommendations were confusing and difficult to implement. They initiated non-prescribed strategies that helped promote recovery and expressed a desire for more interdisciplinary treatment and education on concussions. CONCLUSION: Patients' perceptions of health care provider recommendations after concussions did not fully meet patients' perceived needs. Young adults with concussions and anxiety would benefit from more education, guidance, and psychosocial and rehabilitation services. Addressing these gaps may help align treatments with patients' needs and therefore help optimize their recovery.

A biopsychosocial model of NICU family adjustment and child development.

BACKGROUND: Although infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) are at risk for developmental impairments and parents are at risk for emotional distress, factors that explain outcomes remain unknown. Here, we developed the first biopsychosocial model to explain family adjustment after NICU discharge. METHODS: Participants included 101 families at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Neonatal Follow-Up Program who had been discharged 1.5-2.5 years prior. We gathered data using validated assessments, standardized assessments, and electronic medical records. RESULTS: Our structural equation model, informed by the Double ABC-X Model, captured the dynamic relationships among infant, parent, couple, and family factors. Infant medical severity, posttraumatic stress, couple functioning, and family resources (e.g., time, money) were key for family adjustment and child development. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that target parental posttraumatic stress, couple dynamics, parental perception of time for themselves, and access to financial support could be key for improving NICU family outcomes.

Pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, and substance use among Black individuals with chronic pain who use opioids.

OBJECTIVE: Substance use is the leading cause of preventable deaths in the U.S. Chronic pain is associated with risky substance use. Black individuals experience substantial disparities in pain and substance use outcomes and treatment. Maladaptive psychological reactions to chronic pain, such as pain catastrophizing and pain anxiety, can increase substance use among White individuals. However, no research to date has tested this among Black individuals. This study is the first to test the relationships between pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, and substance use among Black individuals with chronic pain who use opioid medications. METHOD: Black adults with chronic pain who use opioids (N = 401) completed online measures of pain catastrophizing (Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale); pain anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale Short Form-20); risky use of alcohol, tobacco, e-cigarettes, cannabis and opioids (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test); and opioid dependence (Severity of Dependence Scale). We conducted zero-inflated and hierarchical regressions to test associations between pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety and substance use (risky use; general use vs. nonuse) above that of demographics, pain intensity and pain interference. RESULTS: Pain catastrophizing was uniquely associated with risky use of all substances (ßs = .03-.09, ps < .001-.02), opioid dependence (ß = .13, SE = .05, p = .01), and use (vs. nonuse) of tobacco, alcohol and opioids (ßs = .07-.11, ps < .001-.02). Pain anxiety was uniquely associated with tobacco use (vs. nonuse; ß = -.02, SE = .01, p = .04) and severity of opioid dependence (ß = .21, SE = .01, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Pain catastrophizing and, to a lesser degree, pain anxiety may be useful intervention targets for this underserved and understudied population. Addressing them may help reduce additional health complications and costs associated with substance use-related risk and dependence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The Recovering Together study protocol: A single-blind RCT to prevent chronic emotional distress in patient-cargiver dyads in the Neuro-ICU.

INTRODUCTION: Patients admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) with acute neurological illnesses (ANI; e.g., stroke, tumor, TBI) and their informal caregivers experience high rates of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. To address this need, we previously developed the Recovering Together (RT) dyadic intervention to help prevent chronic emotional distress in both patients and caregivers. Currently, we are conducting a fully-powered, single-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of RT versus an attention matched health education control. Here, we describe the protocol and current status of this RCT. METHODS: We aim to recruit 194 at risk patient-caregiver dyads from the Neuro-ICU at MGH. Eligible dyads include patients diagnosed with ANI, cognitively intact, at least one partner endorses emotional distress (on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), English speaking, age 18 or older. Dyads are randomized to the intervention (RT-1) or control condition (RT-2) (both six sessions). RT-1 teaches resiliency (e.g., coping, mindfulness) and interpersonal skills. RT-2 provides education on health-related topics (e.g., stress, self-care, adhering to medical recommendations). Blinded research assistants collect measures at baseline, post-intervention, and three months follow-up. We will conduct mixed linear, mediation, and actor-partner interdependence models to examine changes in dyads' outcomes across time. RESULTS: We have recruited 41 dyads and aim to recruit 194 total. DISCUSSION: If successful, we plan to test RT in a large-scale, multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation study in Neuro-ICUs across the country. Enhancing psychosocial supports for patients and families could improve health outcomes, healthcare efficiency, and the culture of these units.

Fitbit Activity, Quota-Based Pacing, and Physical and Emotional Functioning Among Adults With Chronic Pain.

Physical activity can improve function in patients with chronic pain, however, adherence is low, in part due to inconsistent activity patterns. Smart wearable activity trackers, such as Fitbits, may help promote activity. In our program for chronic pain, we examined: 1) Fitbit activity patterns (ie, step count, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary behavior), and 2) whether achievement of weekly, individualized Fitbit step goals was associated with functional outcomes. We conducted a secondary analysis of Fitbit data from our 10-week mind-body activity program for chronic pain (GetActive-Fitbit arm, N = 41). Participants self-reported emotional and physical function and completed performance-based and accelerometer-based assessments. From week 1 to week 10, 30% of participants increased >800 steps; 32.5% increased MVPA; and 30% decreased sedentary behavior. Only step count significantly changed across time with mean steps peaking at week 8 (M = +1897.60, SD = 467.67). Fitbit step goal achievement was associated with improvements in anxiety (ß = -.35, CI [-2.80, -.43]), self-reported physical function (ß = -.34, CI [-5.17, 8.05]), and performance-based physical function (ß = .29, CI [-71.93, 28.38]), but not accelerometer-based physical function or depression. Adhering to individualized Fitbit step goals in the context of a mind-body activity program may improve anxiety and self-reported and performance-based physical function. PERSPECTIVE: We examine Fitbit activity patterns and the association between quota-based pacing and functional outcomes within a mind-body activity program for adults with chronic pain. Complementing quota-based pacing and coping skills with Fitbits may be a useful approach to promote activity engagement and behavior change in chronic pain populations.

"No One Truly Understands What We Go through and How to Treat It": Lived Experiences with Medical Providers among Patients with Orofacial Pain.

Orofacial pain affects 10-15% of adults, yet treatments are limited. The gaps in care are frustrating for both patients and providers and can negatively impact patient-provider interactions. These interactions are key because they impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with care. PURPOSE: Our study aims to understand the nuanced experiences with medical providers among patients with orofacial pain. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, 260 patients provided written responses describing their experiences with medical providers. Using an inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis, we identified themes and subthemes and organized them into four domains based on the Patient-Centered Model of Communication. RESULTS: Patients reported feeling hopeless about treatment options, frustrated with lack of provider knowledge, disappointed in ineffective care, and stigmatized and dismissed by providers. Patients also said they learned to advocate for their health, were grateful for effective care, and felt lucky when providers listened and showed compassion. Patients identified key barriers that interfere with care (e.g., insurance, transportation, limited providers, lack of team coordination). CONCLUSIONS: Findings can help inform training programs and psychoeducation that target patient-provider communication to improve patient-reported outcomes, the quality of care delivered, and health care utilization and costs.

Caring for our caretakers: building resiliency in NICU parents and staff.

The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a high-acuity, stressful unit for both parents and staff. Up to 50% of mothers and partners experience emotional distress (i.e., depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress) during NICU hospitalization and 30-60% continue to experience distress after discharge. Similarly, up to 50% of NICU staff report burnout and emotional distress. Although healthcare providers have developed interdisciplinary guidelines to enhance psychosocial resources for parents and staff, standardized psychosocial services are lacking. The purpose of this short communication is to describe: (1) the need for psychosocial interventions for NICU parents and staff; (2) existent psychosocial programs and their gaps and limitations; and (3) future directions for psychosocial care in NICU settings. We reviewed the current literature and propose a new conceptual model to inform psychosocial interventions for the NICU. We argue that brief, evidence-based, resiliency, and relationship-based programs are needed to enhance parent and staff outcomes and, ultimately, child development and the NICU unit culture. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of standardized psychosocial care, new interventions for NICU families and staff are needed more than ever. Resiliency, relationship-based interventions that leverage multidisciplinary support may be an innovative way to enhance NICU outcomes and care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • 40-50% of parents in the NICU report elevated emotional distress and 30-50% of staff report burnout. • Psychosocial interventions for parents and staff are needed, yet lacking. WHAT IS NEW: • Interventions that focus on resiliency and relationships may improve the culture of the NICU. • New multidisciplinary collaborations and approaches are needed to improve implementation.

Motherhood and Me (Mom-Me): The Development of an Acceptance-Based Group for Women with Postpartum Mood and Anxiety Symptoms.

Untreated postpartum mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) place women and their families at risk for negative biopsychosocial sequelae. Innovative and tailored treatments are needed to address potential disruptions in maternal functioning. Third-wave cognitive-behavioral approaches, including acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), hold promise for optimizing functioning given the focus on values-based living, rather than symptom reduction. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of an innovative psychotherapy group for women with symptoms of PMADs. METHODS: This seven-session group, Motherhood and Me (Mom-Me), includes selected skills training from ACT, DBT, and Emotion-Centered Problem-Solving Therapy. RESULTS: Mom-Me group sessions are described, and an outline of key information (session goals, content, and homework assignments) is provided to facilitate practical implementation. CONCLUSION: In line with third-wave approaches, this group was developed to enhance maternal functioning, which, in turn, may help women cope with psychological distress during the transition to motherhood.

Together from the start: A transdiagnostic framework for early dyadic interventions for neurodegenerative diseases.

BACKGROUND: Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are increasingly prevalent and radically alter the lives of individuals and their informal care partners (together called a dyad). As symptoms progress, dyads are at risk for elevated emotional distress and declines in relationship functioning and quality of life. Psychosocial interventions delivered to dyads early after diagnosis have successfully prevented chronic emotional distress across several chronic illnesses including cancer and acute brain injury. Dyads with NDD could benefit from such interventions, however, they are limited. Because NDDs have symptom profiles that are distinct from other chronic illnesses, they require a unique framework and interventions. Given the limited dyadic interventions and unified symptoms across NDDs, a transdiagnostic framework may help to enhance scalability and efficiency. To address this problem, we developed a transdiagnostic framework that cuts across NDD physical and emotional diagnoses to inform cost-effective and sustainable NDD dyadic interventions. METHODS: To develop this framework, we conducted: (1) a narrative review on dyadic adjustment and existent dyadic interventions for those with NDDs, and (2) integrated findings to develop our NDD transdiagnostic framework for dyadic interventions early after diagnosis. RESULTS: Findings revealed no existent dyadic interventions for NDDs delivered shortly after diagnosis. Among available interventions, all were delivered later in disease progression, thereby focusing on dyadic challenges at more advanced stages. In addition, although research emphasized the influence of individual, dyadic, and contextual factors on dyads' early adjustment to NDDs, no conceptual model has been developed. Informed by theory and current research, we introduce an NDD transdiagnostic framework for couples' early biopsychosocial adjustment. This framework includes NDD specific: contextual factors, illness-related factors, individual and dyadic stressors, adaptive coping strategies, and dyads' resources. CONCLUSIONS: Our NDD transdiagnostic framework can be used to inform early dyadic psychosocial interventions that cut across all NDDs. This approach has important implications for implementation and scalability.

One Diagnosis, Two Perspectives: Lived Experiences of Persons With Young-Onset Dementia and Their Care-Partners.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Young-onset dementias (YODs) are a set of progressive illnesses that are stressful for both persons with the diagnosis and their care-partners. Although the stressors differ based on their roles and individual experiences, both individuals are at risk for heightened emotional distress (e.g., depression and anxiety). Understanding the unique stressors for each partner and adaptive coping strategies to manage these stressors is important for informing individual and couples-based psychosocial interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted open-ended individual interviews with persons with YOD (N = 12) and their care-partners (i.e., romantic partner; N = 17) over live video. We utilized a hybrid of deductive and inductive analysis techniques to extract individual-level themes and subthemes regarding stressors and adaptive coping strategies. RESULTS: Persons with YOD identified stressors including burden of YOD symptoms, loss of familial roles, resentment toward partner, isolation, and fear of the future. Care-partners identified stressors including managing their partners' symptoms, increased responsibilities, caregiving role, loss of intimacy, social isolation, and grief. For adaptive coping strategies, persons with YOD endorsed use of acceptance, promotion of independence, social support, and engaging in pleasurable activities. Care-partners endorsed value of learning about the diagnosis, using resources, optimism, social support, and self-care. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight the unique experiences of persons with YOD and their care-partners. Identified themes can be used to inform role-specific psychosocial interventions for both individuals and couples coping with YOD.

Psychosocial profiles of risk and resiliency in neurofibromatoses: a person-centered analysis of illness adaptation.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize psychosocial profiles of adaptation to neurofibromatosis (NF). METHODS: Participants (N = 224) completed self-report measures of psychosocial functioning, including risk (i.e., perceived stress, depression, anxiety) and resiliency (i.e., gratitude, optimism, coping, social support, mindfulness, empathy). We used a TwoStep hierarchical cluster analysis to determine clusters reflecting adaptation to NF. RESULTS: The analysis revealed two distinct groups, with the "Low Adaptation" group defined by high emotional distress and low resiliency (n = 130; 57% of participants), and the "High Adaptation" group defined by low emotional distress and high resiliency (n = 85; 37% of participants). Clusters differed significantly across nearly all criterion variables, as well as quality of life and pain interference. CONCLUSION: Both risk and resiliency factors are important for understanding psychosocial adaptation to NF. Findings suggest that clinical providers should prioritize screening and intervention methods targeting these variables to promote positive adaptation to NF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406208; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406208 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/72ZoTDQ6h ).

What Are Orthopaedic Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes Toward Addressing Patient Psychosocial Factors? A Mixed-Methods Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Integrating psychosocial resources into orthopaedic clinics can reduce psychological distress and opioid use after injury, enhance functional outcomes, and increase patient satisfaction with care. Establishing referral pathways for connecting orthopaedic patients with psychosocial resources requires the active collaboration and buy-in of orthopaedic healthcare professionals. Designing and disseminating psychosocial training materials for orthopaedic healthcare professionals requires a nuanced understanding of orthopaedic healthcare professionals' current attitudes toward addressing psychosocial factors, including any stigma and misconceptions about mental health that exist. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are orthopaedic healthcare professionals' attitudes toward addressing patient psychosocial factors, and how are they related? (2) How do orthopaedic healthcare professionals' beliefs, reasonings, and experiences help to explain these attitudes? (3) How do attitudes differ between physicians and nonphysician healthcare professionals? METHODS: In this multisite, mixed-methods study (that is, a study collecting both quantitative and qualitative data), our team of psychology researchers conducted qualitative focus groups over secure live video with 79 orthopaedic healthcare professionals at three geographically diverse Level I trauma centers. We approached all orthopaedic healthcare professionals within the three trauma centers to participate in the study to collect as many diverse perspectives as possible. Eighty-four percent (79 of 94) of the professionals we approached participated in qualitative data collection (the group of professionals comprised 20 attending surgeons; 28 residents; 10 nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and physician assistants; 13 medical assistants; five physical therapists and social workers; and three research fellows). We also asked participants to complete self-report items that assessed their attitudes toward addressing patients' psychosocial factors (research question 1). The different attitudes identified through the quantitative measurement served as a priori defined themes within which our two independent coders organized the qualitative data and identified beliefs and experiences that explained attitudes (research question 2). We used both quantitative and qualitative data to assess differences between surgeons and residents and nonphysician healthcare professionals (research question 3). RESULTS: We quantitatively identified six underlying attitudes toward addressing psychosocial factors: professional confidence, perceived resource availability, fear of offending patients, fear of negative patient reactions, blame toward patients, and professional role resistance. We observed a strong quantitative correlation between the attitudes of professional confidence and perceived resource availability, and qualitative data revealed how healthcare professionals' willingness to discuss psychosocial issues with patients is shaped by their perception of psychosocial resources available for orthopaedic patients, as well as their perception of their own skills and tools to navigate these conversations. Quantitative data suggested that surgeons and residents endorse higher blame toward patients for psychosocial factors (medium effect size; p = 0.04), which is a stigmatizing attitude that serves as a barrier to integrating psychosocial resources into orthopaedic settings. CONCLUSION: The varying levels of confidence orthopaedic healthcare professionals reported with respect to the topic of discussing psychosocial factors and the misconceptions they endorse regarding psychosocial factors (such as blame toward patients) highlight the need for more specific education for orthopaedic healthcare professionals to help equip them with skills to raise and discuss psychosocial factors with patients in an empathic and destigmatizing manner. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The strong relationship observed between the attitudes of professional confidence and perceived resource availability suggests that expanding the provision of psychosocial resources in orthopaedic settings and establishing specific, efficient referral processes to connect patients with psychosocial resources will in turn increase orthopaedic healthcare professionals' confidence discussing psychosocial issues with patients.

Parental mental health screening in the NICU: a psychosocial team initiative.

OBJECTIVE: About 40-50% of parents with children admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) experience clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and trauma. Poor parental mental health can negatively influence parent-child interactions and child development. Therefore, early identification of parents at-risk for clinical distress is of paramount importance. METHODS: To address this need, the psychosocial team, including psychology and psychiatry, at a large, level 4 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) developed a quality-improvement initiative to assess the feasibility of screening parents and to determine rates of depression and trauma in the unit. RESULTS: About 40% of mothers and 20% of fathers were screened between 2 weeks of their child's hospitalization. About 40-45% of those parents endorsed clinically significant levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for enhancing the feasibility and effectiveness of this process are discussed and considerations for future clinical and research endeavors are introduced.