Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Cancer: A Statement from the American Society of Onco-Nephrology.

Accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial to guiding drug eligibility, dosing of systemic therapy, and minimizing the risks of both undertreatment and toxicity in patients with cancer. Up to 32% of cancer patients have baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD), and both malignancy and treatment may cause kidney injury and subsequent CKD. To date, there has been lack of guidance to standardize approaches to GFR estimation in the cancer population. In this two-part statement from the American Society of Onco-Nephrology, we present key messages for estimation of GFR in patients with cancer, including the choice of GFR estimating equation, use of race and body surface-area (BSA)-adjustment, and anticancer drug dose-adjustment in the setting of CKD. These key messages are based on a systematic review of studies assessing GFR estimating equations using serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer, against a measured GFR comparator. The preponderance of current data involving validated GFR estimating equations involves the CKD-EPI equations, with 2,508 patients in whom CKD-EPI using serum creatinine and cystatin C was assessed (8 studies) and 15,349 in whom CKD-EPI with serum creatinine was assessed (22 studies). The former may have improved performance metrics and be less susceptible to shortfalls of eGFR using serum creatinine alone. Since included studies were moderate quality or lower, the ASON Position Committee rated the certainty of evidence as low. Additional studies are needed to assess the accuracy of other validated eGFR equations in patients with cancer. Given the importance of accurate and timely eGFR assessment we advocate for the use of validated GFR estimating equations incorporating both serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer. Measurement of GFR via exogenous filtration markers should be considered in patients with cancer for whom eGFR results in borderline eligibility for therapies or clinical trials.

Definition, Staging, and Role of Biomarkers in Acute Kidney Injury in the Context of Cardiovascular Interventions.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequently occurring complication of cardiovascular interventions, and associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, a clear definition of AKI is of paramount importance to enable timely recognition and treatment. Historically, changes in the serum creatinine and urine output have been used to define AKI, and the criteria have evolved over time with better understanding of the impact of AKI on the outcomes. However, the reliance on serum creatinine for these AKI definitions carries numerous limitations including delayed rise, inability to differentiate between hemodynamics versus structural injury and assay variability to name a few.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Cross Talk.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a multisystem condition with effects beyond the liver. The identification of chronic kidney disease as an independent mediator of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or associated entity with shared cardiometabolic risk factors remains controversial and continues to draw scientific interest. With increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and lack of Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, these shared cardiometabolic risk factors have drawn significant attention. In this article, we review shared pathophysiological mechanisms between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease along with current treatment strategies that might be useful for both disease processes.

Establishing an effective clinical data collecting tool for optimal evaluation of native and allograft renal biopsies.

Introduction: Percutaneous kidney biopsy is the gold standard method to reach a precise diagnosis in most medical kidney diseases, which positively impacts patient care by personalizing the treatment. Accurate diagnosis in the pathology report for medical kidney diseases requires clinicopathological correlation, and clinical data is not always reachable to the nephropathologist. This study aimed to create a standardized, paperless requisition form compatible with medical renal biopsies. Methods: An initial form was prepared for native and allograft renal biopsies according to the current classification of medical kidney diseases. We invited 33 nephropathologists working in Canadian healthcare institutions to answer survey questions about the need to include a particular aspect of clinical information. According to the responses, we modified the experimental form. Eighty nephrologists were asked to complete a clinical data-collecting form given out as PDF files. The time for completing the form and clinicians' satisfaction were assessed. Results: The experimental form survey was answered by 20 out of 33 nephropathologists (61%) from 14 Canadian healthcare centers. The agreement rate on the questions was from 38.89% to 100.00% (average 83.33% and 77.14% for the native and the allograft section, respectively). Seventeen out of 80 nephrologists and their assistants (21%) responded by completing 22 PDF forms. The time required to finish a PDF form was 10.4 min on average. Nephrologists considered the form time-consuming and suggested making it more clinically relevant. Only seven nephrologists responded to the satisfaction survey; four (57%) were satisfied. Conclusions: Medical information is critical in renal pathology diagnoses. A uniform paperless clinical data requisition form was evolved through an agreement by Canadian nephropathologists.

Onconephrology 2022: An Update.

Onconephrology is an upcoming and expanding subspecialty that deals with the intersections between hematology/oncology and nephrology. With the paradigm shift in the understanding of cancer immunobiology and mechanisms of oncotherapeutic drug toxicities, it is important for a nephrologist to have a sound understanding of this field. Over the last 5 years, there have been immense developments in our understanding of kidney-related adverse events from various targeted, immuno- and cellular-based therapies. Pathogenic mechanisms of electrolyte imbalance, hypertension (oncohypertension), and AKI from multiple forms of cancer therapies have been explored. Significant research has also been conducted in the field of transplant onconephrology. In this review, we have tried to assimilate the most recent updates in the last 2 years in this ever-growing and fascinating field.

Utility of semi-private messaging application (WhatsApp®) for Onconephrology education: a qualitative analysis of a 'mastermind' chat.

Graphical Abstract.

Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer.

Advances in cancer therapy have significantly improved overall patient survival; however, AKI remains a common complication in patients with cancer, occurring in anywhere from 11% to 22% of patients, depending on patient-related or cancer-specific factors. Critically ill patients with cancer as well as patients with certain malignancies (e.g., leukemias, lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and renal cell carcinoma) are at highest risk of developing AKI. AKI may be a consequence of the underlying malignancy itself or from the wide array of therapies used to treat it. Cancer-associated AKI can affect virtually every compartment of the nephron and can present as subclinical AKI or as overt acute tubular injury, tubulointerstitial nephritis, or thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. AKI can have major repercussions for patients with cancer, potentially jeopardizing further eligibility for therapy and leading to greater morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the epidemiology of AKI in critically ill patients with cancer, risk factors for AKI, and common pathologies associated with certain cancer therapies, as well as the management of AKI in different clinical scenarios. It highlights gaps in our knowledge of AKI in patients with cancer, including the lack of validated biomarkers, as well as evidence-based therapies to prevent AKI and its deleterious consequences.

Onconephrology and Thrombotic Microangiopathy: Looking Beyond the Horizon.

Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) represent a complex interaction of endothelial and podocyte biology, nephron physiology, complement genetics, and oncologic therapies with host immunology. The complexity of various factors, such as molecular causes, genetic expressions, and immune system mimicking, along with incomplete penetrance, make it difficult to find a straightforward solution. As a result, there may be variations in diagnosis, study, and treatment approaches, and achieving a consensus can be challenging. Here, we review the molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, molecular genetics, and pathology of the various TMA syndromes in the setting of cancer. Controversies in etiology, nomenclature, and points requiring further clinical, translational, and bench research are discussed. Complement-mediated TMAs, chemotherapy drug-mediated TMAs, TMAs in monoclonal gammopathy, and other TMAs central to onconephrology practice are reviewed in detail. In addition, established and emerging therapies within the US Food and Drug Administration pipeline subsequently are discussed. Finally, a comprehensive review of critical areas of onconephrology clinical practice is presented as practical value to the clinical practitioner and seeds of investigation to be sown among the community of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome researchers.

Acute Kidney Injury in the Patient with Cancer.

Over the last three decades, advancements in the diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care of patients with cancer have significantly improved their overall survival. However, these advancements have also led to a higher rate of cancer-related complications. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent in patients with cancer, and they are associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. This bidirectional interplay between cancer and kidney, termed "the kidney-cancer connection" has become a very active area of research. This review aims to provide an overview of some of the most common causes of AKI in patients with cancer. Cancer therapy-associated AKI is beyond the scope of this review and will be discussed separately.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cancer: A Review of Onconephrology.

Over the past 2 decades, significant research and advancements have been made in oncology and its therapeutics. Thanks to novel diagnostic methods, treatments, and supportive measures, patients with cancer live longer and have a better quality of life. However, an unforeseen consequence of this progress has been increasing medical complications, including acute kidney injury. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the epidemiology and most common causes of acute kidney injury in patients with cancer unrelated to oncological treatment.

Onco-hypertension: An Emerging Specialty.

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. With the introduction of newer chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, the prognosis and survival of patients with cancer has remarkably improved. As a result, patients are living longer and experiencing long-term cardiovascular complications. Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Patients with malignancy have multiple etiologies of hypertension development, worsening, or association. This is because of the complex interplay between cancer type, chemotherapeutic agent, patient age, antihypertensive agent, and preexisting comorbidities in the etiology and pathogenesis of hypertension. Management of hypertension in patients with cancer requires accurate blood pressure measurement and considering factors such as adjuvant therapy and cancer-related pain. There are no set guidelines for management of hypertension in this unique cohort, and the therapy should be individualized based on the treatment guidelines for the general population. Onco-hypertension is an emerging subspeciality and entails a multidisciplinary approach between oncology, primary care physicians, nephrology, and cardiology.

APOL1 Genotyping in Potential African American Living Kidney Donors: Utility and Cost-Effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants predispose to nondiabetic kidney disease in African American (AA) patients. Here, we share our experience with APOL1 genotyping of AA potential living kidney donors and offer a perspective on its utility and cost-effectiveness in this population. METHODS: Since May 2017, all potential AA living kidney donors at our center underwent APOL1 genotyping early in the donor evaluation process. APOL1 high-risk individuals were declined, whereas those with low-risk genotype continued with further evaluation and testing. RESULTS: One out of 26 potential donors had high-risk genotype and was therefore declined. The rest were eligible to continue the donor evaluation process and 7 of them underwent donor nephrectomy without any complications. A crude cost analysis utilizing our sample suggested probable cost-effectiveness of APOL1 genotyping as it can prevent earlier onset of chronic kidney disease in AA donors. CONCLUSION: We propose a role for systematically incorporating APOL1 genotyping in the evaluation and informed consent process of potential AA donors while acknowledging the controversial considerations associated with it.

Acute Kidney Injury, Heart Failure, and Health Outcomes.

Acute kidney injury in acute decompensated heart failure leads to increased readmissions regardless of being transient or sustained at the time of discharge. Timely identification of acute kidney injury and worsening heart failure in patients with acute decompensated heart failure is of utmost importance to optimize different components of heart failure treatment. Acute kidney injury is a strong predictor of poor outcomes and early death in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension and acute right-sided heart failure. Extracorporeal ultrafiltration should not be used as an initial or alternative to diuretic therapy. It should be reserved for diuretic-resistant individuals.

The Enigmatic Fallopian Tube: A More Common Cause of Catheter Malfunction than Previously Recognized.

Successful performance of peritoneal dialysis (PD) depends on a properly functioning PD catheter. Catheter malfunction remains a significant cause of technique failure, especially early in the course of therapy. Common causes of catheter malfunction include catheter displacement, omental or bowel wrapping, and fibrin clots. Less commonly, various intraperitoneal structures have been reported to lead to obstruction, including appendices epiploicae of sigmoid colon and the fallopian tube. Peritoneal dialysis catheter blockage due to fimbriae of the fallopian tube is being recognized as an important cause of catheter malfunction in females due to the increasing availability of diagnostic laparoscopy. We report 5 episodes of catheter malfunction in 4 patients on PD from a single center as a result of obstruction by the fallopian tube.