A single-center experience of the upright proton therapy for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: Updated results.

Aim: To access efficacy and safety of the upright proton therapy for the skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Materials and methods: The study encompasses single-center experience of proton therapy in chordomas (CA) and chondrosarcomas (CSA) of skull-base localization. We evaluate overall survival, local control and toxicity. Tumor response was assessed in accordance with RANO criteria. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated with the help of CTCAE v 5.0 scale. Results: Proton therapy in the upright position was utilized for 51pts (patients) with CA-CSA (40 pts with chordoma and 11pts with chondrosarcoma) at the A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center in 2016-2023. Median tumor volume constituted 30 cm3 (IQR (interquartile range) 15-41 cm3). Median total dose was 70 GyRBE. Median number of fractions was 35. Overall survival (OS) at 1-, 2- and 3-year rates reached 98.0 %, 88.6 % and 82.7 %, respectively. Median follow-up time was 36 months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates constituted, respectively, 98 %, 78.6 % and 66.3 %. Prior surgery showed statistically significant association with better prognosis (p = 0.023). Brainstem-to-tumor dose coverage compromise became the major pattern of LC failure (p = 0.03). The late radiation toxicity reactions included temporal lobe necrosis grade 2 in 2 pts, xerostomia grade 1 in 1pt, radiation cataract grade 2 in 1pt and persistent headache grade 2 in 4 pts. Severe late toxicity reactions were observed in 2 cases (4 %): 1 myelitis grade 3 and brainstem damage grade 5 in 1pt. Conclusion: Local control was achieved in the majority of patients receiving the scanning-beam upright proton therapy for skull-base CA-CSA. The LC rates after a surgery-radiotherapy combination treatment were higher compared with irradiation alone. Pattern of failure is mostly brainstem-tumor dose compromise. The high OS and LC rates were accompanied by low toxicity incidence. Even in complex case of the skull base CA-CSA upright proton therapy shows promising clinical outcomes.

Upright proton therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma: a single-institution experience.

Aim: This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma after pencil beam proton therapy with a fixed beamline in the upright position. Background: Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is an extremely rare tumor of sinonasal area located in critical proximity to vital structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the optimal radiation treatment for head-and-neck tumors, although of limited availability. Upright PT delivered using fixed pencil beamline and rotating chair is a fairly promising option. Methods: This is a single-center experience describing the outcomes of PT in 14 patients with ENB treated between January 2016 and October 2022; half of the cases had a history of previous irradiation. The therapy was applied using a fixed pencil beamline with 6D-chair for positioning. The median dose was 63 GyRBE (total range 48-70 GyRBE; based on 1.1 RBE multiplier for protons) with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean gross tumor volume was 109.5 cm3 (17.1-257.7 cm3). Patient demography, pathology, treatment parameters and toxicity data were analyzed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. Results: The median follow-up time was 28 months. The 1- and 2-year locoregional control rates constituted 100% and 88.9%, respectively; the median duration of local control was 52 months. The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates constituted 92.9% and 75.0%, respectively; the median PFS duration was 52 months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates constituted 92.9% and 84.4%, respectively. Two patients died of non-cancer-related causes (coronavirus-induced pneumonia) and 1 patient died of tumor progression. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment gaps. Serious late toxicity reactions included glaucoma in 1 patient and cataract in 2 patients, in over half a year since irradiation. Conclusion: PT with upright design of the unit affords promising outcomes in terms of disease control and toxicity rates in ENB, a sinonasal tumor of complicated localization.

An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far?

The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.

World's First Experience of the Low-Dose Radionuclide Inhalation Therapy in the Treatment of COVID-19-Associated Viral Pneumonia: Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Previously, low-dose radiation therapy was used for pneumonia treatment. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of carbon nanoparticles labeled with Technetium isotope (99mTc) in a form of ultradispersed aerosol in combination with standard COVID-19 therapy. The study was a randomized phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trial of low-dose radionuclide inhalation therapy for patients with COVID-19 related pneumonia. METHODS: We enrolled 47 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and early laboratory signs of cytokine storm and randomized them into the Treatment and Control groups. We analyzed blood parameters reflecting the COVID-19 severity and inflammatory response. RESULTS: Low-dose 99mTc-labeled inhalation showed a minimal accumulation of radionuclide in lungs in healthy volunteers. We observed no significant differences between the groups before treatment in WBC-count, D-dimer, CRP, Ferritin or LDH levels. We found that Ferritin and LDH levels significantly raised after the 7th day follow-up only in the Control group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively), while mean values of the same indicators did not change in patients in the Treatment group after the radionuclide treatment. D-dimer values also lowered in the radionuclide treated group, however, this effect was not statistically significant. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease in CD19+ cell counts in patients of the radionuclide-treated group. CONCLUSION: Inhalation low-dose radionuclide therapy of 99mTc aerosol affects the major prognostic indicators of COVID-19- related pneumonia restraining inflammatory response. Overall, we identified no evidence of major adverse events in the group receiving radionuclide.

Fast and Furious: Fast Neutron Therapy in Cancer Treatment.

Fast neutron therapy has been used for decades. In conjunction with recent advances in photonic techniques, fast neutrons are no longer of much oncologic interest, which is not unequivocally positive, given their undoubted therapeutic value. This mini-review recalls the history of medical research on fast neutrons, considers their physical and radiobiological properties alongside their benefits for cancer treatment, and discusses their place in modern radiation oncology.

Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity.

AIM: This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. BACKGROUND: Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. METHODS: This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2-115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.

Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: This study presents a retrospective analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with unresectable recurrence of previously irradiated head and neck (H&N) cancers treated with proton therapy. Locoregional recurrence is the main pattern of failure in the treatment of H&N cancers. Proton re-irradiation in patients with relapse after prior radiotherapy might be valid as promising as a challenging treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2015 to January 2020, 30 patients with in-field recurrence of head and neck cancer, who were not suitable for surgery due to medical contraindications, tumor localization, or extent, received re-irradiation with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Sites of retreatment included the aerodigestive tract (60%) and the base of skull (40%). The median total dose of prior radiotherapy was 55.0 Gy. The median time to the second course was 38 months. The median re-irradiated tumor volume was 158.1 cm3. Patients were treated with 2.0, 2.4, and 3.0 GyRBE per fraction, with a median equivalent dose (EQD2) of 57.6 Gy (α/ß = 10). Radiation-induced toxicity was recorded according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria. RESULTS: The 1- and 2-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 52.6/21.0, 21.9/10.9, and 73.4/8.4%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. The median overall survival was 16 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in one patient (3.3%). There were five late severe side effects (16.6%), with one death associated with re-irradiation. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation with a proton beam can be considered a safe and efficient treatment even for a group of patients with unresectable recurrent H&N cancers.

Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent brain gliomas: clinical outcomes and toxicity.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of proton re-irradiation in patients with unresectable recurrence of previously irradiated brain gliomas. METHODS: Between February 2016 and December 2019, 44 patients with in-field recurrence after prior irradiation of brain gliomas were irradiated with intensity-modulated proton therapy. Seven patients (15.9%) originally had low-grade (WHO grade I-II) gliomas, nine patients (20.4%) had anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III), and 28 patients (63.7%) had glioblastoma (WHO grade IV). All tumors were unresectable due to their localization. After a median time from the prior irradiation of 28.0 months [range, 12 to 173], patients received PT with 2.0 and 3.0 GyRBE per fraction, with median proton EQD2 (/=10) to a tumor of 55.0 GyRBE [range, 46.0 to 61.75]. Adjuvant chemotherapy (Temozolomide, or Procarbazine, Lomustine and vincristine, or Bevacizumab with Irinotecan) received 86.9% of the patients (n=40). Treatment-related toxicity was reported following CTCAE. RESULTS: The median survival time was 12 months, with 1-year and 2-years overall survival (OS) amounting to 49.6% and 35.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, with 1- and 2-years PFS of 30.5% and 10.2%, respectively. Twenty-six patients died by the time of analysis; among them were 5 non-cancer deaths (19.2%), and 4 patients (15.4%) died of chemotherapy-associated severe toxicity. The incidence rate of radiation-induced necrosis was 6.8% (3 events). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we suggest re-irradiation of recurrent brain gliomas with proton therapy is able to achieve reasonable tumor control. Low adverse events rate and promising outcomes make it a safe treatment option with curative intent, even in unresectable cases.

A Clinical Case of 5 Times Irradiated Recurrent Orbital Hemangiopericytoma.

Orbital hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are rare mesenchymal tumors with a high tendency to recur. Treatment options are quite limited in case of a relapse, but re-irradiation can be useful. Most of the available data limit the possibility of re-irradiation, while novel techniques (e.g., pencil beam proton therapy [PT]) open new approaches for the safe repeating of treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first well-documented case of multi-times (>3) irradiation of tumors located intracranially. The case reported here describes orbital HPCs with proton irradiation performed two times since 1999 in a 30-year-old woman with a medical history as well as surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, and two times stereotactic RT (in 2009 and 2013). In 2016 the patient came to our hospital with the 3rd relapse of the tumor, located in the left orbit, with an intracranial part, involving cavernous sinus, which was close to the temporal lobe. The 4th course of irradiation was done in May to June 2016 by pencil beam PT. Radiation necrosis occurred after 2 years and was treated with bevacizumab (BVZ). Three years later, another relapse was treated with PT and BVZ. The 9-month follow-up showed complete tumor response without signs of brain toxicity. The patient died due to a brain abscess 1 year after the 5th irradiation. This case shows a possibility of irradiation, applied 5 times to the same location, with promising results and manageable toxicity.

Experience in multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy: dose-volume histogram analysis of the first results.

PURPOSE: To report characteristics of our treatment scheme of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of breast cancer and to show the first outcomes of dosimetric planning analysis based on dose-volume histogram (DVH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since August 2017, 25 patients diagnosed with T1N0M0 breast cancer have received a treatment in our center. There was lumpectomy and following breast HDR brachytherapy (10 fractions of 3.4 Gy) administered to each patient. A planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were recorded with DVH analysis. RESULTS: The study describes the full procedure of breast HDR brachytherapy with the lumpectomy. Twenty-five patients were treated, including 9 with cancer of the left breast and 16 of the right breast. The median age was 65 years. The first analysis of DVH data shows that the main OARs were ribs and skin. Mean value of Dmax (ribs) for all patients was 19.90 Gy (55.88% of prescribed dose) and for the skin 30.88 Gy (90.74% of prescribed dose). During the treatment, there was only one case of toxic effects, which was pigmentation on the skin due to excess of dose limit of 1.4 Gy. Therefore, the limit exceeding of 1 Gy does not give any significant toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first stage of the dosimetric evaluation of a new method. The analysis allows treating complex localizations of the breast cancer, for example, in a close position to the skin or ribs. In order to minimize the toxic effects, it is necessary to consider patient selection, catheter administration, and dose optimization.