Assessment of HER2 gene amplification in adenocarcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab has been approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric carcinoma; however, relatively little is known about the role of HER2 in the natural history of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 phase III gastric cancer clinical trial with available tissue specimens were retrospectively evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by FISH and overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The original trial was designed to evaluate the benefit of postoperative chemoradiation compared with surgery alone. RESULTS: HER2 gene amplification rate by FISH was 10.9% among 258 patients evaluated. HER2 overexpression rate by IHC was 12.2% among 148 patients evaluated, with 90% agreement between FISH and IHC. There was a significant interaction between HER2 amplification and treatment with respect to both disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.020) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.034). Among patients with HER2-non-amplified cancers, treated patients had a median OS of 44 months compared with 24 months in the surgery-only arm (P = 0.003). Among patients with HER2-amplified cancers, there was no significant difference in survival based on treatment arm. HER2 status was not a prognostic marker among patients who received no postoperative chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking HER2 amplification benefited from treatment as indicated by both DFS and OS. CLINICAL TRIAL: INT-0116/SWOG9008 phase III.

Cyclophosphamide followed by fludarabine for untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase II SWOG TRIAL 9706.

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accounts for 95% of chronic leukemia cases and 25% of all leukemia. Despite the prevalence of CLL, progress in its treatment has been only modest over the past three decades. Based upon the ability of fludarabine to produce high-grade remissions especially among patients with low initial tumor mass, and the ability of alkylators to reduce tumor mass, we hypothesized that sequential administration of a limited number of cycles of intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide followed by fludarabine could result in a larger percentage of patients with complete remissions (CRs). In all, 27 of the 49 eligible patients achieved overall responses of CR, unconfirmed complete remission (UCR), or PR, for a total response rate of 55% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40-69%). Considering the confounding medical issues of this patient population with advanced aggressive disease, the regimen was generally well tolerated. This study demonstrates that high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by fludarabine was relatively well tolerated in this group of advanced CLL patients. The study's criterion for testing whether the regimen is sufficiently effective to warrant further investigation was met: 14 (32%) of the first 44 eligible patients achieved CR or UCR.

Evaluation of gemcitabine in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine (Gemzar), a nucleoside analogue with broad activity in solid tumors, was performed in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A total of 26 eligible patients were registered to receive a dose of 1250 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 1 week rest. Toxicity was evaluable in 26 patients. Nausea and vomiting occured in 11 and 6 patients, repectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were infrequent. Two patients developed neutropenic infections. One patient developed fatal liver failure which was thought due to progressive liver metastases or infection 14 days after a single dose of gemcitabine. There were no objective treatment responses (95% CI 0-13%), with a median survival of 6 months in this highly resistant disease population. Gemcitabine is not considered active enough as monotherapy for further evaluation in this disease population.

Impact of tamoxifen on the pharmacokinetics and endocrine effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

This study examined whether the addition of tamoxifen to the treatment regimen of patients with advanced breast cancer being treated with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole led to any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction. Twelve of 17 patients completed the core period of the trial in which 2.5 mg/day letrozole was administered alone for 6 weeks and in combination with 20 mg/day tamoxifen for the subsequent 6 weeks. Patients responding to treatment continued on the combination until progression of disease or any other reason for discontinuation. Plasma levels of letrozole were measured at the end of the 6-week periods of treatment with letrozole alone and the combination and once more between 4 and 8 months on combination therapy. No further measurements were done thereafter. Hormone levels were measured at 2-week intervals throughout the core period. Marked suppression of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate occurred with letrozole treatment, and this was not significantly affected by the addition of tamoxifen. However, plasma levels of letrozole were reduced by a mean 37.6% during combination therapy (P<0.0001), and this reduction persisted after 4-8 months of combination therapy. Letrozole is the first drug to be described in which this pharmacokinetic interaction occurs with tamoxifen. The mechanism is likely to be a consequence of an induction of letrozole-metabolizing enzymes by tamoxifen but was not further addressed in this study. It is possible that the antitumor efficacy of letrozole may be affected. Thus, sequential therapy may be preferable with these two drugs. It is not known whether tamoxifen interacts with other members of this class of drugs or with other drugs in combination.

A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind study evaluated treatment with either a single nucleoside or two nucleosides in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) whose CD4 cell counts were from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2467 HIV-1--infected patients (43 percent without prior antiretroviral treatment) to one of four daily regimens: 600 mg of zidovudine; 600 mg of zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine; 600 mg of zidovudine plus 2.25 mg of zalcitabine; or 400 mg of didanosine. The primary end point was a > or = 50 percent decline in the CD4 cell count, development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or death. RESULTS: Progression to the primary end point was more frequent with zidovudine alone (32 percent) than with zidovudine plus didanosine (18 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.50; P<0.001), zidovudine plus zalcitabine (20 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.54; P<0.001), or didanosine alone (22 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.61; P<0.001). The relative hazard ratios for progression to an AIDS-defining event or death were 0.64 (P=0.005) for zidovudine plus didanosine, as compared with zidovudine alone, 0.77 (P=0.085) for zidovudine plus zalcitabine, and 0.69 (P=0.019) for didanosine alone. The relative hazard ratios for death were 0.55 (P=0.008), 0.71 (P=0.10), and 0.51 (P=0.003), respectively. For zidovudine plus zalcitabine, the benefits were limited to those without previous treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with zidovudine plus didanosine, zidovudine plus zalcitabine, or didanosine alone slows the progression of HIV disease and is superior to treatment with zidovudine alone. Antiretroviral therapy can improve survival in patients with 200 to 500 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter.

The relation of virologic and immunologic markers to clinical outcomes after nucleoside therapy in HIV-infected adults with 200 to 500 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Virology Study Team.

BACKGROUND: We studied measures of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, the viral phenotype, and immune function (CD4 cell counts) and the relation of changes in these indicators to clinical outcomes in a subgroup of patients in a controlled trial of early antiretroviral treatment for HIV, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175. METHODS: The 391 subjects, each of whom entered the study with a single screening CD4 cell count of 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter, were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine alone, didanosine alone, zidovudine plus didanosine, or zidovudine plus zalcitabine. Plasma concentrations of HIV RNA were assessed in 366 subjects, and viral isolates from 332 subjects were assayed for the presence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype. RESULTS: After eight weeks, the mean (+/-SE) decrease from base line in the concentration of HIV RNA, expressed as the change in the base 10 log of the number of copies per milliliter, was 0.26+/-0.06 for patients treated with zidovudine alone, 0.65+/-0.07 for didanosine alone, 0.93+/-0.10 for zidovudine plus didanosine, and 0.89+/-0.06 for zidovudine plus zalcitabine (P<0.001 for each of the pairwise comparisons with zidovudine alone). Multivariate proportional-hazards models showed that higher base-line concentrations of plasma HIV RNA, less suppression of plasma HIV RNA by treatment, and the presence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype were significantly associated with an increased risk of progression to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and death. After adjustment for these measures of viral replication and for the viral phenotype, CD4 cell counts were not significant predictors of clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both the risk of the progression of HIV disease and the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy are strongly associated with the plasma level of HIV RNA and with the viral phenotype. The changes in the plasma concentration of HIV RNA predict the changes in CD4 cell counts and survival after treatment with reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.

Zidovudine side effects as reported by black, Hispanic, and white/non-Hispanic patients with early HIV disease: combined analysis of two multicenter placebo-controlled trials.

The objective of this study was to determine whether HIV patients' subjective tolerance of zidovudine differs by racial or ethnic grouping by conducting a post hoc analysis of reported symptoms in two multicenter, placebo-controlled trials of zidovudine monotherapy for early HIV disease. Ratios of rates of developing new or worsening symptoms as reported by patients assigned to active drug or placebo were compared in groups of white/non-Hispanic, black, or Hispanic origin. Patients were included in the study if they had asymptomatic HIV disease and entry absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts below 500 cells/microL and were enrolled in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) protocol 019 or had mild symptoms of HIV disease, were enrolled in ACTG protocol 016, met protocol eligibility criteria for the respective trial, and were categorized at entry as white/non-Hispanic (N = 1801), black (N = 195), or Hispanic (n = 214). The primary outcome measure was development of a new or worsening symptom of any severity. Among patients treated with zidovudine compared with placebo, the estimated risk for developing a new or worsening symptom was not significantly greater for blacks or Hispanics than for white/non-Hispanics for any of the most frequently reported symptoms (p > 0.05 after adjustment for the multiple comparisons performed). Our analysis of 195 black and 214 Hispanic patients did not reveal a significantly increased risk of subjective zidovudine intolerance compared with white/non-Hispanic subjects. If there is an increased risk of such intolerance in minority groups compared with white/non-Hispanics, it is not likely to be clinically important.

Within-subject variation in CD4 lymphocyte count in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection: implications for patient monitoring.

Changes in CD4 lymphocyte counts are widely used in monitoring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients for disease progression. However, random fluctuations may obscure clinically significant changes. CD4 cell counts from 1020 untreated subjects with asymptomatic HIV infection monitored by standardized methods for up to 2 years were assessed. The within-subject coefficient of variation averaged 25% but was higher in subjects with lower counts; in 6% of subjects the count was half or double the one obtained 8 weeks before. Proportionate rates of decline, which had negligible correlation with the baseline count, averaged 14.3%/year but varied considerably between subjects: An estimated 29% had increasing trends. Declines were greater in HIV p24-positive subjects and those with higher lymphocyte percentages or lower platelet counts or hemoglobin levels. With such high variation, changes between single counts should be interpreted cautiously. Using multiple counts and other markers may provide more precise assessment of immune status.