Sickle cell disease landscape and challenges in the EU: the ERN-EuroBloodNet perspective.

Sickle cell disease is a hereditary multiorgan disease that is considered rare in the EU. In 2017, the Rare Diseases Plan was implemented within the EU and 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs) were created, including the ERN on Rare Haematological Diseases (ERN-EuroBloodNet), dedicated to rare haematological diseases. This EU initiative has made it possible to accentuate existing collaborations and create new ones. The project also made it possible to list all the needs of people with rare haematological diseases not yet covered health-care providers in the EU to allow optimised care of individuals with rare pathologies, including sickle cell disease. This Viewpoint is the result of joint work within 12 EU member states (ie, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and The Netherlands), all members of the ERN-EuroBloodNet. We describe the role of the ERN-EuroBloodNet to improve the overall approach to and the management of individuals with sickle cell disease in the EU through specific on the pooling of expertise, knowledge, and best practices; the development of training and education programmes; the strategy for systematic gathering and standardisation of clinical data; and its reuse in clinical research. Epidemiology and research strategies from ongoing implementation of the Rare Anaemia Disorders European Epidemiological Platform is depicted.

Time for Change? The Why, What and How of Promoting Innovation to Tackle Rare Diseases - Is It Time to Update the EU's Orphan Regulation? And if so, What Should be Changed?

Since developments are global in the healthcare arena, more should be done to align EU and other big markets' regulatory practices for rare disease patients. Notwithstanding efforts and cooperation between the US and EU aimed to harmonize their strategic plans in the field of orphan drugs, regulatory criteria and procedures to gain the designation, terms and classifications should be still harmonised. Aligning the criteria of prevalence and support to orphan medicines in the various jurisdictions internationally, would facilitate patient recruitment eventually at global level, so as to gain the data and the biological insights required to identify biomarkers and appropriate endpoints needed for progressing clinical development. A conducive regulatory environment can further support the development of medicines to treat rare diseases. Overall there is a need for joined-up regulatory process coordination. Better integration of regulatory pathways and better integration of regulatory systems, such as scientific tools and methods to generate evidence, would be helpful. There is a need to revise and agree the current frameworks to be improved which will take into account the considerations and challenges to diagnose and treat different rare diseases and improve quality of life. Deliberative processes with multi-stakeholders' involvement for reimbursement should be considered. This paper explores the successes and limitation of both the regulation and its implementation mechanisms in the current regulatory context, and suggests some improvements that could maximise its benefits and boost rare disease research even further.