The Predictors and Risk Factors of 2-Year Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is a definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease. It is associated with improved life expectancy and quality of life. One of the most common complications following kidney transplantation is graft rejection. To our knowledge, no previous study has identified rejection risk factors in kidney transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the specific risk factors of graft rejection. METHODS: A multicenter case-control study was conducted at four transplant centers in Saudi Arabia. All adult patients who underwent a renal transplant between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 were screened for eligibility. Included patients were categorized into two groups (cases and control) based on the occurrence of biopsy-proven rejection within 2 years. The primary outcome was to determine the risk factors for rejection within the 2 years of transplant. Exact matching was utilized using a 1:4 ratio based on patients' age, gender, and transplant year. RESULTS: Out of 1,320 screened renal transplant recipients, 816 patients were included. The overall prevalence of 2-year rejection was 13.9%. In bivariate analysis, deceased donor status, the presence of donor-specific antibody (DSA), intraoperative hypotension, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida, and any infection within 2 years were linked with an increased risk of 2-year rejection. However, in the logistic regression analysis, the presence of DSA was identified as a significant risk for 2-year rejection (adjusted OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.10, 6.49, p = 0.03). Furthermore, blood infection, infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or BK virus within 2 years of transplant, were associated with higher odds of 2-year rejection (adjusted OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.48, 6.48, p = 0.003, adjusted OR: 3.23; 95% CI: 0.87, 11.97, p = 0.08 and adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 0.89, 8.48, p = 0.07, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for appropriate prevention and management of infections following kidney transplantation to avoid more serious problems, such as rejection, which could significantly raise the likelihood of allograft failure and probably death. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the impact of serum chloride levels prior to transplant and intraoperative hypotension on the risk of graft rejection and failure.

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation With Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience.

AIM: The aim of this study is to present the outcome of kidney transplantation after laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) compared with conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in a single-center experience. METHODS: This retrospective study compares data from the initial experience with 110 consecutive LESS DN donors and their recipients (group A) with 205 consecutive conventional LDN donors and their recipients (group B). RESULTS: This study compared 110 LESS DNs completed in an 18-month period with 205 LDNs completed in the immediately preceding 42-month period. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. In groups A and B, respectively, the incidence of immediate graft function was 90% vs 91.2%, slow graft function was 9% vs 5.3%, delayed graft function was 0.9% vs 2.9%, graft loss was 0.9% vs 2.9%, and death with a functioning graft was 0.9% vs 1.5%. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.3 ± 0.93 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL (P = .447), 1.1 ± 0.33 mg/dL vs 1.2 ± 0.75 mg/dL (P = .184), and 1.05 ± 0.25 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.39 mg/dL (P = .224) at 7, 30, and 365 days after transplantation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 88 ± 18.2 vs 83 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = .004). The mean donor operative times in groups A and B were 175.9 ± 24.9 minutes vs 199.88 ± 37.06 minutes (P = .0001), respectively, and the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 minutes vs 3.64 ± 1.38 minutes, respectively (P = .0001). The mean body mass index, the incidence of complex vascular anatomy, and the rate of complications were the same in the 2 donor groups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of kidney transplantation after LESS DN is comparable to conventional LDN. LESS DN can be employed as the primary approach for kidney donation with low donor risk and without compromising recipient outcomes.

Evaluation of Tacrolimus Trough Level in Patients Who Developed Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a complication after kidney transplantation. Studies showed an association between high trough levels of tacrolimus FK506 and PTDM. This study aims to investigate the association between FK506 trough levels during the first year after kidney transplant and the incidence of PTDM. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult kidney transplant patients who were not diabetic before transplantation from 2011 to 2014. The analysis evaluated FK506 trough levels at different time points post-transplant, as well as other variables to determine whether they were associated with PTDM. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of PTDM was 22.5% with a median time to PTDM diagnosis of 10 months. PTDM patients had higher first FK506 (ng/mL) levels (P = .001), and more patients in the PTDM group had FK506 level >10 ng/mL during the first 3 months (P = .004). After 12 months of transplant, PTDM patients had higher body mass index (BMI) 28.3 ± 6.9 kg/m2 compared to non-PTDM patients 26.4 ± 6.7 kg/m2 (P = .015). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥40 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75, P = .004), BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (OR = 2.04, P = .040), and FK506 level ≥10 ng/mL during the first 3 months (OR = 2.65, P = .009) were significantly related to PTDM development. CONCLUSION: Patients with FK506 trough level >10 ng/mL during the first 3 months after transplantation are at higher risk of PTDM, especially in patients >40 years of age and/or who are overweight. These results may strengthen the notion that there is a connection between high FK506 trough levels and PTDM development.

The Frequency and Risk Factors of Delayed Graft Function in living Donor Kidney Transplantation and Its Clinical Impact on Graft and Patient Survival in Part of Middle East.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a form of acute renal failure which results in increased post-transplantation allograft immunogenicity and risk of acute rejection episodes in addition to decreased long-term survival. Its incidence and risk factors have been extensively studied, especially after deceased donation. Until now, only few data has been  published on DGF in living donor kidney transplant recipients. The present study was performed to investigate the frequency and risk factors of DGF among living- kidney transplant recipients. In this retrospective study, data had been collected from existing local hospital registries in three countries (Iran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) , and Kuwait ).

Management and outcome of latent tuberculosis in living renal transplant donors.

In regions where tuberculosis (TB) is endemic, up to 15% of kidney transplant recipients develop Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections (TBI), typically with an increased risk of disseminated disease and allograft loss. To reduce these risks, donors and recipients with latent TB usually receive isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis. However, it is unclear whether latent TB in donors justifies routine prophylaxis of recipients. At our institution, donors and recipients with latent infection receive INH prophylaxis, and those who do not have latent infections are not routinely treated. We retrospectively analyzed the records of 269 living donor kidney transplant recipient and donor pairs in order to determine the risk of posttransplant TB in those whose kidneys were obtained from living donors with latent TB. Three recipients (1.1%) developed active TB, three, 11, and 12 months after transplantation. Neither donors nor recipients in these pairs had evidence of latent TB before transplantation. Of the 224 pairs with complete data, 24 transplant recipients with negative tuberculin skin test received organs from living donors with evidence of latent TB. None developed active TB, and kidney function one and three years later was preserved. Our findings suggest that routine use of prophylaxis in recipients without latent TB who receive organs from positive donors might not add additional benefit.

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: evolving trends.

BACKGROUND: We report our experience with laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN). METHODS: Retrospective comparative study of data from 200 Consecutive left LESS DN (group A) compared to 205 consecutive conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) (group B). Standard laparoscopic instruments were used in all patients. Right nephrectomies were excluded. RESULTS: From 05/2015 to 12/2017, 200 LESS DN (group A) and from 10/2011 till 04/2015, 205 LDN (group B) were performed. In group A and B, respectively, the mean operative time was 175.9 ± 24.9 versus 199.88 ± 37.06 min (p = 0.0001), the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 versus 3.64 ± 1.38 min (p = 0.0001), the mean BMI was 24.8 ± 4.5 versus 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, complex vascular anatomy was found in 60 (30%) and 68 (33.2%), average length of incision was 5.2 versus 7.7 cm (p = 0.001), scar satisfaction rate 8 versus 6 (p = 0.004), mean morphine equivalents 81.0 versus 70.5 mg; (p = 0.03), average timing for return to work was 42 versus 50 days; (p = 0.001). There was no conversion to open surgery in both groups. One case converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in group A. Pure LESS-DN was successfully completed in 169 patients (84.5%). In group A, due to technical difficulties, additional 1 or 2, 5-mm port(s) was added in 21 and 10 cases, respectively. Two negative explorations were performed in the first post-operative week for picture of small bowel obstruction. We had port site hernia in one donor, superficial wound infection in three donors and blood transfusion was required in two donors in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with LESS-DN is encouraging. LESSDN can be integrated as a standard approach for renal donation without additional donor risk. Moreover, LESS DN gives more flexibility by possibility to add one or more 5-mm ports in case of technical difficulties.

A single-center 4-year experience with 47 pediatric renal transplants: Evolving trends.

Outcome of pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) has improved over the last several decades. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes pediatric KT in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center-Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Between May 2013 and November 2016, we performed renal transplantation in 47 children, 30 (64%) males, and 17 (36%) females. All patients received antibody induction with basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin along with triple immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Twenty-four (51%) and 14 (30%) patients were on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. Average duration on dialysis was 18.3 months. Nine patients (19%) had preemptive transplant. Forty-five patients (95.7%) received kidneys from living donors, 38 (83%) males and nine (17%) females, mean age (years), and body mass index were 30.8 ± 8.82 and 23.8 ± 4.54, respectively. Forty-one donors had left nephrectomy. Four right nephrectomies were reported, all of them were through open nephrectomy. Open nephrectomy was reported in 21 (46%) patients. Several laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques were performed; conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, laparo-endoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in 10, 11, and three patients, respectively. The most common etiologies of end-stage renal disease were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 19%, posterior urethral valve 8.5%, and congenital abnormalities 8.5% respectively. With a mean follow-up of 54 months, one and 4-year graft survival rates were 95.7% and 91.5%, respectively. One-and four-year patient survival rates were 100%. Outcomes were similar in patients < or ≥10 years. The graft survival was comparable in laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy (P = 0.72). Average serum creatinine was 0.85, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.84 at 7, 30, 90, 365 days, respectively. Four patients lost their graft due to renal vein thrombosis, chronic allograft nephropathy (cadaveric donor), Antibody-mediated rejection, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome at 0.75, 9, 19, and 24 months, respectively. The incidences of acute rejection and major infection were 2% and 4%, respectively. One patient developed posttransplant lympho-proliferative disease that was treated and is still with excellent graft function. Our pediatric KT experience is encouraging. Acute rejection, patient, and graft survival rates are similar and even better than many of western reports.

Long-term follow-up of post renal transplantation Epstein-Barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumors: Report of two cases and review of the literature.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated smooth muscle tumors (SMTs) following solid organ transplantation are very rare slow growing neoplasms. Most tumors present with non-specific symptoms mainly related to tumor location. Post-transplant EBV-associated small muscle tumors have been reported in various anatomical locations. The tumors have a predilection to unusual sites for SMTs and tend to be multifocal. The histologic appearance of these tumors generally does not predict their clinical behavior. Surgery and reduction in immunosuppression are the main stays of management. We herein report two cases of post renal transplant EBV-associated SMTs with over 6 years of follow-up. A 33-year-old male patient presented with hepatic lesions and a 49-year-old female patient presented with multiple mesenteric and gluteal lesions. The tumors were diagnosed 6 and 10 years after renal transplantation, respectively. Surgical resection and reduction/discontinuation of immunosuppression were successful in delaying progression of the disease; however, in both cases, the allografts failed during the course of management.

Delayed Graft Function in Living-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Middle Eastern Perspective.

With an increased incidence of living-donor kidney transplants, in response to increasing unmet needs for renal transplant, a clear understanding of determinants of posttransplant outcomes is essential. The importance of delayed graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplant is now part of conventional medical wisdom, due to the large amount of evidence focused on this aspect. However, the same is not true for living-donor kidney transplant, partly due to lack of evidence on this crucial clinical question and partly due to lack of awareness about this issue. The current review aims to highlight the importance of delayed graft function as a crucial determinant of outcomes in living-donor kidney transplant. An exhaustive search of online medical databases was performed with appropriate search criteria to collect evidence about delayed graft function after living-donor kidney transplant, with a special focus on studies from the Middle East. Data on incidence, impact, risk factors, and possible prevention modalities of delayed graft function in patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplant are presented. A key finding of this review is that contemporary incidence rates reported from the Middle East are comparatively higher than those reported from outside the region. Although in absolute terms the incidence is lower than deceased donor kidney transplant, the effects of delayed graft function on graft rejection and graft and patient survival are sufficiently large to warrant the formulation of specific treatment protocols. Key to formulating prevention and treatment strategies is identifying discrete risk factors for delayed graft function. Although this evidence is scant, an overview has been provided. Further studies examining different aspects of delayed graft function incidence after living-donor kidney transplant are urgently needed to address a so far little known clinical question.