The effects of hypogonadism on quality of life in survivors of germ cell tumors treated with surgery alone versus surgery plus platinum-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: It is important to assess the prevalence of hypogonadism and to identify the correlation between hypogonadism and cancer treatment with quality of life (QoL) in germ cell tumor (GCT) survivors. METHODS: This is a single-center, non-randomized, prospective observational study in GCT survivors 18-50 years of age previously treated with surgery and chemotherapy (S+C) or surgery alone (S). Patients completed a validated QoL questionnaire at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Patients received supplemental testosterone as clinically indicated. Mean QoL scores were compared between two treatment groups (S+C vs. S) and within each group between survivors with hypogonadism (serum testosterone level < 300 ng/dL) versus without. A two-sided independent-groups t test was used to compare means. RESULTS: We evaluated 199 GCT survivors. At baseline, the prevalence of biochemical hypogonadism was 48% overall, 51% in S+C group, and 45% in S group (p = .4). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in QoL scores between S+C and C groups, except the S+C group exhibited greater modified Aging Male Symptoms (AMS) at baseline and 6 months. Patients with hypogonadism reported more fatigue, poor sleep quality, and worse general health at baseline. There were no statistical differences in mean QOL scores between patients with testosterone < 300 ng/dL who received testosterone supplementation and who did not. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of GCT survivors have low testosterone levels after platinum-based chemotherapy and surgery as well as with just surgery alone. GCT survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy exhibited more symptoms related to male aging compared with survivors treated with surgery alone.

Phase II trial of pembrolizumab in patients with platinum refractory germ-cell tumors: a Hoosier Cancer Research Network Study GU14-206.

Background: Despite remarkable results with salvage standard-dose or high-dose chemotherapy ∼15% of patients with relapsed germ-cell tumors (GCT) are incurable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced significant remission in multiple tumor types. We report the first study of immunotherapy in patients with GCT. Patients and methods: Single arm phase II trial investigating pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. Q3weeks until disease progression in patients with relapsed GCT and no curable options. Patients age ≥18 with GCT who progressed after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy and after at least one salvage regimen (high-dose or standard-dose chemotherapy) were eligible. Centrally assessed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor and infiltrating immune cells was scored. Primary end point was overall response rate using immune-related response criteria. Simon two-stage design with type I error 20% and power 80% was utilized. Results: Twelve male patients were enrolled. Median age was 38 years. All patients had nonseminoma. Primary site was testis (11) or mediastinum (1). Median AFP 615 (range 1-32, 760) and hCG 4 (range 0.6-37, 096). Six patients had late relapse (>2 years). Median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 3. Six patients received prior high-dose chemotherapy. Two patients had positive PD-L1 staining (H-score 90 and 170). Median number of pembrolizumab doses was 2 (range 1-8). There were six grade 3 adverse events. No immune-related adverse events were reported. No partial or complete responses were observed. Two patients achieved radiographic stable disease for 28 and 19 weeks, respectively; both had continued rising AFP level despite radiographic stability and had negative PD-L1 staining. Conclusion: This is the first reported trial evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors in GCT. Pembrolizumab is well tolerated but does not appear to have clinically meaningful single-agent activity in refractory GCT. Clinical trial information: NCT02499952.

Multidisciplinary clinic approach improves overall survival outcomes of patients with metastatic germ-cell tumors.

Background: To report our experience utilizing a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) at Indiana University (IU) since the publication of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG), and to compare our overall survival (OS) to that of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with metastatic germ-cell tumor (GCT) seen at IU from 1998 to 2014. A total of 1611 consecutive patients were identified, of whom 704 patients received an initial evaluation by our MDC (including medical oncology, pathology, urology and thoracic surgery) and started first-line chemotherapy at IU. These 704 patients were eligible for analysis. All patients in this cohort were treated with cisplatin-etoposide-based combination chemotherapy. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of patients treated at IU with that of the published IGCCCG cohort. OS of the IU testis cancer primary cohort (n = 622) was further compared with the SEER data of 1283 patients labeled with 'distant' disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. Results: With a median follow-up of 4.4 years, patients with good, intermediate, and poor risk disease by IGCCCG criteria treated at IU had 5-year PFS of 90%, 84%, and 54% and 5-year OS of 97%, 92%, and 73%, respectively. The 5-year PFS for all patients in the IU cohort was 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 76% to 82%]. The 5-year OS for the IU cohort was 90% (95% CI 87% to 92%). IU testis cohort had 5-year OS 94% (95% CI 91% to 96%) versus 75% (95% CI 73% to 78%) for the SEER 'distant' cohort between 2000 and 2014, P-value <0.0001. Conclusion: The MDC approach to GCT at high-volume cancer center associated with improved OS outcomes in this contemporary dataset. OS is significantly higher in the IU cohort compared with the IGCCCG and SEER 'distant' cohort.

Statistical controversies in clinical research: futility analyses in oncology-lessons on potential pitfalls from a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pre-planned futility analyses are commonly used in oncology studies. The LUME-Lung 2 study (NCT00806819; 1199.14) was stopped early based on a pre-planned, non-binding futility analysis of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), although subsequent analysis showed that the primary endpoint of improvement in centrally reviewed PFS was met. Retrospective analyses were conducted to understand the discrepancy between interim futility and final analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LUME-Lung 2 investigated nintedanib in combination with pemetrexed versus placebo‒pemetrexed for the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer who had relapsed or failed one prior line of chemotherapy. Pre-planned futility analysis was carried out by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) after 50% of the events for the primary PFS analysis (713 events) had occurred; the threshold for futility was a conditional power of < 20%. Conditional/predictive powers and hazard ratios were calculated retrospectively after varying percentages of events had occurred for both investigator- and centrally reviewed PFS. RESULTS: At the time of the pre-planned futility analysis, the conditional power was 10.3% and the predictive power was 18.5%; no safety issues were identified. Retrospective analysis showed that the conditional and predictive powers fluctuated considerably over time for both investigator- and centrally reviewed PFS and that the power only dropped by a notable amount, and below the futility threshold, at the time of the futility analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective investigations suggest that, had the DMC analysis been carried out at another time point, or had centrally reviewed PFS data been used, the futility outcome may have been different and the trial may have been continued. The design of futility analyses requires careful consideration and confirming negative futility outcomes by second analysis may be appropriate. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00806819.

Prognostic factors in patients with poor-risk germ-cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of the Indiana University experience from 1990 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Based on the risk stratification from the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG), only 14% of patients with metastatic germ-cell tumors (GCT) had poor-risk disease with a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 41% and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of only 48%. This analysis attempts to identify prognostic factors for patients with poor-risk disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with GCT diagnosed and treated at Indiana University from 1990 to 2014. Clinical and pathological characteristics were available for all patients and all of them were treated with cisplatin-etoposide-based chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to target significant predictors of disease progression and mortality. A significance level of 5% was used in the analysis. RESULTS: We identified 273 consecutive patients with poor-risk GCT (PRGCT). Median follow-up time was 8 years (range 0.03-24.5). The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 58% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51% to 63%] and 73% (95% CI 67% to 78%), respectively. In multivariate survival analyses, multiple risk factors were associated with disease progression, including liver metastasis, brain metastasis, primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT (PMNSGCT), and elevation in logarithmic ß-hCG. Significant predictors of mortality were PMNSGCT [hazard ratio (HR) 4.63, 95% CI 2.25-9.56; P < 0.001], brain metastasis (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.74-6.23; P < 0.001), and increasing age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PMNSGCT, brain metastasis, or with increasing age are at higher risk of death than their counterparts. This contemporary cohort (1990-2014) of 273 patients with PRGCT had improved PFS and OS outcomes than those from the historical IGCCCG group of patients (1975-1990).

A randomized phase II study of the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) compared with docetaxel in KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)†.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are detected in 25% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no targeted therapies are approved for this subset population. Trametinib, a selective allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2, demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. We report a phase II trial comparing trametinib with docetaxel in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed KRAS-mutant NSCLC previously treated with one prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2 : 1 to trametinib (2 mg orally once daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. every 3 weeks). Crossover to the other arm after disease progression was allowed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was prematurely terminated after the interim analysis of 92 PFS events, which showed the comparison of trametinib versus docetaxel for PFS crossed the futility boundary. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC were randomized; of which, 86 patients received trametinib and 43 received docetaxel. Median PFS was 12 weeks in the trametinib arm and 11 weeks in the docetaxel arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.75-1.75; P = 0.5197). Median overall survival, while the data are immature, was 8 months in the trametinib arm and was not reached in the docetaxel arm (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52-1.83; P = 0.934). There were 10 (12%) partial responses (PRs) in the trametinib arm and 5 (12%) PRs in the docetaxel arm (P = 1.0000). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of trametinib patients were rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs in the trametinib arm were hypertension, rash, diarrhea, and asthenia. CONCLUSION: Trametinib showed similar PFS and a response rate as docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRAS-mutant-positive NSCLC. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01362296.

Gefitinib in patients with chemo-sensitive and chemo-refractory relapsed small cell cancers: a Hoosier Oncology Group phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib has demonstrated activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials have not demonstrated a relationship between response to gefitinib and over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Although, EGFR is not over-expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we postulated that gefitinib might affect tumor growth through other mechanisms. Agents that are active in NSCLC usually are also effective in SCLC. METHODS: The primary objective was to assess the clinical control rate: complete response (CR) partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD > 90 days), of gefitinib in patients with chemo-resistant and chemo-sensitive small cell cancers. Eligibility criteria included pathologic proof of a neuroendocrine tumor, especially small cell cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2, prior treatment with one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and adequate end-organ function. Patients received gefitinib, 250 mg p.o. daily until disease progression or intolerable side effects. RESULTS: From April 2003 to March 2004, 19 patients were enrolled. Small cell lung cancer accounted for 18 of the 19 patients and one patient had metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Twelve patients (63%) had chemo-sensitive disease, defined as progression greater than three months from completion of prior chemotherapy; 7 (37%) had chemo-refractory disease; 13 (68%) had one prior chemotherapy regimen. Other patient characteristics: mean age 64 years (range 52-79 years); ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 7/9/3, M:F = 9:10. Grade 3 toxicities included: fatigue in three patients (15.8%), pulmonary toxicities in three (15.8%) and one patient (5.3%) each with hyperglycemia or pain. Four patients had grade four toxicities: one patient (5.3%) with fatigue and three patients (15.8%) with dyspnea. There were no patients with grade 3 or 4 rash or diarrhea. Two patients had stable disease (<90 days) and 17 had progressive disease as their best response. This study was a two-stage design and because the continuing criterion for stage one was not met, stage 2 was not performed. Median time to progression (TTP) was 50 days (95% CI = 21-58 days). One year overall survival (OS) was 21% (95% CI = 6-45.6%). CONCLUSION: Although gefitinib has activity in select patients with NSCLC, this study failed to demonstrate benefit in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Maintenance daily oral etoposide versus no further therapy following induction chemotherapy with etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group randomized study.

BACKGROUND: We performed this phase III study to determine whether the addition of 3 months of oral etoposide in non-progressing patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with four cycles of etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin (VIP) improves progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with extensive SCLC with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > or =50, adequate renal function and bone marrow reserve were eligible. Patients with CNS metastasis were eligible and received concurrent whole-brain radiotherapy. All patients received etoposide 75 mg/m2, ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-4 every 3 weeks for four cycles. Non-progressing patients were randomized to oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days every 4 weeks for three courses versus no further therapy until progression. RESULTS: From September 1993 to June 1998, 233 patients were entered and treated with VIP with 144 non-progressing patients subsequently randomized to oral etoposide (n = 72) or observation (n = 72). Minimum follow up for all patients is 2 years. Toxicity with oral etoposide was mild. There was an improvement in median PFS favoring the maintenance arm of 8.23 versus 6.5 months (P = 0.0018). There was a trend towards an improvement in median (12.2 versus 11.2 months), 1-year (51.4% versus 40.3%), 2-year (16.7% versus 6.9%) and 3-year (9.1% versus 1.9%) survival (P = 0.0704) favoring the maintenance arm. CONCLUSIONS: Three months of oral etoposide in non-progressing patients with extensive SCLC was associated with a significant improvement in PFS and a trend towards improved overall survival.

[The biology and polygyny of the ant Tapinoma simrothi phoenicium Emery]. / Contribution à l'étude l'étude de la biologie et de la polygynie de la fourmi Tapinoma simrothi phoenicium Emery

Laying and nesting start in winter. The society is strictly polygynous. All the fertilized females participate in the laying. After the nuptial flight, the founders cohabit and together form a new society. The pullulation and resistance of this species is explained by its polygymy.