Liraglutide and Colesevelam Changes Serum and Fecal Bile Acid Levels in a Randomized Trial with Patients with Bile Acid Diarrhea.

INTRODUCTION: Both liraglutide and colesevelam improve bile acid diarrhea (BAD) symptoms. Colesevelam binds excess amounts of diarrhea-causing bile acids in the colon whereas the mode of action for liraglutide remains elusive. Here, we examined the impact of colesevelam and liraglutide treatment on the concentrations of bile acids in serum and feces and the fecal microbiota composition to better understand the two drugs' modes of action. METHODS: Bile acid species were analyzed in serum and fecal samples from a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial at baseline and after three and six weeks of orally administered colesevelam (1,875 mg twice daily, n = 26) or subcutaneously administered liraglutide (uptitrated by weekly increments of 0.6 mg from 0.6 to 1.8 mg daily, n = 26) in patients with 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test-verified, idiopathic, or post-cholecystectomy BAD. Fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing at the same time points. RESULTS: Colesevelam increased the fecal concentrations of all bile acid species while it decreased serum concentrations of secondary bile acids. Liraglutide induced a small increase in serum unconjugated bile acid concentrations without affecting fecal bile acid concentrations. No changes in fecal microbiota composition were observed with either treatment. CONCLUSION: Colesevelam and liraglutide exhibit distinct effects on serum and fecal bile acid concentrations with colesevelam reducing serum concentrations of secondary bile acids and promoting fecal bile acid excretion while liraglutide enhances serum concentrations of unconjugated bile acids, potentially through deceleration of small intestinal transit time allowing more time for passive absorption of bile acids.

Safety and efficacy of liraglutide versus colesevelam for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea: a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator, non-inferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Bile acid diarrhoea is an underdiagnosed disease estimated to affect 1-2% of the general population. Case reports indicate that the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide might be an effective treatment for bile acid diarrhoea. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator, double-dummy, non-inferiority clinical trial at the Center for Clinical Metabolic Research at Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark. Patients aged 18-75 years with 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT)-verified moderate-to-severe primary bile acid diarrhoea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive liraglutide (one daily subcutaneous injection uptitrated from 0·6-1·8 mg per day over 3 weeks) or colesevelam (three capsules of 625 mg twice daily), the standard of care, for 6 weeks following one run-in week with no treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing a reduction in daily stool frequency of 25% or greater after 6 weeks. Data from all participants were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. The non-inferiority limit was set to 15% in favour of colesevelam. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2018-003575-34) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2019, and Jan 31, 2021, 52 patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to liraglutide and 26 to colesevelam. 20 (77%) of 26 participants on liraglutide and 13 (50%) of 26 on colesevelam experienced a 25% or greater reduction in stool frequency, corresponding to a significant risk difference of -27% in favour of liraglutide (one-sided 95% CI -100 to -6). Liraglutide was therefore superior to colesevelam in reducing daily stool frequency. Mild nausea with a duration of 10-21 days was reported by six participants in the liraglutide group and by one participant in the colesevelam group. No other adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: The superiority of liraglutide compared with colesevelam in reducing stool frequency suggests consideration of liraglutide as a potential new treatment modality for bile acid diarrhoea, although larger confirmatory trials powered for superiority are warranted. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science under The A.P. Møller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Foundation.

Bilio-enteric flow and plasma concentrations of bile acids after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Bile acids in plasma are elevated after bariatric surgery and may contribute to metabolic improvements, but underlying changes in bile flow are poorly understood. We assessed bilio-enteric flow of bile and plasma bile concentrations in individuals with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery compared with matched non-surgical controls (CON). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Fifteen RYGB, 10 SG and 15 CON underwent 99Tc-mebrofenin cholescintigraphy combined with intake of a high-fat 111In-DTPA-labelled meal and frequent blood sampling. A 75Se-HCAT test was used to assess bile acid retention. RESULTS: After RYGB, gallbladder filling was decreased (p = 0.045 versus CON), basal flow of bile into the small intestine increased (p = 0.005), bile acid retention augmented (p = 0.021) and basal bile acid plasma concentrations elevated (p = 0.009). During the meal, foods passed unimpeded through the gastric pouch resulting in almost instant postprandial mixing of bile and foods, but the postprandial rise in plasma bile acids was brief and associated with decreased overall release of fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19) compared with CON (p = 0.033). After SG, bile flow and retention were largely unaltered (p > 0.05 versus CON), but gastric emptying was accelerated (p < 0.001) causing earlier mixture of bile and foods also in this group. Neither basal nor postprandial bile acid concentrations differed between SG and CON. CONCLUSIONS: Bilio-enteric bile flow is markedly altered after RYGB resulting in changes in plasma concentrations of bile acids and FGF-19, whereas bile flow and plasma concentrations are largely unaltered after SG.

Glepaglutide, a novel long-acting glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue, for patients with short bowel syndrome: a randomised phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with short bowel syndrome might have impaired postprandial endogenous glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) secretion, which is required for optimal intestinal adaptation. We aimed to assess the therapeutic potential of glepaglutide, a novel long-acting GLP-2 analogue, for reducing faecal output and increasing intestinal absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome. METHODS: In this single-centre, double-blind, crossover, randomised phase 2 trial, adults (aged ≥18 to ≤90 years) with short bowel syndrome and with a faecal wet weight output of 1500 g/day or more were randomly assigned to receive one of six dose sequences of glepaglutide (10 mg, 1 mg; 10 mg, 0·1 mg; 1 mg, 10 mg; 1 mg, 0·1 mg; 0·1 mg, 10 mg; or 0·1 mg, 1 mg). Patients received daily subcutaneous injections of the first assigned dose of glepaglutide for 3 weeks, followed by a washout period of 4-8 weeks, and then the second dose of glepaglutide for 3 weeks. An unmasked statistician generated the randomisation list, and the trial investigator enrolled patients and assigned them their patient numbers. Trial investigators, patients, and other care providers were masked throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in faecal wet weight output, measured separately over the two treatment periods. Metabolic balance studies were done before and after each treatment period to assess the primary endpoint. Per-protocol analysis was used to assess the efficacy. Safety analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02690025, and has completed. FINDINGS: Of the 22 patients screened between Feb 5, 2016, and Jan 25, 2017, 18 patients were randomly assigned and treated with glepaglutide; 16 patients completed the trial. Treatment with 1 mg and 10 mg glepaglutide changed the adjusted mean faecal output by -592 g/day (95% CI -913 to -272; p=0·002) and -833 g/day (-1152 to -515; p=0·0002) from baseline, respectively. No changes were observed with 0·1 mg glepaglutide. Of the 18 patients who were randomly assigned to treatment, common treatment-related adverse events were stoma complications (13 [72%] patients), injection site reactions (11 [61%]), peripheral oedema (ten [56%]), nausea and abdominal pain (eight [44%] each), polyuria and fatigue (six [33%] each), abdominal distention, vomiting, and dizziness (five [28%] each); and cough and decreased appetite (four [22%] each). Related or possibly related serious adverse events were reported in two patients in the 0·1 mg dose group and two patients in the 10 mg dose group. These events included abdominal pain, stoma obstruction, catheter-related sepsis, and infection of unknown origin. No patients died during the trial. INTERPRETATION: Glepaglutide was well tolerated, and was associated with improved intestinal absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome with 1 mg and 10 mg glepaglutide, but not with 0·1 mg glepaglutide. Larger phase 3 clinical trials of longer durations have been initiated to fully assess the safety and efficacy of glepaglutide. FUNDING: Zealand Pharma.

Preliminary report: Measurement of apixaban and rivaroxaban in plasma from bleeding patients.

OBJECTIVES: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban and rivaroxaban, are used for anticoagulation treatment. Although biochemical monitoring is not required, severe bleedings caused by DOAC have been reported. We therefore evaluated the chromogenic assay Biophen DiXaI® (Biophen) using plasma from non-bleeding patients in treatment with DOAC and on spiked plasma from patients with ongoing bleeding. METHODS: The Biophen method was compared with an in-house reference method; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using plasma spiked with the compounds ranging from 20 to 1500 µg/L. Furthermore, the methods were compared using plasma from non-bleeding patients in treatment with DOAC (n = 106). In addition, plasma was collected from patients not treated with DOAC, but with ongoing bleeding and tested in spiking experiments (n = 14). RESULTS: Analysis of plasma from 106 patients receiving rivaroxaban (n = 91) or apixaban (n = 15) showed agreement and correlation between the methods. Measurement in spiked plasma from patients with active bleeding, however, revealed a 26% overestimation by the assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that Biophen is suitable for measuring apixaban and rivaroxaban concentrations in plasma. However, our results in patients with active bleeding show an overestimation of 26%. This should be taken into account when assessing possible intoxication with apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients presenting with bleeding.