RESUMEN
Background/Objective: This prospective, multicenter observational cohort study was carried out in 12 trauma centers in Germany and Switzerland. Its purpose was to evaluate the rate of undertriage, as well as potential consequences, and relate these with different Trauma Team Activation Protocols (TTA-Protocols), as this has not been done before in Germany. Methods: Each trauma center collected the data during a three-month period between December 2019 and February 2021. All 12 participating hospitals are certified as supra-regional trauma centers. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of undertriaged patients. Those included in the study were all consecutive adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with acute trauma admitted to the emergency department of one of the participating hospitals by the prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) within 6 h after trauma. The data contained information on age, sex, trauma mechanism, pre- and in-hospital physiology, emergency interventions, emergency surgical interventions, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and death within 48 h. Trauma team activation (TTA) was initiated by the emergency medical services. This should follow the national guidelines for severe trauma using established field triage criteria. We used various denominators, such as ISS, and criteria for the appropriateness of TTA to evaluate the undertriage in four groups. Results: This study included a total of 3754 patients. The average injury severity score was 5.1 points, and 7.0% of cases (n = 261) presented with an injury severity score (ISS) of 16+. TTA was initiated for a total of 974 (26%) patients. In group 1, we evaluated how successful the actual practice in the EMS was in identifying patients with ISS 16+. The undertriage rate was 15.3%, but mortality was lower in the undertriage cohort compared to those with a TTA (5% vs. 10%). In group 2, we evaluated the actual practice of EMS in terms of identifying patients meeting the appropriateness of TTA criteria; this showed a higher undertriage rate of 35.9%, but as seen in group 1, the mortality was lower (5.9% vs. 3.3%). In group 3, we showed that, if the EMS were to strictly follow guideline criteria, the rate of undertriage would be even higher (26.2%) regarding ISS 16+. Using the appropriateness of TTA criteria to define the gold standard for TTA (group 4), 764 cases (20.4%) fulfilled at least one condition for retrospective definition of TTA requirement. Conclusions: Regarding ISS 16+, the rate of undertriage in actual practice was 15.3%, but those patients did not have a higher mortality.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: High-energy injuries of the pelvic ring are rare. The wide application of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is relatively new. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term quality of life. (2) Methods: All patients treated with an iliosacral screw for a posterior pelvic ring stabilization after high-energy trauma at a level 1 trauma center between 2005 and 2015 were included. Pelvic ring injuries were classified according to the Tile classification adapted by AO/ASIF. The clinical evaluation included the patient-oriented questionnaires surveys of the Majeed Score, Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS), Work Ability Index (WAI), SF-36, EQ5D-5L. (3) Results: A total of 84 patients were included with a median follow-up of 130.1 months (IQR 95.0-162.0 months). The median ISS was 22.5 (IQR 16.0-29.0), mean Majeed Score 83.32 (SD ± 19.26), IPS 77.88 (SD ± 13.96), WAI 32.71 (SD ± 11.31), SF-36 PF 71.25 (SD ± 29.61) and EQ5D-5L 0.83 (SD ± 0.21). There was a notably difference between uni- and bilateral pelvic fractures (p = 0.033) as well as a correlation with the ISS (p = 0.043) with inferior functional outcome measured by IPS. (4) Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of iliosacral screw fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures showed a good quality of life and functional outcome with equal EQ5D-5L results and inferior SF-36 physical functioning compared to the German population.
RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to analyze the mortality of polytrauma patients and identify prediction parameters. A further aim was to create from the results a score for the prehospital predictive evaluation of 30-day survival. The study was conducted with a retrospective, observational design and was carried out unicentrically at a Level 1 Trauma Center. During the 4-year investigation period, patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 were examined and their demographic basic data, laboratory values, and vital parameters were recorded. The mortality data analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and Log-Rank tests. Cox regressions were carried out to determine influencing factors and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to establish limit values for potential influencing factors. All statistical tests were conducted at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), age at admission, sex, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) had a significant impact on the survival of polytrauma patients. The identified prediction parameters were combined with the shock index (SI). The generated score showed a sensitivity of 93.1% and a specificity of 73.3% in predicting the mortality risk. The study was able to identify significant influencing prehospital risk factors on 30-day survival after polytrauma. A score created from these parameters showed higher specificity and sensitivity than other prediction scores. Further studies with a larger number of participants and the inclusion of slightly injured patients could verify these findings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The decision of the Federal Joint Committee has resulted in the further development of in-hospital emergency medicine through the establishment of central emergency departments and staged emergency care. In addition, the additional training in clinical acute and emergency medicine was established. AIM: The aim of this work is on the one hand to make trauma surgeons aware of these structural changes. On the other hand, we would like to evaluate an opinion and discuss the position of trauma surgery in emergency medicine. METHODS: A web-based online survey was conducted at the Trauma Network and Trauma Registry Congress to collect participants' opinions on the position of trauma surgery in emergency medicine. RESULTS: Of 143 congress participants, 98 (67%) responded to the survey. The majority of participants were male (nâ¯= 78, 80%), over 40 years of age (nâ¯= 62, 63%), and in a professional position with staff responsibility (nâ¯= 73, 75%). Emergency medicine (mean: 84.8; SD: 18.7) and intensive care medicine (mean: 78.3; SD: 20.4) training appears important. On the other hand, subsequent work in these areas appears less important (prehospital emergency medicine: mean: 65.1; SD: 28.0; ICU: mean: 53.7, SD: 30.3); however, activity in an emergency department is rated higher (MW: 87.0; SD: 18.7). There is high agreement that the trauma leader should be a trauma surgeon (mean 87.9; SD: 19.7). DISCUSSION: A high volume of emergency trauma surgery patients and the care of severely injured patients in designated trauma centers show that trauma surgery expertise is mandatory in a central emergency department. Senior positions should also be sought to ensure high quality standards.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Medicina de Emergencia , Cirujanos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Centros TraumatológicosRESUMEN
Critically injured patients pose great challenges for medical personnel in emergency room treatment. How can such a high workload due to a lack of personnel be reduced? Telemedicine can offer solutions here. With the help of external medical expertise, diagnoses and treatment processes are already significantly accelerated and optimized in other specialist areas. This possibility should now also be introduced into the care of critical trauma surgery patients. In this article, current emergency room treatment is reflected, problems are shown and future-oriented solutions are suggested.
Asunto(s)
Telemedicina , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: The stability of the pelvic ring mainly depends on the integrity of its posterior part. Percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screws are widely implanted as standard of care treatment. The main risk factors for their fixation failure are related to vertical shear or transforaminal sacral fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of fixations using one (Group 1) or two (Group 2) standard SI screws versus one SI screw with bone cement augmentation (Group 3). Materials and Methods: Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring (AO/OTA 61-C1.3, FFP IIc) were simulated in 21 artificial pelvises by means of vertical osteotomies in the ipsilateral anterior and posterior pelvic ring. A supra-acetabular external fixator was applied to address the anterior fracture. All specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading until failure, with monitoring by means of motion tracking. Fracture site displacement and cycles to failure were evaluated. Results: Fracture displacement after 500 cycles was lowest in Group 3 (0.76 cm [0.30] (median [interquartile range, IQR])) followed by Group 1 (1.42 cm, [0.21]) and Group 2 (1.42 cm [1.66]), with significant differences between Groups 1 and 3, p = 0.04. Fracture displacement after 1000 cycles was significantly lower in Group 3 (1.15 cm [0.37]) compared to both Group 1 (2.19 cm [2.39]) and Group 2 (2.23 cm [3.65]), p ≤ 0.04. Cycles to failure (Group 1: 3930 ± 890 (mean ± standard deviation), Group 2: 3676 ± 348, Group 3: 3764 ± 645) did not differ significantly between the groups, p = 0.79. Conclusions: In our biomechanical setup cement augmentation of one SI screw resulted in significantly less displacement compared to the use of one or two SI screws. However, the number of cycles to failure was not significantly different between the groups. Cement augmentation of one SI screw seems to be a useful treatment option for posterior pelvic ring fixation, especially in osteoporotic bone.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Tornillos Óseos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Pelvis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the four anterior pubic rami are described as "straddle fractures". The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical anterior plating (group 1) versus the bilateral use of retrograde transpubic screws (group 2). METHODS: A straddle fracture was simulated in 16 artificial pelvises. All specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading, with monitoring by means of motion tracking. RESULTS: Axial stiffness did not differ significantly between the groups, p = 0.88. Fracture displacement after 1000-4000 cycles was not significantly different between the groups, p ≥ 0.38; however, after 5000 cycles it was significantly less in the retrograde transpubic screw group compared to the anterior plating group, p = 0.04. No significantly different flexural rotations were detected between the groups, p ≥ 0.32. Moreover, no significant differences were detected between the groups with respect to their cycles to failure and failure loads, p = 0.14. CONCLUSION: The results of this biomechanical study reveal less fracture displacement in the retrograde transpubic screw group after long-term testing with no further significant difference between anterior plating and bilateral use of retrograde transpubic screws. While the open approach using anterior plating allows for better visualization of the fracture site and open reduction, the use of bilateral retrograde transpubic screws, splinting the fracture, presents a minimally invasive and biomechanically stable technique.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidence of pelvic ring fractures has increased over the past four decades, especially after low-impact trauma-classified as fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). To date, there is a lack of biomechanical evidence for the superiority of one existing fixation techniques over another. An FFP type IIc was simulated in 50 artificial pelvises, assigned to 5 study groups: Sacroiliac (SI) screw, SI screw plus supra-acetabular external fixator, SI screw plus plate, SI screw plus retrograde transpubic screw, or S1/S2 ala-ilium screws. The specimens were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading. Axial stiffness and cycles to failure were analysed. Displacement at the fracture sites was evaluated, having been continuously captured via motion tracking. RESULTS: Fixation with SI screw plus plate and SI screw plus retrograde transpubic screw led to higher stability than the other tested techniques. The S1/S2 ala-ilium screws were more stable than the SI screw or the SI screw plus external fixator. CONCLUSIONS: In cases with displaced fractures, open reduction and plate fixation provides the highest stability, whereas in cases where minimally invasive techniques are applicable, a retrograde transpubic screw or S1/S2 ala-ilium screws can be considered as successful alternative treatment options.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: In Dec 2019, COVID-19 was first recognized and led to a worldwide pandemic. The German government implemented a shutdown in Mar 2020, affecting outpatient and hospital care. The aim of the present article was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 shutdown on patient volumes and surgical procedures of a Level I trauma center in Germany. METHODS: All emergency patients were recorded retrospectively during the shutdown and compared to a calendar-matched control period (CTRL). Total emergency patient contacts including trauma mechanisms, injury patterns and operation numbers were recorded including absolute numbers, incidence proportions and risk ratios. RESULTS: During the shutdown period, we observed a decrease of emergency patient cases (417) compared to CTRL (575), a decrease of elective cases (42 vs. 13) and of the total number of operations (397 vs. 325). Incidence proportions of emergency operations increased from 8.2 to 12.2% (shutdown) and elective surgical cases decreased (11.1 vs. 4.3%). As we observed a decrease for most trauma mechanisms and injury patterns, we found an increasing incidence proportion for severe open fractures. Household-related injuries were reported with an increasing incidence proportion from 26.8 to 47.5% (shutdown). We found an increasing tendency of trauma and injuries related to psychological disorders. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows a decrease of total patient numbers in an emergency department of a Level I trauma center and a decrease of the total number of operations during the shutdown period. Concurrently, we observed an increase of severe open fractures and emergency operations. Furthermore, trauma mechanism changed with less traffic, work and sports-related accidents.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Innovación Organizacional , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugíaRESUMEN
Percutaneous sacro-iliac screw osteosynthesis is considered to be standard of care for most posterior pelvic ring fractures. However, special situations require alternative strategies for sufficient stabilization. In these cases, stabilization can often be achieved using posterior instrumentation e.g. using SIPS-screws (spina-iliaca-posterior-superior screws). However, this often leads to implant-related aggravation of the sometimes already critical soft tissue conditions after pelvic trauma. S2-Ala-Ilium screws (S2AI screws) are a suitable alternative. The starting point lies medial of the posterior superior iliac spine below the iliac level. It is almost in line with a potential spinal instrumentation and therefore usually causes fewer soft tissue problems. Although this technique has been widely used in spinal surgery in recent years, its use in orthopaedic traumatology is largely unknown. The possibilities but also the limitations of this technique for the treatment of injuries to the pelvis are illustrated by this retrospective case series.
Asunto(s)
Ilion , Fusión Vertebral , Tornillos Óseos , Ilion/diagnóstico por imagen , Ilion/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagen , Sacro/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiological trends and incidences in inpatient pelvic surgery in the period from 2005 to 2007. METHOD: Approximately 194 million anonymized diagnosis-related groups (DRG) inpatient records were collected by the German Federal Statistical Office between 2005 and 2017. These data were screened for pelvic procedures, gender and age of the patients. Statistical testing was performed using the χ2-test and Mann-Whitney U-test (pâ¯< 0.05). RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2017 the number of closed reduction and internal fixation of the pelvic ring with screw fixation increased by +1116%. The use of screw fixation for closed reduction and internal fixation of the sacroiliac joint increased by +800%. The number of cases of open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the pelvic ring and pelvic rim increased by +185% and reposition with external fixator increased by +188%. In 2005 more surgical procedures were undertaken in male inpatients, whereas more surgical procedures were undertaken in female inpatients in 2017. In general, a large increase in the number of pelvic procedures was observed in the group of patients >50 years old. CONCLUSION: There was an increase in the number of all analyzed pelvic procedures between 2005 and 2017. Especially the use of screw fixation increased. The introduction of new techniques (e.g. screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint) and progress and innovation in the field of three-dimensional navigation techniques, the demographic trend, greater mobility and higher demands on functionality of older patients might explain this increase in pelvic procedures.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Pélvicos , Tornillos Óseos , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Huesos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , PelvisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differentiation between traumatic osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic vertebral fractures is crucial for optimal therapy planning. We postulated that the morphology of the posterior edge of the cranial fragment of A3 vertebral fractures is different in these entities. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a simple method to differentiate between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic A3 vertebral fractures by morphological analysis. METHODS: A total of 86 computer tomography scans of AO Type A3 (cranial burst) vertebral body fractures (52 non-osteoporotic, 34 osteoporotic) were included in this retrospective study. Posterior edge morphology was analyzed using the sagittal paramedian slice with the most prominent shaped bulging. Later, the degree of bulging of the posterior edge fragment was quantified using a geometric approach. Additionally, the Hounsfield units of the broken vertebral body, the vertebra above, and the vertebra below the fracture were measured. RESULTS: We found significant differences in the extent of bulging comparing osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures in our cohort. Using the presented method, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 96%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 94%. In contrast, by evaluating the Hounsfield units, sensitivity was 94%, specificity 94% and the PPV was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Our method of analysis of the bulging of the dorsal edge fragment in traumatic cranial burst fractures cases allows, in our cases, a simple and valid differentiation between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures. Further validation in a larger sample, including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements, is necessary.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive sacroiliac-screw (SI-screw) fixation of the pelvis is used in energy trauma (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classified) and fragility fractures (Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis (FFP) classified). However, available clinical data are based on small case series and biomechanical data seem to be contradictory. METHODS: The present single center retrospective cohort study investigated percutaneous SI-screw fixation and augmentation over 15 years. Groups were compared concerning the general epidemiological data, mobilization, complication rates, duration of stay, and safety of SI-screw insertion. Multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Between 2005 and March 2020, 448 patients with 642 inserted SI-screws were identified. Iatrogenic neurological impairment was documented in 2.47% and correlated with screw misplacement. There was an increased complication risk in patients with AO type C over patients with AO type B and in FFP II over FFP III/IV patients. Cement-augmented FFP patients showed a 25% reduced stay in hospital and a reduced complication risk. Cement-associated complications were seen in 22% without correlation to neurologic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the safety and usability of percutaneous SI-screw fixation, despite specific risks. Cement augmentation seems to reduce the complication risk in FFP patients and shorten hospital stay for some reasons, without increased specific complications or correlated neurological impairment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) can significantly impact morbidity and mortality if undetected and, therefore, untreated. Two diagnostic concepts are standard practice in major trauma management: Application of clinical screening criteria (CSC) does or does not recommend consecutive computed tomography angiography (CTA) of head and neck. In contrast, liberal CTA usage integrates into diagnostic protocols for suspected major trauma. First, this study's objective is to assess diagnostic accuracy of different CSC for BCVI in a population of patients diagnosed with BCVI after the use of liberal CTA. Second, anatomical locations and grades of BCVI in CSC false negatives are analyzed. METHODS: The hospital database at University Hospital Münster was retrospectively searched for BCVI diagnosed in patients with suspicion of major trauma 2008 to 2015. All patients underwent a diagnostic protocol including CTA. No BCVI risk stratification or CSC had been applied beforehand. Three sets of CSC were drawn from current BCVI practice management guidelines and retrospectively applied to the study population. Primary outcome was false-negative recommendation for CTA according to CSC. Secondary outcome measures were stroke, mortality, mechanism of injury, multivessel BCVI, location and grade of BCVI. RESULTS: From 4,104 patients with suspicion of major trauma, 91 (2.2%) were diagnosed with 126 BCVI through liberal usage of CTA. Sensitivities of different CSC ranged from 57% to 84%. Applying the set of CSC with the highest sensitivity, false-negative BCVIs were found more often in the petrous segment of the carotid artery (p = 0.01) and more false negatives presenting with pseudoaneurysmatic injury were found in the vertebral artery (p = <0.01). CONCLUSION: This study provides further insight into the common debate of correct assessment of BCVI in trauma patients. Despite following current practice management guidelines, a large number of patients with BCVI would have been missed without liberal CTA usage. Larger-scale observational studies are needed to confirm these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Erróneo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In osteoporotic bone, the quality of the bone-to-implant interface is decreased, which may lead to early implant failure. Screw anchorage can be improved by augmentation. This effect is mainly investigated with a pull-out test. To our knowledge, the effect of cement augmentation in an in vivo physiological setup focusing on screw movement has not been investigated to date. The aim of this work was to investigate and compare augmented and native screw behavior in a physiologically related setup. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human lumbar vertebrae were divided into two groups. Each vertebra was bilaterally instrumented with either non-augmented or augmented pedicle screw systems and loaded in a recently developed test setup that provided cyclic conditions comparable to a physiological gait. The cyclic loading should test the primary implant stability, comparable to the postoperative period of two months in a worst-case scenario in the absence of osseous remodeling. Screws were tracked optically, and screw movement and failure patterns were observed. RESULTS: Mutual influence between the left and right sides resulted in a successive, rather than simultaneous, failure. Augmentation of the screws in vertebrae with poor bone quality reduced screw subsidence and thus improved the rigidity of the screw-to-implant interface by up to six-fold. The non-augmented condition was significantly related to early screw failure. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle screw system failure involves a complex bilateral-coupled mechanism. The cyclic loading based on physiological conditions during walking has allowed the postoperative conditions and clinical failure mechanisms to be simulated in vitro and clarified. Future implant systems should be investigated with a physiologically related setup.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Tornillos Pediculares , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cementos para Huesos , Prótesis Anclada al Hueso , Interfase Hueso-Implante , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/cirugía , Polimetil Metacrilato , Falla de Prótesis , Soporte de PesoRESUMEN
The development of the numbers of cases involved in accident insurance consultant procedures (DAV), injury type procedures (VAV) and severe injury type procedures (SAV) after the introduction of the new injury type catalogue from 1 July 2018 is presented. Furthermore, possible alterations to organizational aspects, such as operating room times and average duration of hospitalization are presented. A first critical assessment of the modifications in the new catalogue was carried out, particularly with reference to the newly introduced section on complications (section 11). METHODS: A retrospective study of all inpatients treated in the context of the DAV, VAV and SAV procedures at a SAV center from the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2018 was carried out. The development of the number of cases, the case mix index (CMI), the mean number of operations, the mean time in the operating room and the length of hospitalization were analyzed. Furthermore, an assessment of the SAV cases was carried out with respect to the new developments and with particularly reference to complications. RESULTS: The total number of inpatients in the context of the DAV, VAV, SAV procedures changed only slightly. There was a clear decrease in DAV cases and a relevant increase in SAV cases. The CMI increased by 47%, the number of surgical procedures by 15%, the mean time in the operating room by 36% and the length of hospitalization by 43%. When converted to a daily operating room unit of 7â¯h (Tagestischeinheit, TTE) the operating room time increased from 89 to 108 TTE and the length of hospitalization increased from 1028 to 1358 days. Of the 111 SAV cases in the 3rd quarter, 52% were assigned to the catalogue number 11 "complications". In comparison to the previous version of the VAV/SAV catalogue, it was now possible to assign all inpatients to a single category. CONCLUSION: The modifications of the VAV in the observational period led to an enormous increase in SAV cases. It remains to be seen whether this development is confirmed in subsequent quarters. The increase in CMI, the number of necessary operations, operating room times and duration of hospitalization showed the necessity of these innovations on structural changes of hospitals involved in the treatment of SAV cases.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Seguro por Accidentes , Hospitales , Quirófanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
In a consensus process with four sessions in 2017, the working group on "the upper cervical spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) formulated "Therapeutic Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fractures to the Upper Cervical Spine", incorporating their own experience and current literature. The following article describes the recommendations for the atlas vertebra. About 10% of all cervical spine injuries include the axis vertebra. The diagnostic process primarily aims to detect the injury and to determine joint incongruency and integrity of the atlas ring. For classification purposes, the Gehweiler classification and the Dickman classification are suitable. The Canadian c-spine rule is recommended for clinical screening for c-spine injuries. CT is the preferred imaging modality; MRI is needed to determine the integrity of the Lig. transversum atlantis in complete atlas ring fractures. Conservative treatment is appropriate in very many atlas fractures. Surgical treatment is recommended in existing or potential joint incongruity or instability, which are frequently seen in Gehweiler IIIB or Gehweiler IV fractures. Posterior atlanto-axial stabilisation and fusion using transarticular screws or an internal fixator are regarded as a gold standard in the majority of surgical cases. Especially in young patients, the possibility of isolated atlas osteosynthesis should be checked. A possible option for Gehweiler IV fractures is halo-fixation with mild distraction for ligamentotaxis. Secondary dislocation should be checked for frequently. Involvement of the occipito-atlantal joint complex requires stabilisation of the occiput as well.
Asunto(s)
Atlas Cervical/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Canadá , Atlas Cervical/diagnóstico por imagen , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Consenso , Tratamiento Conservador , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/clasificación , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is an important etiology of ischemic stroke and early recognition is vital to protect patients from the major complication of cerebral embolization by administration of anticoagulants. The etiology of arterial dissections differ and can be either spontaneous or traumatic. Even though the historical gold standard is still catheter angiography, recent studies suggest a good performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of CAD. We conducted this research to evaluate the variety and frequency of possible imaging signs of spontaneous and traumatic CAD and to guide neuroradiologists' decision making. METHODS: Retrospective review of the database of our multiple injured patients admitted to the Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery of the University Hospital Münster in Germany (a level 1 trauma center) for patients with traumatic CAD (tCAD) and of our stroke database (2008-2015) for patients with spontaneous CAD (sCAD) and CT/CTA on initial clinical work-up. All images were evaluated concerning specific and sensitive radiological features for dissection by two experienced neuroradiologists. Imaging features were compared between the two etiologies. RESULTS: This study included 145 patients (99 male, 46 female; 45⯱ 18.8 years of age), consisting of 126 dissected arteries with a traumatic and 43 with spontaneous etiology. Intimal flaps were more frequently observed after traumatic etiology (58.1% tCADs, 6.9% sCADs; pâ¯< 0.001); additionally, multivessel dissections were much more frequent in trauma patients (3 sCADs, 21 tCADs) and only less than half (42%) of the patients with traumatic dissections showed cervical spine fractures. CONCLUSION: Neuroradiologists should be aware that intimal flaps and multivessel dissections are more common after a traumatic etiology. In addition, it seems important to conduct a CTA in a trauma setting, even if no cervical spine fracture is detected.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/irrigación sanguínea , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Expert consensus. OBJECTIVES: To establish treatment recommendations for subaxial cervical spine injuries based on current literature and the knowledge of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. METHODS: This recommendation summarizes the knowledge of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. RESULTS: Therapeutic goals are a stable, painless cervical spine and protection against secondary neurologic damage while retaining maximum possible motion and spinal profile. The AOSpine classification for subaxial cervical injuries is recommended. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is recommended to decide on the need for imaging. Computed tomography is the favoured modality. Conventional x-ray is preserved for cases lacking a "dangerous mechanism of injury." Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended in case of unexplained neurologic deficit, prior to closed reduction and to exclude disco-ligamentous injuries. Computed tomography angiography is recommended in high-grade facet joint injuries or in the presence of vertebra-basilar symptoms. A0-, A1- and A2-injuries are treated conservatively, but have to be monitored for progressive kyphosis. A3 injuries are operated in the majority of cases. A4- and B- and C-type injuries are treated surgically. Most injuries can be treated with anterior plate stabilization and interbody support; A4 fractures need vertebral body replacement. In certain cases, additive or pure posterior instrumentation is needed. Usually, lateral mass screws suffice. A navigation system is advised for pedicle screws from C3 to C6. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a framework for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine Injuries. They give advice about diagnostic measures and the therapeutic strategy.
RESUMEN
In a consensus process with four sessions in 2017, the working group "upper cervical spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) formulated "Therapeutic Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Upper Cervical Fractures", taking their own experience and the current literature into consideration. The following article describes the recommendations for axis ring fractures (traumatic spondylolysis C2). About 19 to 49% of all cervical spine injuries include the axis vertebra. Traumatic spondylolysis of C2 may include potential discoligamentous instability C2/3. The primary aim of the diagnostic process is to detect the injury and to determine potential disco-ligamentous instability C2/3. For classification purposes, the Josten classification or the modified Effendi classification may be used. The Canadian C-spine rule is recommended for clinical screening for C-spine injuries. CT is the preferred imaging modality and an MRI is needed to determine the integrity of the discoligamentous complex C2/3. Conservative treatment is appropriate in case of stable fractures with intact C2/3 motion segment (Josten type 2 and 2). Patients should be closely monitored, in order to detect secondary dislocation as early as possible. Surgical treatment is recommended in cases of primary severe fracture dislocation or discoligamentous instability C2/3 (Josten 3 and 4) and/or secondary fracture dislocation. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) C2/3 is the treatment of choice. However, in case of facet joint luxation C2/3 with looked facet (Josten 4), a primary posterior approach may be necessary.