Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve block is a widely accepted nerve block method with evident reduction in consumption of opioid painkiller and minimization of the duration of hospital stay but may cause weakness of quadriceps muscle strength. Adductor canal block is another nerve block technique that attracts the attention of scientific community nowadays because of its possible superiority over Femoral nerve block regarding mobility and muscle strength. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies, aiming to compare femoral nerve block with adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty regarding pain control and mobilization. RESULTS: Adductor canal block showed better preservation of quadriceps muscle strength (MD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.11, 0.46], P = .002), and better mobilization up to 2 days postoperatively. However, no significant difference was found between the 2 interventions regarding pain control (MD = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.17], P = .33) or opioid consumption (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.22], P = .28) up to 2 days postoperatively. The better mobilization results of adductor canal block did not translate into a significant difference in the risk of falls or patients' satisfaction; however, adductor canal block patients had less mean length of hospital stay than the patients with femoral nerve block. CONCLUSION: Both femoral nerve block and adductor canal block provide similar results regarding pain control and opioid consumption, however adductor canal block provides better preservation of quadriceps strength and mobilization, giving it more advantage over femoral nerve block.

Restless Leg Syndrome in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a clinical entity characterized by sensory-motor manifestations commonly observed in end-stage renal illness. Evidence suggests that RLS is a multifactorial phenomenon that can be influenced by many critical factors, including genetic predisposition, dietary patterns, and deficiency in some vitamins. Iron metabolism disorders and metabolic derangements have been generally accepted as predisposing elements in RLS. Furthermore, both pharmacological and neuroimaging studies demonstrated dopamine deficiency and dopamine receptors decrease in basal ganglia during RLS. REVIEW SUMMARY: A literature search was done in three databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) to identify the pertinent articles discussing the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of RLS in hemodialysis patients. RLS can affect the morbidity and mortality of patients treated with dialysis. It also has significant impacts on the quality of life since it can lead to insomnia, increased fatigue, mental health troubles, and other movement problems. Appropriate measures should be considered in this particular population so to prevent and treat RLS. Many drugs and other nonpharmacological methods have been investigated to attenuate the disease's severity. No treatment, however, could offer long-term effects. CONCLUSION: Further efforts are still required to improve the understanding of RLS pathogenic trends to find more specific and efficient therapies. A wide range of treatment options is available. However, it can be individualized according to the patients' several factors.