The effectiveness of a self-reported questionnaire on masticatory function in health examinations.

Periodontal diseases have been reported to be lifestyle-related and associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS). The introduction of dental checkups in a health checkup program may create a synergistic effect and aid the prevention of MetS. In Japan, a chewing function questionnaire has now been introduced into the national health checkup program. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the questionnaire reflects dental and oral conditions and whether it helps improve general and oral health. A total of 6599 subjects who underwent health checkups or guidance specified by the National Health Insurance of Japan for two consecutive years were included. A single comprehensive question to evaluate masticatory function was asked. Medical and dental examinations and insurance data were collected and used for analysis. In terms of masticatory function during chewing, 82.3% of subjects experienced no problems, 17.3% experienced some difficulty, and 0.4% experienced severe problems. There was a significant relationship between the questionnaire response and dental examinations results for several items of examination. The overall dental consultation rate after health screening was 42.3%. Improvement in periodontal disease was achieved in those who reported some problems with chewing function. Improvement in blood pressure was also observed in those who reported some problem with chewing function and subsequently had a dental consultation. The results of this study indicate that questionnaires on masticatory function reflect the status of dental and oral health. In addition, the results suggested that questionnaire results are potentially linked to improvement in dental and oral health status, and improvement in MetS.

Dental and oral management in the perioperative period of surgery: A scoping review.

Dental and oral management (DOM) is a long-established treatment modality. This scoping review aimed to narratively review previous studies, examine the effects of perioperative DOM, and identify the available evidence. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed electronic database for studies published between January 1, 2000, and March 8, 2022. The search yielded 43 studies, most of which were published in the last 10 years. The results of this study confirmed that improved perioperative oral hygiene is effective in preventing postoperative pneumonia. Our results also suggested that preoperative DOM is effective in preventing postoperative surgical site infections. Perioperative DOM is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia, SSI, and postsurgical complications. Further studies are needed to elucidate the various mechanism of DOM and to examine efficient intervention methods and timing.

A retrospective investigation of minor risk factors as prognostic predictors and treatment indications in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Abstract. BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The clinical significance of minor risk factors remins uncertain in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of minor risk factors in OSCC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cases of OSCC patients that underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with major risk factors for recurrence, such as positive surgical margins or extracapsular spread, were excluded. The impact of possible minor risk factors on treatment outcomes was analyzed. One hundred and seventy-five patients with primary OSCC that underwent surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 81.2%, 91.0%, and 72.4%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, RFS exhibited a significant association with the pattern of invasion (grade 4 vs. grades 1-3: hazard ratio: 3.096, 95% confidence interval: 1.367-6.884, p < 0.01), OS exhibited a tendency towards associations with the pattern of invasion and perineural invasion, and CSS displayed a tendency towards an association with perineural invasion. The prognosis of the patients with ≥2 minor risk factors was significantly worse than that of the patients with 0 or 1 minor risk factor(s) (OS: 91.6% vs. 64.5%, respectively, p < 0.01; CSS: 98.9% vs. 78.9%, respectively, p < 0.001; and RFS: 81.2% vs. 58.5%, respectively p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Grade 4 invasion and perineural invasion might be significant minor risk factors in OSCC patients. The presence of ≥2 minor risk factors might be a predictor of a poor prognosis in OSCC patients.

Treatment outcomes of adjunctive teriparatide therapy for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): A multicenter retrospective analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic strategies for patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) remain controversial. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of teriparatide therapy in Japanese MRONJ patients based on a large number of case series with a multicenter retrospective analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 29 patients who were diagnosed with MRONJ at 10 hospitals were treated with teriparatide. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety of teriparatide therapy for MRONJ patients. RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 17.2% of patients (5/29). One patient developed severe arthralgia and discontinued teriparatide therapy after 12 days, while others continued the treatment. Among 29 patients, the median period of administration of teriparatide was 14.0 months (range, 0.3-26 months), and treatment outcomes were evaluated as effective in 75.9% of patients with complete resolution in 65.5%. Among patients treated with oral bisphosphonates (BPs), 83.3% were effectively treated with teriparatide and 40% with intravenous BPs. The oral administration of BPs was associated with successful treatment outcomes with teriparatide (p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide therapy has potential as an effective treatment option for MRONJ.

Treatment strategies for and outcomes of older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors that have a significant impact on decision making regarding treatment strategies and on the resultant outcomes in older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). STUDY DESIGN: To define fit, vulnerable, and frail patients, as well as treatment strategies/outcomes, in patients 75 years of age and older with primary OSCC were retrospectively reviewed from the medical records. RESULTS: Among patients with stage I and II tumors, those with a Geriatric 8 (G8) score of 11.5 or greater had favorable outcomes and those with a score less than 11.5 had acceptable outcomes (5-year self-reliance [SR] rates: 80.8 and 53.5%, respectively). Among patients with stage III and IV tumors, those with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status (ECOG-PS) score less than 2 and/or a G8 score 11.5 or greater mainly received standard therapy, had favorable outcomes (5-year SR rate: 66.7%). The 5-year SR rates of stage IV patients with an ECOG-PS score 2 or greater and those with a G8 score less than 11.5 were poor regardless of any treatment strategy. Although the 5-year SR rate of patients with standard therapy was 73.4%, that of patients receiving other curative therapies was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage III/IV, ECOG-PS 2 or greater, and/or G8 score less than 11.5, treatment was difficult, and the prognosis was poor.

Clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated the clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients using a multicenter analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 438 primary OSCC patients aged 75 years and older were retrospectively reviewed. To examine the clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly OSCC patients, self-reliance (SR) rates and prognostic factors were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean score of the G8 screening tool was 10.9 ± 2.93. The SR cut-off value of the G8 score was 9.5 in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Five-year overall survival rates were 40.1% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 58.4% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific rates were 34.3% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 55.7% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.01). Five-year SR rates were 40.7% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 55.3% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.05). A multivariate analysis identified an advanced age (≥ 80 vs < 80; HR, 1.437; 95%CI, 1.181-1.843; p < 0.01), poorer ECOG-PS (2-4 vs 0-1; HR, 1.560; 95%CI, 1.14-2.106; p < 0.01), and standard treatment (non-standard therapy vs standard therapy; HR, 0.598; 95%CI, 0.405-0.910; p < 0.05) as significant independent prognostic factors for SR. A lower G8 score was associated with poorer SR (≥ 9.5 vs < 9.5; HR, 0.765; 95%CI, 0.575-1.034; p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: The clinical significance of the G8 score for elderly OSCC patients was demonstrated and its combination with ECOG-PS may be useful for assessing their prognoses.