Kinematic posture analysis of orthodontists in their daily working practice.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to conduct a kinematic analysis of occupational posture in orthodontists. METHODS: A representative sample of 21 (13 female/8 male) residents in orthodontics and orthodontists was studied. The CUELA system collects kinematic data of the occupational posture. Alongside the kinematic analysis, the tasks performed on-site were also subject to a detailed computerized analysis. Data analysis comprised the evaluation and comparison of joint angle distribution in accordance with ergonomic standards categorized as neutral, moderate or awkward posture. RESULTS: The most common activities were executed in a seated position. During "treatment" (28% of total time) participants most often worked with a straight back (84.7%), whereas a "bent or twisted" torso posture was observed 23.4% of the time. For head and cervical spine, the 75th and 95th percentiles presented worse (higher) values during treatment as compared to non-orthodontic activities. The seated position next to the patient during treatment showed a stronger inclination of the thoracic spine to the right and an inclination of the lumber spine to the left. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontists do take characteristic postures during treatment activities with highest angle values. The postures differ in the area of head and cervical spine with regard to the various activities carried out in the 3 categories.

Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a kinematic comparison of occupational posture in orthodontists and dentists in their workplace. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Dentist surgeries and departments of orthodontics at university medical centres in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 21 (10 female, 11 male) dentists (group G1) and 21 (13 female, 8 male) orthodontists (G2) with one male dropout in G2. OUTCOME MEASURES: The CUELA (computer-assisted acquisition and long-term analysis of musculoskeletal loads) system was used to analyse occupational posture. Parallel to the recording through the CUELA system, a software-supported analysis of the activities performed (I: treatment; II: office; III: other activities) was carried out. In line with ergonomic standards the measured body angles are categorised into neutral, moderate and awkward postures. Activities between the aforementioned groups are compared using the stratified van Elteren U test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test. All p values are subject to the Bonferroni-Holm correction. The level of significance is set at 5%. RESULTS: The percentage of time spent on activities in categories I-II-III was as follows: dentists 41%-23%-36% and orthodontists 28%-37%-35%. The posture analysis of both groups showed, for all percentiles (P5-95), angle values primarily in the neutral or moderate range. However, depending on the activity performed, between 5% and 25% of working hours were spent in unfavourable postures, especially in the head-and-neck area. Orthodontists have a greater tendency than dentists to perform treatment activities with the head and torso in unfavourable positions. The statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the duration and the relevance of the activities performed confirm this assumption for all three categories (p<0.01, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, both groups perform treatment activities in postures that are in the neutral or medium range; however, dentists had slightly more unfavourable postures during treatment for a greater share of their work day.