RESUMEN
The role of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in the pathogenesis of febrile seizures (FSs) is unclear. In our controlled follow-up study, we compared serum levels of HMGB1 (s-HMGB1) in the same individuals after the first FS, during febrile episodes without a FS, after recurrent FS, during healthy periods after FS, and between patients and controls. In all, 122 patients with FSs were included in the final analysis, including 18 with recurrent FSs with a complete follow-up protocol. We recruited 30 febrile children and 18 matched febrile children without seizures as controls. S-HMGB1 was lower in patients with recurrent FSs after the first FS than that in matched febrile control children (median 1.12⯵g/L (0.14-2.95) vs 1.79⯵g/L (0.33-47.90), P<0.04). We did not find any other differences in s-HMGB1 between the groups. S-HMGB1 did not differ in different types of FSs. We updated a meta-analysis of s-HMGB1 in patients with FSs and found that the differences were significant only in the studies conducted in East Asian populations. We conclude that S-HMGB1 does not seem to be a key factor in the pathogenesis of FSs but differences in HMGB1 concentrations could explain some of the ethnicity related susceptibility to FSs.
Asunto(s)
Proteína HMGB1 , Convulsiones Febriles , Humanos , Proteína HMGB1/sangre , Convulsiones Febriles/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Preescolar , Estudios de Seguimiento , Niño , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of febrile seizures (FSs) is unclear, and information regarding cytokine production outside of FS episodes is scarce. METHODS: In our controlled follow-up study of patients with FSs, we compared the levels of 12 serum cytokines after the patients' first FSs, during febrile episodes without FSs, after recurrent FSs, during healthy periods after FSs, and between patients and controls. RESULTS: Two-hundred fifty-one patients with first FS participated in the study, of whom 17 (mean age 1.6 years, SD 0.7) with recurrent FSs completed the protocol as required by the sample size calculations. The mean IL-1RA level was higher after the first FSs (2580 pg/mL, SD 1516) than during febrile episodes without FSs (1336 pg/mL, SD 1364, P = 0.006) and healthy periods after FSs (474 pg/mL, SD 901, P = 0.001). IL-1RA levels were also higher during first (2580 pg/mL) and recurrent FSs (2666 pg/mL, SD 1747) in comparison with febrile controls (746 pg/mL, SD 551) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), but there was no difference in the IL-1RA between febrile episodes without FSs and febrile controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FSs produce stronger inflammatory reactions during febrile episodes with FSs compared with febrile episodes without FSs and febrile controls. IMPACT: In patients with FSs, IL-1RA was higher following first FS than during febrile episodes without FSs and healthy periods after FSs. IL-1RA was higher in patients with FSs following first and recurrent FSs than in febrile controls. There was no significant difference in IL-1RA between febrile episodes of patients without FSs and febrile controls. Using IL-1RA as a surrogate marker of IL-1 axis activity, our results indicate that patients with FSs produced stronger inflammatory reactions during FS episodes but not during other febrile episodes or healthy periods after FSs. Cytokines may play a role in pathogenesis of FSs.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Convulsiones Febriles , Humanos , Lactante , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1 , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fiebre , InflamaciónRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate the usefulness of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II head trauma decision rule in clinical practice for paediatric patients in a tertiary university hospital serving as the only paediatric hospital in the area. METHODS: We compared how doctors evaluated and examined patients with head injury during two time periods, before and after the introduction of NEXUS II decision rule. Multiple implementation strategies were used as follows: education, tutoring and written instructions for the use of NEXUS II. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-four head injury patients visited the hospital before and 385 after the introduction of the NEXUS II decision rule. The number of hospital admissions (56%) and the mean duration of hospitalisation (2.5 days) remained the same during the two periods. In the NEXUS II evaluated group, there was a decrease of 40% in the number of hospital admissions. NEXUS II was applied in only 62 (16%) cases. The number of head imaging procedures remained the same. No patients with a clinically significant head injury were missed with the NEXUS II evaluation. CONCLUSION: NEXUS II was ineffective as our implementation failed. When used, NEXUS II reduced expenses in our study population by decreasing the number of hospital admissions.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Niño , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Radiografía , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on the pathogen-related and host-related factors in the pathogenesis of febrile seizures (FS). We designed a controlled study to compare the role of different respiratory viruses and febrile response in FS. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 1899 pediatric emergency room patients aged 6 months-6 years with a positive respiratory virus multiplex PCR, we identified 225 patients with FSs. We first compared the distribution of respiratory viruses in age-stratified patients with FSs with that in other patients. In an embedded case-control study, we compared the febrile response in patients with FSs with that in the controls matched for age, season and the same respiratory virus. RESULTS: The relative risk for FS was the highest for coronavirus OC43, 229E, and NL63 infections [RR: 3.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.4-7.2) and influenza A and B [RR: 2.5, 95 % CI: 1.4-4.7] as compared to those with other respiratory viral infections. The patients with FSs had a stronger febrile response of 39.2 °C (difference: 0.8 °C, 95 % CI: 0.5-1.2) later during hospitalization after acute care than the controls matched for the same respiratory virus. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza and coronaviruses caused relatively more FS-related emergency room visits than other respiratory viruses. Furthermore, the febrile response was stronger in the patients with FSs than in the controls matched for the same respiratory virus. The results suggest that the pathomechanism of FSs includes modifiable pathogen-related and host-related factors with possible potential in the prevention of FSs.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterovirus/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Convulsiones Febriles/epidemiología , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/virología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Coronavirus Humano 229E , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Coronavirus Humano NL63 , Coronavirus Humano OC43 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infecciones por Enterovirus/virología , Femenino , Fiebre/fisiopatología , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Inflamación , Virus de la Influenza A , Virus de la Influenza B , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/virología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/fisiopatología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Rhinovirus , Riesgo , Convulsiones Febriles/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Indication-based data on the use of antimicrobials in animals were collected using a prospective cross-sectional survey, similarly as for surveys carried out in human medicine, but adapting the questionnaire to include veterinary-specific issues. The participating veterinarians were randomly selected from a sample population of practising veterinarians. The sampling was stratified to take into account the proportions of different types of veterinary practice in the country. All patients consulting the veterinary practice during a 1-week period were included in the study and veterinarians returned a completed questionnaire for each patient receiving antimicrobial treatment. As cattle received most of the treatments, results from the survey are given using cattle as an example species. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 681 veterinarians, of whom 262 (39%) responded. In total 2850 questionnaires were completed. The largest quantities of antimicrobials, measured in kilograms, were used for cattle, followed by pigs, dogs and horses. The species that were treated most were cattle (n = 1308), dogs (n = 989) and cats (n = 311). For cattle, the most common reason for treatment was acute mastitis (52%), followed by dry-cow therapy (21%), subclinical mastitis (6%) and treatment for acute enteritis (4%). The remaining treatments covered 17% of cattle patients and 15 different indications. For acute mastitis, parenteral or intramammary treatment was used in 36% and 34% of the cases, respectively. The remaining 30% received both treatments simultaneously. Of the parenteral treatments (n = 459), benzyl penicillin was used in 83% of the treated animals (n = 379), while fluoroquinolones were used in 49 cases (11%). Of the 433 cows receiving intramammary treatment, ampicillin combined with cloxacillin was most commonly used (n = 157; 36%), followed by cephalexin+streptomycin (n = 113; 26%). CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional prospective survey provided a useful method for the collection of information on the indication-based use of antimicrobials in different animal species. Cattle were the most commonly treated animal species during the study period. The most common indication for antimicrobial use in cows was mastitis. Benzyl penicillin was the drug most frequently used for the treatment of mastitis, which seems appropriate according to the national guidelines on the use of antimicrobials in cattle in Finland.