Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 39(1): 4-11, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789980

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As of December 31, 2016, in the United States, 22 866 patients received left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1080-1086). First responders are generally unfamiliar with LVAD equipment functionality (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(4):S275). When a patient has an emergency either clinically or with a controller alarm or failure, speaking with ventricle assist device (VAD)-trained personnel is imperative to the prevention of adverse events. Starting February 2017, an LVAD program totaling 181 patients at a large teaching hospital changed their afterhours process to reduce wait time between patient call and talking to VAD-trained personnel to increase patient safety and patient satisfaction. METHODS: The Plan-Do-Check-Act quality improvement method was used to evaluate this project from February 2017 to July 2018 by the program's clinical information analyst. An afterhours summary of telephone interactions between VAD program clinicians (VAD coordinators, physician assistants, and nurse practitioner) was used to analyze the use of the "VAD Emergency Line." An annual patient satisfaction survey was completed to analyze patient satisfaction of the VAD Emergency Line. INTERVENTIONS: Review of the afterhours summary was conducted to determine the use of the VAD Emergency Line. The process of afterhours patient calls was changed so that calls are answered immediately by a 24-hour LVAD-trained medical ambulance service, called VAD Emergency Line. Patient use of the VAD Emergency Line was continuously assessed. In November 2017, it was recognized that only 57% of patient calls used the VAD Emergency Line, and further intervention was needed. In November 2017, patients were provided visual reminders to ensure compliance. RESULTS: Seventeen months after the implementation of the VAD Emergency Line, 92% of patient's afterhours calls were through the VAD Emergency Line. Although there was no statistical significance found, there was clinical significance. Since the implementation of the VAD Emergency Line, patient use of the VAD Emergency Line increased 56% from March 2017 to July 2018. There have been zero adverse safety events. Sixty-one percent of patients strongly agreed to the question "You are able to communicate emergent needs after hours (VAD Emergency Line)? CONCLUSION: Implementation of the LVAD Emergency Line has improved communication between patients in the outpatient setting. This increased patient safety by allowing patients to speak to LVAD-trained first responders and VAD coordinator personnel immediately without ever being put on hold. This communication process can be applied to other clinical programs.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/normas , Comunicación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Algoritmos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Seguridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Análisis de Causa Raíz
3.
Crit Care Nurse ; 37(3): e1-e8, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28572111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is important to prevent hospital-acquired infections. Patients' hand hygiene is just as important as hospital workers' hand hygiene. Hospital-acquired infection rates remain a concern across health centers. OBJECTIVES: To improve patients' hand hygiene through the promotion and use of hand washing with soap and water, hand sanitizer, or both and improve patients' education to reduce hospital-acquired infections. METHODS: In August 2013, patients in a cardiothoracic postsurgical step-down unit were provided with individual bottles of hand sanitizer. Nurses and nursing technicians provided hand hygiene education to each patient. Patients completed a 6-question survey before the intervention, at hospital discharge and 1, 2, and 3 months after the intervention. Hospital-acquired infection data were tracked monthly by infection prevention staff. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between hand hygiene and rates of infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (P = .003) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (P = .01) after the intervention. After the implementation of hand hygiene interventions, rates of both infections declined significantly and patients reported more staff offering opportunities for and encouraging hand hygiene. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement project demonstrates that increased hand hygiene compliance by patients can influence infection rates in an adult cardiothoracic step-down unit. The decreased infection rates and increased compliance with hand hygiene among the patients may be attributed to the implementation of patient education and the increased accessibility and use of hand sanitizer.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos/normas , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/normas , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pacientes/psicología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA