RESUMEN
This study examined the relationship between cocaine withdrawal and lifetime history of depression (major depression, dysthymia). Participants with a history of regular cocaine use (n = 146) were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID) and were asked to recall whether they experienced any of the six DSM-IV cocaine withdrawal symptoms. Results of bivariate analyses demonstrated that those meeting criteria for the cocaine withdrawal syndrome (dysphoria plus two or more other symptoms), in comparison to those who did not, were significantly (P<.001) more likely to have a lifetime history of depression. Lifetime history of depression was also more common in those individuals reporting the withdrawal symptoms of "dysphoria" (P<.001), "insomnia/hypersomnia" (P<.05), "vivid unpleasant dreams" (P<.01), and "psychomotor agitation/retardation" (P<.01). These relationships remained significant after controlling for demographics, severity of addiction, and the presence of opiate, alcohol and cannabis dependence or abuse. The withdrawal symptoms of "fatigue" and "increased appetite" were not associated with mood history. Results suggest that lifetime history of depression is strongly related to whether or not a cocaine abuser self-reports withdrawal symptoms. Several competing hypotheses regarding the nature of this relationship are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Cocaína/efectos adversos , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/psicología , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/complicacionesRESUMEN
This study examined the relationship between novelty seeking between treatment retention and among heroin dependent cocaine users. Participants were treated with buprenorphine maintenance and contingency management. The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire's (TPQ) Novelty Seeking scale was administered to 68 participants prior to buprenorphine induction. Demographics, mood and anxiety disorders, antisocial personality disorder, and substance use were also assessed. Variables with significant relationships with overall retention were entered into a logistic regression analysis. In addition, using a survival analysis, all variables with significant relationships with time to drop-out were entered into a multivariate proportional hazards regression with time dependent covariates. Results demonstrated that although high novelty seekers, in comparison to low novelty seekers, were more likely to drop-out by the end of treatment, they had higher retention rates during the early phases of treatment. It is suggested that buprenorphine and contingency management were viewed by participants as novel treatment components and thus facilitated high novelty seekers' success early in treatment. If replicated, results suggest that inclusion of novel treatment components might facilitate retention among this at-risk group.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/psicología , Conducta Exploratoria , Dependencia de Heroína/psicología , Narcóticos , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/terapia , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Dependencia de Heroína/rehabilitación , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This study targeted poly-drug (cocaine plus heroin) abstinence among buprenorphine-maintained participants with a 12-week voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) phase versus a yoked control condition. Baseline levels of cocaine and heroin use were significant predictors of treatment outcome, regardless of treatment assignment. Overall, there were no significant group differences on treatment outcome. However, among the subsample that produced one or more poly-drug-free urine results, VBRT participants had significantly increased cocaine-but not heroin and poly-drug-abstinence, although all results were in the predicted direction. Results suggest that for those who achieve poly-drug abstinence, VBRT may enhance treatment outcome. However, improved interventions, perhaps targeting single-drug abstinence, increasing reinforcement magnitude, or both, may be necessary to promote initial poly-drug abstinence in this population.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Dependencia de Heroína/rehabilitación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Pruebas Respiratorias , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/rehabilitación , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Dependencia de Heroína/complicaciones , Dependencia de Heroína/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Contingency management procedures have proven effective in the treatment of drug-dependent patients. These procedures, however, often require frequent urine testing, which is too costly for community treatment programs. To make urine-testing procedures more cost effective, the feasibility of reinforcing accurate predictions of urine drug screen (UDS) results was evaluated. Participants made extremely accurate UDS predictions, particularly when they made drug-positive predictions, regardless of whether predictions were reinforced. However, self-reports of recent drug use had poor correspondence with predictions of UDS results. Results suggested that if programs only tested samples predicted to be drug free, considerable cost savings could be incurred. Further research is needed to determine if validity would be enhanced by using a proportion of costs saved to provide nominal reinforcement when samples were verified to be drug free.