The importance of EN ISO 15189 accreditation of allergen-specific IgE determination for reliable in vitro allergy diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E detection and quantification have become an important step in allergy diagnosis and follow-up. In line with the current trend of laboratory test accreditation to international standards, we set out to design and assess an accreditation procedure for allergen-specific serum IgE. METHODS: Method validation according to the accreditation procedure under the EN ISO 15189 standard was carried out for allergen-specific immunoglobulin E determination using the fluoroimmunoenzymatic method ImmunoCAP(®) (ThermoFisher). Data were produced by 25 hospital laboratories in France. A total of 29 allergen specificities including mixes, extracts, and molecular allergens were assayed. Allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 100 kUA /l. RESULTS: Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy results fulfilled method validation criteria for automated laboratory tests and proved similar irrespective of the allergen specificity, allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E concentration, or individual laboratory. CONCLUSION: Allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E determination with the fluoroimmunoenzymatic method ImmunoCAP(®) is a highly repeatable, reproducible, and accurate method which may be considered as a single analyte assay in view of the EN ISO 15189 accreditation procedure.

Interleukin-22 binding protein (IL-22BP) is constitutively expressed by a subset of conventional dendritic cells and is strongly induced by retinoic acid.

Interleukin-22 (IL-22) is mainly produced at barrier surfaces by T cells and innate lymphoid cells and is crucial to maintain epithelial integrity. However, dysregulated IL-22 action leads to deleterious inflammation and is involved in diseases such as psoriasis, intestinal inflammation, and cancer. IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP) is a soluble inhibitory IL-22 receptor and may represent a crucial regulator of IL-22. We show both in rats and mice that, in the steady state, the main source of IL-22BP is constituted by a subset of conventional dendritic cells (DCs) in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues. In mouse intestine, IL-22BP was specifically expressed in lamina propria CD103(+)CD11b(+) DC. In humans, IL-22BP was expressed in immature monocyte-derived DC and strongly induced by retinoic acid but dramatically reduced upon maturation. Our data suggest that a subset of immature DCs may actively participate in the regulation of IL-22 activity in the gut by producing high levels of IL-22BP.

Evaluation of two antibodies against double-stranded DNA assays in discriminating between active and non-active systemic lupus erythematosus: correlation between the cut-off and the specificity.

This study aimed to evaluate, improve and compare the performances of two anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) detection kits, differing by their affinity, in discriminating between active and non-active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Eighty-two anti-nuclear antibody positive sera (45 patients) were tested by two anti-dsDNA commercial quantitative assays (Fidis™, Farrzyme™). All the patients fulfilled at least four of the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria. SLE disease activity was assessed using a modified SLEDAI to remove anti-dsDNA descriptors. When using the manufacturers' cut-offs, no difference in the frequency of positive results was found with respect to disease activity, with Fidis™. On the contrary, with Farrzyme™, a significantly higher frequency of positive sera was found in active SLE patients. Nonetheless, poor performances were observed for both tests. With thresholds defined by ROC methodology, 212IU/mL for Fidis™ (Se: 83.9%, Sp: 86.3%), and 68.8IU/mL for Farrzyme (Se: 71.0%, Sp: 96.1%), a great improvement of the accuracy of the two methods was observed. Moreover, the better specificity and pLR, obtained after optimization of the Farrzyme™ test, could also be obtained with the Fidis™ assay by using a higher threshold than that obtained after optimization of the test. We concluded that when using manufacturers' cut-offs, the two assays appeared to be of poor clinical usefulness in the determination of disease activity. A great improvement was observed using higher thresholds. Moreover, a good concordance could be observed between the two assays (κ=0.764).