Systematic Review of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Lung Oligometastases: How to Stop Worrying and Love One and Done.

Adoption of single-fraction lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with medically inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or oligometastatic lung disease, even during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, was limited despite encouraging phase II trial results. Barriers to using single-fraction SBRT may include lack of familiarity with the regimen and lack of clarity about the expected toxicity. To address these concerns, we performed a systematic review of prospective literature on single-fraction SBRT for definitive treatment of early stage and oligometastatic lung cancer. A PubMed search of prospective studies in English on single-fraction lung SBRT was conducted. A systematic review was performed of the studies that reported clinical outcomes of single-fraction SBRT in the treatment of early stage non-small-cell lung cancer and lung oligometastases. The current prospective literature including nine trials supports the use of single-fraction SBRT in the definitive treatment of early stage peripheral NSCLC and lung oligometastases. Most studies cite local control rates of >90%, mild toxicity profiles, and favorable survival outcomes. Most toxicities reported were grade 1-2, with grade ≥3 toxicity in 0-17% of patients. Prospective trial results suggest potential consideration of utilizing single-fraction SBRT beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of a Thoracic Multidisciplinary Conference on Lung Cancer Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: With the complexity of cancer treatment rising, the role of multidisciplinary conferences (MDCs) in making diagnostic and treatment decisions has become critical. This study evaluated the impact of a thoracic MDC (T-MDC) on lung cancer care quality and survival. METHODS: Lung cancer cases over 7 years were identified from the Roswell Park cancer registry system. The survival rates and treatment plans of 300 patients presented at the MDC were compared with 300 matched patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were used to define the standard of care. The compliance of care plans with NCCN guidelines was summarized using counts and percentages, with comparisons made using the Fisher exact test. Survival outcomes were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: There was improvement in median overall survival (36.9 vs 19.3 months; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (48 vs 28.1 months; P < .001) for lung cancer patients discussed at the T-MDC compared with controls. These differences were statistically significant in patients with stages III/IV disease but not in patients with stages I/II disease. The NCCN guidelines compliance rate of treatment plans improved from 80% to 94% (P < .001) after MDC discussion. MDC recommendations resulted in treatment plan changes in 123 of 300 patients (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that lung cancer patients have a survival benefit from MDC discussion compared with controls. Patients with advanced disease (stages III and IV) benefited the most. Further research is necessary to understand the precise mechanisms that drive these results.

Prior Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients who Undergo Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for a Subsequent Lung Malignancy: A Retrospective Multivariate and Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite occurring commonly, the prognoses of second early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are not well known. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of inoperable patients who underwent thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from February 2007 to April 2019. Those with previous small cell lung cancers or SBRT treatments for tumors other than NSCLC were excluded. Multivariate Cox regression and a matched pair cohort analyses evaluated the prognoses of patients undergoing definitive SBRT for a new second primary. RESULTS: Of 438 patients who underwent definitive SBRT for NSCLC, 84 had previously treated NSCLC. Univariate log-rank tests identified gender, Karnofksy performance status (KPS), prior lung cancer, anticoagulation use, and history of heart disease to correlate with overall survival (OS) (P<0.05). These factors were incorporated into a multivariate Cox regression model that demonstrated female sex (P=0.004, hazard ratio [HR]=0.68), KPS (P<0.001, HR=2.0), and prior lung cancer (P=0.049, HR=0.7) to be significantly associated with OS. A similar approach found only gender (P=0.017, HR=0.64) and tumor stage (P=0.02, HR=1.7) to correlate with relapse-free survival. To support the Cox regression analysis, propensity score matching was performed using gender, age, KPS, tumor stage, history of heart disease, and anticoagulation use. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis within the matched pairs found prior lung cancer to be associated with improved OS (P=0.011), but not relapse-free survival (P=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with initial lung cancer SBRT inoperable cases, ablative radiotherapy for new primaries was associated with improved OS. Physicians should not be dissuaded from offering SBRT to such patients.

The association of nodal upstaging with surgical approach and its impact on long-term survival after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Proponents of open thoracotomy (OPEN) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) claim its oncological superiority over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in terms of the accuracy of lymph node staging. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2014. Nodal upstaging rates were compared using a surgical approach. Overall survival adjusted for confounding variables was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 64 676 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The number of patients who underwent lobectomy by RATS, VATS and OPEN approaches was 5470 (8.5%), 17 545 (27.1%) and 41 661 (64.4%), respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes examined for each of these approaches was 10.9, 11.3 and 10 (P < 0.01) and upstaging rates were 11.2%, 11.7% and 12.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. For patients with clinical stage I disease (N = 46 826; RATS = 4338, VATS = 13 416 and OPEN = 29 072), the mean lymph nodes examined were 10.6, 10.8 and 9.4 (P < 0.01), and upstaging rates were 10.8%, 11.1% and 12.1% (P < 0.01), respectively. A multivariable analysis suggested an association with improved survival with RATS and VATS compared with OPEN surgery [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89 and 0.89, respectively; P < 0.01] for patients with all stages. In stage I disease, VATS but not RATS was associated with increased overall survival compared with the OPEN approach (HR = 0.81; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RATS lobectomy is not superior to VATS lobectomy with respect to lymph node yield or upstaging of NSCLC. Increased nodal upstaging by the OPEN approach does not confer a survival advantage in any stage of NSCLC and may be associated with decreased overall survival.

Minimally Invasive Approaches Do Not Compromise Outcomes for Pneumonectomy: A Comparison Using the National Cancer Database.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly being used for the conduct of complex surgical procedures. Whether the benefits of minimally invasive approaches compared to thoracotomy for sublobar and lobar lung resection for NSCLC are realized for patients undergoing pneumonectomy is not clear. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent pneumonectomy for NSCLC from 2010 to 2014. Case data from patients who underwent resection by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were compared with those from patients who received thoracotomy (open) in an intention-to-treat analysis. Associations between potential covariates and treatment were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic models and proportional hazards model were used to assess the effect of surgical approach on 30-day and 90-day mortality and overall survival. Relative prognosis was summarized using odds ratios and hazards ratios estimates and 95% confidence limits. RESULTS: A total of 4,938 patients underwent pneumonectomy during the study period, of which 755 (15.3%) were completed by MIS. No difference was noted in 30- and 90-day mortality rates for MIS compared to open approaches (6.8% and 12.3% versus 6.7% and 11.9%, respectively; p = 0.9 and 0.86, respectively). Tumor histology and stage characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mean number of lymph nodes examined was higher in the MIS group compared to the open thoracotomy group (17.1 ± 0.4 versus 16.1 ± 0.2, p = 0.034). The conversion rate for the MIS cohort was 36.7%. Surgical approach was not associated with any difference in perioperative mortality with univariable or multivariable analysis. MIS was associated with improved overall survival on univariable analysis, but this was not evident with multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonectomy performed by minimally invasive approaches does not compromise perioperative mortality or long-term outcomes. Further investigation into the impact of minimally invasive approaches on perioperative outcomes for whole-lung resection is warranted.

Technique of video-assisted thoracoscopic left pneumonectomy.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches to lobectomy for treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have generally been accepted to be beneficial. Experience and results for more extensive resections, including thoracoscopic pneumonectomy are limited. Here we report a case with attached videos describing key technical aspects of performing a thoracoscopic left pneumonectomy. This demonstrates the adoption of VATS for tumor pathology requiring pneumonectomy is feasible and can be done safely. Further study is needed to clarify potential advantages or drawbacks to approaching more complex tumor pathology by VATS.

Does Thoracoscopic Surgery Decrease the Morbidity of Combined Lung and Chest Wall Resection?

BACKGROUND: Because the traditional open lung approach with en bloc chest wall resection carries substantial risk for complications and death, we studied our thoracoscopic approach for this operation. METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, all consecutive video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and open chest wall resections at a comprehensive cancer center were tabulated retrospectively. Data were analyzed by approach, type, and cause of early major morbidity and mortality. Lung cancer cases (the largest subset, T3) were analyzed separately. Statistical tests included the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the χ(2) for categoric variables. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 47 chest wall resections performed, 17 (36%) were performed by VATS with no conversions. Resections were performed for primary non-small cell lung cancer (15 VATS and 16 thoracotomy), sarcoma (11), metastatic disease from a separate primary (2), and benign conditions (3). Patients undergoing a VATS approach were older (76 vs 56 years, p = 0.003), and the operative times, blood loss, and ribs resected were similar between groups. Patients undergoing VATS had shorter intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, but both groups had high hospital morbidity and mortality, largely resulting from postoperative pneumonia or respiratory systemic inflammatory response syndrome (n = 5), stroke (n = 2), and postoperative colon ischemia (n = 1). Groups had a 90-day mortality of 26.7% and 25% respectively. Stage-matched survival curves for both approaches were superimposable (p=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic chest wall resection was feasible, expanded our case selection, and reduced prosthetic reconstruction. It did not, however, protect frail, elderly patients reliably. Briefer, less traumatic operations may be needed for this cohort.

Thoracoscopic pneumonectomy: an 11-year experience.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether thoracoscopic (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]) pneumonectomy improves outcomes compared with open approaches. METHODS: One hundred seven consecutive pneumonectomies performed at an experienced center from January 2002 to December 2012 were studied retrospectively. Forty cases were open, and 50 successful VATS and 17 conversions were combined (intent-to-treat [ITT] analysis). RESULTS: The VATS cohort had more preoperative comorbidities (three vs two, P = .003), women (57% vs 30%, P = .009), and older ages (65 years vs 63 years, P = .07). Although advanced clinical stage was less for VATS (26% vs 50% stage III, P = .035), final pathologic staging was similar (25% vs 38%, P = .77). Pursuing a VATS approach yielded similar complications (two vs two, median, P = .73) with no catastrophic intraoperative events like bleeding. Successful VATS pneumonectomy rates rose from 50%-82% by the second half of the series (P < .001). Completion pneumonectomy cases (13.4% VATS, 7.5% open) had similar outcomes. Having similar initial discomforts as patients undergoing open surgery, more patients undergoing VATS were pain-free at 1 year (53% vs 19%, P = .03). Conversions resulted in longer ICU stays (4 days vs 2 days, P = .01). Advanced clinical stage (III-IV) ITT VATS had longer median overall survival (OS) (42 months vs 13 months, log-rank P = .042). Successful VATS cases with early pathologic stage (0-II) had a median OS of 80 vs 16 months for converted and 28 months for open (log rank = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Attempting thoracoscopic pneumonectomy at an experienced center appears safe but does not yield the early pain/complication reductions observed for VATS lobectomy. There may be long-term pain/survival advantages for certain stages that warrant further study and refinement of this approach.

Thoracoscopic maneuvers for chest wall resection and reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report is to describe technical maneuvers used to complete minimally invasive resections of the chest wall successfully. METHODS: Case videos of advanced thoracoscopic chest wall resections performed at a comprehensive cancer center were reviewed, as were published reports. These were analyzed for similarities and also categorized to summarize alternative approaches. RESULTS: Limited chest wall resections en bloc with lobectomy can be accomplished with port placement similar to that used for typical thoracoscopic anatomic resections, particularly when the utility incision is close to the region of excision. Generally, chest wall resection precedes lobectomy. Ribs can be transected with Gigli saws, endoscopic shears, or high-speed drills. Division of bone and overlying soft tissue can be planned precisely using thoracoscopic guidance. Isolated primary chest wall masses may require different port position and selective reconstruction using synthetic materials. Patch anchoring can be accomplished by devices that facilitate laparoscopic port site fascial closure. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic chest wall resections have been accomplished safely using tools and maneuvers summarized here. Further outcomes research is necessary to identify the benefits of thoracoscopic chest wall resection over an open approach.

Advances in lung cancer surgery.

The last few years have witnessed an explosion of the use of minimally invasive techniques for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all stages of lung Cancer. The use of these techniques has improved the risk-benefit ratio of surgery and has made it more acceptable to patients considering lung surgery. They have also facilitated the delivery of multi-modality therapy to patients with advanced lung cancer. This review article summarizes current surgical techniques that represent the "cutting edge" of thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Thoracoscopic resection and re-resection of an anterior chest wall chondrosarcoma.

The limits of thoracoscopic resections are expanding, with improved instruments for manipulating and dividing tissues such as the bone. We encountered a patient with a primary chest wall tumor that had exposure characteristics similar to our limited, but promising, experience with en bloc rib resections for primary lung cancer. A 71-year-old female patient presented with a symptomatic right meningocele, at which time a 7.7-cm left anterior mediastinal mass bulging through the second interspace was detected. With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, a modified three-incision approach similar to that for a video-assisted thorascopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy was performed but angled slightly different to expose the anterior chest wall. Using this approach, the mass was excised intact en bloc, with ribs 2 and 3 (9.5-cm total specimen with 6-cm longest rib). No chest wall reconstruction was necessary. The patient did well and had her chest tube removed on postoperative day (POD) 1, was discharged with minimal pain on POD 3, and was pain free on POD 14. Because a microscopic focus of chondrosarcoma was found at the second rib intramedullary margin on the final pathologic review, she returned for VATS re-resection of an additional 5 cm of rib on POD 43 using the same incisions, and her postoperative recovery was replicated. The operative times were 160 and 90 minutes, and blood loss was 400 and 100 mL, respectively. This case demonstrates that if traditional surgical values of exposure and oncologic safety can be replicated using enhanced instrumentation, it is reasonable to attempt more complex operations thoracoscopically. Even though ribs were removed, pain control was similar to other VATS operations.

Implementation of an Acuity Adaptable Patient Care Unit is associated with improved outcomes after major pulmonary resections.

BACKGROUND: Many centers have adapted an Acuity Adaptable Cardiothoracic Unit (AACU) to fast track cardiac surgery patients, yet few data exist on the impact of such a unit on general thoracic surgery outcomes. We examined the effects of implementing an Acuity Adaptable Cardiothoracic Unit on patients undergoing major pulmonary resections. METHODS: We reviewed data from an IRB-approved, prospective thoracic surgery database for patients during the 3-y periods pre- and post-adoption of an Acuity Adaptable Cardiothoracic Unit. As surrogate endpoints to quality and cost, we examined length of stay, place of discharge, readmission rate, and 30-d mortality during these two time periods. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients underwent major pulmonary resections (416 lobectomies, 72 pneumonectomies) in this 6-y time period. Patients cared for in the AACU model had a shorter length of stay (LOS) compared with patients in a traditional ICU/general care model. The mean and median LOS for patients in the AACU model was 4.2 ± 0.3 d and 3 d, and for the traditional ICU/general care model these were 7.8 ± 1.2 d and 5 d, respectively (P < 0.001). Relative risk of readmission was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.45, 1.66, P = 0.392) and 30-d mortality was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.68, P = 0.205) for patients in the AACU model compared with patients in the traditional ICU/general care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an Acuity Adaptable Cardiothoracic Unit is associated with reduced length of hospital stay in patients undergoing major lung resections, without increased risk of readmission or 30-d mortality. Future studies will evaluate post-operative events unique to an AACU model.