RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to describe the demands and costs from chronic pain patients over the private Brazilian healthcare system. Methods: This was a retrospective claim database study to assess the resource utilization of pain patients in the private setting. We used a four-year follow-up period to assess inpatient, outpatient, and procedures reported. Further, we promoted a forum of discussion with five pain experts and healthcare managers to address the management of chronic pain and assistance models.Results: We identified 79,689 patients with chronic pain. The orthopedist was the main medical specialist consulted with a total number of 38,879 visits performed. The ophthalmologist, cardiologist, gynecologist, and general practitioner were also frequently consulted (rheumatologist was seldom consulted). Among non-medical specialists, the physical therapist was consulted 87,574 times by 12,342 patients (15% of the entire cohort), Among chronic pain patients, 96% performed at least one exam and 86% of the patients presented at least one ER visit during the follow-up period. In 4 years, we estimate that pain patients costed more than 3 billion reais to the private health care system. According to the experts' opinions, a fragmented healthcare system and the lack of patient centered interdisciplinary approaches contributes to a high ineffective pain management leading to a high use of resources. Conclusion: There is an urgent need to change the chronic pain care model in the Brazilian private setting. Qualification in pain management, a multidisciplinary patient centered care, integrated approaches, pain centers, and patients' education may help changing this scenario.
Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi descrever as demandas e custos dos pacientes com dor crônica no sistema privado de saúde brasileiro. Métodos: Neste estudo retrospectivo do banco de dados administrativo, avaliamos a utilização de recursos de pacientes com dor no ambiente privado. Em um período de quatro anos, avaliamos internações, visitas ambulatoriais e procedimentos. Adicionalmente, promovemos um fórum de discussão com cinco especialistas em dor e gerentes de saúde para abordar o manejo da dor e os modelos de assistência. Resultados: Identificamos 79.689 pacientes com dor crônica. O ortopedista foi o principal especialista médico consultado, com 38.879 visitas realizadas. O oftalmologista, o cardiologista, o ginecologista e o clínico geral também foram consultados com frequência (o reumatologista foi raramente consultado). Entre os especialistas não médicos, o fisioterapeuta foi consultado 87.574 vezes por 12.342 pacientes (15% de toda a coorte). Entre os pacientes, 96% realizaram pelo menos um exame e 86% apresentaram pelo menos uma consulta de emergência durante o período. Em 4 anos, estimamos um custo de mais de 3 bilhões de reais para o sistema privado de saúde. De acordo com as opiniões dos especialistas, um sistema de saúde fragmentado e a falta de abordagens centradas no paciente contribuem para um manejo ineficaz da dor, resultando em um alto uso de recursos. Conclusão: Há necessidade de mudar o modelo de manejo da dor crônica no sistema privado brasileiro. Qualificação dos profissionais, atendimento multidisciplinar centrado no paciente, abordagens integradas, centros de dor e educação dos pacientes podem ajudar a mudar esse cenário.
Asunto(s)
Salud Complementaria , Dolor Crónico , Manejo del DolorRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The 100-item World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-100) evaluates quality of life as a subjective and multidimensional construct. Currently, particularly in Brazil, there are controversies concerning quality of life after sex reassignment surgery (SRS). AIM: To assess the impact of surgical interventions on quality of life of 47 Brazilian male-to-female transsexual individuals using the WHOQOL-100. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using the WHOQOL-100 and sociodemographic questions for individuals diagnosed with gender identity disorder according to criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. The protocol was used when a transsexual person entered the ambulatory clinic and at least 12 months after SRS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initially, improvement or worsening of quality of life was assessed using 6 domains and 24 facets. Subsequently, quality of life was assessed for individuals who underwent new surgical interventions and those who did not undergo these procedures 1 year after SRS. RESULTS: The participants showed significant improvement after SRS in domains II (psychological) and IV (social relationships) of the WHOQOL-100. In contrast, domains I (physical health) and III (level of independence) were significantly worse after SRS. Individuals who underwent additional surgery had a decrease in quality of life reflected in domains II and IV. During statistical analysis, all results were controlled for variations in demographic characteristics, without significant results. CONCLUSION: The WHOQOL-100 is an important instrument to evaluate the quality of life of male-to-female transsexuals during different stages of treatment. SRS promotes the improvement of psychological aspects and social relationships. However, even 1 year after SRS, male-to-female transsexuals continue to report problems in physical health and difficulty in recovering their independence.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida/psicología , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/psicología , Personas Transgénero/psicología , Transexualidad/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Disforia de Género/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the impact of sex reassignment surgery on the defense mechanisms of 32 transsexual patients at two different points in time using the Defensive Style Questionnaire. Method: The Defensive Style Questionnaire was applied to 32 patients upon their admission to the Gender Identity Disorder Program, and 12 months after they had undergone sex reassignment surgery. Results: There were changes in two defense mechanisms: anticipation and idealization. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of the mature, neurotic and immature categories. Discussion: One possible explanation for this result is the fact that the procedure does not resolve gender dysphoria, which is a core symptom in such patients. Another aspect is related to the early onset of the gender identity disorder, which determines a more regressive defensive structure in these patients. Conclusion: Sex reassignment surgery did not improve the defensive profile as measured by the Defensive Style Questionnaire.
Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da cirurgia de redesignação sexual nos mecanismos de defesa de 32 pacientes transexuais em dois momentos do estudo usando o Defensive Style Questionnaire. Método: O Defensive Style Questionnaire foi aplicado a 32 pacientes quando ingressaram no Programa de Transtorno de Identidade de Gênero e 12 meses após a cirurgia de redesignação sexual. Resultados: Houve modificações em dois mecanismos de defesa: antecipação e idealização; porém, sem mudanças significativas nos fatores maduro, neurótico e imaturo. Discussão: Uma possibilidade para esse resultado é o fato de a intervenção cirúrgica não resolver a disforia de gênero (principal sintoma desses pacientes). Outro aspecto está relacionado com o fato de o transtorno de identidade de gênero ser instalado precocemente, o que determina uma estrutura defensiva mais regressiva para esses pacientes. Conclusão: A cirurgia de redesignação sexual não foi capaz de modificar o padrão dos mecanismos de defesa medidos pelo Defensive Style Questionnaire.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mecanismos de Defensa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/psicología , Transexualidad/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of sex reassignment surgery on the defense mechanisms of 32 transsexual patients at two different points in time using the Defensive Style Questionnaire. METHOD: The Defensive Style Questionnaire was applied to 32 patients upon their admission to the Gender Identity Disorder Program, and 12 months after they had undergone sex reassignment surgery. RESULTS: There were changes in two defense mechanisms: anticipation and idealization. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of the mature, neurotic and immature categories. DISCUSSION: One possible explanation for this result is the fact that the procedure does not resolve gender dysphoria, which is a core symptom in such patients. Another aspect is related to the early onset of the gender identity disorder, which determines a more regressive defensive structure in these patients. CONCLUSION: Sex reassignment surgery did not improve the defensive profile as measured by the Defensive Style Questionnaire.
Asunto(s)
Mecanismos de Defensa , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Transexualidad/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
This study examined the impact of sex reassignment surgery on the satisfaction with sexual experience, partnerships, and relationship with family members in a cohort of Brazilian transsexual patients. A group of 19 patients who received sex reassignment between 2000 and 2004 (18 male-to-female, 1 female-to-male) after a two-year evaluation by a multidisciplinary team, and who agreed to participate in the study, completed a written questionnaire. Mean age at entry into the program was 31.21+/-8.57 years and mean schooling was 9.2+/-1.4 years. None of the patients reported regret for having undergone the surgery. Sexual experience was considered to have improved by 83.3% of the patients, and became more frequent for 64.7% of the patients. For 83.3% of the patients, sex was considered to be pleasurable with the neovagina/neopenis. In addition, 64.7% reported that initiating and maintaining a relationship had become easier. The number of patients with a partner increased from 52.6% to 73.7%. Family relationships improved in 26.3% of the cases, whereas 73.7% of the patients did not report a difference. None of the patients reported worse relationships with family members after sex reassignment. In conclusion, the overall impact of sex reassignment surgery on this cohort of patients was positive.