RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), are a key element of evaluating success after total ankle replacement (TAR), many do not explicitly state a key factor of postoperative success: is the patient satisfied with their outcome after TAR? The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients consider themselves well. This study aimed to establish the PROMIS thresholds for the PASS in a primary cohort of TAR patients. METHODS: This single-institution study included 127 primary TAR patients with preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores. At 2 years postoperatively, patients answered 2 PASS anchor questions (Satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale) with Likert-scale responses. PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from PROMIS scores using an anchor-based method. Using a bootstrapping technique with 1,000 iterations, the Youden index was calculated to determine the best specificity and sensitivity coordinates to maximize their combination. Finally, preoperative variables associated with the likelihood of achieving the PASS were assessed. RESULTS: There was a strong association between PASS thresholds and PROMIS domains, especially Pain Interference (PASS threshold of <56.0, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.940), Pain Intensity (<48.4, AUC = 0.936), and Physical Function (>44.7, AUC = 0.883). The likelihood of achieving the PASS was not affected by age, race, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, body mass index, or severity of ankle deformity. Patients with worse preoperative Physical Function and Global Mental Health scores were less likely to meet the PASS threshold for Physical Function postoperatively (p = 0.028 and 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to reach the PASS after TAR was most strongly associated with postoperative PROMIS pain scores. However, PASS thresholds were generally poorer than population means. This demonstrates that patients do not need to reach normal pain or physical function levels to have an acceptable symptom state after TAR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The literature on survivorship and outcomes after revision total ankle replacement (TAR) in the modern era is limited. This study aimed to describe the timing to revision and survivorship after revision TAR. We hypothesized that tibial-sided failures would occur earlier after the primary TAR, and secondary revisions after failure of revision TAR would occur more due to talar-sided failures than tibial-sided failures. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of TAR patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Revision TARs (defined as exchange of tibial and/or talar components) for aseptic causes with any implant were included. Etiology of failure necessitating revision and ultimate outcomes after revision (survival of TAR revision, additional revision, conversion to fusion, and below-knee amputation [BKA]) were recorded. RESULTS: There were 46 revision TARs, with mean age of 60.6 (range: 31-77) years and mean 3.5 years' follow-up postrevision. Revisions for tibial failure occurred significantly earlier (n = 22, 1.3 ± 0.5 years after index procedure) than those for talar failure (n = 19, 2.3 ± 1.7 years after index procedure) or combined tibial-talar failure (n = 5, 3.4 ± 3.4 years after index procedure) (P = .015). Revisions for tibial-only failure had better survival (95.5%) than revisions for talar or combined tibial-talar failures: 26% of talar failures and 20% of combined tibial-talar failures underwent ≥1 revisions. Of the 6 additional revisions after failure of the talar component, 1 ultimately underwent BKA, 2 were converted to total talus replacement, 2 were revised to modular augmented talar components, and 1 was treated with explant and cement spacer for PJI after the revision. CONCLUSION: TAR tibial failures occurred earlier than talar failures or combined tibial-talar failures. Revisions for talar failures and combined tibial-talar failures were more likely to require additional revision or ultimately fail revision treatment. This is important given the consequences of talar implant subsidence, bone necrosis, loss of bone stock, and limited salvage options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) represents the threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their outcome. This study aimed to define PASS thresholds for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) reconstruction using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and anchor question responses. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 109 patients who underwent flexible PCFD reconstruction, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores, and 2-year postoperative anchor question responses. ROC curve analyses were performed to quantify PASS thresholds. RESULTS: PASS thresholds for the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. Furthermore, patients with higher preoperative PROMIS PF scores or lower preoperative PROMIS PI scores had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving the PASS thresholds. CONCLUSION: In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help surgeons optimize treatment for PCFD and better manage patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Deformidades del Pie/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total ankle replacements (TARs) have rapidly advanced in terms of volume, technique, design, and indications. However, TARs are still at risk for early mechanical failure and revision. Prior studies have investigated potential risk factors for failure, but have been limited to smaller series or older implants. This study sought to identify risk factors for early mechanical failure in modern TAR. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a single-institution registry. Five surgeons contributed cases involving patients who underwent a primary TAR with any implant. Implants were grouped on the basis of the type of fixation. The primary outcome was early mechanical failure (revision with component removal for a non-infectious etiology, that is, subsidence, aseptic loosening, and/or malalignment). Logistic regression determined the effects of age, weight, hindfoot arthrodesis, implant type, and radiographic deformity on failure. RESULTS: The 731 included patients had a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. Ten percent (71 patients) had hindfoot arthrodesis. There were 33 mechanical failures (4.5%) at a mean of 1.7 years after the index surgical procedure. Our model demonstrated that hindfoot arthrodesis was associated with 2.7 times greater odds of failure (p = 0.045), every 10 kg of body weight increased the odds of tibial-sided failure by 1.29 times (p = 0.039), and implants with more extensive tibial fixation (stems or keels) lowered the odds of tibial failure by 95% (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with uncontrollable risk factors (hindfoot arthrodesis) or risk factors that may or may not be modifiable by the patient (weight), implants with more robust tibial fixation may be able to reduce the risk of early mechanical failure. Further research is warranted to support efforts to decrease early failure in TAR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis/instrumentación , Artrodesis/métodos , Artrodesis/efectos adversos , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Infinity Total Ankle Arthroplasty (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) is a low-profile fixed-bearing implant first introduced in 2014. Although the short-term survivorship (2-4 years follow-up) and complication rates of the Infinity TAA have been reported, there are limited midterm outcome reports. The aim of this study was to describe the survivorship and clinical outcomes of a single-center experience with the Infinity implant at minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review of 65 ankles that underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with the Infinity implant was conducted. Mean clinical follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 5.0-8.0). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were measured to assess tibiotalar alignment, periprosthetic lucencies, and cysts. Preoperative, 2-year, and 5-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscores were compared to assess midterm clinical outcomes. Survivorship assessment was determined by removal of 1 or both metallic implant components. RESULTS: Survivorship of the implant was 93.8% at final follow-up. There were 4 revisions: 2 for tibial implant loosening, 1 for talar loosening, and 1 for loosening of both components. Three of the 4 revisions occurred within the first 2 years following implantation, and the last failure occurred at 7 years postoperatively. There were 11 reoperations in 10 (15%) ankles and 3 wound complications. There were 17 ankles (26.2%) with radiographic abnormalities around the implants, including 14 cases with tibial component lucencies and 4 cases of periimplant cysts. FAOS outcome measurement showed general stability between 2 and 5 years and substantial improvement from preoperative status. CONCLUSION: To date this study is the largest midterm report on the Infinity total ankle prosthesis, with 65 implants at a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. We found good midterm implant survivorship, and patients experienced significant improvements in FAOS outcome scores and radiographic alignment at final follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Quistes , Prótesis Articulares , Humanos , Tobillo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia , Falla de Prótesis , Diseño de Prótesis , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As total talus replacement (TTR) grows in popularity as a salvage option for talar collapse, a critical evaluation of the complications associated with this procedure is indicated. METHODS: In this review of the literature, we present a patient report and provide a review of several complications seen after TTR, including ligamentous instability, infection, and adjacent joint osteoarthritis, which we have encountered in our practice. RESULTS: Total talus replacement has the potential to reduce pain and preserve range of motion. However, the treating surgeon must be cognizant of the variety of adverse outcomes. We have presented cases of potential devastating complications from our own clinical experience and the literature. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TTR may have utility in the properly selected patient with end-stage talar collapse, but implant composition, indications, and patient demographic variables complicate the interpretation of the literature.Levels of Evidence: Level III.
RESUMEN
Aims: The Vantage Total Ankle System is a fourth-generation low-profile fixed-bearing implant that has been available since 2016. We aimed to describe our early experience with this implant. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective review of patients who underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with a Vantage implant between November 2017 and February 2020, with a minimum of two years' follow-up. Four surgeons contributed patients. The primary outcome was reoperation and revision rate of the Vantage implant at two years. Secondary outcomes included radiological alignment, peri-implant complications, and pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes. Results: There were 168 patients (171 ankles) included with a mean follow-up of 2.81 years (2 to 4.6) and mean age of 63.0 years (SD 9.4). Of the ten ankles with implant failure (5.8%), six had loosening of the tibial component. In the remaining four failed implants, one was due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), one was due to loosening of the talar component, and two were due to loosening of both the tibial and talar components. Seven patients underwent reoperation: irrigation and debridement for superficial infection (n = 4); bone grafting for cysts (n = 2); and open reduction internal fixation (n = 1). Asymptomatic peri-implant lucency/subsidence occurred in 20.1% of ankles, with the majority involving the tibial component (n = 25). There were statistically significant improvements in PROMs in all domains. Conclusion: Short-term results of this implant demonstrate early survival comparable to the reported survivorship of similar low-profile, non-stemmed implants. Radiological lucency occurred more commonly at the tibial component, and revisions occurred primarily due to loosening of the tibial component. Further research is needed to evaluate longer-term survivorship.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses. RESULTS: All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions. CONCLUSION: FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Motivación , Humanos , Tobillo/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex pathology associated with tendon insufficiency, ligamentous failure, joint malalignment, and aberrant plantar force distribution. Existing knowledge of PCFD consists of static measurements, which provide information about structure but little about foot and ankle kinematics during gait. A model of PCFD was simulated in cadavers (sPCFD) to quantify the difference in joint kinematics and plantar pressure between the intact and sPCFD conditions during simulated stance phase of gait. METHODS: In 12 cadaveric foot and ankle specimens, the sPCFD condition was created via sectioning of the spring ligament and the medial talonavicular joint capsule followed by cyclic axial compression. Specimens were then analyzed in intact and sPCFD conditions via a robotic gait simulator, using actuators to control the extrinsic tendons and a rotating force plate underneath the specimen to mimic the stance phase of walking. Force plate position and muscle forces were optimized using a fuzzy logic iterative process to converge and simulate in vivo ground reaction forces. An 8-camera motion capture system recorded the positions of markers fixed to bones, which were then used to calculate joint kinematics, and a plantar pressure mat collected pressure distribution data. Joint kinematics and plantar pressures were compared between intact and sPCFD conditions. RESULTS: The sPCFD condition increased subtalar eversion in early, mid-, and late stance (P < .05), increased talonavicular abduction in mid- and late stance (P < .05), and increased ankle plantarflexion (P < .05), adduction (P < .05), and inversion (P < .05). The center of plantar pressure was significantly (P < .01) medialized in this model of sPCFD and simulated stance phase of gait. DISCUSSION: Subtalar and talonavicular joint kinematics and plantar pressure distribution significantly changed with the sPCFD and in the directions expected from a PCFD foot. We also found that ankle joint kinematics changed with medial and plantar drift of the talar head, indicating abnormal talar rotation. Although comparison to an in vivo PCFD foot was not performed, this sPCFD model produced changes in foot kinematics and indicates that concomitant abnormal changes may occur at the ankle joint with PCFD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study describes the dynamic kinematic and plantar pressure changes in a cadaveric model of simulated progressive collapsing foot deformity during simulated stance phase.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo , Deformidades del Pie , Humanos , Articulación del Tobillo/fisiología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Tobillo , Marcha/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total ankle replacement (TAR) often have symptomatic adjacent joint arthritis and deformity. Subtalar arthrodesis can effectively address a degenerative and/or malaligned hindfoot, but there is concern that it places abnormal stresses on the TAR and adjacent joints of the foot, potentially leading to early TAR failure. This study hypothesized that ankle and talonavicular joint kinematics would be altered after subtalar arthrodesis in the setting of TAR. METHODS: Thirteen mid-tibia cadaveric specimens with neutral alignment were tested in a robotic gait simulator. To simulate gait, each specimen was secured to a static mounting fixture about a 6-degree of freedom robotic platform, and a force plate moves relative to the stationary specimen based on standardized gait parameters. Specimens were tested sequentially in TAR and TAR with subtalar arthrodesis (TAR-STfuse). Kinematics and range of motion of the ankle and talonavicular joint were compared between TAR and TAR-STfuse. RESULTS: There were significant differences in kinematics and range of motion between TAR and TAR-STfuse groups. At the ankle joint, TAR-STfuse had less internal rotation in early-mid stance (P < .05), with decreased range of motion in the sagittal (-2.7 degrees, P = .008) and axial (-1.8 degrees, P = .002) planes in early stance, and increased range of motion in the coronal plane in middle (+1.2 degrees, P < .001) and late (+2.5 degrees, P = .012) stance. At the talonavicular joint, there were significant differences in axial and coronal kinematics in early and late stance (P < .05). Subtalar arthrodesis resulted in significantly decreased talonavicular range of motion in all planes in early and late stance (P < .003). CONCLUSION: In ankles implanted with the TAR design used in this study, kinematics of the ankle and talonavicular joint were found to be altered after subtalar arthrodesis. Aberrant motion may reflect altered contact mechanics at the prosthesis and increased stress at the bone-implant interface, and affect the progression of adjacent joint arthritis in the talonavicular joint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may provide a correlate to clinical studies that have cited hindfoot arthrodesis as a risk factor for TAR failure.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Articulación Talocalcánea , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artritis/cirugía , Artrodesis/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cadáver , Marcha , Humanos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Articulación Talocalcánea/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The dome-type osteotomy is a powerful technique for deformity correction of the limb. However, there is limited information about the utility of dome supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) in ankle joint preservation surgery. This study aimed to describe the technique and indications for dome SMO in distal tibial malalignment. METHODS: Twenty-three patients (23 ankles) who underwent dome SMO with a 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Dome SMO was indicated when there were opposing deformities in the ankle and lower limb mechanical axis (ie, varus ankle deformity with valgus lower limb alignment and vice versa) where inherent translation following conventional wedge-type osteotomies could worsen the deformity of the entire lower limb. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative ankle alignment: the varus ankle group (n = 11) and the valgus ankle group (n = 12). The radiographic correction was assessed using 6 parameters from weightbearing ankle and hindfoot alignment views. In addition, the lower limb mechanical axis was assessed with ankle center deviation (ACD) from the hip-knee (HK) line on the whole limb radiograph, and the weightbearing line (WBL) point was measured to identify changes in the weightbearing load within the ankle joint. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the varus ankle group had varus ankle deformity (tibiotalar angle [TTA], 76.5 ± 5.8 degrees) with valgus lower limb mechanical axis, whereas the valgus ankle group had valgus ankle deformity (TTA, 99.1 ± 4.5 degrees) with varus lower limb mechanical axis alignment. Postoperatively, a significant improvement in the ankle alignment and the lower limb mechanical axis was observed in both groups. The ACD significantly changed toward the HK line, suggesting an improved lower limb mechanical axis, and the WBL point showed a significant shift of the weightbearing axis toward the uninvolved area within the ankle joint. CONCLUSION: Dome SMO demonstrated a successful correction of local deformity while simultaneously realigning the hip-knee-ankle axis toward neutral. Additionally, an effective load shifting toward an uninvolved area within the ankle joint was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo , Tobillo , Tobillo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artralgia , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior , Osteotomía/métodosRESUMEN
A recently published study, "Risk of Nonunion With Nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 Inhibitors, and Opioids" by George et al (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:1230-1238), assesses whether the use of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) enzyme inhibitors, or opioids was associated with a risk of long bone fracture nonunion in Optum's deidentified private health database. This review analyzes the study, including strengths, weaknesses, and areas for future research. The study found an association between COX-2 inhibitor and opioid use with fracture nonunion but not with nonselective NSAID use. Although the literature on this topic is varied, these results are at least partially aligned with several animal studies that show COX-2 inhibitors to be associated with fracture nonunion. The George et al study design has several important limitations, indicating that further research is needed on this topic.
RESUMEN
The number of total ankle replacements (TARs) performed in the United States has dramatically increased in the past 2 decades due to improvements in implant design and surgical technique. Yet as the prevalence of TAR increases, so does the likelihood of encountering complications and the need for further surgery. Patients with new-onset or persistent pain after TAR should be approached systematically to identify the cause: infection, fracture, loosening/subsidence, cysts/osteolysis, impingement, and nerve injury. The alignment of the foot and ankle must also be reassessed, as malalignment or adjacent joint pathology can contribute to pain and failure of the implant. Novel advanced imaging techniques, including single-photon emission computed tomography and metal-subtraction magnetic resonance imaging, are useful and accurate in identifying pathology. After the foot and ankle have been evaluated, surgeons can also consider contributing factors such as pathology outside the foot/ankle (eg, in the knee or the spine). Treatment of the painful TAR is dependent on etiology and may include debridement, bone grafting, open reduction and internal fixation, realignment of the foot, revision of the implants, arthrodesis, nerve repair/reconstruction/transplantation surgery, or, in rare cases, below-knee amputation.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion or review.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Tobillo , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dolor , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Mental health diagnoses involving depression or anxiety are common and can have a dramatic effect on patients with musculoskeletal pathologies. In orthopaedics, depression/anxiety (D/A) is associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. However, few studies have assessed the effect of D/A on expectations and satisfaction in foot and ankle patients. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery were prospectively enrolled. Preoperatively, patients completed the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Expectations Survey. At 2 years postoperatively, surveys including satisfaction, improvement, and fulfillment of expectations were administered. Fulfillment of expectations (fulfillment proportion) and FAOS scores were compared between patients with D/A and non-D/A patients. RESULTS: Of 340 patients initially surveyed, 271 (80%) completed 2-year postoperative expectations surveys. One in five patients had D/A symptoms. Preoperatively, D/A patients had greater expectations of surgery (P = 0.015). After adjusting for measured confounders, the average 2-year postoperative fulfillment proportion was not significantly lower among D/A compared with non-D/A (0.86 versus 0.78, P = 0.2284). Although FAOS scores improved postoperatively for both groups, D/A patients had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores for domains of symptoms, activity, and quality of life (P < 0.05 for all). D/A patients reported less improvement (P = 0.036) and less satisfaction (P = 0.005) and were less likely willing to recommend surgery to others (P = 0.011). DISCUSSION: Patients with D/A symptoms had higher preoperative expectations of surgery. Although D/A patients had statistically similar rates of fulfillment of expectations compared with non-D/A patients, they had markedly lower FAOS scores for domains of symptoms, activity, and quality of life. D/A patients also perceived less improvement and were more often dissatisfied with their outcomes. These findings should not dissuade providers from treating these patients surgically but rather emphasize the importance of careful patient selection and preoperative expectation management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective review of prospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Motivación , Adulto , Tobillo/cirugía , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Satisfacción Personal , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various factors may affect differences between patient and surgeon expectations. This study aimed to assess associations between patient-reported physical and mental status, patient-surgeon communication, and musculoskeletal health literacy with differences in patient and surgeon expectations of foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: Two hundred two patients scheduled to undergo foot or ankle surgery at an academic hospital were enrolled. Preoperatively, patients and surgeons completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey. Patients also completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Depression, and Global Health. Patient-surgeon communication and musculoskeletal health literacy were assessed via the modified Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) and Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LiMP) questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: Greater differences in patient and surgeon overall expectations scores were associated with worse scores in Physical Function (P = .003), Pain Interference (P = .001), Pain Intensity (P = .009), Global Physical Health (P < .001), and Depression (P = .009). A greater difference in the number of expectations between patients and surgeons was associated with all of the above (P ≤ .003) and with worse Global Mental Health (P = .003). Patient perceptions of higher surgeons' partnership building were associated with a greater number of patient than surgeon expectations (P = .017). There were no associations found between musculoskeletal health literacy and differences in expectations. CONCLUSION: Worse baseline patient physical and mental status and higher patient perceptions of provider partnership building were associated with higher patient than surgeon expectations. It may be beneficial for surgeons to set more realistic expectations with patients who have greater disability and in those whom they have stronger partnerships with. Further studies are warranted to understand how modifications in patient and surgeon interactions and patient health literacy affect agreement in expectations of foot and ankle surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative series.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Tobillo/cirugía , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Alfabetización en Salud , Salud Mental , Motivación , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirujanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In response to COVID-19, American medical centers have enacted elective case restrictions, markedly affecting the training of orthopaedic residents. Residencies must develop new strategies to provide patient care while ensuring the health and continued education of trainees. We aimed to describe the evolving impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic surgery residents. METHODS: We surveyed five Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic residency programs within cities highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic about clinical and curricular changes. An online questionnaire surveyed individual resident experiences related to COVID-19. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one resident survey responses were collected. Sixty-five percent of the respondents have cared for a COVID-19-positive patient. One in three reported being unable to obtain institutionally recommended personal protective equipment during routine clinical work. All programs have discontinued elective orthopaedic cases and restructured resident rotations. Most have shifted schedules to periods of active clinical duty followed by periods of remote work and self-isolation. Didactic education has continued via videoconferencing. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has caused unprecedented changes to orthopaedic training; however, residents remain on the front lines of inpatient care. Exposures to COVID-19 are prevalent and residents have fallen ill. Programs currently use a variety of strategies to provide essential orthopaedic care. We recommend continued prioritization of resident safety and necessary training accommodations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/educación , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Ciudades , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aligning patient and surgeon expectations may improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. This study aimed to assess differences in expectations of foot and ankle surgery between patients and their surgeons. METHODS: Two hundred two patients scheduled to undergo foot or ankle surgery by one of 7 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons were enrolled. Preoperatively, patients and surgeons completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey independently. Differences between patient and surgeon overall expectations scores, number of expectations, and number of expectations with complete improvement expected were assessed. A difference of ≥10 points was considered a clinically important difference in expectations score. Associations between patient demographic and clinical characteristics, major/minor surgery, and individual surgeon with differences in expectations were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 66.3% of patients had higher expectations, 21.3% had concordant expectations, and 12.4% had lower expectations compared with their surgeons. On average, patients had higher expectations scores than their surgeons (70 ± 20 vs 52 ± 20 points, P < .001). Patients expected complete improvement in a greater number of expectations than surgeons (mean 11 ± 7 vs 1 ± 3, P < .001). Patients had higher expectations than surgeons for 18 of 23 items (78%). Items that had the greatest number of patients with higher expectations than surgeons were "improve confidence in foot/ankle," "prevent foot/ankle from getting worse," and "improve pain at rest." Higher body mass index (BMI) (P = .027) and individual surgeon (P < .001) were associated with greater differences between patient-surgeon expectations. Major/minor surgery was not associated with differences in expectations (P ≥ .142). CONCLUSION: More than two-thirds of patients had significantly higher expectations than their surgeons. Higher BMI was associated with higher patient than surgeon expectations. These results emphasize the importance for foot and ankle surgeons to adequately educate patients preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Tobillo/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Humanos , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hallux rigidus (HR) is a common pathology of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint causing pain and stiffness. However, severity of symptoms and radiographic findings are not always concordant. A novel flexibility device, which measures the mobility of the MTP joint through its arc of motion, has been validated. This study compares flexibility in patients before and after cheilectomy (with or without proximal phalanx osteotomy) for HR. METHODS: This is a single-center study of adult patients with HR who were indicated for cheilectomy or cheilectomy and Moberg (dorsiflexion closing wedge) osteotomy of the proximal phalanx based on symptoms and radiographs from 2013 to 2015. Pre- and postoperatively, patients underwent testing with a validated flexibility protocol to generate flexibility curves. Parameters included early and late flexibility, laxity torque, and laxity angle. Patients completed Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) pre- and postoperatively. Twelve operative patients underwent preoperative testing, with 9 completing postoperative testing (mean age, 53.0 years; 67% female; mean 2.8-year follow-up). RESULTS: Patients had significant improvements in early sitting and standing flexibility, sitting and standing laxity angles, standing laxity torque, and both sitting and standing maximum dorsiflexion after surgery (all P < .05). While preoperative early flexibility, laxity angle, and maximum dorsiflexion all differed significantly between patients and controls (P < .015), postoperative early flexibility was similar to controls (P > .279). FAOS scores for pain, symptoms, sport, and quality improved significantly after surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment with cheilectomy was associated with significant improvements in nearly all flexibility parameters for sitting and standing positions. However, most postoperative flexibility parameters did not improve to the level of normal controls. Regardless, patients still experienced significant improvements in outcomes. This study demonstrated that surgical correction is associated with significant biomechanical and clinical results. The flexibility device can be used in further studies to assess outcomes after other HR procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, no study has assessed fulfillment of patients' expectations after foot and ankle surgery. This study aimed to validate a method of assessing expectation fulfillment in foot/ankle patients postoperatively. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients completed the expectations survey, consisting of 23 questions for domains including pain, ambulation, daily function, exercise, and shoe wear. At 2 years postoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they received for each item cited preoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated as the amount of improvement received versus the amount of improvement expected. The FP ranges from 0 (no expectations fulfilled), to between 0 and 1 (expectations partially fulfilled), to 1 (expectations met), to greater than 1 (expectations surpassed). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the expectations survey to other outcome surveys, including Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, improvement, overall fulfillment, Delighted-Terrible scale, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 271 patients (mean age 55.4 years, mean BMI 27.5, 65% female), 34% had expectations surpassed (FP >1), 4% had expectations met, 58% had expectations partially fulfilled (FP between 0 and 1), and 5% had no expectations met. The mean FP was 0.84 ± 0.41 (range 0-3.13), indicating partially fulfilled expectations. FP correlated significantly with all outcome measures (P ≤ .007). FP was associated most closely with satisfaction (r = 0.66 [95% CI 0.57-0.75]; AUC = 0.92 [95% CI 0.88-0.96]; P < .001) and improvement (r = 0.73 [95% CI 0.64-0.81]; AUC = 0.94 [95% CI 0.91-0.96]; P < .001). Based on the associations with satisfaction and improvement outcomes, a clinically important proportion of expectations fulfilled is 0.68, with sensitivity 0.85-0.90 and specificity 0.84-0.86. CONCLUSION: The proportion of expectations fulfilled is a novel patient-centered outcome that correlated with validated outcome measures. The expectations survey may be used by surgeons to counsel patients preoperatively and also to assess patients' results postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative series.