Femoral bone mineral density reflects histologically determined cortical bone volume in hemodialysis patients.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the associations between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and histologically determined cancellous and cortical bone volume by controlling for vascular calcifications and demographic variables in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Femoral bone mineral density (f-BMD) was associated with cortical porosity. INTRODUCTION: Assessment of bone mass in chronic kidney disease patients is of clinical importance because of the association between low bone volume, fractures, and vascular calcifications. DXA is used for noninvasive assessment of bone mass whereby vertebral results reflect mainly cancellous bone and femoral results reflect mainly cortical bone. Bone histology allows direct measurements of cancellous and cortical bone volume. The present study evaluates the association between DXA and histologically determined cancellous and cortical bone volumes in HD patients. METHODS: In 38 HD patients, DXA was performed for assessment of bone mass, anterior iliac crest bone biopsies for bone volume, and multislice computed tomography for vascular calcifications. RESULTS: While lumbar bone mineral density (l-BMD) by DXA was not associated with histologically measured cancellous bone volume, coronary Agatson score showed a borderline statistically significant association (P = 0.055). When controlled for age and dialysis duration, f-BMD by DXA was associated with cortical porosity determined by histology (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of l-BMD for predicting bone volume is limited most probably because of interference by soft tissue calcifications. In contrast, f-BMD shows significant association with cortical porosity.

The five most commonly used intact parathyroid hormone assays are useful for screening but not for diagnosing bone turnover abnormalities in CKD-5 patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Assessment of bone turnover for management of renal osteodystrophy is part of routine care in chronic kidney disease Stage 5 (CKD-5) patients. Measurement of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) is the most commonly used surrogate marker for bone turnover in these patients. The current study was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of the five most commonly used iPTH assays for bone turnover. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 84 CKD-5 patients underwent bone biopsy and blood drawings for determination of iPTH and total serum alkaline phosphatase (AP). RESULTS: Histologically, patients presented with a broad range of bone turnover abnormalities as determined by activation frequency and bone formation rate/bone surface. Results of the five iPTH assays in each patient correlated but were significantly different. There were also significant differences between iPTH measurements at the same bone turnover level. Using Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative recommended iPTH ranges, all assays showed comparably poor diagnostic performance. At 80% specificity, cut-off values of the 5 iPTH assays for low bone turnover varied from 165 to 550 pg/ml and for high bone turnover from 404 to 1,003 pg/ml. Sensitivities at these cutoffs remained below acceptable standards. Addition of AP measurements to iPTH did not improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Precise assessment of bone turnover will require utilization of established and novel bone markers reflecting effects of bone turnover rather than measuring only iPTH or other effectors.

Changes in total parathyroid hormone (PTH), PTH-(1-84) and large C-PTH fragments in different stages of chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Loss of renal function is accompanied by progressive increase in serum levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There is a paucity of data regarding levels of PTH-(1-84) and its large carboxyl-terminal fragments (large C-PTH fragments) and progressive loss of kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current study was undertaken to describe the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-dependent plasma concentrations of PTH-(1-84) and related large C-PTH fragments in adult patients with CKD by using different commercially available PTH assays. METHODS: We studied 80 Caucasian patients with CKD stages 1-5 without renal replacement therapy. Creatinine clearance was calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Levels of iPTH were determined by second-generation assays (iPTH Elecsys system, Roche Diagnostics; DUO total iPTH, Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc.; iPTH, Nichols Institute Diagnostics). Third-generation assays were used to measure PTH-(1-84) (CAP (cyclase activating PTH), Scantibodies; Bio-Intact PTH, Nichols). Levels of large C-PTH fragments and ratios of PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments were calculated and statistical analyses performed. RESULTS: Levels of iPTH and PTH-(1-84) showed CKD stage-dependent increases. Variations among the assays increased with progressive loss of kidney function. The assay from Scantibodies showed a GFR-dependent decrease of the ratio 1-84 PTH / large C-PTH fragment that was not observed with the Nichols assay. CONCLUSION: Increasing variations among the assays with progression of CKD emphasize the fact that the interpretation of measurements must take into consideration the specific assay. We found evidence for a possible preferential increase of the level of large C-PTH fragments over 1-84 PTH in a CKD stage-dependent manner (Scantibodies). The clinical implications of this finding have to be further evaluated by bone biopsy studies.