Clinical evaluation of Sofia Rapid Antigen Assay for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among emergency department to hospital admissions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the Sofia SARS rapid antigen fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) to guide hospital-bed placement of patients being admitted through the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a clinical quality improvement study. SETTING: This study was conducted in 2 community hospitals in Maryland from September 21, 2020, to December 3, 2020. In total, 2,887 patients simultaneously received the Sofia SARS rapid antigen FIA and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays on admission through the ED. METHODS: Rapid antigen results and symptom assessment guided initial patient placement while confirmatory RT-PCR was pending. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the rapid antigen assay were calculated relative to RT-PCR, overall and separately for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Assay sensitivity was compared to RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. Assay turnaround times were compared. Clinical characteristics of RT-PCR-positive patients and potential exposures from false-negative antigen assays were evaluated. RESULTS: For all patients, overall agreement was 97.9%; sensitivity was 76.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-82%), and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI, 99%-100%). We detected no differences in performance between asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. As RT-PCR Ct increased, the sensitivity of the antigen assay decreased. The mean turnaround time for the antigen assay was 1.2 hours (95% CI, 1.0-1.3) and for RT-PCR it was 20.1 hours (95% CI, 18.9-40.3) (P < .001). No transmission from antigen-negative/RT-PCR-positive patients was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although not a replacement for RT-PCR for detection of all SARS-CoV-2 infections, the Sofia SARS antigen FIA has clinical utility for potential initial timely patient placement.

Clinical evaluation of Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® CMV test using nonplasma samples.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a leading cause of loss of hearing, vision, and mental retardation in congenitally infected children. It is also associated with complications of organ transplant and opportunistic HIV coinfection. The Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® CMV test is an FDA-approved test that measures CMV DNA viral load in plasma for the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of CMV-associated diseases. Besides plasma, CMV is often found in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine. Thus, monitoring of CMV for critical care of patients in these nonplasma samples becomes necessary. The objective of this study was to conduct an analytic and clinical feasibility study of the Roche CMV test in BAL, CSF, and urine. The lower limit of detection, analytic measurement range, assay sensitivity, specificity, and precision were determined. Results of this study showed that the lower limit of detections were 50, 100, and 300 IU/mL for BAL, CSF, or urine, respectively. The analytic measurement ranges were from log10 2.48 to log10 5.48. The assay specificity was 94.4% for BAL and 100% for CSF and urine. The assay precision was all within the acceptable range. The performance of Roche test was further compared with 2 comparators including the RealTime CMV assay (Abbott Molecular) and a CMV Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction test (Vela Diagnostics). There was a general positive correlation between the Roche method and the Abbott or the Vela method. Overall, this study suggests that the Roche CMV test is suitable for the quantification of CMV viral load DNA in the described nonplasma samples.