What are older people and their families looking for in an aged care services provider?

OBJECTIVE: Choosing an aged care services provider is a complex decision. This study explored the factors older people and their families consider during this decision-making process. METHODS: Four focus groups (two in rural, two in urban Queensland) included older people using and not using aged care services and family members seeking residential aged care services. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the analysis of participants' perspectives, with human needs (such as autonomy, caring, respect, certainty) and organisational values (such as person-centredness) viewed as most important. Costs, value for money and regulatory considerations were sometimes perceived to be more important than locality. The perceived significance of facilities, services and amenity needs differed according to age and time of life, although a clear pathway to residential aged care facilities from living in the community was desired. Finding information, planning and choosing providers was seen to be hindered by lack of accessible, quality information. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting human needs (such as autonomy, caring, respect, certainty) through organisational values (such as person-centredness) is the most desirable factor according to the perceptions of older people and their families when choosing an aged care services provider.

Current practice for genetic counselling by nurses: An integrative review.

AIM: To examine current practice of genetic counselling by nurses. BACKGROUND: Recent debate argues that genetic counselling is a specialist advanced practice role, whilst others argue it is the role of all nurses. Current evidence is required to determine if genetic counselling could be included in all nurses' scope of practice. DESIGN: Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES: A search of electronic databases (CINHAL, Medline, PubMed, Scopus), and reference lists published between January 2012 and March 2017, was undertaken. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were critically appraised for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Data from each study were extracted and categorized according to their primary findings. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met in 10 studies. Main findings were identified: role of genetic counselling, current knowledge, need for further education, and client satisfaction with nurse genetic counsellors. CONCLUSION: This paper concludes that some nurses do engage in genetic counselling, but how they engage is not consistent, nor is there consensus about what should be the scope of practice. Further investigation into credentialing, role recognition support and education for nurse genetic counselling are strongly recommended. As nurses are widely available, nurses can make a significant contribution to supporting those affected by genetic problems.