Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 269(12): 2575-80, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22707319

RESUMEN

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPR) are both common health problems causing severe morbidity. Since they have similar risk factors, the prevalence of LPR among patients with OSAS is higher compared with general population. However, there exist only a few studies showing the potential causal relation between LPR and OSAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the coexistence between OSAS and LPR and to determine whether the therapy of OSAS alters LPR parameters and vice versa. In this study, 44 patients underwent double probed 24 h pH monitoring simultaneously with polysomnography due to the complaints of obstructive sleep apnea and reflux. Twenty of those 44 patients were diagnosed with both OSAS and LPR. Among those patients, 10 patients with mild to moderate OSAS were given only LPR treatment for 3 months. The remaining 10 patients who had severe OSAS underwent CPAP treatment for 3 months. After the end of treatment, all patients were reevaluated with double probed 24 h pH monitoring simultaneously with PSG. Moreover, the patients were evaluated subjectively by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), snoring Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). The results of this study revealed that OSAS and LPR coexist frequently. LPR treatment did not improve the polysomnographic parameters, but significantly reduced ESS and snoring VAS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007, respectively). Although the CPAP treatment significantly improved subjective parameters of reflux, such as RSI and RFS (p = 0.016 for both), there was no significant improvement in objective parameters of 24-h pH monitoring. We concluded that since there is a high frequency of coexistence between LPR and OSAS, all patients with OSAS should also be queried for LPR symptoms. In addition, more in-depth and comprehensive research is required to elucidate the association between OSAS and LPR.


Asunto(s)
Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/terapia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Adulto , Monitorización del pH Esofágico , Femenino , Humanos , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisomnografía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones
3.
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol ; 15(2-4): 225-9, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9216811

RESUMEN

Lip, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal cancer are among the most common forms of the disease in the world. These types of cancer display significant geographic, ethnic, and socioeconomic variations. We examined the cases of cancer of the lip, oral cavity, and oropharynx diagnosed in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Uludag School of Medicine during the last 5 years, July 1990 to June 1995, and recorded the epidemiological features of these tumors. The Department of Otolaryngology treated a total of 26,225 in- and outpatients during the 5-year period. 320 of these patients (1.2%) were seen for head and neck cancer. 42 of the 320 patients (13.1%) were diagnosed with cancer of the lip, oral cavity, and oropharrynx. After the larynx, this was the second most frequent location of malignant head and neck tumors. We discovered the following epidemiological and pathological features: (1) The incident rate was highest in patients between 41 and 60 years of age. (2) 70% of the patients were male, and 76% of them had a history of tobacco/alcohol use. (3) Occupation had no apparent relevance (four of the patients were farmers). (4) Approximately one third of the patients had undergone medical therapy prior to diagnosis. (5) One third of the patients had initially seen a dentist for treatment, and approximately half had poor dental and oral hygiene. (6) The most frequent symptom was ulceration. (7) Histopathological examination revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 88% of the cases. (8) The cancer was localized to the lip in 31% of cases, oral cavity, 50%, and oropharynx, 19%. (9) Almost half of the cancer cases were diagnosed in advanced stage (stages III and IV).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Boca/epidemiología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias de los Labios/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Labios/patología , Masculino , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ocupaciones , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA