Intravenous immunoglobulin in heart transplant recipients with mild to moderate hypogammaglobulinemia and infection.

BACKGROUND: Hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) is a complication of solid organ transplantation leading to increased risk of infections. Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) replacement in patients with HGG may be able to reduce risk and morbidity associated with infection; however, there is scarce data about IVIG in mild to moderate HGG (IgG 400-700 mg/dl) and heart transplant recipients. METHODS: A single center, retrospective study was performed in heart transplant recipients with mild (IgG 500-700 mg/dl) to moderate (IgG 400-499 mg/dl) HGG in the presence of an infection. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included in this study; 19 patients (45.2%) received IVIG and 23 (54.8%) patients did not. Patients in the IVIG group received on average one dose of IVIG at 0.5 g/kg. No differences in incidence of new infection at 3 months (26.3% vs. 17.4%; P = .71) and 6 months (42.1% vs. 34.8%; P = .63) were observed between the IVIG and non-IVIG groups. Infections based on mild or moderate HGG also had no differences at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a single infusion of IVIG in mild to moderate HGG may have little to no benefit in reducing incidence of new infections. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Anti-peptidylarginine deiminase-4 antibodies at mucosal sites can activate peptidylarginine deiminase-4 enzyme activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal sites are hypothesized to play a role in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since serum anti-peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD)4 antibodies, including a subset that cross-react with PAD3 (PAD3/4), are specific for RA and associate with severe disease, we sought to examine whether anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4 antibodies were present in the lung and oral mucosa of subjects with RA and "at-risk" for RA. METHODS: We included 37 RA, 25 healthy control, and 46 subjects "at-risk" for RA based on familial RA and/or serum anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity. Paired serum, sputum, and saliva were evaluated for anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4 using immunoprecipitation and ACPA using ELISA. Immunoglobulins (Ig) were purified from representative samples, and their effect on citrullination of histone H3 by recombinant human PAD4 was measured by anti-citH3 immunoblot. RESULTS: Anti-PAD4 antibodies were detected in the serum of 6/37 (16.2%), sputum of 3/37 (8.1%), and saliva of 3/33 (9.1%) RA subjects and in the serum and sputum of 1/46 (2.2%) at-risk subjects. None of the healthy controls had anti-PAD4 antibodies at any site. Serum, sputum, and salivary anti-PAD4 antibodies were more prevalent in RA subjects with RA duration >2 years. Purified antibodies from representative anti-PAD4-positive and anti-PAD3/4-positive sputum were primarily of the IgA isotype and able to increase PAD4 enzymatic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PAD4 antibodies are present in the sputum and saliva of a portion of RA patients and are infrequent in at-risk subjects. Importantly, the ability of anti-PAD4, and particularly anti-PAD3/4, antibodies in the sputum to enhance PAD4 enzymatic activity suggests that anti-PAD4 may play an active role in the RA lung.

Patient-reported outcomes in light of supportive medications in treatment-naïve lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The impact of supportive medications on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been systematically evaluated. We describe the supportive medications used by treatment-naïve lung cancer patients and assess their association with PROs from MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). METHODS: Treatment-naïve lung cancer patients who completed PROs from MDASI at the initial visit to MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Medications from the initial visit were abstracted from the electronic medical records system and categorized into therapeutic classes based on U.S. Pharmacopeia v7.0. A chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test was conducted as appropriate. RESULTS: Among 459 patients, ~ 50% took any analgesics and 25% were on opioids. One-third of patients with moderate-severe pain were not on any analgesics. Patients taking opioids had significantly worse median pain scores (6 vs. 0) compared with those not taking any analgesics (p < 0.0001). Higher proportion of patients with moderate-severe pain took opioids compared with those with mild pain (52% vs. 16%, p < 0.0001). Patients on opioids also reported significantly worse scores for five other cancer-specific core symptoms and all six symptoms rating interference with daily life. Only 15% of patients with higher composite score for depression-related symptoms were on antidepressants. However, patients taking antidepressants did not significantly differ in any individual MDASI symptom scores compared with those not on antidepressants (p = 0.4858). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a need for better screening for pain and depression and optimization of pain management in treatment-naïve lung cancer patients since their poor functional status may result in suboptimal cancer therapy.