A comparison of ultrasound-guided aspiration with open surgical drainage in the management of pediatric acute suppurative cervical lymphadenitis.

OBJECTIVES: Image-guided aspiration has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional open drainage in acute suppurative cervical lymphadenitis, although little evidence comparing these approaches exists. The aim of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided aspiration and open surgical drainage in the management of pediatric acute suppurative cervical lymphadenitis. METHODS: Patients treated for acute suppurative cervical lymphadenitis at a tertiary referral pediatric hospital over a three-year period were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of eighteen patients included, 9 (50 %) underwent aspiration and 9 (50 %) underwent open surgical drainage. None required repeat intervention or readmission over a median follow up of 10.5 weeks. Those undergoing aspiration had a shorter post-operative length of stay (1.67 vs 4.33 days, p = 0.001) compared with open surgical drainage. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided aspiration of pediatric acute suppurative cervical lymphadenitis is a safe and effective alternative to open drainage.

How to apply evidence-based practice to the use of artificial intelligence in radiology (EBRAI) using the data algorithm training output (DATO) method.

OBJECTIVE: As the number of radiology artificial intelligence (AI) papers increases, there are new challenges for reviewing the AI literature as well as differences to be aware of, for those familiar with the clinical radiology literature. We aim to introduce a tool to aid in this process. METHODS: In evidence-based practise (EBP), you must Ask, Search, Appraise, Apply and Evaluate to come to an evidence-based decision. The bottom-up evidence-based radiology (EBR) method allows for a systematic way of choosing the correct radiological investigation or treatment. Just as the population intervention comparison outcome (PICO) method is an established means of asking an answerable question; herein, we introduce the data algorithm training output (DATO) method to complement PICO by considering Data, Algorithm, Training and Output in the use of AI to answer the question. RESULTS: We illustrate the DATO method with a worked example concerning bone age assessment from skeletal radiographs. After a systematic search, 17 bone age estimation papers (5 of which externally validated their results) were appraised. The paper with the best DATO metrics found that an ensemble model combining uncorrelated, high performing simple models should achieve error rates comparable to human performance. CONCLUSION: Considering DATO in the application of EBR to AI is a simple systematic approach to this potentially daunting subject. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The growth of AI in radiology means that radiologists and related professionals now need to be able to review not only clinical radiological literature but also research using AI methods. Considering Data, Algorithm, Training and Output in the application of EBR to AI is a simple systematic approach to this potentially daunting subject.

Abdominal radiography is not necessary in children with intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Children with intussusception require rapid and accurate diagnosis to enable timely intervention for satisfactory outcome. Ultrasonography is the recommended standard diagnostic modality; however, abdominal radiography (AR) is still used as an initial investigation. The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of AR in intussusception by determining diagnostic accuracy and analysing correlation of AR findings with outcome. METHODS: Index cases of intussusception presenting over 15 years (1998-2013) were analysed. Those who had AR performed were allocated into groups with positive or normal findings. Outcome of pneumatic reduction of intussusception (PRI) between these groups was compared. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-four cases of intussusception treated with PRI were identified, 412 (64 %) had AR performed and 232 (36 %) did not. 303 (74 %) radiographs had positive findings and 109 (26 %) were normal. The success rate of PRI did not differ between AR positive (82 %) and AR normal (84 %). Occult pneumoperitoneum was not detected in any patient by AR in our cohort. CONCLUSION: AR is not recommended for the diagnosis of intussusception in children, for the prediction of the outcome of PRI or for the detection of occult pneumoperitoneum. AR should always be performed when clinical peritonism is present but is not otherwise necessary in children with suspected or confirmed intussusception.