Molecular portraits of clear cell ovarian and endometrial carcinoma with comparison to clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced clear cell gynecologic malignancies remain among the most challenging diseases to manage. We evaluated ovarian and endometrial clear cell carcinoma (OCCC and ECCC) specimens using comprehensive sequencing technology to identify mutational targets and compared their molecular profiles to histologically similar clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), fragment analysis (FA), and in situ hybridization (ISH), 164 OCCC, 75 ECCC and 234 ccRCC specimens from 2015 to 2018 were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The highest mutation rates in ECCC and OCCC were noted in: ARID1A (75.0%, 87.5%), TP53 (34.8%, 11.1%), PIK3CA (25.0%, 46.8%), PPP2R1A (8.7%, 16.7%), MSI-high (8.8%, 6.4%) and PTEN (8.3%, 7.1%). Among these mutations, there was no significant difference between OCCC and ECCC mutation prevalence except in TP53, with higher mutation rates in ECCC versus OCCC (34.8 vs. 11.1%, respectively, p < 0.05). ccRCC demonstrated different mutation profiles with higher mutation rates in VHL (80.3%), PBRM1 (43.9%), SETD2 (31.1%), and KDM5C (29.2%). By contrast, VHL, PBRM1, and SETD2 mutations were not found in ECCC and OCCC (0.0%). Compared to ccRCC and ECCC, OCCC was found to have a significantly higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (19.1%). CONCLUSION: Gynecologic and renal CCC demonstrate separate and disparate somatic profiles. However, OCCC and ECCC are diseases with similar profiles. TMB and MSI analyses indicate that a subset of OCCC may benefit from immunotherapy. Prospective clinical trials are needed and are underway to examine targeted therapies in these gynecologic disease subtypes.

Genomic profiling in low grade serous ovarian cancer: Identification of novel markers for disease diagnosis and therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Low grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) differs from high grade serous in terms of pathogenesis, molecular, genetic, and clinical features. Molecular studies have been hampered by small sample sizes, heterogenous histology, and lack of comprehensive testing. We sought to molecularly profile LGSOC in a homogenously tested, histologically confirmed cohort. METHODS: Using hot-spot and whole exome next generation sequencing (NGS), fusion gene analysis interrogating RNA, fragment analysis, in situ hybridization and/or immunohistochemistry, 179 specimens were evaluated by Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). A second independent histologic review confirmed histology in 153 specimens. RESULTS: Most frequently mutated genes (5% or greater) were members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: KRAS (23.7%, n = 36), NRAS (11.2%, n = 19), NF1 (7.9%, n = 5), and BRAF (6.6%, n = 10). Class III mutations were seen in 3 of 10 BRAF mutations while 7 were Class I V600E. Overall, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression was 80.2% (n = 130) and 27.8% (n = 45), respectively. Of those that were hormone negative, nearly 50% contained KRAS or NF1 mutations. None were NRAS mutated. Markers of response to immunotherapy were low to absent. CONCLUSION: BRAF mutations were seen to be lower than those traditionally reported. With increased MAPK activation resulting in ligand independent activation of ERα, a role of combination therapy with hormonal and targeted therapy should be considered as 49.2% of hormone negative specimens were KRAS or NF1 mutated. Absence of immunotherapy biomarkers suggest limited benefit to immunotherapeutic agents.