Population-based study of factors associated with severe paediatric drowning events in Maryland.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric drowning is an injury associated with significant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe drowning trends, including associations with inpatient hospitalisation or fatality, in a state-wide paediatric cohort to inform prevention strategies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study using the Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify patients aged 0-19 years with an outpatient (including emergency department) or inpatient medical encounter following a non-fatal or fatal drowning event between 2016 and 2019. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to summarise the data and evaluate associations with inpatient hospitalisation or fatality. RESULTS: There were 541 medical encounters for drowning events, including 483 non-fatal outpatient encounters, 42 non-fatal inpatient encounters and 16 fatal cases. Overall, most patients were boys, 0-4 years, white and lived in urban settings. White children accounted for 66% of encounters among those aged 0-4 years, whereas non-white children accounted for 62% of visits among those aged 10-19 years. Non-white children were more likely than white children to experience a fatal drowning (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.2 to 11.5). Adolescents were more likely than younger children to be hospitalised (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.6 to 6.5) and had higher charges in outpatient (p=0.002) and inpatient settings (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: Our study revealed high fatality rates among non-white children and high admission rates among adolescents.

A Study of Households with Children and Firearms in Baltimore, Maryland.

Firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the US. Safe storage of firearms in the home is one of the most effective ways of preventing firearm injuries in children. This feasibility study was conducted in both the pediatric and general Emergency Departments of a large urban academic medical center in a community with high rates of firearm injuries in children. The objective was to pilot a survey seeking to describe sociodemographic characteristics, firearm specific risk factors, and firearm storage practices of households with children in the community. One hundred participants completed a survey containing items regarding participant demographics, household features, firearm ownership, firearm characteristics, and storage practices. Descriptive statistics were used to define sociodemographic characteristics of the enrolled population, comparing those with firearms to those without, and to describe firearms and storage practices of firearm owners in households with children. Of 100 participants, 30 lived in households with firearms and children. Most firearms in homes with children were stored locked and unloaded most of the time; however, 30% of participants with firearms and children in the home reported not consistently storing a firearm locked and unloaded. The most common reason given for not storing a firearm in the safest manner possible was that storing a firearm locked and unloaded would make it difficult to access quickly. Engaging families with children in discussions around firearm prevention during Emergency Department visits is feasible and may have implications for future efforts to promote safe firearm storage practices.

Documentation of Trauma-Informed Care Elements for Young People Hospitalized After Assault Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Violent traumatic injury, including firearm violence, can adversely impact individual and community health. Trauma-informed care (TIC) can promote resilience and prevent future violence in patients who have experienced trauma. However, few protocols exist to facilitate implementation of TIC for patients who survive traumatic injury. The purpose of the study is to characterize documentation of TIC practices and identify opportunities for intervention in a single academic quaternary care center. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review analyzing the documentation of trauma-informed elements in the electronic medical record of a random sample of youth patients (ages 12-23) admitted for assault trauma to the pediatric (n = 50) and adult trauma (n = 200) services between 2016 and mid-2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics, and documentation of trauma-informed elements. Chi-square analyses were performed to compare pediatric and adult trauma services. RESULTS: Among pediatric and adult assault trauma patients, 36.0% and 80.5% were hospitalized for firearm injury, respectively. More patients admitted to the pediatric trauma service (96%) had at least one trauma-informed element documented than patients admitted to the adult service (82.5%). Social workers were the most likely clinicians to document a trauma-informed element. Pain assessment and social support were most frequently documented. Safety assessments for suicidal ideation, retaliatory violence, and access to a firearm were rarely documented. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight opportunities to develop trauma-informed interventions for youth admitted for assault trauma. Standardized TIC documentation could be used to assess risk of violent reinjury and mitigate sequelae of trauma.

Pediatric Residents' Outpatient Firearm Screening and Safety Counseling Practices (Or Lack Thereof): A Retrospective Chart Review.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children and adolescents be universally screened for access to firearms and exposure to violence. The purpose of this study was to characterize how often pediatric residents at one institution document screening for firearm access and violence risk factors and provide risk reduction counseling in the primary care setting. A retrospective chart review was conducted at two primary care clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, for patient ages 10 to 25 years who were seen by resident physicians for well care between October 2019 and December 2020. We reviewed 169 patients' charts meeting the inclusion criteria. Forty (24%) patients had a documented history of exposure to violence or history of suicidal ideation. Based on resident documentation, one (<1%) patient was screened for firearm access or exposure to firearm violence and 10 (6%) were provided risk reduction counseling or any type of firearm safety counseling. Pediatric resident physicians at our institution rarely screen for firearm access or provide violence prevention counseling in the primary care setting. Targeted interventions and quality improvement projects are needed to address screening barriers and design novel interventions to overcome these barriers.

Disparities in Patient Safety Voluntary Event Reporting: A Scoping Review.

Voluntary event reporting (VER) systems underestimate the incidence of safety events and often capture only serious events. A limited amount of data is collected through these systems, and they may be inadequate to characterize disparities in reported safety events. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to summarize the state of the evidence as it relates to differences in safety events and safety event reporting by age, gender, and race. Using a broad-based query, a systematic search for published, peer-reviewed literature that discusses patient safety event reporting and differences by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status was conducted. Based on modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 283 studies underwent title and abstract review, yielding 56 studies for full text review. After full text review, 23 studies were carefully reviewed individually, grouped thematically, and summarized to highlight the most pertinent findings. The studies reviewed yielded important insights, particularly with regard to race, gender, and the ways events are identified. Patients from minoritized groups may be less likely to have events reported and more likely to suffer serious events. Some studies found differences in rates of reporting safety events for female vs. male providers. The rate of VER is consistently lower than the rate of events identified through identified using automated detection. The current literature describing VER data shows disparities by race, language, age, and gender for patients and providers. Further research and systematic change are needed to specifically study these disparities to guide health care institutions on ways to mitigate bias and deliver more equitable care.

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of drowning patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department from 2017 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Drowning is a common mechanism of injury in the pediatric population that often requires hospitalization. The primary objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of pediatric drowning patients evaluated in a pediatric emergency department (PED), including the clinical interventions and outcomes of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric patients evaluated in a mid-Atlantic urban pediatric emergency department from January 2017 to December 2020 after a drowning event. RESULTS: Eighty patients ages 0-18 were identified, representing 57 79 unintentional events and 1 intentional self-injury event. The majority of patients (50%) were 1-4 years of age. The majority (65%) of patients 4 years of age or younger were White, whereas racial/ethnic minority patients accounted for the majority (73%) of patients 5 years of age or older. Most drowning events (74%) occurred in a pool, on Friday through Saturday (66%) and during the summer (73%). Oxygen was used in 54% of admitted patients and only in 9% of discharged patients. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 74% of admitted patients and 33% of discharged patients. CONCLUSIONS: Drowning can be an intentional or unintentional source of injury in pediatric patients. Among the patients who presented to the emergency department for drowning, more than half received CPR and/or were admitted, suggesting high acuity and severity of these events. In this study population, outdoor pools, summer season and weekends are potential high yield targets for drowning prevention efforts.

Assessing the effect of COVID-19 stay-at -home orders on firearm injury in Maryland.

This study sought to characterize frequency and demographic characteristics of firearm injury and penetrating trauma in Maryland over the first year of the pandemic, by comparing these characteristics to those of the three years prior to stay-at-home order issuance. Patients were identified in the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database using ICD-10 codes for firearm injury by all intents and assaults by penetrating trauma. Cases from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2020 ("pre-stay-at-home") were compared to those from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 ("post-stay-at-home") using descriptive statistics. There was no significant change overall in frequency or demographics of firearm injury or penetrating trauma in the year after stay-at-home orders were issued. Youth between ages 15 and 24, overwhelmingly male, comprise a disproportionately high percentage of firearm injuries and assaults, and most penetrating trauma occurs in urban environments where Black non-Hispanic youth and children of low socioeconomic status are at high risk. Our study also found unintentional firearm injury among adults was significantly increased during the pandemic. While increased unintentional firearm injury among adults was the major significant change found in our study, the persistence of firearm injury, particularly in youth, racial and ethnic minority groups, and those in urban environments, should be deeply concerning. Stay-at-home policies did not keep youth safer from firearm injury. With continued high rates of firearm injury and the national debate over how to prevent these incidents, increased education and comprehensive strategies for prevention are needed.

The 5 A's of firearm safety counseling: Validating a clinical counseling methodology for firearms in a simulation-based randomized controlled trial.

The 5 A's of Firearm Safety Counseling is a novel framework by which clinicians can approach firearm injury prevention counseling. To evaluate this methodology as a tool for clinicians, a single-center, simulation-based randomized controlled trial was performed with clinical trainees in psychiatry, medicine, and pediatrics in an urban quaternary care center. Participants received didactic education on firearm injury epidemiology and evidence-based policies and training on a specific counseling framework, the 5 A's of Firearm Safety Counseling which they then implemented in a simulation setting with standardized patients. Of the 29 participants who were randomized, 28 completed the trial. Most participants were psychiatry trainees (residents or subspecialty fellows). While over 60% of participants were uncomfortable or extremely uncomfortable counseling on firearm injury prior to the interventions, only 4% reported being uncomfortable after receiving education and participating in simulated encounters. There was no significant difference between the quality and content of the counseling provided before and after the didactic-only session. There was a significant difference between the quality and content of the counseling provided before and after the specific training on the 5 A's for Firearm Safety Counseling strategy. The 5 A's for Firearm Safety Counseling is a promising educational tool to improve quality, content, and comfort delivering patient-centered counseling on firearm injury prevention in a simulation-based setting. These findings suggest that further validation in a clinical setting is warranted given there is an urgent need for feasible and effective firearm injury prevention strategies among clinicians.

Consensus-Driven Priorities for Firearm Injury Education Among Medical Professionals.

PURPOSE: Firearm injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, many medical professionals currently receive minimal or no education on firearm injury or its prevention. The authors sought to convene a diverse group of national experts in firearm injury epidemiology, injury prevention, and medical education to develop consensus on priorities to inform the creation of learning objectives and curricula for firearm injury education for medical professionals. METHOD: In 2019, the authors convened an advisory group that was geographically, demographically, and professionally diverse, composed of 33 clinicians, researchers, and educators from across the United States. They used the nominal group technique to achieve consensus on priorities for health professions education on firearm injury. The process involved an initial idea-generating phase, followed by a round-robin sharing of ideas and further idea generation, facilitated discussion and clarification, and the ranking of ideas to generate a prioritized list. RESULTS: This report provides the first national consensus guidelines on firearm injury education for medical professionals. These priorities include a set of crosscutting, basic, and advanced learning objectives applicable to all contexts of firearm injury and all medical disciplines, specialties, and levels of training. They focus on 7 contextual categories that had previously been identified in the literature: 1 category of general priorities applicable to all contexts and 6 categories of specific contexts, including intimate partner violence, mass violence, officer-involved shootings, peer (nonpartner) violence, suicide, and unintentional injury. CONCLUSIONS: Robust, data- and consensus-driven priorities for health professions education on firearm injury create a pathway to clinician competence and self-efficacy. With an improved foundation for curriculum development and educational program-building, clinicians will be better informed to engage in a host of firearm injury prevention initiatives both at the bedside and in their communities.

Diagnostic Stewardship of Endotracheal Aspirate Cultures in a PICU.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly obtain endotracheal aspirate cultures (EACs) in the evaluation of suspected ventilator-associated infections. However, bacterial growth in EACs does not distinguish bacterial colonization from infection and may lead to overtreatment with antibiotics. We describe the development and impact of a clinical decision support algorithm to standardize the use of EACs from ventilated PICU patients. METHODS: We monitored EAC use using a statistical process control chart. We compared the rate of EACs using Poisson regression and a quasi-experimental interrupted time series model and assessed clinical outcomes 1 year before and after introduction of the algorithm. RESULTS: In the preintervention year, there were 557 EACs over 5092 ventilator days; after introduction of the algorithm, there were 234 EACs over 3654 ventilator days (an incident rate of 10.9 vs 6.5 per 100 ventilator days). There was a 41% decrease in the monthly rate of EACs (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.67; P < .001). The interrupted time series model revealed a preexisting 2% decline in the monthly culture rate (IRR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-1.0; P = .01), immediate 44% drop (IRR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.70; P = .02), and stable rate in the postintervention year (IRR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.07; P = .09). In-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, 7-day readmissions, and All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Group severity and mortality scores were stable. The estimated direct cost savings was $26 000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical decision support algorithm standardizing EAC obtainment from ventilated PICU patients was associated with a sustained decline in the rate of EACs, without changes in mortality, readmissions, or length of stay.

Firearm Suicide Among Veterans of the U.S. Military: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, firearm suicide represents a major cause of preventable, premature death among veterans. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the body of literature on veteran firearm suicide and identify areas for future research, which may facilitate the development of firearm suicide interventions in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and non-Veterans Health Administration clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, naturalistic, observational, and case study designs published between January 1, 1990 and February 21, 2019 were included in our review. Following title and abstract review, 65 papers were included in our full-text review and 37 studies were included in our analysis. We based our approach on a modification of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were grouped into broad, nonmutually exclusive categories: (1) heterogeneity of datasets and veteran status determination for inclusion, (2) service histories, (3) firearm ownership, storage, behaviors, and risk perceptions, (4) patient and clinician attitudes toward firearm restriction interventions, (5) firearm suicide risk factors by study population, and (6) assessments of clinical firearm interventions. RESULTS: This body of literature consists predominately of cross-sectional studies with mixed definitions and validation of veteran status, which revealed high concordance of increased risk of firearm suicide compared with nonveterans. Veterans have higher rates of firearm ownership than the general population, primarily citing personal protection as the reason for gun ownership. Veterans often exhibit risky firearm usage and storage behaviors but tend to favor measures that limit access to firearms by at-risk individuals. Despite this, there remains persistent hesitation among clinicians to screen and counsel veterans on firearm safety. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights an urgent need to produce higher quality evidence and new data with standard definitions that are critical to inform clinical practice and enhance public health measures to reduce firearm suicide among veterans.

Stay-at-home orders and firearms in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Firearms are a leading cause of death and injury in the United States, and this trend has continued during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to identify whether states designated gun retailers as essential businesses in their stay-at-home orders and characterize other references that could affect firearm acquisition during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional policy review, we assessed stay-at-home orders issued in March or April 2020. Orders were reviewed in their entirety, and any reference to firearms, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, or other relevant elements was documented. Forty-three states and the District of Columbia issued stay-at-home orders. Most considered federal firearm licensees to be among essential businesses or made provisions for them to remain open during widespread business closures. Others referenced the US Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) advisory memorandum on essential critical infrastructure workers which named workers supporting firearm manufacturing and retail among essential workers. Therefore, stay-at-home orders issued in most states included provisions for firearms retailers to remain open, at least in some capacity. Only four states and the District of Columbia did not include federal firearms licensees among essential businesses or include provisions for them to be open. Meanwhile, an all-time high in firearm background checks indicates firearm sales have markedly increased. Given the associations between firearm access and injury risk, the effects of continued firearm access facilitated by these orders should be the focus of future research.

How good is our diagnostic intuition? Clinician prediction of bacteremia in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Clinical intuition and nonanalytic reasoning play a major role in clinical hypothesis generation; however, clinicians' intuition about whether a critically ill child is bacteremic has not been explored. We endeavored to assess pediatric critical care clinicians' ability to predict bacteremia and to evaluate what affected the accuracy of those predictions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of clinicians' responses to a sepsis screening tool ("Early Sepsis Detection Tool" or "ESDT") over 6 months. The ESDT was completed during the initial evaluation of a possible sepsis episode. If a culture was ordered, they were asked to predict if the culture would be positive or negative. Culture results were compared to predictions for each episode as well as vital signs and laboratory data from the preceding 24 h. RESULTS: From January to July 2017, 266 ESDTs were completed. Of the 135 blood culture episodes, 15% of cultures were positive. Clinicians correctly predicted patients with bacteremia in 82% of cases, but the positive predictive value was just 28% as there was a tendency to overestimate the presence of bacteremia. The negative predictive value was 96%. The presence of bandemia, thrombocytopenia, and abnormal CRP were associated with increased likelihood of correct positive prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are accurate in predicting critically ill children whose blood cultures, obtained for symptoms of sepsis, will be negative. Clinicians frequently overestimate the presence of bacteremia. The combination of evidence-based practice guidelines and bedside judgment should be leveraged to optimize diagnosis of bacteremia.

Critical care resource use, cost, and mortality associated with firearm-related injuries in US children's hospitals.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To assess trends and resource use attributable to firearm-related injuries in US pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). METHODS: Retrospective data from Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database from 2004 to 2017. RESULTS: Of 5,984,938 admissions to 28 children's hospitals, 3707 were for firearm injuries. A total of 1088 of 3707 hospitalizations (29.9%) required PICU admission. Median PICU length of stay was 2 days (IQR, 1-6 days), and the median cost for PICU patients was $37,569.31 (IQR, $19,243.83-$77,856.32). Use of mechanical ventilation (674/1088 admissions [61.9%]), surgical procedures (744/1088 admissions [68.3%]), blood transfusions (429/1088 admissions [39.9%]), and intracranial pressure monitoring devices (30/1088 admissions [2.8%]) increased in PICU patients. Computed tomography showed an overall increase (197/287 [68.6%] to 138/177 [78%], P = .037) from 2004 to 2007 to 2016-2017. Mortality among PICU patients (140/1058 [13.23%]) attributable to firearm-related injuries increased insignificantly (34/285 (11.93%] to 25/172 [14.53%], P = .746). CONCLUSIONS: Using PHIS data, we found a significant increase in median cost per hospitalization and an increase in critical care resource use, including the frequency of invasive mechanical ventilatory assistance, neuromonitoring, operations performed, and transfusion of blood products. Further research is needed to continue to characterize the burden of pediatric critical firearm injury. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law.

Importance: On October 1, 2018, Maryland's extreme risk protection order (ERPO) law took effect. This was the first ERPO law in the United States to authorize clinicians to initiate a civil court process to temporarily prohibit people behaving dangerously and at risk of engaging in violence from purchasing and possessing firearms. This is the first publication reporting results from a survey of physicians about ERPOs. Objectives: To assess Maryland physicians' knowledge, past use, and likely future use of ERPOs, and to identify barriers to physicians' use of ERPOs and strategies to address those barriers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study conducted at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, surveyed physicians, including emergency medicine physicians, pediatricians, and psychiatrists, using a 15-question online instrument between June 15, 2019, and July 1, 2019. Data analysis was performed in July 2019. Exposure: Maryland's ERPO law. Main Outcomes and Measures: Knowledge, use, and likely use of ERPOs, barriers to use, and strategies to address those barriers. Results: Ninety-two of 353 physicians invited (26.1%) completed the survey; 1 respondent reported having filed an ERPO petition. Sixty-six respondents (71.7%) described themselves as not at all familiar with ERPOs. After reading a brief description of the ERPO law, 85 respondents (92.4%) indicated that they encounter patients whom they would consider for an ERPO at least a few times per year. Fifty-five respondents (59.8%) reported that they would be very or somewhat likely to file an ERPO petition when they identify a qualifying patient. Respondents identified time as the main barrier to using ERPOs (not enough time to complete paperwork, 57 respondents [62.6%]; not enough time to attend hearing at courthouse, 64 respondents [70.3%]), followed by concern that filing an ERPO would negatively affect their relationship with the patient (36 respondents [39.6%]). Having a coordinator to manage the process (80 respondents [87.0%]), training (79 respondents [85.9%]), participating in court hearings remotely (68 respondents [73.9%]), and having access to legal counsel (59 respondents [64.1%]) were all selected by large majorities of respondents as strategies to address barriers to ERPO use. Conclusions and Relevance: Awareness of ERPOs among physicians in the sample was low. Physicians are treating patients who would qualify for an ERPO, and respondents in the sample indicated a willingness to use ERPOs. Training, providing access to legal counsel, designating a clinician to process petitions, and allowing clinicians to participate remotely in court hearings were strategies respondents identified to address barriers to ERPO use. These survey findings identify concrete solutions for addressing barriers to physician use of ERPOs.