Carcinocythemia: A rare entity becoming more common? A 3-year, single institution series of seven cases and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Carcinocythemia is a rare phenomenon defined as morphologically identifiable, circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood. No modern case series of carcinocythemia exists in the literature. METHODS: Blood smears from carcinocythemia patients were reviewed and associated clinicopathologic findings described and compared to the literature. When available, bone marrows were examined. RESULTS: We identified 7 carcinocythemia cases over 3 years at our institution in 5 females and 2 males with a median age of 57 and compare them to 26 case reports in the literature (19 females, 10 males; median age 57). The primary neoplasms were carcinomas of breast (3 cases), lung, non-small cell (2 cases), prostate (1), and 1 case of unknown primary. Circulating tumor cells were associated with fragmentation hemolysis (2 cases), asplenic RBC changes (3 cases), and myeloid antigen expression by flow cytometry (2 cases) and were most commonly found at the feathered edge of the slide (6 cases) as single cells or in clusters. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the largest series of carcinocythemia reported. The identification of 7 cases at one institution over a 3-year period suggests carcinocythemia may becoming more common. Raising awareness of this entity and its associated clinicopathologic findings may help avoid diagnostic pitfalls in blood smear examinations and may guide timely clinical management.

Evaluation of CD43 expression in non-hematopoietic malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: CD43 is normally expressed only on the surface of leukocytes, and is considered a sensitive and specific marker for hematologic malignancies. As such, it may have diagnostic utility in confirming hematolymphoid lineage in cases that are negative for CD45. Aberrant CD43 expression has been described in non-hematopoietic tumors, although literature data on this topic is variable and sometimes contradictory. To clarify and expand on existing literature findings, we evaluated CD43 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a large cohort (307) of non-hematopoietic neoplasms, including poorly differentiated malignancies. METHODS: 17 tissue microarrays and sections from 19 individual cases were stained with CD43 (clone DF-T1) monoclonal antibody. The proportion of positive cells, stain localization (nuclear, cytoplasmic or membranous), and intensity (compared to internal leukocyte controls) were recorded in all cases. RESULTS: There were 98/307 (32%) positive cases, that showed focal weak nuclear staining in 1-25% of cells, including 23/25 (92%) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas; 31/34 (91%) breast invasive ductal carcinomas; 13/15 (87%) papillary thyroid carcinomas; 3/4 (75%) follicular thyroid carcinomas; 6/15 (40%) renal cell carcinomas; 9/28 (32%) lung adenocarcinomas; 1/13 (8%) lung squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); 2/8 (25%) prostate adenocarcinomas; 8/62 (13%) colon adenocarcinomas; and 2/21 (10%) neuroendocrine neoplasms. None of the positive cases demonstrated strong, membranous CD43 expression comparable to that seen in background mature lymphocytes or segmented neutrophils. Negative cases included 11 cervical SCCs, 12 cervical adenocarcinomas, 19 urothelial carcinomas, 10 lung small cell carcinomas, 11 sarcomas, and 19 poorly differentiated carcinomas from various tissue sites. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, most non-hematopoietic neoplasms are negative for CD43 expression, with a subset showing focal, weak nuclear positivity. This data indicates that uniform and strong membranous staining appears to be specific to hematopoietic neoplasms.

Immunophenotypes of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Subtypes by Flow Cytometry: A Comparison of CMML-1 vs CMML-2, Myeloproliferative vs Dysplastic, De Novo vs Therapy-Related, and CMML-Specific Cytogenetic Risk Subtypes.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to immunophenotype blasts, monocytes, and granulocytes in chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMMLs) and compare CMML subtypes, to identify if significant antigen expression differences existed. METHODS: Bone marrow blasts, monocytes, and granulocytes from CMML subgroups (n = 30; World Health Organization types 1/2, proliferative/dysplastic, therapy related/de novo, and low/intermediate/high cytogenetic risk) were immunophenotypically compared by flow cytometry with 10 nonneoplastic control marrows. RESULTS: Aberrancies were present in blasts of 26 (87%) of 30 CMMLs (26 diagnostic; four follow-up) and six (60%) of 10 controls (P = .089), monocytes of 28 (93%) of 30 CMMLs and six (60%) of 10 controls (P = .026), and granulocytes of eight (28%) of 29 CMMLs and zero of 10 controls (P = .166). Underexpression of CD14 and CD15 on monocytes was more common in CMMLs compared with controls (P = .008 and P = .043). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in antigen expression between the CMML subgroups on blasts or monocytes; granulocytes demonstrated more common HLA-DR expression in CMML-2 vs CMML-1. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm heterogeneity within CMML subgroups and find no specific qualitative or quantitative findings characteristic of a subgroup.