Impact of assigning 2-field HLA alleles from real-time PCR on deceased donor assessments and conformance with high resolution alleles.

Waitlisted sensitised transplant recipients with HLA allele level antibodies to their own HLA antigen family are disadvantaged by current deficiencies in HLA typing for deceased donors. This is primarily because at time of organ allocation, HLA typing is provided at antigen level whereas solid phase assays provide allele level antibody definition. The gold standard for HLA allele typing is next generation sequencing (NGS), however time limitations with established NGS systems prevent NGS use for deceased donors. Instead, many labs use a real-time PCR (qPCR) antigen level result for deceased donors, which can disadvantage sensitised patients. Here, we compared assigning qPCR 2-field alleles to qPCR antigen level to determine the impact on virtual crossmatch (VXM) and discuss impact on donor-specific antibody (DSA) assignments. 244 consecutive deceased donors were HLA typed to allelic level by qPCR (LinkSeq SABR) and subsequently by NGS (One Lambda Alltype). The impact of qPCR allele assignments on potential DSA identification was investigated, by retrospectively investigating all 3904 VXMs, where recipient DSA assessments were assessed against donor HLA, was performed within the cohort. There was 96.3% concordance between qPCR and NGS for all allele level loci, with HLA-A; DQB1; and DPB1 having best agreement (99.4%, 98.4% and 99.4% respectively). Of the 3904 VXMs with qPCR allele assignment, there were 13 (<1%) occasions where the potential DSA assignment was impacted, with DQA1 having the most impact. Assigning alleles derived from qPCR to define unacceptable antigens for VXMs, can allow improved access to donor offers for sensitised patients by better defining alleles.

Successful Implementation of an Increased Viral Risk Donor Waiting List for Preconsented Kidney Transplant Candidates in Victoria, Australia.

Increased viral risk donors (IVRDs) with increased risk behaviors for blood-borne virus infection and negative nucleic acid testing have a low absolute risk of "window period" infection. Utilization and allocation of IVRD organs differ between jurisdictions. METHODS: We examined the characteristics and utilization of deceased donor IVRD kidneys and recipient outcomes within a 2-y period (July 31, 2018-July 31, 2020) postimplementation of a new opt-in allocation pathway for preconsented recipients in Victoria, Australia. RESULTS: Fifty-six kidneys from 31 IVRDs were utilized, comprising 13% of donors. Preconsent rate to accept IVRD kidneys increased to 41% of the waitlist in the 2 y postimplementation, and IVRDs having no kidneys utilized reduced to 0%. Compared with non-IVRD kidneys, kidney offer declines >10 per donor were less likely from IVRDs (3% vs 19%; P < 0.05). IVRDs were younger (median age 36 [IQR 30-44] vs 51 [35-60] y; P < 0.0001), with lower kidney donor profile index (25% [13-40%] vs 57% [29-75%]; P < 0.0001), and less hypertension (0% vs 22%; P < 0.01). Estimated glomerular filtration rate 3 mo post-transplant was superior (P < 0.01). Injecting drug use (61%) was the most common increased risk behavior. 29% of IVRDs were hepatitis C antibody positive but nucleic acid testing negative. No active infection was detected in any recipient post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The described opt-in system permits efficient allocation and utilization of kidneys from IVRDs, with superior quality and graft function. Education is crucial to facilitate informed consent and equity of access to this donor pool.

Tissue typing for kidney transplantation for the general nephrologist.

Tissue typing is the process by which an individual's human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are determined. In transplantation, this vital process allows the immunologic or rejection risk of a donor-recipient pairing to be assessed through reviewing their HLA matching and whether any anti-HLA antibodies present in recipient serum are donor specific. Tissue typing has increased in sophistication over time which has allowed a deeper appreciation of the antigenically important parts of HLA and increased the complexity of determining immunologic risk.

Transfer of donor anti-HLA antibody expression to multiple transplant recipients: A potential variant of the passenger lymphocyte syndrome?

Antibody-mediated rejection, whereby transplant recipient B cells and/or plasma cells produce alloreactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, negatively influences transplant outcomes and is a major contributor to graft loss. An early humoral immune response is suggested by the production of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) that can be measured using solid phase assays. We report the early posttransplant coexistence of a shared anti-HLA antibody profile in 5 solid organ transplant recipients who received organs from the same donor. Retrospective analysis of the donor's serum confirmed the presence of the same anti-HLA profile, suggesting the transfer of donor-derived anti-HLA antibodies, or the cells that produce them, to multiple solid organ transplant recipients. The time frame and extent of transfer suggest a novel variant of the passenger lymphocyte syndrome. These findings have important implications for the consideration of all posttransplant antibody measurements, particularly the interpretation of non-DSAs in the sera of transplant recipients.

Review article: Luminex technology for HLA antibody detection in organ transplantation.

Since its inception in the early 1960s, the serologically based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay has been the cornerstone technique for the detection of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, not only in pre-transplant renal patients, but also in other forms of organ transplantation. Recently, solid phase assays have been developed and introduced for this purpose, and in particular the Flow-based bead assays such as the Luminex system. This latter assay has proved to be far more sensitive than the CDC assay and has revealed pre-sensitization in potential transplant recipients not detected by other methods of HLA antibody detection. However, the clinical implications of this increased sensitivity have not been convincingly demonstrated until recently. This technology for HLA antibody detection permits the evaluation of the clinical importance of antibodies directed at, for example, HLA-DPB1 and HLA-DQA1, which has not been possible to date. There are Luminex issues, however, requiring resolution such as the ability to distinguish between complement fixing and non-complement fixing antibodies and determination of their relative clinical significance. Luminex technology will permit a re-evaluation of the role of HLA antibodies in both early and late antibody-mediated rejection.

A single low-fixed dose of rituximab to salvage renal transplants from refractory antibody-mediated rejection.

Rituximab may improve graft survival in renal acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), but data confirming efficacy and optimal dosing is lacking. High-dose regimens may be associated with significant rates of infective complications. We therefore conducted a pilot study of a single low-fixed dose (500 mg) of rituximab in seven consecutive patients with AMR resistant to standard therapy. After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range, 9.5-33 months), graft and patient survival were 100% with serum creatinine levels significantly lower than peak rejection levels (171+/-73 micromol/L vs. 559+/-358 micromol/L, P=0.028). B cells were undetectable in all patients for more than or equal to 6 months and in six of seven patients for more than or equal to 12 months after rituximab. Three patients encountered a significant infective complication including cytomegalovirus reactivation, viral pneumonia, and polyoma viral nephropathy. All have since resolved. A single low-fixed dose of rituximab may help improve graft survival in AMR and offers the potential advantage of reduced infective complications.

Human leukocyte antigen mismatch and other factors affecting cryopreserved allograft valve function.

The causes of cryopreserved allograft heart valve degeneration are poorly understood. We investigated HLA mismatch and other factors implicated in allograft valve degeneration. For this study we recruited 110 adult recipients of allograft heart valves who underwent surgery between June 1998 and March 2003 in the state of Victoria, Australia. Recipients and donors were HLA typed using serological and molecular methods. Valve function at most recent echocardiographic follow-up was examined for an association with the following variables using univariate and multivariate methods: HLA-A,-B, and -DR donor-recipient mismatch; HLA class I mismatch; total HLA mismatch; valve ischemic time; recipient age; donor age; ABO blood group donor-recipient match; and allograft size. Mean recipient age was 45 years (18-75 years), 75% were men. Seventy-four pulmonary (62 Ross procedure) and 36 aortic allografts were examined. Median valve ischemic time was 31 hours, range 20-48 hours. Echocardiographic follow-up was complete at a mean of 41 (+/-18) months, range 6-85 months. At univariate analysis longer ischemic time and younger recipient age were associated with valve dysfunction. HLA-A, -B, or DR mismatch, HLA class I mismatch, total HLA mismatch, donor age, ABO mismatch, and allograft size were not associated with valve dysfunction. Only younger recipient age remained significant at multivariate analysis. In conclusion, longer ischemic times and younger patient age predicted valve dysfunction at a mean of 3 years follow-up. Recipient age remained the strongest predictor of valve dysfunction. These results indicate that allograft ischemic times should be minimized.

Anti-HLA antibodies after cryopreserved allograft valve implantation does not predict valve dysfunction at three-year follow up.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: As the cause of allograft heart valve degeneration is poorly understood, the study aim was to investigate the host antibody response to allograft valve implantation. METHODS: Sera were obtained from 92 recipients of allograft heart valves (61 pulmonary, 31 aortic). Sera were tested for anti-HLA class I antibodies by ELISA and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) methods, and anti-HLA class II antibodies by ELISA. Specificities of recipient anti-HLA class I antibodies were defined by standard CDC testing against a panel of T lymphocytes from 80 blood donors. Donor valve HLA typing was performed on stored donor DNA samples using molecular methods. The presence of donor-specific anti-HLA class I antibodies was hence defined in recipient sera. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-HLA class I antibodies were correlated with function of allograft valves at the most recent echocardiographic follow up. RESULTS: At a mean of 3.0 years (range: 0.3-5.4 years) after allograft implantation, 96% (87/92) and 82% (75/92) of patients were positive for anti-HLA class I and II antibodies, respectively, by ELISA testing. Some 68% (61/90) of patients were positive for anti-HLA class I antibody (PRA > 5%) by CDC testing. PRA levels decreased with greater postoperative interval (r = -0.31, p = 0.003). In 68 recipients where donor HLA type was defined, 54% (37/68) of patients had antibodies specific to at least one donor HLA class I antigen. In 87 patients with a recent echocardiographic examination available for analysis (at a mean of 3.5 +/- 1.6 years postoperatively), there was no association between valve dysfunction and antibody status. CONCLUSION: Anti-HLA class I and II antibodies were detected by ELISA methods in most patients after allograft implantation extending to 5.4 years. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear, as no correlation was found between the prevalence of anti-HLA antibody and echocardiographic parameters of valve dysfunction at a mean of 3.5 years follow up.