Doctors' alertness, contentedness and calmness before and after night shifts: a latent profile analysis.

BACKGROUND: While night shifts are crucial for patient care, they threaten doctors' well-being and performance. Knowledge of how the impact of night shifts differs for doctors is needed to attenuate the adverse effects of night shifts. This study aimed to obtain more precise insight into doctors' feelings surrounding night shift by: identifying profiles based on doctors' alertness, contentedness and calmness scores before and after night shifts (research question (RQ) 1); assessing how doctors' pre- and post-shift profiles change (RQ2); and determining associations of doctors' demographics and shift circumstances with alertness, contentedness and calmness change (RQ3). METHODS: Latent Profile Analysis using doctors' pre- and post-shift self-rated alertness, contentedness and calmness scores was employed to identify pre- and post-shift profiles (RQ1). A cross-tabulation revealed pre- and post-shift profile changes (RQ2). Multiple regressions determined associations of demographics (i.e. age, sex, specialty) and night shift circumstances (i.e. hours worked pre-call, hours awake pre-call, shift duration, number of consecutive shifts, total hours of sleep) with alertness, contentedness and calmness change (RQ3). RESULTS: In total, 211 doctors participated with a mean age of 39.8 ± 10 years; 47.4% was male. The participants included consultants (46.4%) and trainees (53.6%) of the specialties surgery (64.5%) and obstetrics/gynaecology (35.5%). Three pre-shift (Indifferent, Ready, Engaged) and four post-shift profiles (Lethargic, Tired but satisfied, Excited, Mindful) were found. Most doctors changed from Ready to Tired but satisfied, with alertness reducing most. Age, specialty, sleep, shift duration and the number of consecutive shifts associated with alertness, contentedness and calmness changes. CONCLUSIONS: The results provided nuanced insight into doctors' feelings before and after night shifts. Future research may assess whether specific subgroups benefit from tailored interventions.

Assessment of fitness to perform using a validated self-test in obstetric and gynecological night shifts in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The field of obstetrics and gynecology requires complex decision-making and skills because of unexpected high-risk situations. These skills are influenced by alertness, reaction time, and concentration. Night shifts result in sleep deprivation, which might impair these functions, although it is still unclear to what extent. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the obstetrics and gynecology consultants' and residents' fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit compared with relevant frames of reference. STUDY DESIGN: Residents (n=33) and consultants (n=46) in obstetrics and gynecology conducted multiple measurements (n=415) at precall, postcall, and noncall moments with the fitness to perform self-test. The self-test consists of an adaptive pursuit tracking task that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and hand-eye coordination and Visual Analog Scale tests to subjectively score alertness. The test is validated with a sociolegal reference of a 0.06% ethanol blood concentration (the peak level after 2 units of alcohol, the legal driving limit). This equals -1.37% on the objective score and -8.17 points on subjective alertness. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the difference within subjects over a night shift, integrating repeated measures over time. RESULTS: The overnight objective difference between postcall and precall measurements was -0.62 (P<.05) for residents and 0.28 (P=NS) for consultants, both not exceeding the sociolegal reference as a group. Objective impairment exceeded the reference for 31% of the residents and 28% of the consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents (-18.26; P<.001) and consultants (-10.85; P<.001), both exceeding the reference. No residents had to continue work postcall versus 7.8% of the consultants. None of the consultants that had to continue work were in an objective critically impaired state. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight and awareness of individual performance after night shifts with clear frames of reference. The performance of residents is negatively and significantly affected by night shifts; therefore, a scheduled day off after a night shift is justified. Consultants showed no overall impairment; however, a quarter did exceed the alcohol limit reference after their night shift. If not logistically feasible to schedule a protected day off after a night shift, our group recommends safe shift scheduling, including options to transfer care after a demanding night shift to prevent working in a compromised state.

Objective Assessment of Fitness to Perform (FTOP) After Surgical Night Shifts in the Netherlands: An Observational Study Using the Validated FTOP Self-test in Daily Surgical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Surgical skills and decision making are influenced by alertness, reaction time, eye-hand coordination, and concentration. Night shift might impair these functions but it is unclear to what extent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the surgeon's fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit as compared to relevant frames of reference. METHODS: Consultants (n = 59) and residents (n = 103) conducted fitness to perform measurements at precall, postcall, and noncall moments. This validated self-test consists of an adaptive tracker that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and eye-hand coordination, and multiple visual analog scales to subjectively score alertness. Results are compared to sociolegal (ethanol) and professional (operative skills) frames of reference that refer to a decrease under the influence of 0.06% ethanol. RESULTS: Residents spent 1.7 call hours asleep on average as compared to 5.4 for consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents after night shifts (-13, P < 0.001) but not in consultants (-1.2, P = NS). The overnight difference in tracker score was -1.17 (P < 0.001) for residents and 0.46 (P = NS) for surgeons. Postcall subjective alertness only correlated to objective alertness in consultants. For residents, hours slept on-call correlated to objective alertness. For consultants, subsequent night calls significantly correlated to objective alertness, with the third subsequent call related to performance below the reference. CONCLUSIONS: Consultants remain fit to perform after night call, but subsequent calls may compromise clinical activities. This study provides insight and awareness of individual performance with clear frames of reference.

A review of current approaches for evaluating impaired performance in around-the-clock medical professionals.

The need for data to study the relationship between fatigued healthcare professionals and performance outcomes is evident, however, it is unclear which methodology is most appropriate to provide these insights. To address this issue, we performed a systematic review of relevant articles by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. The literature search identified 2960 unique references, of which 82 were identified eligible. The impact on performance was studied on clinical outcomes, medical simulation, neurocognitive performance, sleep quantification and subjective assessment. In general results on performance are conflicting; impairment, no effect, and improvement were found. This review outlines the various methods currently available for assessing fatigue-impaired performance. The contrasting outcomes can be attributed to three main factors: differences in the operationalisation of fatigue, incomplete control data, and the wide variety in the methods used. We recommend the implementation of a clinically applicable tool that can provide uniform data. Until these data become available, caution should be used when developing regulations that can have implications for physicians, education, manpower planning, and ‒ ultimately ‒ patient care.

Evaluating Fitness to Perform in Surgical Residents after Night Shifts and Alcohol Intoxication: The development of a "Fit-to-Perform" test.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-test to measure clinical fitness to perform in surgical residents, with alcohol-induced impairment as reference. DESIGN: Observational, exploratory study to evaluate night shift-induced impaired performance in surgical residents followed by a randomized blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study to evaluate impaired performance as a result of ethanol intoxication. Impairment was quantified using the Mini-NeuroCart, a psychomotor and cognitive test battery for assessment of subjective and objective measures of alertness, concentration, eye-hand coordination, mood, and self-assessed ability to perform. Surgical performance was tested in the randomized study with a laparoscopy surgical trainer. SETTINGS: Level-I trauma hospital and a clinical research unit. PARTICIPANTS: Surgical residents (n = 12 for the observational study, n = 18 for the randomized study). RESULTS: High alcohol levels (0.6gL-1) impaired adaptive tracking, reduced objective and subjective alertness, and increased slowness. Moreover, laparoscopy depth perception was impaired in the 0.6gL-1 group. No significant within-subject correlation between subjective and objective measures of alertness was found. Performance of postcall surgeons was similar to, or even worse than, the performance of intoxicated surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-NeuroCart detected ethanol-induced performance effects that were similar to the effects of working a 14-hour night shift. Social (ethanol), personal (mood), and professional (laparoscopic skills) standards of fitness can in this manner be related to accepted deleterious effects of alcohol. The Mini-NeuroCart is, therefore, a potential noninvasive test for assessing "fitntness to perform" in healthcare professionals.

[Survey among gynaecologists and surgeons on rectocele]. / Enquête onder gynaecologen en chirurgen over rectocele.

OBJECTIVE: Provide insight into how gynaecologists and surgeons name, diagnose and treat a rectocele and identify the differences between these two professional groups. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. METHODS: We sent an online survey with 16 multiple-choice questions to gynaecologists and surgeons from two national working groups. RESULTS: There is no discernible consensus on nomenclature, diagnostics and treatment. Gynaecologists and surgeons each choose their own approach. CONCLUSION: It is in the patient's interest to draw up a joint guideline; however, multidisciplinary cooperation is only possible if gynaecologists and surgeons speak the same language.