RESUMEN
Purpose: The withdrawal of HVAD in 2021 created a concern for the pediatric population. The alternative implantable centrifugal blood pump HeartMate 3 has since been used more frequently in children. This paper analyses the outcome of children on LVAD support provided with an HVAD or HM3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS database on children supported with VAD < 19 years of age from 1 January 2009 to 1 December 2021 was conducted. All patients with an LVAD and either an HVAD or HM3 were included. Patients with missing data on VAD status and/or missing baseline and/or follow up information were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival differences. Analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test. Results: The study included 150 implantations in 142 patients with 128 implants using an HVAD compared to 28 implants using an HM3. Nine patients (6%) needed temporary right ventricular mechanical support, which was significantly higher in the HM3 group, with 25% (p: 0.01). Patients in the HVAD group were significantly younger (12.7 vs. 14.5 years, p: 0.01), weighed less (45.7 vs. 60 kg, p: <0.000) and had lower BSA values (1.3 vs. 1.6 m2, p: <0.000). Median support time was 204 days. Overall, 98 patients (69%) were discharged and sent home, while 87% were discharged in group HM3 (p: ns). A total of 123 children (86%) survived to transplantation, recovery or are ongoing, without differences between groups. In the HVAD group, 10 patients (8%) died while on support, whereas in 12% of HM3 patients died (p: 0.7). Conclusions: Survival in children implanted with an HM3 was excellent. Almost 90% were discharged and sent home on the device.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data on the use and outcome of children on ventricular assist device (VAD) support provided with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) remains poor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS database on children supported with VAD < 19 years of age from January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2020. Patients with missing data on status of ICD, missing baseline and/or follow up information were excluded. The primary independent variable of interest was the concomitant presence or absence of an ICD at the time of VAD placement. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival differences between children on VAD with and without an ICD. RESULTS: Out of 303 patients provided with a VAD, 7% (7â, 15â) had an ICD implanted and formed the study group. Median age was 14 years, median weight was 43.5 kg, and median BSA was 1.39. Median Intermacs stage was 2 (range: 1-7). Seventeen patients (77%) were transplanted, 4 (18%) died while on support, and 1 (5%) was weaned from device after myocardial recovery. Median time on support was 68 days compared to 361 days in the control group (p: 0.01). Three patients underwent device exchange due to thrombus formation in the pump. There was no difference in survival between groups (p = 0.342). CONCLUSION: The presence of ICD in pediatric patients supported with a VAD is low (7%). Children on VAD support provided with an ICD do not have a survival benefit compared to children without an ICD.