Epidemiology of and Risk Factors in Postoperative Complications from Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Contemporary National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data.

Introduction: For localized clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is the gold standard surgical treatment. Despite low overall complication rate, continued quality assurance (QA) efforts to minimize complications of RALP are important, particularly given movement toward same-day discharge. In 2019, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) began collecting RALP-specific data. In this study, we assessed pre- and perioperative factors associated with postoperative complications for RALP to further QA efforts. Materials and Methods: Surgical records of csPCa patients who underwent RALP were retrieved from the 2019 to 2021 NSQIP database, including new RALP-specific data. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the association between risk factors and outcomes specific to RALP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Input variables included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, age, operative time, and body mass index (BMI). Variables from the extended dataset with PLND information included number of nodes evaluated, perioperative antibiotics, postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, history of prior pelvic surgery, and history of prior radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes of interest were any surgical complication, infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, acute kidney injury, pneumonia, lymphocele, and urinary/anastomotic leak (UAL). Results: A total of 11,811 patients were included with 6.1% experiencing any complication. Prior RT, prior pelvic surgery, older age, higher BMI, lack of perioperative antibiotic therapy, longer operative time, PLND, and number of lymph nodes dissected were associated with higher risk of postoperative complications. Regarding procedure-specific complications, there were increased odds of UAL with prior RT, prior pelvic surgery, longer operative time, and higher BMI. Odds of developing lymphocele increased with prior pelvic surgery, performance of PLND, and increased number of nodes evaluated. Conclusion: In contemporary NSQIP data, RALP is associated with low complication rates; however, these rates have increased compared with historical studies. Attention to and counseling regarding risk factors for peri- and postoperative complications are important to set expectations and minimize risk of unplanned return to a health care setting after discharge.

Telemedicine in management of genitourinary malignancies: Patient and physician perspectives.

PURPOSE: The rapid expansion of telemedicine has presented a challenge for the care of patients with genitourinary malignancies. We sought to assess patient and physician perspectives on the use of telemedicine for genitourinary cancer care. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients who had telemedicine visits with urology, medical oncology, or radiation oncology for management of genitourinary malignancies from July-August 2020. Patients and physicians each received a questionnaire regarding the telemedicine experience. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The primary outcomes of the study were patient and physician satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients who enrolled, we received 96 patient responses and 46 physician responses. Overall, 77% of patients and 70% of physicians reported being "extremely satisfied" with the telemedicine encounter. Satisfaction was high among all components of the encounter including patient-physician communication, counseling, shared decision making, time spent, timeliness and efficiency, and convenience. Additionally, 78% of patients and 85% of physicians "strongly agreed" that they were able to discuss sensitive topics about cancer care as well as they could at an in-person visit. Nine telemedicine visits (9%) encountered technological barriers. Technological barriers were associated with lower overall satisfaction scores among both patients and physicians (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: We observed high levels of patient and physician satisfaction for telemedicine visits for management of genitourinary malignancies. Technological barriers were encountered by 9% of patients and were associated with decreased satisfaction.

A population-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes of prostatic abscess.

BACKGROUND: Prostate abscess is a severe complication of acute bacterial prostatitis. To date, a population-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes of prostatic abscess has not been performed. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2015, we identified rates of prostatic abscess among non-elective hospitalizations for acute prostatitis. Significant Elixhauser comorbidities and risk factors were analyzed using survey-weighted logistic regression. Additional survey-weighted regression models were constructed to analyze sepsis, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. RESULTS: A weighted total of 126,103 hospitalizations for acute prostatitis was identified, with 6,775 (5.4%) hospitalizations with prostatic abscess. Numerous risk factors for prostatic abscess were identified, with a history of prostate biopsy (adjusted OR: 5.7; p < 0.001), complicated diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR: 3.23, p < 0.001), and urethral stricture (adjusted OR: 3.15; p < 0.001) having the greatest magnitude of developing abscess. Moreover, those diagnosed with prostatic abscess had increased odds of sepsis (adjusted OR: 1.71, p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 2.73, p < 0.001), LOS (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio: 1.86, p < 0.001), and total hospital charges (adjusted Ratio: 2.06, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Numerous risk factors were associated with the development of prostatic abscess, with those diagnosed experiencing greater odds of sepsis, in-hospital mortality, longer LOS, and greater hospital charges. Ultimately, better understanding of risk factors associated with this condition will enable clinicians to identify patients at high risk, thereby expediting and tailoring management.

Delayed Decompression of Obstructing Stones with Urinary Tract Infection is Associated with Increased Odds of Death.

PURPOSE: Obstructive pyelonephritis is considered a urological emergency but there is limited evidence regarding the importance of prompt decompression. We sought to investigate whether delay in decompression is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Secondarily, we aimed to determine the impact of patient, hospital and disease factors on the likelihood of receipt of delayed vs prompt decompression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2015, all patients 18 years old or older with ICD-9 diagnosis of urinary tract infection who had either a ureteral stone or kidney stone with hydronephrosis (311,100) were identified. Two weighted sample multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors of the primary outcome of death in the hospital and secondly, predictors of delayed decompression (2 or more days after admission). RESULTS: After controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity and disease severity, delayed decompression significantly increased odds of death by 29% (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.63, p=0.032). Delayed decompression was more likely to occur with weekend admissions (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.30, p <0.001), nonwhite race (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.44, p <0.001) and lower income demographic (lowest income quartile OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.36, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the overall risk of mortality is fairly low in patients with obstructing upper urinary tract stones and urinary tract infection, a delay in decompression increased odds of mortality by 29%. The increased likelihood of delay associated with weekend admissions, minority patients and lower socioeconomic status suggests opportunities for improvement.

Exposure to direct-to-consumer advertising is associated with overestimation of benefits regarding ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: While direct-to-consumer (DTC) medical advertising can provide useful information, it also risks oversimplification and being misleading. For an abbreviated prostate cancer treatment regimen called "ultrahypofractionation" (UHF), advertising has been used for CyberKnife (CK), a common delivery system for stereotactic body radiation therapy. We hypothesized that those viewing an advertisement for CK versus factual information would have inaccurate impressions of effectiveness and safety. METHODS: 400 men aged 40-80 were randomly assigned to one of four arms: a de-identified CK advertisement, the same advertisement with disclaimers, scientific information obtained from review of contemporary peer-reviewed literature, and a control. Subjects answered questions regarding risks/benefits of CK and likelihood of pursuing CK versus other treatments. Regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with CK preference. RESULTS: 400 men were included. Compared to controls, those who viewed any of the three interventions were more likely to pursue CK over other treatments (p < 0.01), with a greater increase in the advertisement groups. Respondents who viewed scientific information were less likely to agree CK is superior regarding impotence and urinary dysfunction. Disclaimers decreased positive impressions of CK's side effects, but not effectiveness. Both advertisement and advertisement with disclaimer respondents were more likely to consider CK superior. CONCLUSIONS: DTC medical advertisements can be misleading and impact laypersons' impressions. In this case, viewing an advertisement created inaccurate impressions regarding effectiveness and safety of UHF for prostate cancer.

Temporal Trends and Practice Patterns for Inpatient Management of Malignant Extrinsic Ureteral Obstruction in the United States.

Purpose: Malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction (MEUO) is a challenging clinical problem. Many factors weigh into the decision to proceed with retrograde ureteral stent (RUS), nephrostomy tube (NT), or observation; however, there is no consensus for the optimal approach. The objective of this study was twofold. First, to determine practice patterns by correlating patient, hospital, and disease characteristics to manage MEUO; second, to describe treatment trends of MEUO over time. Materials and Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample 2010-2015, we abstracted all adults with diagnoses of hydronephrosis and concurrent metastasis or lymphoma, excluding any record with a diagnosis of urinary tract stone. Multinomial regression assessed predictors of undergoing no decompression, stenting, or nephrostomy. Quarterly trends and annual percentage change of MEUO prevalence and percentage decompressed with stent vs nephrostomy were calculated. Results: There were an estimated 238,500 cases of MEUO from 2010 to 2015, of which 18.0% underwent decompression with RUS and 11.4% NT. On multinomial regression, prostate (odds ratio [OR] 1.5), bladder (1.6), cervical (1.6) cancer, academic hospitals (1.4), and acute kidney injury were among factors that most significantly increased odds of undergoing NT. Factors that significantly increased odds of undergoing RUS included colon (OR 1.4), rectal/anal (1.3), ovarian (1.2) cancer, Midwest (vs northeast) hospitals (1.4), and female gender (1.4), whereas decreased odds of RUS were associated with bladder cancer (0.7), nonwhite race (0.8), and weekend admission (0.8). While MEUO prevalence has been increasing on an average of 2.9%/year, decompression rates have been decreasing, driven solely by a decrease in RUS of 3.8%/year on average. Conclusions: There is substantial variation in approach for MEUO among patient, hospital, and disease types, with an overall decline in stenting compared with steady nephrostomy use. Further investigation into best approaches for certain patient characteristics and disease types is needed to standardize care and reduce disparities.

A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis.

Robotic surgical skill development is central to training in urology as well as other surgical disciplines. Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) in robotic prostatectomy is a challenging task for novices due to delicate tissue and difficult suturing angles. Commercially available, realistic training models are limited. Here, we describe the development and validation of a 3D-printed model of the VUA for ex vivo training using the da Vinci Surgical System. Models of the bladder and urethra were created using 3D-printing technology based on estimations of average in vivo anatomy. 10 surgical residents without prior robotics training were enrolled in the study: 5 residents received structured virtual reality (VR) training on the da Vinci Skills Simulator ("trained"), while the other 5 did not ("untrained"). 4 faculty robotic surgeons trained in robotic urologic oncology ("experts") were also enrolled. Mean (range) completion percentage was 20% (10-30%), 54% (40-70%), and 96% (85-100%) by the untrained, trained, and expert groups, respectively. Anastomosis integrity was rated as excellent (as opposed to moderate or poor) in 40%, 60%, and 100% of untrained, trained, and expert groups, respectively. Face validity (realism) was rated as 8 of 10 on average by the expert surgeons, each of whom rated the model as a superior training tool to digital VR trainers. Content validity (usefulness) was rated as 10 of 10 by all participants. This is the first reported 3D-printed ex vivo trainer for VUA in robotic prostatectomy validated for use in robotic simulation. The addition of 3D-printed ex vivo training to existing digital simulation technologies may augment and improve robotic surgical education in the future.

Assessment of men's risk thresholds to proceed with prostate biopsy for the early detection of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To delineate the range of "risk thresholds" for prostate biopsy to determine how improved prostate cancer (CaP) risk prediction tools may impact shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving men 45-75 years old attending a multispecialty urology clinic. Data included demographics, personal and family prostate cancer history, and prostate biopsy history. Respondents were presented with a summary of the details, risks, and benefits of prostate biopsy, then asked to indicate the specific risk threshold (% chance) of high-grade CaP at which they would proceed with prostate biopsy. RESULTS: Of a total of 103 respondents, 18 men (17%) had a personal history of CaP, and 31 (30%) had undergone prostate biopsy. The median risk threshold to proceed with prostate biopsy was 25% (interquartile range 10-50%). Risk thresholds did not vary by race, education, or employment. Personal history of CaP or prostate biopsy was significantly associated with lower mean risk thresholds (19% vs. 32% [P = 0.02] and 23% vs. 33% [P = 0.04], respectively). In the lowest versus highest risk threshold quartiles, there were significantly higher rates of CaP (36% vs. 1%, P = 0.01) and prior prostate biopsy (46% vs. 17%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Men have a wide range of risk thresholds for high-grade CaP to proceed with prostate biopsy. Men with a prior history of CaP or biopsy reported lower risk thresholds, which may reflect their greater concern for this disease. The extent to which refined risk prediction tools will improve SDM warrants further study.

Alpha Blocker and 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Prescribing Habits among Urologists and Primary Care Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: While primary care physicians often prescribe medical therapy for voiding symptoms attributed to benign prostate enlargement, it is not clear to what extent they use novel or varied agents. We describe alpha blocker and 5-alpha reductase inhibitor prescribing habits of primary care physicians and compare them with those of urologists. METHODS: Within Medicare Part D we identified providers who prescribed alpha blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in 2015. We determined the proportions that prescribed 1 versus multiple agents, different types of agents and both types of medications, and compared them between providers. RESULTS: Overall 94% (9,327) of urologists, 50% (54,253) of internal medicine physicians and 61% (60,063) of family medicine physicians prescribed an alpha blocker in 2015. Urologists were more likely to prescribe multiple alpha blockers. However, they were also more likely to predominantly use a single agent. A higher percentage of urologists prescribed newer agents (alfuzosin, silodosin) while a higher percentage of primary care physicians prescribed older agents (terazosin, doxazosin). For 5-alpha reductase inhibitors 87.5% (8,692) of urologists, 32.0% (34,598) of internal medicine physicians and 34.4% (33,720) of family medicine physicians issued prescriptions. Urologists were more likely to prescribe a single 5-alpha reductase inhibitor predominantly and prescribe multiple 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. More primary care physicians prescribed alpha blockers without also prescribing 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care physicians prescribed alpha blockers to Medicare beneficiaries. Urologists were more likely to use diverse as well as newer agents, signaling greater awareness of medical options, although also more complex cases. Urologists were more likely to habitually prescribe single medications. As primary care physicians are involved in the initial treatment of these patients, further education regarding medical options and appropriate indications should be considered.

Receiving Industry Payments is Associated with Prescribing Habits of Tadalafil.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated whether industry payments for tadalafil are associated with prescribing habits among urologists and primary care physicians. METHODS: The Medicare Part D Public Use File and Open Payments Program database were linked to identify urologists and primary care physicians who prescribed and received a payment for tadalafil in 2015. We determined whether the presence and extent of payment were associated with tadalafil prescription habits. Statistical tests included the chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, logistic regression and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Within 2015 Medicare Part D 2,602 urologists and 3,095 primary care physicians prescribed tadalafil. In the 2015 Open Payments/General Payments database 2,304 urologists and 12,465 primary care physicians received a payment from Eli Lilly and Company pertaining to tadalafil. The range of individual payments was $10.21 to $15,478.88 (median $25.16) for urologists and $1.39 to $21,681 (median $20.11) for primary care physicians. The presence of payment was associated with prescription of tadalafil for primary care physicians (OR 4.48, 95% CI 3.67-5.50, p <0.001) but not for urologists (p=0.922). Urologist prescription was not associated with increasing payment amount or greater number of payments. For primary care physicians there was an association of prescribing tadalafil with increasing payment amount (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p=0.02) and increasing number of payments (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28, p=0.01). There were weak but statistically significant correlations between claim count and payment amount for urologists and primary care physicians (r=0.063 and r=0.1, respectively, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant relationship between payments and tadalafil prescribing habits. Scrutiny of these relationships has value in improving transparency and reflects the importance of the Open Payments system.

Urology is a Sensitive Area: Assessing Patient Preferences for Male or Female Urologists.

INTRODUCTION: The number of women in urology training programs has recently surged. To date, to our knowledge, there have been no comprehensive studies of urology patients' preferences regarding the gender of the provider. We evaluated whether these preferences exist and for what subset of patients. METHODS: Convenience sampling of urology clinic patients at our rural academic center was used to collect data. Data on demographics/background, presenting diagnosis and presence or absence of gender preference were obtained. The chi-square, Fisher exact and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were used. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was performed comparing those with and those without gender preference. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 73.8% with 477 questionnaires collected and 457 had adequate data for analysis. Overall 80% of patients had no gender preference for their provider and 18% stated a preference for the same gender with 2% for the opposite gender (p <0.0001). There was no significant difference between these categories in demographic factors or new vs established patient visit. Evaluating subsets by presenting diagnosis and controlling for patient gender, patients with incontinence had a statistically significant preference for the gender of their provider (p=0.003). Patients with different diagnoses did not demonstrate statistically significant gender preferences. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients did not have a gender preference for their urology provider, a subset of patients did express a preference (ie patients with incontinence). Interestingly, other sensitive subjects such as erectile dysfunction were not associated with gender preference. As the female component of the urology workforce grows, a reasonable effort to meet patient preferences should be made while attempting to disabuse patients of stereotypical views.

Impact of numeracy on understanding of prostate cancer risk reduction in PSA screening.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer in men of average risk remains controversial. Patients' ability to incorporate risk reduction data into their decision-making may depend on their numeracy. We assessed the impact of patients' numeracy on their understanding of the risk reduction benefits of PSA screening. Men attending a general internal medicine clinic were invited to complete a survey. Four versions of the survey each included a three-item numeracy test and PSA risk reduction data, framed one of four ways: absolute (ARR) versus relative risk reduction (RRR), with or without baseline risk (BR). Respondents were asked to adjust their perceived risk of prostate-cancer mortality using the data presented. Accuracy of risk reduction was evaluated relative to how risk data were framed. Among a total of 200 respondents, a majority incorrectly answered one or more of the numeracy items. Overall accuracy of risk adjustment was only 20%. Accuracy varied with data framing: when presented with RRR, respondents were 13% accurate without BR and 31% accurate with BR; when presented with ARR, they were 0% accurate without BR and 35% accurate with BR. Including BR data significantly improved accuracy for both RRR (P = 0.03) and ARR groups (P < 0.01). Accuracy was significantly related to numeracy; numeracy scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were associated with accuracy rates of six, five, nine, and 36 percent, respectively (P < 0.01). Overall, numeracy was significantly associated with the accuracy of interpreting quantitative benefits of PSA screening. Alternative methods of communicating risk may facilitate shared decision-making in the use of PSA screening for early detection of prostate cancer.

Are there regional tendencies toward controversial screening practices? A study of prostate and breast cancer screening in a Medicare population.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate and breast cancer screening in older patients continue to be controversial. Balancing the desire for early detection with avoidance of over-diagnosis has led to competing and contradictory guidelines for both practices. Despite similarities, it is not known how these screening practices are related at the regional level. In this study, we examined how screening PSA and mammography are related within healthcare regions, and, to better understand what may be driving these practices, whether they are associated with local intensity of care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2012. For each of 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs), we calculated rates of PSA screening for men aged ≥68 years, as well as rates of screening mammography for women aged ≥75 years, adjusted for age and race. Additionally, we determined regional rates of "healthcare intensity", including spending on tests and procedures, and intensity of end-of-life care. Pearson correlations of adjusted rates were calculated within HRRs. RESULTS: The mean adjusted rate of PSA screening was 22%. The mean age of screened and unscreened patients was 75.0 and 77.4 years, respectively (p<0.0001). The mean adjusted rate of screening mammography was 23%; mean ages of screened and non-screened women were 79.95 and 83.67, respectively (p<0.0001). HRR-level PSA screening rates were independent of screening mammography rates (r=0.06, p=0.31). PSA screening rates were associated with spending on testing and procedures (r=0.42, p<0.0001) and various measures of intensity of EOL care (e.g. r=0.40, p<0.0001 for mechanical ventilator use). Screening mammography had low correlation with both health care spending and EOL care intensity measures (all r-values <0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Regional rates of PSA screening rates were independent of screening mammography, thus these practices appear to be driven by different factors. Unlike mammography, PSA screening was associated with local enthusiasm for testing and treatment. Efforts to reduce over-testing should contemplate these practices differently, and future research should examine the factors motivating these screening practices.

Secular Trends in Prostate Biopsy Criteria and Outcomes: The Dartmouth Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in prostate biopsy and cancer diagnosis at a center with conservative screening practices in the pre- and post-2012 era. More restrictive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have led to lower rates of screening, biopsy, and diagnosis of prostate cancer. It is not clear, however, how regions with low baseline screening rates (the Lebanon, New Hampshire hospital referral region centered on Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center had the lowest rate of screening among Medicare patients in 2012) have responded to these guidelines. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent prostate biopsy from January 2011 to March 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed by time. Multivariable analysis assessed for factors associated with higher grade cancer. RESULTS: There were 614 prostate biopsies were performed. PSA at biopsy increased with time (7.2 in 2011 vs 10.1 in 2015, P = .0085); age did not. There was a stable proportion of benign findings; proportions of low-grade disease decreased, whereas intermediate- and high-grade disease increased (2011 vs 2015: 21.1% vs 10.8% Gleason 3 + 3, 32.9% vs 43.3% ≥ Gleason 3 + 4, P = .0454). Factors predictive of higher grade disease included abnormal digital examination (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, P = .0076), higher PSA (OR 1.09, P = .0040), and later biopsy date (OR 1.01, P = .0469). CONCLUSION: In an environment of conservative baseline screening practices, there has been a shift in prostate biopsy criteria and outcomes, namely a rising PSA threshold for biopsy and a 50% decrease in the diagnosis of low-grade disease. Additional study is needed to ensure these trends are favorably impacting the quality of care.