Hepatocellular carcinoma tumour burden score to stratify prognosis after resection.

BACKGROUND: Although the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system has been largely adopted in clinical practice, recent studies have emphasized the need for further refinement and subclassification of this system. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy with curative intent for BCLC-0, -A or -B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 2000 and 2017 were identified using a multi-institutional database. The tumour burden score (TBS) was calculated, and overall survival (OS) was examined in relation to TBS and BCLC stage. RESULTS: Among 1053 patients, 63 (6·0 per cent) had BCLC-0, 826 (78·4 per cent) BCLC-A and 164 (15·6 per cent) had BCLC-B HCC. OS worsened incrementally with higher TBS (5-year OS 77·9, 61 and 39 per cent for low, medium and high TBS respectively; P < 0·001). No differences in OS were noted among patients with similar TBS, irrespective of BCLC stage (61·6 versus 58·9 per cent for BCLC-A/medium TBS versus BCLC-B/medium TBS, P = 0·930; 45 versus 13 per cent for BCLC-A/high TBS versus BCLC-B/high TBS, P = 0·175). Patients with BCLC-B HCC and a medium TBS had better OS than those with BCLC-A disease and a high TBS (58·9 versus 45 per cent; P = 0·005). On multivariable analysis, TBS remained associated with OS among patients with BCLC-A (medium TBS: hazard ratio (HR) 2·07, 95 per cent c.i. 1·42 to 3·02, P < 0·001; high TBS: HR 4·05, 2·40 to 6·82, P < 0·001) and BCLC-B (high TBS: HR 3·85, 2·03 to 7·30; P < 0·001) HCC. TBS could also stratify prognosis among patients in an external validation cohort (5-year OS 79, 51·2 and 28 per cent for low, medium and high TBS respectively; P = 0·010). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with HCC varied according to the BCLC stage but was largely dependent on the TBS.

ANTECEDENTES: Aunque el sistema de estadificación del Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) ha sido adoptado en gran medida en la práctica clínica, estudios recientes han enfatizado la necesidad de un mayor refinamiento y subclasificación del sistema BCLC. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular (hepatocellular cancer, HCC) BCLC-0, A y B que se sometieron a una hepatectomía con intención curativa entre 2000 y 2017 fueron identificados utilizando una base de datos multi-institucional. Se calculó la puntuación de carga tumoral (tumour burden score, TBS) y se examinó la supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) en relación con la TBS y los estadios BCLC. RESULTADOS: En la serie de 1.053 pacientes, 63 (6%) tenían HCC BCLC-0, 826 (78,4%) HCC BCLC-A y 164 (15,6%) HCC BCLC-B. La OS disminuyó de forma incremental en función de la mayor TBS (OS a 5 años; TBS baja: 77,9% versus TBS media: 61% versus TBS alta: 39%, P < 0,001). No se observaron diferencias en la OS entre pacientes con una puntuación TBS similar, independientemente del estadio BCLC (BCLC-A/TBS media: 61,6% versus BCLC-B/TBS media: 58,9%, P = 0,93; BCLC-A/TBS alta: 45,1% versus BCLC-B/TBS alta: 12,8%, P = 0,175). Los pacientes con BCLC-B/TBS media tuvieron una mejor OS que los pacientes con BCLC-A/TBS alta (58,9% versus 45,1%, P = 0,005). En el análisis multivariable, la TBS se mantuvo asociada a la OS en el caso de BCLC-A (TBS media: cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR = 2,07, i.c. del 95%: 1,42-3,02, P < 0,001; TBS alta: HR = 4,05, i.c. del 95%: 2,40-6,82, P < 0,001) y BCLC-B pacientes (TBS alta: HR = 3,85, i.c. del 95%: 2,03-7,30, P < 0,001). La TBS también pudo estratificar el pronóstico entre pacientes en una cohorte de validación externa (OS a 5 años; TBS baja: 78,7% versus TBS media: 51,2% versus TBS alta: 27,6%, P = 0,01). CONCLUSIÓN: El pronóstico de los pacientes con HCC varió según el estadio BCLC, pero dependió en gran medida de la TBS.

Detection and Characteristics of Temporal Encephaloceles in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Temporal encephaloceles are increasingly visualized during neuroimaging assessment of individuals with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy, and their identification could indicate an intracranial abnormality that may be related to a potential seizure focus. Careful review by an experienced neuroradiologist may yield improved detection of TEs, and other clinical, neurophysiologic, and radiologic findings may predict their presence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were reviewed retrospectively in patients at our institution who were presented at a multidisciplinary conference for refractory epilepsy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Clinical, neurophysiologic, and imaging data were collected. An expert neuroradiologist reviewed the latest MR imaging of the brain in patients for whom one was available, noting the presence or absence of temporal encephaloceles as well as other associated imaging characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, 16 of whom were excluded due to unavailable or poor-quality MR imaging. Seven patients had temporal encephaloceles reported on initial imaging, while 52 patients had temporal encephaloceles identified on expert review. MR imaging findings were more often initially normal in patients with temporal encephaloceles (P < .001), and detection of temporal encephaloceles was increased in patients in whom 3T MR imaging was performed (P < .001), the T2 sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions sequence was used (P < .001), or the presence of radiologic findings suggestive of idiopathic intracranial hypertension was noted. Seizure onset by scalp electroencephalogram among patients with temporal encephaloceles was significantly more likely to be temporal compared with patients without temporal encephaloceles (P < .001). A significant correlation between intracranial electroencephalogram seizure onset and patients with temporal encephaloceles compared with patients without temporal encephaloceles was not observed, though there was a trend toward temporal-onset seizures in patients with temporal encephaloceles (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Careful review of MR imaging in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy by a board-certified neuroradiologist with special attention paid to a high-resolution T2 sequence can increase the detection of subtle temporal encephaloceles, and certain clinical and neurophysiologic findings should raise the suspicion for their presence.