Reduction of adverse reactions and correlation between post-vaccination fever and specific antibody response across successive SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, recognized for high immunogenicity, frequently induces adverse reactions, especially fever. We previously reported a correlation between post-vaccination fever and specific antibody responses to the primary series and first booster. We herein report changes in adverse reactions and the correlation between post-vaccination fever and antibody responses across successive vaccinations, from monovalent to bivalent mRNA vaccines. Methods: This cohort study was conducted at a Japanese hospital to investigate adverse reactions to the monovalent primary, first booster, and BA.4/5 bivalent BNT162b2 vaccinations. Local and systemic reactions were reported through a self-reporting diary after each dose. The spike-specific IgG titers were measured following each vaccination. Results: Across 727 vaccinations in the vaccine series, the bivalent booster induced fewer adverse reactions than earlier doses. Fever ≥ 38.0 °C was significantly less frequent in the bivalent booster (12.3 %) compared to the primary series and monovalent booster (22.0 %, 26.2 %, p < 0.001). Reaction severity was also reduced in the bivalent booster. In the analysis of 70 participants with complete data for all doses, post-vaccination fever ≥ 38.0 °C exhibited the highest relative risk (RR) among all solicited reactions throughout the vaccine series (RR: 5.24 [95 % CI: 2.40-11.42] for monovalent and 6.24 [95 % CI: 2.14-18.15] for bivalent). The frequency of fever ≥ 38.0 °C after all doses was 8.6 % (6/70), with no fever ≥ 39.0 °C across all vaccinations. A high-grade post-vaccination fever was correlated with higher IgG titers, with multivariate analyses confirming this correlation as independent for each dose and unaffected by previous post-vaccination fever. Conclusions: The bivalent mRNA vaccine booster showed fewer and milder adverse reactions than the monovalent doses. Although vaccinees with a history of post-vaccination fever were more likely to experience fever after a subsequent dose, such recurrences were infrequent. A correlation between post-vaccination fever and increased IgG titers was identified for each vaccination, irrespective of post-vaccination fever history.

Comparative Effectiveness of Baloxavir Marboxil and Oseltamivir Treatment in Reducing Household Transmission of Influenza: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BLOCKSTONE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The transmission of influenza virus in households, especially by children, is a major route of infection. Prior studies suggest that timely antiviral treatment of ill cases may reduce infection in household contacts. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of oseltamivir (OTV) and baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment of index cases on the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza within household. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was done in BLOCKSTONE trial-a placebo-controlled, double-blinded post-exposure prophylaxis of BXM. Data were derived from the laboratory-confirmed index cases' household contacts who received placebo in the trial and also from household members who did not participate in the trial but completed illness questionnaires. To assess the SAR of household members, multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, vaccination status, and household size were performed and compared between contacts of index cases treated with BXM or OTV. RESULTS: In total, 185 index cases (116 treated with BXM and 69 treated with OTV) and 410 household contacts (201 from trial, 209 by questionnaire) were included. The Poisson regression modeling showed that the SAR in household contacts of index cases treated with BXM and OTV was 10.8% and 18.5%, respectively; the adjusted relative reduction in SAR was 41.8% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%-65.7%, p = 0.0456) greater with BXM than OTV. Similar reductions were found in contacts from the trial and those included by questionnaire. CONCLUSION: BXM treatment of index cases appeared to result in a greater reduction in secondary household transmission than OTV treatment.

Virological and clinical outcomes in outpatients treated with baloxavir or neuraminidase inhibitors for A(H3N2) influenza: A multicenter study of the 2022-2023 season.

While clinical trials have illuminated both the virological and clinical efficacy of baloxavir for influenza and post-treatment viral resistance, these aspects warrant further study in real-world settings. In response, we executed a prospective, observational study of the Japanese 2022-2023 influenza season. A cohort of 73 A(H3N2)-diagnosed outpatients-36 treated with baloxavir, 20 with oseltamivir, and 17 with other neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs)-were analyzed. Viral samples were collected before and after administering an antiviral on days 1, 5, and 10, respectively. Cultured viruses were amplified using RT-PCR and sequenced to detect mutations. Fever and other symptoms were tracked via self-reporting diaries. In the baloxavir cohort, viral detection was 11.1% (4/36) and 0% (0/36) on day 5 and day 10, respectively. Two isolates from day 5 (5.6%, 2/36) manifested I38T/M-substitutions in the polymerase acidic protein (PA). For oseltamivir and other NAIs, viral detection rates were 60.0% (12/20) and 52.9% (9/17) on day 5, and 16.7% (3/18) and 6.3% (1/16) on day 10, respectively. No oseltamivir-resistant neuraminidase mutations were identified after treatment. Median fever durations for the baloxavir, oseltamivir, and other NAI cohorts were 27.0, 38.0, and 36.0 h, respectively, with no significant difference. Two patients harboring PA I38T/M-substitutions did not exhibit prolonged fever or other symptoms. These findings affirm baloxavir's virological and clinical effectiveness against A(H3N2) in the 2022-2023 season and suggest limited clinical influence of post-treatment resistance emergence.

In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of four neuraminidase inhibitors in the Japanese 2022-23 season: Comparison with the 2010-11 to 2019-20 seasons.

To assess the extent of susceptibility to the four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) approved in Japan of the epidemic viruses in the 2022-23 influenza season in Japan, we measured the 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) of oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir in influenza virus isolates from patients. Viral isolation was done with specimens obtained prior to and after treatment, and the type/subtype was determined by RT-PCR using type- and subtype-specific primers. The IC50 was determined by a neuraminidase inhibition assay using a fluorescent substrate. Virus isolates, one A(H1N1)pdm09 and 74 A(H3N2), were measured in the 2022-23 season. The geometric mean IC50s of the 74 A(H3N2) isolated prior to treatment were 0.78 nM, 0.66 nM, 2.08 nM, and 2.85 nM for oseltamivir, peramivir, zanamivir, and laninamivir, respectively, comparable to those of the previous ten studied seasons. No A(H3N2) with highly reduced sensitivity to any of the NAIs was found in the 2022-23 season prior to or after drug administration. These results indicate that the sensitivity to these four commonly used NAIs has been maintained, at least for A(H3N2), in the 2022-23 influenza season in Japan, after the 2020-21 and 2021-22 seasons when the prevalence of influenza was extremely low.

Distinct features of SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity against Omicron breakthrough infection.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron breakthrough infection (Omicron-BTI) after vaccination has been frequently observed. A more detailed understanding of the humoral immunity against Omicron-BTI is required. METHODS: We measured strain-specific live-virus based neutralizing activity, anti-spike IgG, and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG titers in individuals with Omicron/BA.1-BTI and directly compared them with controls with diverse combinations of wild-type (WT) mRNA vaccination and infection history. RESULTS: Omicron-BTI individuals showed markedly higher neutralizing titers against all the WT, Delta, and Omicron strains in convalescent sera, compared with unvaccinated Omicron-infection individuals with only Omicron neutralizing activity. Similar tendencies were found in strain-specific anti-spike and anti-RBD IgG titers. The Omicron-specificity (BA.1/WT neutralizing ratio), Omicron-neutralizing efficiency per antibody unit, and anti-Omicron RBD-directivity of anti-spike antibodies in Omicron-BTI individuals were all significantly lower than those in unvaccinated Omicron-infection individuals, but they were equivalent to or higher than those in uninfected vaccinees. The induction of Omicron-specific neutralizing activity after Omicron-BTI was not weakened for eight months from the last vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cross-reactive vaccine-induced immunity was intensively stimulated following Omicron breakthrough infection, which contributed to Omicron neutralization. Measuring SARS-CoV-2 variant-specific antibody levels as well as neutralizing activity is useful for evaluating humoral immunity after breakthrough infection in the current situation of antigenic gaps between vaccinated and epidemic (Omicron sub-lineages) strains.

Correlation between specific antibody response to wild-type BNT162b2 booster and the risk of breakthrough infection with omicron variants: Impact of household exposure in hospital healthcare workers.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of omicron variants exhibiting antigenic changes has led to an increase in breakthrough infection among individuals with a wild-type SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster. The correlation between post-booster spike-specific antibodies and omicron infection risk remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included SARS-CoV-2-naive healthcare workers with three-dose BNT162b2. Post-booster spike-specific IgG and interferon-γ levels were measured. Breakthrough infection was documented during a 10-month omicron-predominant period. Household and healthcare contacts were followed to identify subsequent infections. The IgG titers were additionally measured at the end of follow-up, and the titers at exposure were estimated from the two-point titers. RESULTS: Of 333 participants, 89 developed infection, of whom 37 (41.6 %) were household contacts. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that higher IgG titers were significantly correlated with lower cumulative infection incidence (p = 0.029), whereas the interferon-γ levels were not (p = 0.926). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that increasing IgG titers were associated with a reduced hazard ratio (HR) of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.55). Household exposure posed a greater infection risk than healthcare exposure (HRs, 11.24 [6.88-18.40] vs. 2.82 [1.37-5.44]). The difference in geometric mean IgG titers of infected and uninfected participants was significant among household contacts (20,244 AU/mL vs. 13,842 AU/mL, p = 0.031). Estimation of IgG titers at exposure showed a significantly higher infection incidence in those exposed with titers of <3,000 AU/mL than in those with higher titers (79.2 % vs. 32.3 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Spike-specific antibodies induced by a wild-type SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster are suggested to be effective in protecting against omicron infection. Household exposure would be a significant source of infection for hospital healthcare workers.

Achievement of sufficient antibody response after a fourth dose of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in nursing home residents.

BACKGROUND: Infection control during COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing facilities is a critical public health issue. Antibody responses before and after the fourth (second booster) dose of wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in nursing home residents have not been fully characterized. METHODS: This study included 112 individuals: 54 nursing home residents (mean age: 84.4 years; 35 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 19 previously infected) and 58 healthcare workers (mean age: 47.7 years; 25 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 33 previously infected). Antispike and antinucleocapsid antibody responses to messenger RNA vaccination were evaluated using serum samples collected shortly and 5 months after the third dose, and shortly after the fourth dose. RESULTS: The median immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in SARS-CoV-2-naive residents was similar to that in SARS-CoV-2-naive healthcare workers after the fourth dose (24,026.3 vs. 30,328.6 AU/mL, p = .79), whereas after the third dose the IgG level of SARS-CoV-2-naive residents was approximately twofold lower than that in SARS-CoV-2-naive healthcare workers. In residents with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, timing of infection in relation to vaccination affected the kinetics of antibody responses. Residents infected after the third dose showed the highest IgG levels after the fourth dose among all groups (median: 64,328.8 AU/mL), in contrast to residents infected before initiating vaccination with antibody levels similar to those of SARS-CoV-2-naive residents. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced aged nursing home residents, poor responders in the initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series, could achieve sufficient antibody responses after the fourth (second booster) vaccination, comparable to those of younger adults.

SARS-CoV-2 strain-specific anti-spike IgG ELISA utilizing spike protein produced by silkworms.

BACKGROUND: A cost-effective and eco-friendly method is needed for the assessment of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in large populations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the performance of an ELISA that uses silkworm-produced proteins to quantify the strain-specific anti-Spike IgG (anti-S IgG) titer. METHODS: The OD values for the anti-His-tag antibody, a standard material of ELISA quantification, were measured. Correlations between the ELISA for each strain and the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay for the wild type were evaluated with serum samples from nine participants with various infection and vaccination statuses. RESULTS: Linear dose-responses were confirmed by high coefficients of determination: 0.994, 0.994, and 0.996 for the wild-type, Delta, and Omicron (BA.1) strain assays, respectively. The coefficient of determination for the wild-type and Delta strain assays was high at 0.959 and 0.892, respectively, while the Omicron strain assay had a relatively low value of 0.563. Booster vaccinees showed similar or higher titers against all strains compared to infected persons without vaccination. The Omicron-infected persons without vaccination had lower antibody titers against wild type than did the vaccinated persons. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data indicating that the ELISA with silkworm-produced proteins makes it possible to discriminate and quantify the strain-specific anti-S IgG antibody induced by vaccination or infection.

No significant influence of pre-vaccination antipyretic use on specific antibody response to a BNT162b2 vaccine booster against COVID-19.

The relation between pre-vaccination antipyretic use and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been unclear. We measured the pre- and post-BNT162b2 booster spike-specific IgG titers and recorded antipyretic use and adverse reactions for SARS-CoV-2-naive hospital healthcare workers. The data of 20 cases who used antipyretics within 24 h before vaccination were compared to that of 281 controls. The post-booster geometric mean IgG titers were 15,559 AU/mL (95 % CI, 11,474-21,203) for the cases and 16,850 AU/mL (95 % CI, 15,563-18,243) for the controls (p = 0.622). No significant reduction in the frequency or severity of any of the solicited adverse reactions was found for the cases. Similar results were obtained after adjustment with propensity-score matching for demographic characteristics, baseline IgG titer, and post-vaccination antipyretic use. Antipyretic use within 24 h before vaccination would not affect mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced specific antibody responses and that postponement of vaccination due to pre-vaccination antipyretic use would be unnecessary.

Correlation of Postvaccination Fever With Specific Antibody Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 BNT162b2 Booster and No Significant Influence of Antipyretic Medication.

Background: A severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine booster elicits sufficient antibody responses that protect against coronavirus disease 2019, whereas adverse reactions such as fever have been commonly reported. Associations between adverse reactions and antibody responses have not been fully characterized, nor has the influence of antipyretic use. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study in Japan, following our prior investigation of BNT162b2 2-dose primary series. Spike-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers were measured for SARS-CoV-2-naive hospital healthcare workers who received a BNT162b2 booster. The severity of solicited adverse reactions, including the highest body temperature, and self-medicated antipyretics were reported daily for 7 days following vaccination through a web-based self-reporting diary. Results: The data of 281 healthcare workers were available. Multivariate analysis extracted fever after the booster dose (ß = .305, P < .001) as being significantly correlated with the specific IgG titers. The analysis of 164 participants with data from the primary series showed that fever after the second dose was associated with the emergence of fever after the booster dose (relative risk, 3.97 [95% confidence interval, 2.48-6.35]); however, the IgG titers after the booster dose were not associated with the presence or degree of fever after the second dose. There were no significant differences in the IgG titers by the use, type, or dosage of antipyretic medication. Conclusions: These results suggest an independent correlation between mRNA vaccine-induced specific IgG levels and post-booster vaccination fever, without any significant influence of fever after the primary series. Antipyretic medications for adverse reactions should not interfere with the elevation of specific IgG titers.

Pronounced antibody elevation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA booster vaccination in nursing home residents.

BACKGROUND: Infection control during COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing facilities is a critical public health issue. Antibody responses before and after the third (booster) dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in nursing home residents have not been fully characterized. METHODS: This study included 117 individuals: 54 nursing home residents (mean age, 83.8 years; 39 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 15 previously infected) and 63 healthcare workers (mean age, 45.8 years; 32 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 31 previously infected). Anti-spike (receptor-binding domain [RBD]) and anti-nucleocapsid antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination and their related factors were evaluated using pre- (shortly and 6 months after the second dose) and post-booster vaccination samples. RESULTS: The median anti-spike (RBD) IgG level in SARS-CoV-2-naive residents 6 months after the second dose was the lowest among the four groups, with a decreasing rate of over 90%. The median rate of increase before and after the third dose in SARS-CoV-2-naive residents was significantly higher than that in SARS-CoV-2-naive healthcare workers (64.1- vs. 37.0-fold, P = 0.003), with the highest level among the groups. The IgG ratio of SARS-CoV-2-naive residents to healthcare workers after the second and third doses changed from one-fifth (20%) to one-half (50%). The rate of increase after the third dose in previously infected individuals was three- to fourfold, regardless of residents or healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced aged nursing home residents, poor responders in the initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series, could obtain sufficient antibody responses with the additional booster dose, despite more than 6 months after the second.

Post-vaccination antibody evaluation for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 delta variant breakthrough infection.

Waning humoral immunity after mRNA vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a significant problem for public health. Breakthrough infection in hospitals over several months after vaccination has not been fully characterized, especially against the delta (B.1.617.2) variant. Here, we describe an outbreak in our hospital in September of 2021, mainly through serological evaluation of the breakthrough infection. This retrospective observational study was done at an emergency and acute care hospital with 204 beds and 486 staff members where most staff members (92.6%) had had their second BNT162b2 vaccination by May of 2021. The peri-infection anti-spike RBD protein IgG (anti-S IgG) titers (lowest values between 11 days before and 7 days after onset or diagnosis) of serum samples from the breakthrough-infected persons were quantified. We also logarithmically estimated the anti-S IgG titers during the exposure period in September of uninfected staff members from their samples collected in May and December 2021. Whole-genome sequencing was done on obtained samples. In this outbreak, twelve persons (ten inpatients and two staff members) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) or RT-PCR, eight of whom had been vaccinated twice. Peri-infection anti-S IgG titers could be determined in seven of the eight breakthrough cases, with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 1,034 AU/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 398 to 2,686). Among 289 uninfected staff members with data from the two sampling points, the GMT of the estimated anti-S IgG titers during the exposure period in 51 staff members, who were working at the outbreak ward and potentially exposed but uninfected, and 238 other unexposed staff members were 1,458 AU/ml (95% CI, 1,196 to 1,777) and 1,628 AU/ml (95% CI, 1,500 to 1,766), respectively. All viruses from the eight samples for which whole-genome sequencing was available were identified as delta variants. Of the infected persons, one remained asymptomatic throughout the course of treatment, and eleven had an illness of mild to moderate severity, including ten who received monoclonal antibody cocktail (Casirivimab/imdevimab) therapy. Measurement and estimation of anti-spike antibody levels after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination would be helpful for evaluating the risk of breakthrough infection and for determining the necessity of booster vaccination.

Duration of fever and other symptoms after the inhalation of laninamivir octanoate hydrate: A study of the 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons and comparison with the 2011/12 to 2016/17 Japanese influenza seasons.

INTRODUCTION: Large scale investigation of the clinical effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors for circulating influenza viruses are important along with the surveillance of virus susceptibility in vitro. METHODS: The duration of fever and other influenza symptoms as markers of the clinical effectiveness of laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) were investigated in the Japanese 2017/18 and 2018/19 influenza seasons and compared with the results of the previous six seasons. RESULTS: Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B were found in 14, 45, and 52 patients in the 2017/18 season and in 22, 62, and 0 in the 2018/19 season, respectively. The median duration of fever for B was significantly longer than for A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) in the 2017/18 season (p = 0.0461) and for A(H3N2) than for A(H1N1)pdm09 in the 2018/19 season (p = 0.0290). However, the differences were subtle in both seasons for other symptoms, with no significant differences in their median duration in comparison of the circulating types/subtypes. Over the eight seasons with the previous six seasons added, the median durations of fever were consistently longer for B than for A, but the relation between the A subtypes was inconsistent. The median durations of fever were comparable over the eight seasons for the virus types/subtypes, as were the median durations of other symptoms. The percentage of febrile patients decreased in a similar pattern over the eight seasons for each type/subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that laninamivir has continued to be clinically effective against all types/subtypes of influenza viruses, with no safety issues.

Relation of fever intensity and antipyretic use with specific antibody response after two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

BACKGROUND: The reactogenicity of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has been commonly reported and antipyretic medications are often used for mitigating adverse reactions. Possible associations between the reactogenicity events and specific antibody responses have not been fully investigated, nor has the influence of using antipyretics. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from hospital healthcare workers with no COVID-19 history and the SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG titer after two doses was measured. Degree of solicited adverse reactions in a day, including the highest body temperature, were reported using a self-reporting diary for five days after each dose. The highest body temperature during the five days was divided into three grades (<37.0 °C, 37.0-37.9 °C, or ≥ 38.0 °C). Self-medicated antipyretics were reported using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The data of 335 participants were available for analysis. Multivariate analysis extracted the fever grade after the second dose (standardized coefficient beta = 0.301, p < 0.0001), female sex (beta = 0.196, p = 0.0014), and age (beta = -0.119, p = 0.0495) as being significantly correlated with the IgG titers. The positive correlation of the fever grade after the second dose with the IgG titers was also observed when analyzed by sex and age. The use of antipyretics did not interfere with the IgG titers irrespective of the fever grade. CONCLUSIONS: The fever intensity after the second dose was associated with the IgG titer and antipyretic medications may be beneficial to mitigate the suffering from adverse reactions, without interfering with the acquisition of sufficient antibody responses.

Susceptibility of epidemic viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors and treatment-emergent resistance in the Japanese 2019-20 influenza season.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the susceptibility of epidemic influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) and the emergence of resistant viruses after treatment, a prospective, observational study was done in the 2019-20 Japanese influenza season. METHODS: Influenza viruses were isolated before and twice after treatment, the first at day 5 and the second at day 10. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) to oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir were measured and compared with those of 2010-11 to 2018-19 seasons. NA amino acid sequences were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: The IC50 geometric means of the NAIs for 128 A(H1N1)pdm09, 2 A(H3N2), and 33 B were comparable to those of the previous seasons. Only 2 (1.6%) A(H1N1)pdm09 with significantly high IC50 to oseltamivir were found pretreatment. No A(H3N2) or B had resistance. Treatment-emergent oseltamivir resistance was found in 2 among 33 oseltamivir-treated A(H1N1)pdm09, only at the second follow-up. The NGS indicated a rapid increase in the proportion of H275Y to wild type, from 0% to almost 100% between days 5 and 10. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the continued effectiveness of these NAIs for epidemic influenza in Japan. Treatment-emergent resistant H275Y A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses were detected after oseltamivir treatment, rapidly replacing the wild type.

Reducing Influenza Virus Transmission: The Potential Value of Antiviral Treatment.

Prompt antiviral treatment has the potential to reduce influenza virus transmission to close contacts, but rigorous data on the magnitude of treatment effects on transmission are limited. Animal model data indicate that rapid reductions in viral replication after antiviral treatment reduce the risk of transmission. Observational and clinical trial data with oseltamivir and other neuraminidase inhibitors indicate that prompt treatment of household index patients seems to reduce the risk of illness in contacts, although the magnitude of the reported effects has varied widely across studies. In addition, the potential risk of transmitting drug-resistant variants exists with all approved classes of influenza antivirals. A controlled trial examining baloxavir treatment efficacy to reduce transmission, including the risk of transmitting virus with reduced baloxavir susceptibility, is currently in progress. If reduced transmission risk is confirmed, modeling studies indicate that early treatment could have major epidemiologic benefits in seasonal and pandemic influenza.

Virological and clinical outcomes in outpatients treated with baloxavir or oseltamivir: A Japanese multicenter study in the 2019-2020 influenza season.

Although the virological and clinical efficacies of baloxavir for influenza and the post-treatment emergence of variant viruses have been reported in clinical trials, its efficacies have not been fully investigated in clinical settings. This prospective, observational investigator-initiated study was conducted during the 2019-2020 Japanese influenza season. In outpatients receiving baloxavir or oseltamivir, nasopharyngeal samples were obtained on day 1 before treatment and on the scheduled days 5 and 10 after treatment. RT-PCR and sequencing were performed to detect polymerase acidic protein (PA) E23X/I38X and neuraminidase (NA) H275Y variants in clinical and cultivated samples. Fever and illness-related symptoms were recorded using self-reporting diaries. Overall, 116 outpatients, 76 treated with baloxavir (34 under 12 years) and 40 with oseltamivir (32 under 12 years), were eligible. Of these, 91 were infected with A (H1N1)pdm09 (78.4%), of which 58 received baloxavir and 33 received oseltamivir. PA variants were detected in clinical (1.7%, 1/58; 3.8%, 1/26 for children under 12 years) and isolated (3.4%, 2/58; 3.8%, 1/26 for children under 12 years) samples obtained on day 5 after baloxavir treatment, but not on day 10. The isolation frequencies of A (H1N1)pdm09 on days 5 and 10 after baloxavir treatment were 5.2% (3/58) and 0.0% (0/58), respectively. Of the three viruses isolated on day 5, two (66.7%, 2/3) were PA I38 T/F variants with reduced baloxavir susceptibility. The isolation frequencies of A (H1N1)pdm09 on days 5 and 10 after oseltamivir treatment were 30.3% (10/33) and 6.1% (2/33), respectively. Only the two viruses isolated on day 10 were NA H275Y variants. The median duration of fever in baloxavir and oseltamivir recipients was 22.3 and 27.5 h, respectively. No patients with PA or NA variants showed prolonged durations of fever. Baloxavir was virologically effective for influenza in the clinical setting of the 2019-2020 Japanese season. Variant emergence after baloxavir treatment was limited to the early post-treatment stage.

Genetic testing and serological screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing facility in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has critically impacted the spread of infection within nursing facilities. We evaluated the usefulness of genetic and serological tests conducted during a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing facility in Japan. METHODS: After the first identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a comprehensive, facility- and/or unit-wide PCR testing from nasopharyngeal swabs was repeatedly performed in a three-unit facility including 99 residents with dementia and 53 healthcare personnel. Additionally, PCR testing was conducted separately for residents and staff with fever of ≥37.5 °C. Facility-wide serological testing, including rapid kit testing and quantitative assay, was conducted twice over 1 month apart. RESULTS: A total of 322 PCR and 257 antibody tests were performed. 37 (24.3%) of the 152 individuals (25/99 residents, 25.3%; 12/53 staff, 22.6%) were identified as PCR-positive. Seven residents died with a mortality of 7.1% (7/99). Among the 37 individuals, 10 (27.0%) were asymptomatic at the time of testing. PCR positivity was concentrated on one unit (Unit 1) (20/30 residents, 66.7%; 9/14 staff, 64.3%). The other units showed a limited spread of infection. In unit-wide and separate tests, PCR positivity detection was highly prevalent (22.9 and 44.4%, respectively) in Unit 1, compared with that in the other units. Serological testing identified two additional infected residents with a negative PCR result and showed that no staff was newly identified as infected. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough PCR testing, in combination with comprehensive and separate tests, is critical for managing COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing facilities, particularly, in units considered an epicenter. Serological testing is also beneficial for tracing contacts, confirming the number of infected individuals, and authorizing the termination of the outbreak.

Clinical significance of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG detection with a rapid antibody kit for COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal observation of the detection of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 using antibody kits during the clinical course of COVID-19 is not yet fully investigated. OBJECTIVES: To understand the significance of the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, particularly IgG, using a rapid antibody kit, during the clinical course of COVID-19 patients with different severities. METHODS: Sixty-three serum samples from 18 patients (5 asymptomatic and 13 symptomatic patients) were retrospectively examined using a commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibody kit. PCR positivity of patient samples was also examined as a marker of current SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: IgG antibodies were detected in all cases in this study. The IgG detection rates reached 100.0% in samples collected on day 13 or later. IgG seropositivity after an initial negative status was observed in 13 patients (3/5 asymptomatic and 10/13 symptomatic cases). Interestingly, the persistence of both PCR and IgG positivity was detected in seven cases, of which three were asymptomatic. The longest overlap duration of the PCR and IgG positivity was 17 days in asymptomatic status. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG production can be detected in all infected individuals, using a rapid antibody kit, irrespective of clinical status. However, these findings suggest that, in some infected individuals, particularly those with asymptomatic status, the presence of virus-specific IgG antibodies does not imply prompt viral clearance.