RESUMEN
Objective: This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with severe systemic reactions following bee stings, focusing on patients treated at Pa-Sang Community Hospital, located in Lamphun Province, Thailand, which is recognized as one of the country's largest apicultural areas. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, utilizing electronic medical records with ICD-10 coding, of patients treated for bee sting injuries at the Emergency Department of Pa-Sang Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. Results: This analysis included a total of 591 bee sting events involving 533 patients. The average incidence of bee sting injuries was 31.3 per 10,000 Emergency Department visits, with 55% being male. A significant majority (86%) of events occurred outside the patients' home area. Notably, the head or extremities (49%) were the most common anatomical sites stung. Systemic reactions were observed in 44% of cases, with 96 visits (16%) diagnosed as anaphylaxis. Epinephrine injection was administered in 77% of these cases, and fortunately, no fatal anaphylactic reactions were recorded. Protective factors for anaphylaxis and severe systemic reactions after bee stings included age less than 15 years old and stings on extremities. Conversely, having more than ten bee stings and seeking Emergency Department treatment within 60 minutes of being stung were identified as significant risk factors. Conclusion: Bee sting injuries were a common presentation at the hospital situated in the high apicultural area, and severe systemic reactions were observed. This study highlights the need for comprehensive interventions to mitigate the increased risk of bee-related accidents in communities with thriving apicultural industries.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bee venom (BV) hypersensitivity can be severe and potentially life-threatening. Beekeepers heavily exposed to bee stings and are thus at a high-risk group. The data on bee sting reactions among beekeepers in Thailand is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, clinical and immunological characteristics, and the knowledge of BV hypersensitivity in Thai beekeepers. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire survey about BV reactions in beekeepers were conducted. Further blood test for immunological parameters: serum BV-specific IgE (BV sIgE), phospholipase A2-specific IgE (Api m1 sIgE), and BV-specific IgG4 (BV sIgG4) were compared between non-allergic beekeepers, patients with a history of bee sting anaphylaxis and the non-allergic control group. RESULTS: A total of 202 out of 447 questionnaires (response rate 45%) were returned. The median age was 46.7 years. Systemic reactions were documented in 6.4%. Younger than 45 years was found to be a factor associated with systemic reactions (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.16-16.31). The BV sIgE and Api m1 sIgE were significantly higher in the anaphylaxis group (p = 0.001). The median of BV sIgG4 was significantly higher in non-allergic beekeepers (p = 0.001). For the knowledge of BV hypersensitivity, 56.4% recognized that BV hypersensitivity could be fatal but only 6% knew about epinephrine auto-injector device. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of systemic reactions after stings among Thai beekeepers was not high, which might be due to the tolerance induced by natural exposure via sIgG4. The level of knowledge of BV hypersensitivity among beekeepers was insufficient, more education must be provided.