Upper and lower cervical alignment parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging with the occipital slope as a key marker of cervical alignment.

Objectives: Cervical spine alignment is evaluated by measuring the cervical angles or parameters on standing plain radiography. In this study, we aimed to evaluate mainly the upper cervical alignment and the correlation between upper and lower cervical sagittal parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Cervical MRIs of 210 outpatients were reviewed to measure the upper and lower cervical sagittal parameters. Their mean values were compared with normative values measured on standing X-ray from the literature. Correlations between the parameters were analyzed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: The C0 slope was correlated with all other parameters, except for the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. The strongest correlations (r > 0.500) were between the CL and C2 slope, between the CO2 and C0 slope, and between the C2 slope and C0 slope. Conclusion: On supine MRI, the C0 slope is a key marker of cervical spinal alignment. A strong correlation was observed between the C2 slope and C0 slope; therefore, the relationship between upper and lower cervical alignment could be assessed using slopes on MRI.

L1 slope: an overlooked spinal parameter.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar lordosis can be divided into two parts by a horizontal line, creating the L1 slope and the sacral slope. Despite being a major spinopelvic parameter, the L1slope (L1S) is rarely reported. However, there is some evidence that L1S is a relatively constant parameter. This study aimed to analyze the L1 slope and its relationships with other spinopelvic parameters. METHODS: Standing lateral lumbosacral x-ray radiographies of 76 patients with low back pain and CT scans of 116 asymptomatic subjects were evaluated for spinal and spinopelvic parameters including L1 slope (L1S). The x-ray and CT groups were divided into subgroups according to mean sacral slope (SS) or pelvic incidence (PI) values. The mean values of the spinopelvic parameters and the correlations between them were investigated and compared. RESULTS: L1S was 19.70 and 18.15 in low SS and high SS subgroups of x-ray respectively. L1S was 7.95 and 9.36 in low and high PI subgroups of CT, respectively, and the differences were insignificant statistically. L1S was the only spinal parameter that did not change as SS or PI increased in standing and supine positions. L1S was correlated with lumbar lordosis (LL) proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL) and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL) in both x-ray and CT groups. L1S was also the strongest correlated parameter with pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) mismatch in supine position. CONCLUSIONS: L1S is a relatively constant parameter and is around 16°-18° and 8°-9° in the standing and supine positions, respectively. It was significantly correlated with LL, PLL, DLL, and PI-LL. In the standing position it was nearly equal to PLL while this equality was present in low PI subgroups of CT. There is strong evidence that L1S is significantly correlated with health-related quality of life scores.

Tracing the disc: The novel qualitative morphometric MRI based disc degeneration classification system.

Background: This study aimed to develop a classification system for lumbar disc degeneration using routine magnetic resonance images (MRIs) that is easily applicable and unaffected by existing classifications' limitations, and to compare its reliability, reproducibility, and discriminative power to the widely used Pfirrmann classification. Methods: Five features were graded. This new classification system has eight grades, with at least one of these five features altering each grade. The T2-weighted sagittal images were acquired using a rapid spin-echo sequence with a repetition time of 2680 to 4900 milliseconds, an echo time of 100 to 109 milliseconds, and an echo train length of 17. Slice thick was 4 mm and the display field of view was 32 × 32 cm. The new classification system used five features: signal intensity, disc height, disc boundary regularity, and nucleus annulus separation. Increased signal intensity, decreased height, decreased regularity, and decreased nucleus-annulus separation indicated degeneration. Four raters classified 400 discs from 80 patients using the Pfirrmann and Novel systems. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate reliability and correlation. Results: The overall ICC and kappa values were found to be higher in the novel classification. (0.988 indicating excellent agreement for ICC and 0.76/0.94 indicating good-very good agreement for kappa). The Kendall tau c value, which shows the correlation between the two classifications and indicates the validity of the new classification, was 0.872, which is very strong. Through the use of cross-tabulations, the discriminatory power of the two newly added classification criteria was determined. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of an easy-to-use, discriminative novel morphometric MRI based classification system for lumbar disc degeneration. The differentiation of grades based on five distinct criteria may generate novel hypotheses regarding treatment selection and response monitoring, as well as new insights into the study of disc degeneration.

A simple method for the selection of valid spinopelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae.

PURPOSE: Transitional lumbosacral vertebrae (TLSV) are a congenital anomaly of the lumbosacral region that is characterized by the presence of a vertebra with morphological properties of both the lumbar and sacral vertebrae, with a prevalence of up to 36% in asymptomatic patients and 20% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. In patients with TLSV, because of these morphological changes and the different numbers of lumbar vertebrae, there are two optional reference sacral endplates that can be selected intently or inadvertently to measure the spinopelvic parameters: upper and lower endplates. The spinopelvic parameters measured using the upper and lower endplates are significantly different from each other as well as from the normative values. Therefore, the selection of a reference endplate changes the spinopelvic parameters, lumbar lordosis (LL), and surgical goals, which can result in surgical over- or under-correction. Because there is no consensus on the selection of sacral endplate among these patients, it is unclear as to which of these parameters should be used in diagnosis or surgical planning. The present study describes a standardization method for measuring the spinopelvic parameters and LL in patients with TLSV. METHODS: Upper and lower endplate spinopelvic parameters (i.e., pelvic incidence [PI], sacral slope [SS], and pelvic tilt) and LL of 108 patients with TLSV were measured by computed tomography. In addition, these parameters were measured for randomly selected subjects without TLSV. The PI value in the TLSV group, which was closer to the mean PI value of the control group, was accepted as valid and then used to create an optimum PI (OPI) group. Finally, the spinopelvic parameters and LL of the OPI and control groups were compared. RESULTS: Except for SS, all spinopelvic parameters and LL were comparable between the OPI and control groups. In the OPI group, 60% of the patients showed valid upper endplate parameters, and 40% showed valid lower endplate parameters. No difference was noted in the frequency of valid upper or lower endplates between the sacralization and lumbarization groups. Both the OPI and control groups showed nearly comparable correlations between their individual spinopelvic parameters and LL, except for PI and LL in the former. CONCLUSIONS: Because PI is unique for every individual, the endplate whose PI value is closer to the normative value should be selected as the reference sacral endplate in patients with TLSV.

Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters and Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Transitional Lumbosacral Vertebrae, with Special Reference to Sacralization and Lumbarization.

BACKGROUND: Transitional lumbosacral vertebra presents in 2 forms based on its origin: sacralization and lumbarization. These patients have 2 options for sacral endplates (upper and lower) and consequently, 2 sets of values for spinopelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis (LL). This study aimed to evaluate these parameters in asymptomatic patients with sacralization and lumbarization and compare them with each other and normative values. METHODS: Spinopelvic parameters and LL according to upper and lower endplate were measured using abdominal computed tomography in 1420 asymptomatic patients, of which 108 had Transitional lumbosacral vertebra. These parameters were compared among patients with lumbarization and sacralization and with normal controls. In addition, correlations between the upper and lower endplate parameters were determined. RESULTS: As compared to the control group, upper endplate measurements yielded lower spinopelvic parameters and LL values while lower endplate values yielded higher values. While these values were significantly different from normative values, these parameters were similar in both lumbarization and sacralization groups. Furthermore, most spinopelvic parameters of both upper and lower endplates were strongly correlated, and the differences between the upper and lower PI and LL values are relatively constant (27° and 14°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Upper and lower endplate parameters are comparable in patients with sacralization and lumbarization; therefore, the average spatial position of a sacralized L5 and a lumbarized S1 within the pelvis is similar and either parameter can be used for radiological measurements. Further studies with symptomatic patients are warranted to confirm these results.