Radiographic Predictors of FACE-Q Outcomes Following Non-Operative Orbital Floor Fracture Management.

BACKGROUND: Orbital floor fractures are common injuries treated by multiple surgical subspecialties. Controversy exists regarding the operative indications. This study sought to correlate radiographic characteristics of orbital floor fractures with validated patient reported outcome measures following non-operative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent non-operative management of an orbital floor fracture at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2013 to 2018 were queried retrospectively. Patients with GCS < 15 and/or distracting facial soft tissue or bony injuries were excluded from analysis. CT images, demographic information, and FACE-Q patient reported outcomes (Satisfaction with Eyes, Psychological Function, Social Function, and Appearance Related Psychosocial Distress) were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in the study. The mean time between injury and completion of the survey was 3.6 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had a right-sided fracture. The mean fracture area was 73.6 mm (Range:15-172 mm), and 913 mm (Range: 0-3106) was the mean volume displaced into the maxillary sinus. The unaffected inferior rectus muscle shape (height/width) was 0.5 (Range: 0.2-0.98) compared to 0.8 (Range 0.4-1.6) for the affected inferior rectus. After controlling for the time interval between survey and injury, gender, income, and education, rounding of the inferior rectus muscle was a significant predictor of appearance related psychosocial distress (P = 0.006). Inferior rectus rounding was stratified into "severe" (75%) and "moderate" (25%) categories. Severe rounding was associated with a larger orbital floor fracture area (110 versus 64 mm; P = 0.074), volume displaced into the maxillary sinus (1,716 versus 610 mm; P = 0.024), and worse appearance-related psychosocial distress (70 versus 25; P = 0.013). Sixty-one percent of patients followed up in clinic with a mean duration of 194 days. CONCLUSION: Prior studies have correlated presenting radiographic findings to follow-up clinical findings. However, this study is the first to assess long-term outcomes using validated patient-reported questionnaires. Inferior rectus muscle belly rounding significantly correlated with appearance related psychosocial distress. This radiographic finding may be valuable to consider in orbital floor fracture management.

Fat Grafting in Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fat grafting is widely utilized in craniofacial surgery. The authors describe a series of consecutive patients who underwent orthognathic surgery with fat grafting by the senior author and review relevant literature in the field; fat grafting technique is discussed in detail. The authors also highlight 3 patients to illustrate postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of consecutive orthognathic surgery patients was reviewed. Age, sex, BMI, procedure, area of harvest, location of injection, donor site complications, and need for repeat fat grafting were analyzed. Inclusion criteria included history of orthognathic surgery and concomitant fat grafting performed by the senior author in 2015. RESULTS: Fifty-three orthognathic surgery patients with concurrent fat grafting were reviewed. The cohort comprised 20 males (37.7%) and 33 females (62.3%). Thirty-three patients (62.3%) underwent Le Fort I operations either in conjunction with genioplasty and/or bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Twenty-eight patients (52.8%) underwent second operations involving additional fat grafting. The majority of these patients (15/28, 53.6%) received additional fat grafting during ensuing rhinoplasty. There were no donor site complications (ie, infection, wound breakdown) recorded in the authors' patient cohort. Amount of fat injected averaged 13.1 cc (range 5-25 cc). Follow-up generally occurred through the 1-year mark. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting is a proven technique to facilitate optimal postoperative wound-healing in orthognathic surgery. The senior author uses Telfa processing and the Coleman system to deliver the fat atraumatically. The authors' cohort of consecutive patients corroborates the benefits of fat grafting in craniofacial surgery; the authors observe wound-healing benefits, enhanced aesthetic outcomes and an anti-inflammatory effect with this technique.

The use of Synthes MatrixWAVE bone anchored arch bars for closed treatment of multiple concurrent mandibular fractures.

BACKGROUND: Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is an important tool in the treatment of facial fractures and bone-anchored arch bar systems have emerged as treatment options. This study illustrates our experience with the Synthes MatrixWAVE MMF system and the novel application in closed treatment of patients with multiple concurrent mandibular fractures. METHODS: We enrolled eight patients with concurrent mandibular fractures and treated them with the MatrixWAVE MMF system. The malleable arch bars were fitted and then secured using 6-8 mm screws. The arch bar was and either stretched or compressed to ensure optimal positioning. 24-gauge interdental fixation wiring was placed using the fish loop technique on either side of the fracture to achieve stabilization of the mandible fractures. RESULTS: All eight patients were retained in MMF until stable occlusion was achieved with clinical evidence of healing, approximately 4-6 weeks. Post-operative Panorex scans did not reveal any evidence of damage to tooth roots. None of the screws became overly embedded in the mucosa secondary to overgrowth; the arch bars were successfully removed in an outpatient setting without local anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The Synthes MatrixWAVE MMF system has unique features such as prominent screw anchor heads and horizontal malleability unique from other bone anchored arch bars. These features allow for completely closed treatment of patients with multiple concurrent mandible fractures.

Transabdominal Breast Augmentation: A Review of 114 Cases Performed over 14 Years.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty patients are frequently candidates for breast rejuvenation as well. Transabdominal breast augmentation permits insertion of breast implants through the abdominoplasty incision. This combined procedure is preferentially performed in an outpatient setting under monitored anesthesia care and nerve blocks. METHODS: This study was a 14-year retrospective review of a single surgeon's technique and outcomes using transabdominal breast augmentation through a low transverse abdominoplasty incision in select patients requesting simultaneous abdominoplasty and bilateral breast augmentation. Patients had minimal ptosis, smoking cessation a minimum of 4 weeks before surgery and indefinitely thereafter, and a lack of superior abdominal or significant breast surgery. RESULTS: The study's 114 patients had a mean follow-up of 19.2 months. The procedure was performed under monitored anesthesia care with intercostal nerve blocks for most patients [n = 107 (93.9 percent)] and general anesthesia [n = 7 (6.1 percent)] for a few. Seventy-nine patients [n = 74 (64.9 percent)] underwent additional procedures, with most (n = 48) undergoing suction-assisted lipectomy. Many patients underwent multiple procedures. Most complications occurred predictably along the central distal abdominoplasty flap and were minor (small wound breakdown, seroma, and mild skin infection). Major complications [n = 8 (7.0 percent)] included two patients with implant malposition requiring revision and one patient with a Baker grade III capsule; notably, this patient was a half-pack-per-day smoker with a body mass index of 27 kg/m. CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal breast augmentation is a safe, reliable procedure in the appropriately selected, healthy patient and may be used in minimally to moderately ptotic patients who request concurrent breast augmentation and abdominoplasty. Morbidity compares favorably to reported abdominoplasty series in the appropriately selected patient. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Diagnosis and Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans in a 3-Year-Old Patient.

In this case report, we present a 3-year-old boy with a diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) on the dorsum of his right hand. Although rarely metastatic, DFSP is highly locally invasive and can cause considerable local morbidity. In the hand, DFSP is uncommon in the young pediatric patient. In our patient, the tumor extended down to the second and third metacarpal heads and was treated with a multistaged excision of his tumor to achieve negative margins under slow Mohs micrographic surgery.

Management of Craniosynostosis at an Advanced Age: Controversies, Clinical Findings, and Surgical Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of unrepaired craniosynostosis is not well defined. Delayed surgical intervention carries greater risk of postoperative complications and its functional benefits for older patients are poorly characterized. The authors reviewed patients in whom children presented beyond 1 year of age to better understand the natural history of craniosynostosis, and the risk-benefit relationship for delayed reconstruction. METHODS: After institutional IRB approval the authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who presented after 1 year of age with craniosynostosis. Type of craniosynostosis, age at evaluation, medical history, surgical findings, developmental abnormalities, ophthalmologic findings, and clinical course were reviewed. RESULTS: Ten patients with delayed presentation for craniosynostosis were identified. The mean age at presentation was 6.8 years ±â€Š4.2 years (range, 3-17 years). Seven of 10 patients presented with developmental delay. Five patients presented with debilitating headaches. Five patients presented with comorbid Chiari malformations, 3 of whom required surgical decompression. Two patients had papilledema. Four patients underwent intracranial pressure monitoring, with elevated pressures found in 3 patients. Six patients underwent delayed cranial vault remodeling. There were no peri- or postoperative complications, including infection or residual bony defects, in those undergoing delayed operation. CONCLUSIONS: Children who present in a delayed fashion with unrepaired craniosynostosis have high rates of debilitating headaches, developmental delays, head shape anomalies, and Chiari malformation. Five patients reporting preoperative headaches noted subjective improvements in headaches following delayed operation. Cranial reconstruction can be safely performed at an older age and is appropriate to consider in carefully selected patients for aesthetic and/or functional concerns.