RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is increasingly utilized worldwide in epilepsy surgery planning. International guidelines for SEEG terminology and interpretation are yet to be proposed. There are worldwide differences in SEEG definitions, application of features in epilepsy surgery planning, and interpretation of surgical outcomes. This hinders the clinical interpretation of SEEG findings and collaborative research. We aimed to assess the global perspectives on SEEG terminology, differences in the application of presurgical features, and variability in the interpretation of surgery outcome scores, and analyze how clinical expert demographics influenced these opinions. METHODS: We assessed the practices and opinions of epileptologists with specialized training in SEEG using a survey. Data were qualitatively analyzed, and subgroups were examined based on geographical regions and years of experience. Primary outcomes included opinions on SEEG terminology, features used for epilepsy surgery, and interpretation of outcome scores. Additionally, we conducted a multilevel regression and poststratification analysis to characterize the nonresponders. RESULTS: A total of 321 expert responses from 39 countries were analyzed. We observed substantial differences in terminology, practices, and use of presurgical features across geographical regions and SEEG expertise levels. The majority of experts (220, 68.5%) favored the Lüders epileptogenic zone definition. Experts were divided regarding the seizure onset zone definition, with 179 (55.8%) favoring onset alone and 135 (42.1%) supporting onset and early propagation. In terms of presurgical SEEG features, a clear preference was found for ictal features over interictal features. Seizure onset patterns were identified as the most important features by 265 experts (82.5%). We found similar trends after correcting for nonresponders using regression analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: This study underscores the need for standardized terminology, interpretation, and outcome assessment in SEEG-informed epilepsy surgery. By highlighting the diverse perspectives and practices in SEEG, this research lays a solid foundation for developing globally accepted terminology and guidelines, advancing the field toward improved communication and standardization in epilepsy surgery.
RESUMEN
Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to delineate surgical targets in focal drug-resistant epilepsy. SEEG uses electrodes placed directly into the brain to identify the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). However, its major constraint is limited brain coverage, potentially leading to misidentification of the 'true' SOZ. Here, we propose a framework to assess adequate SEEG sampling by coupling epileptic biomarkers with their spatial distribution and measuring the system's response to a perturbation of this coupling. We demonstrate that the system's response is strongest in well-sampled patients when virtually removing the measured SOZ. We then introduce the spatial perturbation map, a tool that enables qualitative assessment of the implantation coverage. Probability modelling reveals a higher likelihood of well-implanted SOZs in seizure-free patients or non-seizure free patients with incomplete SOZ resections, compared to non-seizure-free patients with complete resections. This highlights the framework's value in sparing patients from unsuccessful surgeries resulting from poor SEEG coverage.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Epilepsia Refractaria , Electrodos Implantados , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Epilepsia Refractaria/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/cirugía , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Convulsiones/cirugía , Convulsiones/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven , Epilepsias Parciales/cirugía , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Mapeo Encefálico/métodos , AdolescenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sleep has important influences on focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), and the rates and spatial extent of IEDs are increased in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. In contrast, the influence of sleep on seizures is less clear, and its effects on seizure topography are poorly documented. We evaluated the influences of NREM sleep on ictal spatiotemporal dynamics and contrasted these with interictal network dynamics. METHODS: We included patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent continuous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) with depth electrodes. Patients were selected if they had 1 to 3 seizures from each vigilance state, wakefulness and NREM sleep, within a 48-hour window, and under the same antiseizure medication. A 10-minute epoch of the interictal iEEG was selected per state, and IEDs were detected automatically. A total of 25 patients (13 women; aged 32.5 ± 7.1 years) were included. RESULTS: The seizure onset pattern, duration, spatiotemporal propagation, and latency of ictal high-frequency activity did not differ significantly between wakefulness and NREM sleep (all p > 0.05). In contrast, IED rates and spatial distribution were increased in NREM compared with wakefulness (p < 0.001, Cliff's d = 0.48 and 0.49). The spatial overlap between vigilance states was higher for seizures (57.1 ± 40.1%) than IEDs (41.7 ± 46.2%; p = 0.001, Cliff's d = 0.51). INTERPRETATION: In contrast to its effects on IEDs, NREM sleep does not affect ictal spatiotemporal dynamics. This suggests that once the brain surpasses the seizure threshold, it will follow the underlying epileptic network irrespective of the vigilance state. These findings offer valuable insights into neural network dynamics in epilepsy and have important clinical implications for localizing seizure foci. ANN NEUROL 2023.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Epileptic spikes are the traditional interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarker for epilepsy. Given their low specificity for identifying the epileptogenic zone (EZ), they are given only moderate attention in presurgical evaluation. This study aims to demonstrate that it is possible to identify specific spike features in intracranial EEG that optimally define the EZ and predict surgical outcome. METHODS: We analyzed spike features on stereo-EEG segments from 83 operated patients from 2 epilepsy centers (37 Engel IA) in wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement sleep, and rapid eye movement sleep. After automated spike detection, we investigated 135 spike features based on rate, morphology, propagation, and energy to determine the best feature or feature combination to discriminate the EZ in seizure-free and non-seizure-free patients by applying 4-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The rate of spikes with preceding gamma activity in wakefulness performed better for surgical outcome classification (4-fold area under receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC] = 0.755 ± 0.07) than the seizure onset zone, the current gold standard (AUC = 0.563 ± 0.05, p = 0.015) and the ripple rate, an emerging seizure-independent biomarker (AUC = 0.537 ± 0.07, p = 0.006). Channels with a spike-gamma rate exceeding 1.9/min had an 80% probability of being in the EZ. Combining features did not improve the results. INTERPRETATION: Resection of brain regions with high spike-gamma rates in wakefulness is associated with a high probability of achieving seizure freedom. This rate could be applied to determine the minimal number of spiking channels requiring resection. In addition to quantitative analysis, this feature is easily accessible to visual analysis, which could aid clinicians during presurgical evaluation. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:522-535.