Multidimensional Assessment of Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity in Geriatric Patients: Creatinine/Cystatin C Ratio Performs Better than Sarcopenia Index.

The serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and the sarcopenia index (SI) are novel indicators for sarcopenia, but their accuracy may depend on various confounders. To assess CCR and SI diagnostic accuracy, we studied the clinical and biophysical parameters associated with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. A total of 79 elderly patients (65-99 yrs, 33 females) underwent clinical, anthropometric, body composition, geriatric performance, and blood chemistry evaluation. The CCR and SI accuracy were assessed to identify sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was confirmed in 40.5%, and sarcopenic obesity in 8.9% of the subjects. Sarcopenic patients showed an increased Charlson comorbidity index, cardiovascular disease (CVD) rates and frailty, and decreased physical performance than non-sarcopenic subjects. Patients with sarcopenic obesity had increased body fat and inflammatory markers compared to obese subjects without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was associated with a decreased CCR and SI. However, when the logistic regression models were adjusted for possible confounders (i.e., age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of CVD, and frailty score), a significant OR was confirmed for the CCR (OR 0.021, 95% CI 0.00055-0.83) but not for the SI. The AUC for the CCR for sarcopenia discrimination was 0.72. A higher performance was observed in patients without chronic kidney diseases (CKD, AUC 0.83). CCR, more than the SI, is a useful, non-invasive, and cost-effective tool to predict sarcopenia, irrespective of the potential confounders, particularly in subjects without CKD.

Risk for cancer development in familial Mediterranean fever and associated predisposing factors: an ambidirectional cohort study from the international AIDA Network registries.

Objective: Inflammation has been associated with an increased risk for cancer development, while innate immune system activation could counteract the risk for malignancies. Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a severe systemic inflammatory condition and also represents the archetype of innate immunity deregulation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the risk for cancer development in FMF. Methods: The risk ratio (RR) for malignancies was separately compared between FMF patients and fibromyalgia subjects, Still's disease patients and Behçet's disease patients. Clinical variables associated with cancer development in FMF patients were searched through binary logistic regression. Results: 580 FMF patients and 102 fibromyalgia subjects, 1012 Behçet's disease patients and 497 Still's disease patients were enrolled. The RR for the occurrence of malignant neoplasms was 0.26 (95% Confidence Interval [CI.] 0.10-0.73, p=0.006) in patients with FMF compared to fibromyalgia subjects; the RR for the occurrence of malignant cancer was 0.51 (95% CI. 0.23-1.16, p=0.10) in FMF compared to Still's disease and 0.60 (95% CI. 0.29-1.28, p=0.18) in FMF compared to Behçet's disease. At logistic regression, the risk of occurrence of malignant neoplasms in FMF patients was associated with the age at disease onset (ß1 = 0.039, 95% CI. 0.001-0.071, p=0.02), the age at the diagnosis (ß1 = 0.048, 95% CI. 0.039-0.085, p=0.006), the age at the enrolment (ß1 = 0.05, 95% CI. 0.007-0.068, p=0.01), the number of attacks per year (ß1 = 0.011, 95% CI. 0.001- 0.019, p=0.008), the use of biotechnological agents (ß1 = 1.77, 95% CI. 0.43-3.19, p=0.009), the use of anti-IL-1 agents (ß1 = 2.089, 95% CI. 0.7-3.5, p=0.002). Conclusions: The risk for cancer is reduced in Caucasic FMF patients; however, when malignant neoplasms occur, this is more frequent in FMF cases suffering from a severe disease phenotype and presenting a colchicine-resistant disease.

Efficacy of canakinumab in patients with Still's disease across different lines of biologic therapy: real-life data from the International AIDA Network Registry for Still's Disease.

Introduction: The effectiveness of canakinumab may change according to the different times it is used after Still's disease onset. This study aimed to investigate whether canakinumab (CAN) shows differences in short- and long-term therapeutic outcomes, according to its use as different lines of biologic treatment. Methods: Patients included in this study were retrospectively enrolled from the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) International Registry dedicated to Still's disease. Seventy-seven (51 females and 26 males) patients with Still's disease were included in the present study. In total, 39 (50.6%) patients underwent CAN as a first-line biologic agent, and the remaining 38 (49.4%) patients were treated with CAN as a second-line biologic agent or subsequent biologic agent. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between patients treated with CAN as a first-line biologic agent and those previously treated with other biologic agents in terms of the frequency of complete response (p =0.62), partial response (p =0.61), treatment failure (p >0.99), and frequency of patients discontinuing CAN due to lack or loss of efficacy (p =0.2). Of all the patients, 18 (23.4%) patients experienced disease relapse during canakinumab treatment, 9 patients were treated with canakinumab as a first-line biologic agent, and nine patients were treated with a second-line or subsequent biologic agent. No differences were found in the frequency of glucocorticoid use (p =0.34), daily glucocorticoid dosage (p =0.47), or concomitant methotrexate dosage (p =0.43) at the last assessment during CAN treatment. Conclusion: Canakinumab has proved to be effective in patients with Still's disease, regardless of its line of biologic treatment.