RESUMEN
Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In particular, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of cervical cancer, leading to significant survival benefits in both locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent settings. As the landscape of cervical cancer therapies continues to evolve, the aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current state and the latest practice-changing updates in cervical cancer.
RESUMEN
Background and Objective: Serous endometrial cancers (ECs) are an aggressive histotype of ECs which are disproportionately responsible for 40% of cancer-specific mortality rates despite constituting only 5-10% of all uterine cancers in incidence. In recent times, it has become increasingly evident that about 20-40% of uterine serous cancers (USCs) have molecular alterations in ERBB2 pathway with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) amplification or overexpression. We summarise the evidence on genetic and molecular alterations in HER2/neu pathway in USC with a focus on testing criteria, targeting agents and resistance mechanisms. Methods: We conducted a database search of PubMed/Medline up to 28th February 2023 for articles published in the English language using pre-defined search terms. One hundred and seventy-one relevant articles were subsequently reviewed for eligibility and inclusion in the review. Key Content and Findings: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification is a significant development in the molecular profiling of ECs with a positive impact on the treatment of these tumors including USCs. Testing criteria for HER2/neu in USC with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has evolved in more than a decade with progress made towards EC specific testing guidelines. The findings of a recent phase III study have led to the development of practice changing guidelines towards improving patient outcomes. Conclusions: Molecular aberration in the HER2/neu pathway contributes to the aggressive behaviour of USC. Considering the clinical benefit conferred by HER2/neu targeted therapy, HER2/neu testing is recommended for all cases of serous EC in advanced and recurrent settings. Trastuzumab in combination with platinum and taxanes based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment option for patients with advanced or recurrent serous cancers who test positive to HER2/neu. Clinical trials on targeted therapy are ongoing and future research should focus on selection of patients who will derive the most benefit from such therapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes. METHODS: A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use. RESULTS: Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists. CONCLUSION: While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media's effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the management and outcomes of Bartholin gland cancer at a single tertiary institution. STUDY DESIGN: A single institution retrospective review of 9 cases of BGC between 2004 and 2022 was conducted. Demographics, pathological characteristics, treatment, follow up and oncologic outcomes were extracted from clinical records. Data are summarised using descriptive statistics and survival probabilities are presented with Kaplan Meier graphs. RESULTS: Ten cases of BGC were identified at our institution over a period of 18 years. Nine out of ten clinical records were available for analysis. Eight patients presented with vulval swelling and four were treated initially for Bartholin cyst or abscess. One patient had a histological diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma while the remaining were squamous cell carcinomas. With the exception of stage I disease chemoradiation was the primary mode of treatment. Adverse events included skin desquamation (4/9), venous thrombo-embolism (2/9), gastro-intestinal (1/9) and neurotoxicity (1/9). Median follow up was 60 months with a 5-year recurrence free and overall survival at 76 % and 64 % respectively. CONCLUSION: BGC may present after a long duration of symptoms and at advanced stages. Primary chemoradiation appears to be a feasible treatment option in advanced disease with the benefit of decreased morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Glándulas Vestibulares Mayores , Neoplasias de la Vulva , Humanos , Femenino , Glándulas Vestibulares Mayores/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Vulva/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/terapia , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/patología , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/mortalidadRESUMEN
Management of central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an unmet need. We analyzed data on 41 such patients to evaluate predictors of outcome. Between January, 2010 and December 2020, among 1028 patients with EOC treated at our institute 41 (3.98%) developed CNS metastasis. Median age of patients was 48 years, ranging from 22 to 75 years. Primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), and analysis of prognostic factors were secondary outcome measures. An intention to treat analysis was done. We also performed review the literature (n=2253) as regards to clinicopathological and radiological features, treatment received, survival outcomes and prognostic factors. Median time from diagnosis of EOC to CNS metastasis was 27 months (range: 0 to 101 months). 33(80.5%) patients had FIGO stage III-IV at baseline and serous carcinoma (75.6%) was common pathology subtype. Thirteen (31.7%) patients had isolated CNS metastasis and 28 (68.3%) had intra-abdominal disease in addition. Nineteen (46.3%) patients achieved complete response post treatment with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Median PFS and OS from the time of CNS metastasis is 12 (range:1 to 51) months and 33 (range: 1 to 71) months, respectively. Absence of extracranial disease and lower serum CA-125 at diagnosis of CNS metastasis were predictive of superior PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. CNS metastasis is a late event in EOC, post multiple lines of treatment. Patients with disease limited to brain and treated with surgical resection and chemoradiation have best outcome.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , EncéfaloRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Almost 80% of epithelial ovarian cancer present in advanced stage at diagnosis and despite excellent response to surgery and chemotherapy, more than 70% cancers recur. Subsequent therapies become decreasingly effective in controlling the disease, with each successful therapy being effective for a shorter duration. As a result, there is a need for novel therapeutic strategies to effectively treat recurrence. AREAS COVERED: In this extensive literature review of high-quality articles, we have focused on surveillance strategy to detect recurrence early, classification of recurrence based on timeline, role of surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents such as anti-angiogenetic drugs, PARP inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease, respectively. EXPERT OPINION: Recurrent ovarian cancers (ROC) are represented by a heterogenous group of patient population in terms of platinum-free interval (PFI), histology, molecular characteristics and immune recognition. In today's era of precision medicine, chemotherapy should be combined with appropriate targeted agent in a multipronged approach to prolong survival and provide better quality of life outcomes by minimizing side effects.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma arising from malignant transformation of the vagina is an extremely rare condition. The diagnosis is often difficult as the symptomatology and pathological features overlap with that of pelvic endometriosis. A 38 years old female presented with complaints of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and painful defecation along with blood-stained vaginal discharge for a year. Examination revealed the presence of multiple brownish irregular nodules in posterior vaginal fornix and fixed tender nodules which on biopsy revealed florid vaginal endometriosis. She improved symptomatically on medical therapy. After 18 months of diagnosis, she presented again with a necrotic growth in posterior fornix, which on repeat biopsy revealed a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Laparotomy revealed a 7×5 cm mass in the pouch of Douglas, infiltrating the posterior vaginal wall and rectum. A complete cytoreductive surgery with retrograde hysterectomy, excision of posterior vaginal wall and rectosigmoid resection was done. The patient is disease-free at a follow-up of 65 months.
RESUMEN
Evidence from preclinical studies suggests a preventive effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in preeclampsia. Recently, several epidemiological studies have described a conflicting association between the use of PPIs during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PPI use and the risk of preeclampsia. We searched databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Emcare, CINAHL, and the relevant grey literature from inception until 13 September 2021. Studies reporting the preeclampsia risk with the use of PPIs were eligible for inclusion. Literature screening, data extraction, and the risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to generate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of preeclampsia and preterm preeclampsia among women receiving PPIs during pregnancy were the primary outcomes of interest. This meta-analysis comprised three studies involving 4,877,565 pregnant women, of whom 119,017 were PPI users. The included studies were judged to have a low risk of bias. The risk of preeclampsia among pregnant women who received PPIs anytime during pregnancy was significantly increased (RR 1.27 (95% CI: 1.23-1.31)), although the increase was trivial in absolute terms (2 per 1000). The subgroup analysis revealed that the risk was increased in each of the three trimesters. The risk of preterm preeclampsia among pregnant women receiving PPIs anytime during pregnancy was not significantly increased (RR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.70-1.55)). The certainty evaluated by GRADE in these estimates was low. PPI use may be associated with a trivial increase in the risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women. There is no evidence supporting that PPI use decreases the risk of preeclampsia or preterm preeclampsia.
RESUMEN
Management of gynecological cancers has suffered during the pandemic, partly due to lockdown and partly due to directing resources to manage COVID-19 patients. Modification of gynecological cancer management during this pandemic is recommended. Cervical cancer patients who present with stage IA1 disease can have a delay of up to 8 weeks for surgical treatment, considering the slow tumor growth rate. Women with stages IA2, IB1, IB2, IIA1 must undergo radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy within 6 to 8 weeks. In areas where surgical treatment is not available, patients should be referred for radiation therapy/areas with adequate surgical expertise. The surgical option is attractive for early cancers during the COVID era, as it involves a single visit compared to the multiple visits required for chemoradiation. The value of lymph node staging needs to be reconsidered. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given preference over primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancers. Surgeries, which demand extended surgical time such as Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and pelvic exenterations, should be avoided during this pandemic. For patients scheduled for interval surgery after two or three neoadjuvant cycles, six cycles of chemotherapy should be considered before surgery is performed. For early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer, consideration should be given to medical management until surgery is possible. The above recommendations have been made keeping in mind the geography, patient load, and availability of resources available to health care providers from southeast Asia. They might not be applicable globally and every practitioner should take call regarding patient's management as per availability of resources and loco-regional circumstances. The implementation of recommended international guidelines for the management of gynecologic cancers should take precedence. Each modification to the standard approach should be approved by a multidisciplinary team depending on the condition of the patients and the locoregional circumstances.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , PandemiasRESUMEN
Objective Pregnancy with an autoimmune disorder is faced with several risks for mother and fetus. The aim of the present study is to analyze the course and outcome of pregnancy in women with autoimmune disorders (AIDs). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The hospital records of 153 pregnancies with autoimmune disorders and 1095 low-risk pregnant women who served as controls were reviewed. An adverse perinatal outcome was defined as the presence of any obstetric complications, including preeclampsia, eclampsia, abruption, antepartum hemorrhage (APH), prematurity, fetal growth restriction (FGR), intrauterine death (IUD), intrapartum event, mode of delivery, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay, or disease-specific neonatal complications. For all statistical tests with two-tailed probability, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A high incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes was observed in all women with AIDs when compared with age-matched controls. The highest incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes was observed in women with Takayasu's arteritis. The incidence of abortions was more in women with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) and Grave's disease (22.2% and 33.3%, respectively). The incidence of prematurity, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and low birth weight were highest in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Pregnancy with myasthenia gravis and rheumatoid arthritis did not have any significant adverse impact on pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion We found a strong association between autoimmune disorders and obstetric complications. The multidisciplinary team approach and pre-pregnancy optimization of the disease improve maternal and fetal outcomes.