Laparoscopic deroofing of a large hepatic cyst to relieve atypical cardiac symptoms.

A woman in her 60s was referred to the hepato-pancreato-biliary clinic for further assessment of a large hepatic cyst, which was incidentally identified by echocardiography. She was being investigated for possible crescendo angina on the backdrop of a 6-month history of increasing chest pain, shortness of breath, sweating, orthopnoea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea. Coronary angiography and echocardiography demonstrated normal cardiac physiology. A CT abdomen/pelvis confirmed an 8.5 cm hepatic cyst indenting the posterior and caudate lobes and abutting the inferior vena cava. Nocturnal dyspnoea was attributed to diminished venous return. Due to worsening symptoms and their impact on her job, the patient underwent laparoscopic deroofing of the hepatic cyst. Histopathology confirmed a simple hepatic cyst. In her first postoperative review clinic, 8 months after her initial visit to the cardiology team, the patient was asymptomatic and fully functional with a considerably improved quality of life.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Local Anesthetic Infiltration Via Abdominal Wound Catheter in Open Liver Resection.

AIM: To compare outcomes following open liver resection (OLR) between patients receiving thoracic epidural (EP) versus abdominal wound catheters plus patient-controlled analgesia (AWC-PCA). METHOD: Patients were randomized 1:1 to either EP or AWC-PCA within an enhanced recovery protocol. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS), other variables included functional recovery, pain scores, peak flow, vasopressor and fluid requirements, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between April 2015 and November 2017, 83 patients were randomized to EP (n = 41) or AWC-PCA (n = 42). Baseline demographics were comparable. No difference was noted in LOS (EP 6 d (3-27) vs AWC-PCA 6 d (3-66), P = 0.886). Treatment failure was 20% in the EP group versus 7% in the AWC-PCA (P = 0.09). Preoperative anesthetic time was shorter in the AWC-PCA group, 49 minutes versus 62 minutes (P = 0.003). EP patients required more vasopressor support immediately postoperatively on day 0 (14% vs 54%, P = <0.001) and day 1 (5% vs 23%, P = 0.021). Pain scores were greater on day 0, afternoon of day 1 and morning of day 2 in the AWC-PCA group however were regarded as low at all time points. No other significant differences were noted in IV fluid requirements, nausea/sedation scores, days to open bowels, length of HDU, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: AWC-PCA was associated with reduced treatment failure and a reduced vasopressor requirement than EP up to 2 days postoperatively. While the use of AWC-PCA did not translate into a shorter LOS in this study, it simplified patient management after OLR. EP cannot be routinely recommended following open liver resections.

Improved prediction of early-onset coronary artery disease using APOE epsilon4, BChE-K, PPARgamma2 Pro12 and ENOS T-786C in a polygenic model.

OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is often polygenic due to multiple mutations that contribute small effects to susceptibility. Since most prior studies only evaluated the contribution of single candidate genes, we therefore looked at a combination of genes in predicting early-onset CAD [apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon4, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) K, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 (PPARgamma2) Pro12Ala and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ENOS) T-786C]. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the frequencies, individually and in combination, of all four alleles among patients with early-onset CAD (n = 150; <50 years), late-onset CAD (n = 150; >65 years) and healthy controls (n = 150, age range 47-93 years). Differences in the proportion of subjects in each group with the given gene combination were assessed and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using logistic regression to combine the results of multiple genes. RESULTS: Early-onset CAD patients had increased, but non-significant, frequencies of PPARgamma2 Pro12/Pro12 (P = 0.39) and ENOS T-786C (P = 0.72), while BChE-K was only significantly higher in early-onset CAD patients compared to controls (P = 0.03). There were significantly more APOE epsilon4 alleles alone (P = 0.02) or in combination with BChE-K (P = 0.02) among early-onset CAD patients compared to late-onset CAD ones or controls. When combined, there was a higher prevalence of all four alleles in early-onset CAD (early-onset CAD patients: 10.7%, late-onset CAD patients: 3.3% and controls: 2.7%, P = 0.01). LR for early-onset CAD for a single allele was relatively small (1.08 for PPARgamma2 to 1.70 for APOE epsilon4). This increased to 2.78 (1.44-5.37) when combining all four alleles, therefore increasing the pre-test probability of CAD from 5% to a post-test probability of 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: While any single mutation causes only a mildly increased LR (none > 1.7), in combination, the likelihood of early-onset CAD increased to 2.78 with four mutations. The genetics of early-onset CAD appear to be multifactorial, requiring polygenic models to elucidate risk.