Long-term risk of autoimmune diseases after mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccination in a Korean, nationwide, population-based cohort study.

The long-term association between mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and the development of autoimmune connective tissue diseases (AI-CTDs) remains unclear. In this nationwide, population-based cohort study involving 9,258,803 individuals, we aim to determine whether the incidence of AI-CTDs is associated with mRNA vaccination. The study spans over 1 year of observation and further analyses the risk of AI-CTDs by stratifying demographics and vaccination profiles and treating booster vaccination as time-varying covariate. We report that the risk of developing most AI-CTDs did not increase following mRNA vaccination, except for systemic lupus erythematosus with a 1.16-fold risk in vaccinated individuals relative to controls. Comparable results were reported in the stratified analyses for age, sex, mRNA vaccine type, and prior history of non-mRNA vaccination. However, a booster vaccination was associated with an increased risk of some AI-CTDs including alopecia areata, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, we conclude that mRNA-based vaccinations are not associated with an increased risk of most AI-CTDs, although further research is needed regarding its potential association with certain conditions.

Estimating the burden of vitiligo: a systematic review and modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by depigmented skin patches, which can pose substantial psychosocial challenges particularly in individuals with dark skin tones. Despite its impact on quality of life, there is an absence of standardised global epidemiological data. We sought to address this gap with the present study. METHODS: In this study we did a systematic review and modelling analysis to estimate the global, regional, and national prevalence and incidence of vitiligo. We did a comprehensive search of nine digital libraries (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online, KCI Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, Western Pacific Region Index Medicus, Informit, and Health Research and Development Information Network) from inception up to May 25, 2023. We included cross-sectional or cohort studies reporting the incidence rate or prevalence of vitiligo, or data from which incidence rate or prevalence could be calculated, in the general population of a country or area of a country. Summary estimate data were extracted. A main outcome was to estimate the worldwide, regional, and country-specific lifetime prevalence of vitiligo diagnosed by physicians or dermatologists among the general population and in adults and children (as per age groups defined in included studies). We used a Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model to estimate prevalence, and calculated number of affected individuals using the UN population structure in 2022. In estimating lifetime prevalence, studies reporting point or period prevalence were excluded. Our other main outcome was to estimate incidence rates of vitiligo, but due to a small number of studies, the data on incidence were presented in a descriptive summary. This study was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023390433. FINDINGS: Our search identified 22 192 records, of which 90 studies met our inclusion criteria. Of these studies, six focused on the incidence of vitiligo, 79 reported on the prevalence of vitiligo, and five provided data on both incidence and prevalence. 71 studies reported on lifetime prevalence. In the most recent years studied, incidence rates in the general population ranged from 24·7 cases (95% CI 24·3-25·2) per 100 000 person-years in South Korea in 2019, to 61·0 cases (60·6-61·4) in the USA in 2017. In individual studies, incidence rates showed an increasing trend over the periods studied. The global lifetime prevalence of vitiligo diagnosed by a physician or dermatologist was estimated at 0·36% (95% credible interval [CrI] 0·24-0·54) in the general population (28·5 million people [95% CrI 18·9-42·6]), 0·67% (0·43-1·07) in the adult population (37·1 million adults [23·9-58·9]), and 0·24% (0·16-0·37) in the child population (5·8 million children [3·8-8·9]). Vitiligo prevalence was higher in adults than in children across all regions. Central Europe and south Asia reported the highest prevalence (0·52% [0·28-1·07] and 0·52% [0·33-0·82], respectively, in the general population). INTERPRETATION: This study highlights the need for standardised epidemiological data collection globally to inform public health policies and improve vitiligo diagnosis and management. Emphasis on the impact on individuals with darker skin tones is crucial to reducing stigma and improving quality of life. Furthermore, our study highlights the need to conduct more research in regions and populations that have been historically under-represented, to effectively address the worldwide burden of vitiligo. FUNDING: None.

Global, regional and national epidemiology of alopecia areata: a systematic review and modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to a high psychiatric, economic and systemic disease burden. A comprehensive understanding of AA epidemiology is essential for evaluating healthcare source utilization; however, a systematic approach to summarizing epidemiological data on AA is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate systematically the global, regional and national incidence and prevalence of AA. METHODS: A structured search was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO and Korean Journal Database from their date of inception to 4 October 2023. Studies that reported the prevalence or incidence of AA were included. We used a Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model to analyse prevalence estimates. The primary outcomes of our study were the global, regional and national prevalence of physician-diagnosed AA for the overall population, for adults and for children. The incidence data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 88 studies from 28 countries were included in the analysis. The reported incidence of AA tended to be higher in adults aged 19-50 years, and this trend was consistent with its estimated prevalence. The reported prevalence in overall populations tended to be higher in men vs. women. The estimated lifetime prevalence rate of AA was 0.10% [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.03-0.39] in the general population worldwide, 0.12% (95% CrI 0.02-0.52) in adults and 0.03% (95% CrI 0.01-0.12) in children. The estimated prevalence of AA was highest in the Asian region and lowest in the African region. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 48% of the Global Burden of Disease regions had insufficient data on the prevalence or incidence of AA. Further studies are needed to provide epidemiological information on middle- and low-income countries. Our study may serve as a crucial reference in terms of healthcare policy decisions.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can have both a psychological and physical impact on patients. An understanding of in whom, when and where the disease occurs ('epidemiology') is important to evaluate how healthcare resources are used in AA. There is a lack of analysis of epidemiological data in AA. This study investigated the global, regional and national incidence (the number of new cases in a specific time period) and prevalence (the rate of new cases occurring in a specific population over a specific period of time) of AA by reviewing multiple databases. Studies that reported the prevalence or incidence of AA were analysed. The primary outcomes were the global, regional and national prevalence of AA diagnosed by a doctor for the overall population, for adults only and for children only. Altogether, 88 studies from 28 countries were included in the review. The incidence of AA tended to be higher in adults aged 19­50 years, and this trend was consistent with its estimated prevalence. The estimated lifetime prevalence rate (i.e. the proportion of individuals that will be affected) of AA was 0.10% in the general population worldwide, 0.12% in adults and 0.03% in children. The estimated prevalence of AA was highest in the Asian region and lowest in the African region. Overall, we found that 48% of regions did not have enough data on the prevalence or incidence of AA. Further studies are needed to provide epidemiological data on AA, especially in middle- and low-income countries. Our results will help with healthcare policy decisions.

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay and conventional fungus study in superficial fungal infection of the skin: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In superficial fungal infections, prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent the spread of infection and minimise the impact on patients' quality of life. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as KOH smear and fungal culture, have limitations in terms of sensitivity and turnaround time. Recently, the PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA) has been developed for the direct detection of dermatophyte DNA. However, there is a lack of information assessing the diagnostic accuracy of PCR-REBA. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PCR-REBA in superficial fungal infections compared to conventional and molecular methods. METHODS: The comprehensive search containing Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted on 7 August 2022. Two reviewers independently reviewed the included articles. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. RESULTS: The included studies were conducted in Korea (five studies) and the Netherlands (two studies), all of which were conducted in a single institution. The quality assessment of these studies indicated low risk of bias. When compared to the potassium hydroxide (KOH) smear and fungus culture, the sensitivity of PCR-REBA ranged from 85% to 100%, and the positive predictive values ranged from 58.9% to 100%. When compared to the RT-PCR, the sensitivity of PCR-REBA ranged from 93.3% to 100%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 91.6%-99.6% and 81.0%-89.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR-REBA shows promise as a valuable diagnostic tool for dermatophytosis, offering practical and cost-effective benefits.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Biologics (Secukinumab, Ustekinumab, and Guselkumab) for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Real-World Data from a Single Korean Center.

Biologics are important treatment options for psoriasis; however, direct comparison of their efficacy, safety, and drug survival is insufficient in clinical practice. This retrospective single-center study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and drug survival of three commonly used psoriasis biologics (secukinumab, ustekinumab, and guselkumab) and identify the factors affecting drug survival in actual clinics in Korea. We enrolled 111 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and for at least 56 weeks of follow-up; among these, 27, 23, and 61 were administered secukinumab, ustekinumab, and guselkumab, respectively. All groups were comparable with respect to their baseline characteristics. Secukinumab showed a rapid response, and guselkumab was superior in terms of a long-term response and complete remission compared with other biologics, while ustekinumab showed a lower efficacy compared with other biologics. All three biologics had a favorable and similar safety profile; however, allergic reactions and latent tuberculosis were more common with secukinumab and ustekinumab, respectively. Guselkumab was the most sustained biologic, and the survival rates of secukinumab and ustekinumab were similar. Drug survival was remarkably shorter in female patients and those with hypertension. Introduction of new biologics emerged as a negative factor for drug survival in clinical settings.