Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 123(6): e940-e947, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817318

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare how the displacement of the mandibular condyle changed after symmetric or asymmetric mandibular setback surgery using the surgery-first approach (SFA). Patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery using the SFA were selected and divided into a symmetry group (n = 18) with differences of less than 2 mm between the right and left setback, and an asymmetry group (n = 18) with a difference of greater than 2 mm. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated cephalograms were obtained after three-dimensional superimposition of CBCT images taken before surgery (T0), within one week after surgery (T1), and seven months after surgery (T2). The condylar positions were measured. Condylar positional changes according to time were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was performed. There were significant positional changes in mandibular condyles over time in both groups. However, most of these changes returned to their initial state. In the asymmetry group, there was a greater internal rotation of the mandibular condyle on the lesser setback side. The correlation analysis results revealed that only the setback difference was associated with rotational displacement of the condyle on the lesser setback side at two time points (T1-T0, T2-T0). In the SFA, significant condylar displacement occurred immediately after both symmetric and asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, and the right/left difference in mandibular setback showed a significant positive correlation with rotational displacement. Although more significant rotational displacement of the mandibular condyle was observed after asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, the amount was not large enough to be clinically significant.


Asunto(s)
Maloclusión de Angle Clase III , Prognatismo , Humanos , Prognatismo/cirugía , Osteotomía Sagital de Rama Mandibular/efectos adversos , Osteotomía Sagital de Rama Mandibular/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/cirugía , Cóndilo Mandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Cóndilo Mandibular/cirugía
2.
Angle Orthod ; 92(4): 512-520, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166777

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between three-dimensional (3D) skeletal variables and self-recognition of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires and cone beam computed tomography of 74 patients (42 men and 32 women; mean age: 22.8 ± 4.5 years) with skeletal Class III and facial asymmetry were collected retrospectively. Patients were classified into three groups: group Sy (recognition of symmetry), group NS (not sure), and group Asy (recognition of asymmetry), according to their responses to the questionnaires. To assess 3D anatomic differences in the maxillomandibular region, six 3D hard tissue variables: maxillary height, ramal length, frontal ramal inclination (FRI), lateral ramal inclination (LRI), mandibular body length (Mn BL), and mandibular body height (Mn BH) were compared among the three self-recognition groups. Six 3D hard tissue variables and Menton deviation were reduced into three factors and their association with the self-recognition of facial asymmetry was investigated. RESULTS: Maxillary height, FRI, LRI, Mn BH, and Menton deviation demonstrated significant differences among the three self-recognition groups. The reduced factors, which consisted of transverse and vertical parameters, and vertical parameter of the mandibular corpus, demonstrated significant differences among the three self-recognition groups. The difference in Mn BH influenced the self-recognition of facial asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Both the transverse and vertical parameter of the skeleton were determinant in self-recognition of facial asymmetry. Identification of the skeletal difference in the lateral view involving LRI and Mn BH should be included for assessment of facial asymmetry.


Asunto(s)
Asimetría Facial , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III , Adolescente , Adulto , Cefalometría/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Asimetría Facial/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA