Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for early assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 severity.

Despite challenges in severity scoring systems, artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) could assist in early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity prediction. Between March 2020 and June 2022, we enrolled 1453 COVID-19 patients (mean age: 59.7 ± 20.1 years; 54.2% male) who underwent ECGs at our emergency department before severity classification. The AI-ECG algorithm was evaluated for severity assessment during admission, compared to the Early Warning Scores (EWSs) using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, and F1 score. During the internal and external validation, the AI algorithm demonstrated reasonable outcomes in predicting COVID-19 severity with AUCs of 0.735 (95% CI: 0.662-0.807) and 0.734 (95% CI: 0.688-0.781). Combined with EWSs, it showed reliable performance with an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.830-0.835), precision of 0.764 (95% CI: 0.757-0.771), recall of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.741-0.753), and F1 score of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.741-0.753). In Cox proportional hazards models, the AI-ECG revealed a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR, 2.019; 95% CI: 1.156-3.525, p = 0.014) for mortality, even after adjusting for relevant parameters. Therefore, application of AI-ECG has the potential to assist in early COVID-19 severity prediction, leading to improved patient management.

Artificial intelligence-estimated biological heart age using a 12-lead electrocardiogram predicts mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

Background: There is a paucity of data on artificial intelligence-estimated biological electrocardiography (ECG) heart age (AI ECG-heart age) for predicting cardiovascular outcomes, distinct from the chronological age (CA). We developed a deep learning-based algorithm to estimate the AI ECG-heart age using standard 12-lead ECGs and evaluated whether it predicted mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We trained and validated a deep neural network using the raw ECG digital data from 425,051 12-lead ECGs acquired between January 2006 and December 2021. The network performed a holdout test using a separate set of 97,058 ECGs. The deep neural network was trained to estimate the AI ECG-heart age [mean absolute error, 5.8 ± 3.9 years; R-squared, 0.7 (r = 0.84, p < 0.05)]. Findings: In the Cox proportional hazards models, after adjusting for relevant comorbidity factors, the patients with an AI ECG-heart age of 6 years older than the CA had higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.60 [1.42-1.79]) and more major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) [HR: 1.91 (1.66-2.21)], whereas those under 6 years had an inverse relationship (HR: 0.82 [0.75-0.91] for all-cause mortality; HR: 0.78 [0.68-0.89] for MACEs). Additionally, the analysis of ECG features showed notable alterations in the PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval and corrected QT Interval (QTc) as the AI ECG-heart age increased. Conclusion: Biological heart age estimated by AI had a significant impact on mortality and MACEs, suggesting that the AI ECG-heart age facilitates primary prevention and health care for cardiovascular outcomes.