The impact of hysterectomy on subsequent colonoscopy in women with Lynch Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Women with Lynch Syndrome (LS) have a high risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. They are recommended regular colonoscopies, and some choose prophylactic hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hysterectomy on subsequent colonoscopy in these women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 219 LS women >30 years of age registered in the clinical registry at Section for Hereditary Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, were included. Data included hysterectomy status, other abdominal surgeries, and time of surgery. For colonoscopies, data were collected on cecal intubation rate, challenges, and level of pain. Observations in women with and without hysterectomy, and pre- and post-hysterectomy were compared. RESULTS: Cecal intubation rate was lower in women with hysterectomy than in those without (119/126 = 94.4% vs 88/88 = 100%, p = 0.025). Multivariate regression analysis showed an increased risk of challenging colonoscopies (OR,3.58; CI: 1.52-8.43; p = 0.003), and indicated a higher risk of painful colonoscopy (OR, 3.00; 95%CI: 0.99-17.44, p = 0.052), in women with hysterectomy compared with no hysterectomy. Comparing colonoscopy before and after hysterectomy, we also found higher rates of reported challenging colonoscopies post-hysterectomy (6/69 = 8.7% vs 23/69 = 33.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with hysterectomy had a lower cecal intubation rate and a higher number of reported challenging colonoscopy than women with no hysterectomy. However, completion rate in the hysterectomy group was still as high as 94.4%. Thus, LS women who consider hysterectomy should not be advised against it.

Validity of self-reported hysterectomy and oophorectomy in a population-based cohort: The HUNT study.

OBJECTIVE: To validate self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Large population-based cohort study in Norway: The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT). POPULATION: The Trøndelag Health Study 2 and 3 (HUNT2 and HUNT3) included questions on gynaecological history. Women who answered questions regarding hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy were included. In total, 30 263 women were included from HUNT2 (1995-1997) and 23 138 from HUNT3 (2006-2008), of which 16 261 attended both HUNT2 and HUNT3. METHODS: We compared self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy with electronic hospital procedure codes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy, by comparing with hospital procedure codes. RESULTS: Self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in HUNT2 and/or HUNT3 both had specificity and negative predictive value above 99%. Self-reported hysterectomy had a sensitivity of 95.9%, and for bilateral oophorectomy sensitivity was 91.2%. Positive predictive value of self-reported hysterectomy was 85.8%, but for self-reported bilateral oophorectomy it was 65.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported hysterectomy corresponded quite well with hospital data and can be used in epidemiological studies. Self-reported bilateral oophorectomy, on the other hand, had low positive predictive value, and results based on such data should be interpreted with caution. Women who report no previous hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy can safely be classified as unexposed to these surgeries.

Care after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women: Scoping review and international consensus recommendations.

Women at high inherited risk of ovarian cancer are offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) from age 35 to 45 years. Although potentially life-saving, RRSO may induce symptoms that negatively affect quality of life and impair long-term health. Clinical care following RRSO is often suboptimal. This scoping review describes how RRSO affects short- and long-term health and provides evidence-based international consensus recommendations for care from preoperative counselling to long-term disease prevention. This includes the efficacy and safety of hormonal and non-hormonal treatments for vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance and sexual dysfunction and effective approaches to prevent bone and cardiovascular disease.

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality after hysterectomy and oophorectomy in a large cohort (HUNT2).

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy are common major surgical procedures that have been associated with increased mortality risk. We aimed to assess the association of hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a Norwegian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cohort study with data from The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT2) linked to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, with follow-up from 1996 until 2014 or death. The unexposed group (n = 18 673) included women with both their ovaries and uterus intact, while the two exposed groups included women with hysterectomy alone (n = 1199), or bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy (n = 907). We compared mortality in exposed vs unexposed groups and adjusted for relevant covariates by Cox regression. Further, we performed analyses stratified by age at surgery (≤39, 40-52, ≥53 years) and subgroup analyses among women ≤52 years of age at inclusion. RESULTS: Among the 47 312 women in HUNT2 (1995-1997), 20 779 provided complete information regarding gynecological surgery and previous health. The hysterectomy group had increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.58) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09-1.97). We found no significant association between bilateral oophorectomy and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in the total population. However, among women ≤52 years at inclusion, cardiovascular mortality was increased in the hysterectomy group (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.19-6.17) with a similar, but less precise estimate in the bilateral oophorectomy group (HR 2.42, 95% CI 0.84-6.93). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, whereas bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was not. Among women ≤52 years at inclusion, both hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy were associated with a twofold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, but the results were imprecise. Women after hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy constitute a group with increased cardiovascular mortality that may need closer attention to cardiovascular disease risk from the healthcare system to ensure timely and effective preventive interventions.

Risk of cardiovascular disease after preventive salpingo-oophorectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers are recommended to undergo early oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer. Premature loss of ovarian hormones may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Because women with preventive oophorectomy are mainly young and healthy, they rarely undergo specialized cardiological surveillance. We compared the risk of cardiovascular disease in women after preventive oophorectomy with reference women. METHODS: In an historical cohort study, we included 134 women aged ≤52 years after preventive oophorectomy and 268 age matched premenopausal reference women, aged 52 years or less, from the general population, excluding participants with diabetes or cardiovascular disease. The Norwegian risk assessment tool (NORRISK 2) was used to estimate 10 year cardiovascular risk. This algorithm was validated in a large Norwegian population and is based on age, smoking, systolic blood pressure, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, antihypertensive medication, and family history of cardiovascular disease. We also examined cardiometabolic factors (levels of triglycerides and high sensitivity C reactive protein, as well as body mass index and waist circumference) not included in the NORRISK 2 calculation. RESULTS: Median age in the preventive oophorectomy and reference groups were 47 (range 33-52) and 46 (31-52) years, respectively. Mean time since surgery in the preventive oophorectomy group was 4.2 years (standard deviation (SD) 2.8). Ten year cardiovascular risk was similar in women after preventive oophorectomy and reference women (mean 1.15% (SD 1.00) vs 1.25 (1.09), respectively, p=0.4). Women in the preventive oophorectomy group had a lower body mass index (24.7 kg/m2 (4.0) vs 26.2 (4.8), p=0.003) and waist circumference (86 cm vs 89, p=0.006). The overall cardiovascular risk estimation was comparable among hormone therapy users and non-users, but hormone therapy users had lower total cholesterol and waist circumference. DISCUSSION: Women who underwent preventive oophorectomy had a similar risk of cardiovascular disease as population based reference women, estimated according to risk factors easily measured in general practice. Cardiometabolic risks were not increased in the preventive oophorectomy group.

The role of testosterone in menopausal hormone treatment. What is the evidence?

About 40% of postmenopausal women have decreased sexual desire, causing distress. Estrogen therapy attenuates vaginal complaints but has no effect on sexual desire. Although sexual function has been linked to testosterone, there is no clear relation between sexual desire and circulating levels of testosterone. Nevertheless, treatment with transdermal (patch) testosterone improved sexual function in several randomized controlled trials. Women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder who were treated with testosterone reported more satisfying sexual episodes and sexual desire compared with the placebo group. Adverse effects were mild. However, there is no testosterone drug designed for women available on the European market. Consequently, women who opt for testosterone treatment have to use preparations made for men with a high drug concentration. Adequate dosage for women is therefore challenging. A trial of 5 mg transdermal testosterone (gel or cream) daily or less has been suggested, followed by close monitoring of side effects and hormone level.

Hormone Levels and Sexual Functioning After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Women after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) can have impaired sexual functioning, but whether there is an association between hormone levels and sexual functioning is unclear. AIM: To determine whether hormone levels are associated with sexual functioning in women after RRSO. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 198 sexually active and 91 inactive women after RRSO. Participants completed the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, questionnaires concerning hormone replacement therapy (HRT), quality of life, care from partner, body image, and comorbidity and provided blood samples. Associations between sexual functioning scores and covariates were examined by linear regression. Variables associated with sexual activity were examined by logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations with sexual pleasure and sexual discomfort scores were expressed by multivariable regression coefficients and associations with sexual activity were expressed by odds ratios. RESULTS: None of the hormone levels were associated with sexual pleasure in contrast to age (P = .032), current use of systemic HRT (P = .002), and more care form partner (P < .001). Increased free androgen index (P = .016), more care from partner (P = .017), systemic HRT (P = .002), and no history of cardiovascular disease (P = .001) were associated with less sexual discomfort. The odds ratio of being sexually active increased with younger age, no breast cancer, better quality of life, and more care from partner. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that other factors than hormone levels are important for sexual functioning, although systemic HRT can have a positive impact on sexual functioning in women who have undergone RRSO. Testosterone therapy could improve women's sexual functioning after RRSO; however, the inverse association between free androgen levels and sexual discomfort should be addressed in future studies. Johansen N, Liavaag AH, Mørkird L, Michelsen TM. Hormone Levels and Sexual Functioning After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Sex Med 2018;6:143-153.

Use of hormone replacement therapy after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

INTRODUCTION: After premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to prevent ovarian cancer, the non-cancer-related morbidity and mortality may be increased if sex hormones are not replaced. Several guidelines recommend systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to these women until the expected age of menopause. We aimed to study the use of HRT after RRSO. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were 324 women after RRSO and 11 160 postmenopausal controls. A subsample of 950 controls had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). All participants completed the same questionnaire regarding HRT use. We compared HRT use in the RRSO group with the BSO controls using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the women aged ≤52 years without a history of breast cancer, 51.7% of the RRSO group and 48.7% of the BSO controls reported current use of systemic HRT (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76). Among the HRT users, systemic estrogen was used by 35.1% and 58.7% in the RRSO and BSO control groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the women aged >52 years, 16.8% of the RRSO group and 38.4% of the BSO controls (p < 0.001) used systemic HRT. CONCLUSIONS: Among the RRSO women and BSO controls ≤52 years old without a history of breast cancer, relatively few were current users. If there are no contraindications, these women would benefit from systemic HRT. Additionally, almost 40% of the BSO controls >52 years used systemic HRT. Doctors should be aware of this practice and prescribe systemic HRT when indicated.

Sexual activity and functioning after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: Impact of hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine sexual activity and functioning in women after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) compared with the general population (NORM). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. 294 women who underwent RRSO and 1228 women from the NORM group provided written information based on mailed questionnaires. Sexual pleasure and discomfort scores and frequency of sexual activity were evaluated using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire. RESULTS: The RRSO group reported less sexual pleasure (10.5 vs. 11.9, P=0.009), more discomfort (1.9 vs. 0.83, P<0.001), and less frequent sex than did the controls. Significant associations were observed between a lower pleasure score and being in the RRSO group, older age, history of cancer, low body image, high level of role functioning, and low level of global quality of life (QoL). Further, significant associations were detected between more discomfort and being in the RRSO group, older age, history of cancer, poor body image, and low level of global QoL. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use had no impact on pleasure or discomfort score in regression analyses among all the sexually active women. However, in subanalyses of the RRSO group, users of systemic HRT reported less discomfort (1.2 vs. 2.4, P=0.001) than did the nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: After RRSO, women reported significantly less sexual pleasure, more discomfort, and less frequent sex compared with the controls. In the RRSO group, systemic HRT users reported less discomfort than did the nonusers. Health care providers should be attentive to these issues when counseling before and after prophylactic surgery.