Impact of Wound Closure Technique on Surgical Site Infection after Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common complications after lower extremity bypass (LEB). Both patient and hospital-related factors have been associated with SSI after LEB, however, the impact of surgical closure technique on SSI incidence remains unclear. METHODS: Institutional electronic medical records were retrospectively queried for all LEB procedures performed from 2018 through 2022. Data were collected on patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, wound closure techniques, and postoperative outcomes. Closure techniques included skin staples, absorbable monofilament (Monocryl), non-absorbable monofilament (Nylon), or left open to heal by secondary intention. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify risk factors and calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for postoperative SSI. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients underwent LEB surgery over the study period. SSI was diagnosed in 120 (23.2%) patients over a median follow-up period of 1.5 years. The most common SSI locations were groin incision (40.0%), saphenectomy (31.7%), and leg incision (19.2%). Median onset of SSI was 18.5 d (interquartile range [IQR] 11-28 d) post-LEB surgery. Patients with SSI had higher body mass index (BMI) (28.2 [IQR 24.2-33.5] vs 26.6 [23.1-31.5] kg/m2, p=0.03) compared with non-SSI patients. Patient age, sex, and medical comorbidities were otherwise similar between groups. There were no differences in closure technique (79.2% vs 78.1% staples, 18.3% vs 19.7% Monocryl, 0.8% vs 1.8% Nylon, 1.7% vs 0.5% open; p=0.53) in SSI versus non-SSI groups. On multivariate analysis, patient BMI (OR 1.04 per unit, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.08, p=0.02), reoperative field (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.00-3.25, p=0.03), and active smoking (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.12-6.59, p=0.048) were independently associated with increased SSI incidence. Postoperative SSI resulted in prolonged hospital length of stay (7 vs 6 days, p=0.04), unplanned hospital readmission (49.2% vs 12.3%, p<0.001), and reoperation rates (64.7% vs 8.1%, p<0.001). Bypass graft infection rates were also higher among patients suffering postoperative SSI (9.2% vs 0.0%, p<0.001). On subset analysis of patients at increased risk of postoperative SSI, as found on multivariate modelling, there were no differences in closure technique between SSI and no SSI groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights on wound closure techniques and postoperative SSI made available through granular, operative data not found in large database analyses. Surgical wound closure technique was not associated with postoperative SSI after LEB surgery, even among patients at increased risk of infection. These data support individualization of wound closure techniques among patients undergoing LEB surgery.

Practice patterns in utilization of atherectomy and embolic protection devices in inpatient and outpatient treatment settings.

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of atherectomy in lower extremity arterial disease has increased substantially over the past several years, specifically in the office-based laboratory (OBL) setting, yet the efficacy compared with other interventions and the consequences of distal embolization remain unknown. Embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been used at varying rates depending on physician and practice setting. Previous studies have described lesion characteristics to consider when weighing the benefits and drawbacks associated with device use. Our study focuses on the use of atherectomy and EPDs in femoropopliteal arterial disease to better characterize resource use trends and postoperative outcomes in the inpatient and OBL interventional settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on endovascular interventions performed for femoral-popliteal occlusive disease that were entered into the Vascular Quality Initiative data registry between 2017 and 2021. A one:one greedy match, adjusted analysis based on inpatient or OBL location of procedure was used to compare the groups. Hierarchical logistical regression with selective use of principal component analysis was used to further explore the differences in EPD use and immediate postoperative outcomes. A proportional hazard model was used to demonstrate differences in reintervention rates up to 2 years postoperatively between patients who underwent atherectomy in the inpatient vs OBL treatment setting. RESULTS: Were included 2849 matched pairs in the final analysis. In our cohort, there was 22% EPD use overall, 40% in the hospital setting and 4.4% in the OBL setting (P < .001). Among the patients with available follow-up information, OBL intervention setting increased probability of reintervention by 18% at 2 years postoperatively compared with the inpatient setting; however, there was no difference associated with EPD placement and rate of reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Use of EPDs in the OBL setting compared with the hospital setting is dramatically decreased; however, no increased incidence of postoperative complications was seen compared with procedures performed in the hospital setting when controlling for patient and lesion characteristics. Patients with available follow-up data were more likely to undergo ipsilateral reintervention between 6 months and 2 years postoperatively if atherectomy was done in the OBL setting. Dedicated studies are encouraged to ensure patient safety, effective resource allocation, and long-term efficacy of OBL atherectomy as an ever-growing number of peripheral arterial procedures are transitioned to the OBL setting.

Mental health in academia: Hacks for cultivating and sustaining wellbeing.

Mental health concerns among university populations are on the rise. Faculty and students report increasing levels of depression, stress, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. These mental health crises reduce overall wellness and inhibit the educational process. We identify uncertainty, financial stress, disruptions to social networks, burnout, and the contemporary social/political climate as key triggers for mental health crises for faculty and students. Faculty are in a position to provide support to one another and their students and as such, we provide strategies that attend to these triggers and complement other forms of intervention. We do not intend these "hacks" to supplant structural change or reputable medical advice; rather, they are intended to help focus attention on the importance and magnitude of mental health concerns in academia and to offer some strategies that faculty can implement.

Association of insurance status with timing of hemodialysis access placement.

OBJECTIVE: Patients without adequate outpatient follow-up often present requiring emergency hemodialysis and then undergo permanent dialysis access placement at a later time. We sought to examine the relationship between type of insurance and whether a patient was already on dialysis at time of surgery. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative Hemodialysis Access registry was queried for all adult patients undergoing first time permanent hemodialysis access between January 2015 and September 2019. Patient and procedural characteristics were examined in patients split by private insurance-Medicare more than 65 years of age, Medicare less than 65 years of age, and Medicaid. The primary outcome was whether patients were on dialysis at the time of surgery. RESULTS: There were 19,307 adult patients that underwent first time placement of an arteriovenous fistula or graft. Of these patients, 9729 (50%) had Medicare, 7179 (37%) had private insurance, and 2399 (12%) had Medicaid. The patients with Medicare were subgrouped by age with 2968 (31%) being less than 65 years of age and 6761 (69%) being more than 65 years of age. Patients with Medicare and less than 65 were the most likely to be on dialysis at the time of surgical access placement at 67%, whereas 59% of Medicaid patients were on dialysis, and 53% each group of patients with Medicare and more than 65 years of age and private insurance were on dialysis. After adjustment for patient characteristics, patients with Medicare who were less than 65 and more than 65 years of age were both significantly more likely to be on dialysis at time of surgery compared with private insurance with odds ratio (OR) of 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-1.80; P < .001) and an OR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.03-1.20; P = .007), respectively. After adjustment, patients with Medicaid were no longer significantly more likely to be on dialysis. Secondary outcomes demonstrated, after adjustment, no difference in the association between a surgical fistula vs graft in any insurance groups; however, patients with Medicare and who were less than 65 years of age were more likely to have a nonradial artery used for anastomosis with an OR of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.04-1.34; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Certain types of insurance are correlated with being on dialysis at the time of access placement. Although associations were seen between insurance type and surgical access characteristics, these were associations predominantly insignificant when patient demographics and status of dialysis were controlled for. These potential gaps in care represent an area for improvement that deserves further exploration.

Global vascular surgeons' experience, stressors, and coping during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges for health care systems globally. We designed and administered a global survey to examine the effects of COVID-19 on vascular surgeons and explore the COVID-19-related stressors faced, coping strategies used, and support structures available. METHODS: The Pandemic Practice, Anxiety, Coping, and Support Survey for Vascular Surgeons was an anonymous cross-sectional survey sponsored by the Society for Vascular Surgery Wellness Task Force. The survey analysis evaluated the effects of COVID-19-related stressors on vascular surgeons measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. The 28-item Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory was used to assess the active and avoidant coping strategies. Survey data were collected using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) from April 14, 2020 to April 24, 2020 inclusive. Additional qualitative data were collected using open-ended questions. Univariable and multivariable analyses of the factors associated with the anxiety levels and qualitative analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1609 survey responses (70.5% male; 82.5% vascular surgeons in practice) from 58 countries (43.4% from United States; 43.4% from Brazil) were eligible for analysis. Some degree of anxiety was reported by 54.5% of the respondents, and 23.3% reported moderate or severe anxiety. Most respondents (∼60%) reported using active coping strategies and the avoidant coping strategy of "self-distraction," and 20% used other avoidant coping strategies. Multivariable analysis identified the following factors as significantly associated with increased self-reported anxiety levels: staying in a separate room at home or staying at the hospital or a hotel after work (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.79), donning and doffing personal protective equipment (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.41-2.33), worry about potential adverse patient outcomes due to care delay (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87), and financial concerns (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.49-2.42). The factors significantly associated with decreased self-reported anxiety levels were hospital support (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and the use of positive reframing as an active coping strategy (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons globally have been experiencing multiple COVID-19-related stressors during this devastating crisis. These findings have highlighted the continued need for hospital systems to support their vascular surgeons and the importance of national societies to continue to invest in peer-support programs as paramount to promoting the well-being of vascular surgeons during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery practice in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to widespread postponement and cancelation of elective surgeries in the United States. We designed and administered a global survey to examine the impact of COVID-19 on vascular surgeons. We describe the impact of the pandemic on the practices of vascular surgeons in the United States. METHODS: The Pandemic Practice, Anxiety, Coping, and Support Survey for Vascular Surgeons is an anonymous cross-sectional survey sponsored by the Society for Vascular Surgery Wellness Task Force disseminated April 14 to 24, 2020. This analysis focuses on pattern changes in vascular surgery practices in the United States including the inpatient setting, ambulatory, and vascular laboratory setting. Specific questions regarding occupational exposure to COVID-19, adequacy of personal protective equipment, elective surgical practice, changes in call schedule, and redeployment to nonvascular surgery duties were also included in the survey. Regional variation was assessed. The survey data were collected using REDCap and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 535 vascular surgeons responded to the survey from 45 states. Most of the respondents were male (73.1%), white (70.7%), practiced in urban settings (81.7%), and in teaching hospitals (66.8%). Almost one-half were in hospitals with more than 400 beds (46.4%). There was no regional variation in the presence of preoperative COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 OR protocols, adherence to national surgical standards, or the availability of personal protective equipment. The overwhelming majority of respondents (91.7%) noted elective surgery cancellation, with the Northeast and Southeast regions having the most case cancellations 94.2% and 95.8%, respectively. The Northeast region reported the highest percentage of operations or procedures on patients with COVID-19, which was either identified at the time of the surgery or later in the hospital course (82.7%). Ambulatory visits were performed via telehealth (81.3%), with 71.1% having restricted hours. More than one-half of office-based laboratories (OBLs) were closed, although there was regional variation with more than 80% in the Midwest being closed. Cases performed in OBLs focused on critical limb ischemia (42.9%) and dialysis access maintenance (39.9%). Call schedules modifications were common, although the number of call days remained the same (45.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons in the United States report substantial impact on their practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, and regional variations are demonstrated, particularly in OBL use, intensive care bed availability, and COVID-19 exposure at work.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Vascular Surgery Trainees in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic on health care workers has been substantial. However, the impact on vascular surgery (VS) trainees has not yet been determined. The goals of our study were to gauge the impact of COVID-19 on VS trainees' personal and professional life and to assess stressors, coping, and support structures involved in these trainees' response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was an anonymous online survey administered in April 12-24, 2020 during the surge phase of the global COVID-19 pandemic. It is a subset analysis of the cross-sectional Society for Vascular Surgery Wellness Committee Pandemic Practice, Anxiety, Coping, and Support Survey. The cohort surveyed was VS trainees, integrated residents and fellows, in the United States of America. Assessment of the personal impact of the pandemic on VS trainees and the coping strategies used by them was based on the validated Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale and the validated 28-time Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory. RESULTS: A total of 145 VS trainees responded to the survey, with a 23% response rate (145/638). Significant changes were made to the clinical responsibilities of VS trainees, with 111 (91%) reporting cancellation of elective procedures, 101 (82%) with call schedule changes, 34 (24%) with duties other than related to VS, and 29 (24%) participation in outpatient care delivery. Over one-third (52/144) reported they had performed a procedure on a patient with confirmed COVID-19; 37 (25.7%) reported they were unaware of the COVID-19 status at the time. The majority continued to work after exposure (29/34, 78%). Major stressors included concerns about professional development, infection risk to family/friends, and impact of care delay on patients. The median score for GAD-7 was 4 (interquartile range 1-8), which corresponds to no or low self-reported anxiety levels. VS trainees employed mostly active coping and rarely avoidant coping mechanisms, and the majority were aware and used social media and online support systems. No significant difference was observed between integrated residents and fellows, or by gender. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has had significant impact on VS trainees. Trainees reported significant changes to clinical responsibilities, exposure to COVID-19, and pandemic-related stressors but demonstrated healthy coping mechanisms with low self-reported anxiety levels. The VS community should maintain awareness of the impact of the pandemic on the professional and personal development of surgeons in training. We recommend adaptive evolution in training to accommodate the changing learning environment for trainees.

Brazilian vascular surgeons experience during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has made a significant impact on all spheres of society. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on the practices, finances, and social aspects of Brazilian vascular surgeons' lives. METHODS: This is a descriptive analysis of the responses from Brazilian vascular surgeons to the cross-sectional anonymous Society for Vascular Surgery Wellness Task Force Pandemic Practice, Anxiety, Coping, and Support Survey for Vascular Surgeons disseminated 14-24 April 2020. Survey dissemination in Brazil occurred mainly via the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery (SBACV) and social media. The survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgeons' lives by assessing COVID-19-related stressors, anxiety using theGeneral Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 scale, and coping strategies using the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) inventory. RESULTS: A total of 452 responses were recorded from Brazil, with 335 (74%) respondents completing the entire survey. The majority of respondents were males (N = 301, 67%) and practiced in an urban hospitals. The majority of respondents considered themselves at high risk to be infected with COVID-19 (N = 251, 55.8%), and just over half the respondents noted that they had adequate PPE at their primary hospital (N = 171, 54%). One hundred and nine (35%) surgeons confirmed that their hospitals followed professional surgical society guidelines for prioritizing surgeries during the pandemic. At the time of the survey, only 33 (10%) surgeons stated they have pre-operative testing of patients for COVID-19 available at their hospital. Academic vascular surgeons reported being redeployed more often to help with other non-vascular duties compared to community-based or solo practitioners (43% vs. 30% vs. 21% respectively, P = .01). Severe anxiety due to pandemic-related financial concerns was similar in those surgeons practicing solo compared to those in community- or academic-based/group practice (46% vs. 38% vs. 22%; P = .54). The respondents reported their anxiety levels as mild based on the stressors investigated instead of moderate-severe (54% vs. 46%; P = .04). Social media was utilized heavily during the pandemic, with video gatherings being the most commonly used tool (76%). Self-distraction (60%) and situational acceptance (81%) were the most frequently reported coping mechanisms used among Brazilian vascular surgeons. CONCLUSION: The COVID pandemic has greatly affected healthcare providers around the world. At the time of this survey, Brazilian vascular surgeons are reporting low anxiety levels during this time and are using mostly active coping mechanisms.

The Pathway to Low Outlier Status in Venous Thromboembolism Events: An Analysis of Pancreatic Surgery in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Purpose: Our institution's hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery service (HPBS) has demonstrated low rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to determine whether the HPBS's regimented multimodal VTE prophylaxis pathway, which includes the use of mechanical prophylaxis, pharmacological prophylaxis, and ambulation, plays a role in achieving low VTE rates. Methods: We compared pancreatic surgeries in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant user file with our institution's data from 2011 to 2016 using univariate, multivariate, and matching statistics. Results: Among 36,435 NSQIP operations, 850 (2.3%) underwent surgery by the HPBS. The HPBS achieved lower VTE rates than the national cohort (2.0% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.018). Upon multivariate analysis, having an operation performed by the HPBS independently conferred lower odds of VTE incidence in the matched cohort (odds ratio = 0.530, p = 0.041). Conclusions: We identified an independent correlation between the HPBS and decreased VTE incidence, which we believe to be due to strict adherence to and team participation in a high risk VTE prophylaxis pathway, including inpatient pharmacological prophylaxis, thromboembolic deterrent stockings, sequential compression devices, and mandatory ambulation.

Managing central venous access during a health care crisis.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.

Asymptomatic Trauma Patients Screened for Venous Thromboembolism Have a Higher Risk Profile with Lower Rate of Pulmonary Embolism: A Five-Year Single-Institution Experience.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is linked to reimbursements and publicly reported metrics. Some hospitals discourage venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) screening in asymptomatic trauma patients because they often find higher rates of DVT. We aim to evaluate the association between lower extremity (LE) VDUS screening and pulmonary embolism (PE) in trauma patients. Trauma patients admitted to an urban Level-1 trauma center between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. We characterized the association of asymptomatic LE VDUSs with PE, upper extremity DVT, proximal LE DVT, and distal LE DVT by univariate and multivariable logistic regression controlling for confounders. Of the 3959 trauma patients included in our study-after adjusting for covariates related to patient demographics, injury, and procedures-there was a significantly lower likelihood of PE in screened patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.02, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of distal LE DVT (OR 11.1, P = 0.004). Screening was not associated with higher rates of proximal LE DVT after adjustment for covariates (OR = 1.8, P = 0.193). PE was associated with patient transfer status, pelvis fracture, and spinal procedures in unscreened patients. After adjusting for covariates, we have shown that LE VDUS asymptomatic screening is associated with lower rates of PE in trauma patients and not associated with higher rates of proximal LE DVT. Our detailed institutional review of a large cohort of trauma patients over five years provides support for ongoing asymptomatic screening and better characterizes venous thromboembolism outcomes than similarly sized purely administrative data reviews. As a retrospective cohort study with a large sample size, no loss to follow-up, and a population with low heterogeneity, this study should be considered as level III evidence for care management.

Does Perceived Resident Operative Autonomy Impact Patient Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association of perceived trainee autonomy with patient clinical outcomes following colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a prospective multi-institutional study that consisted of surgery trainees completing a survey tool immediately after participating in colorectal resections to rate their self-perceived autonomy and case characteristics. Self-perception of autonomy was classified as observer, assistant, surgeon, or teacher. The completed trainee surveys were linked with patient information available through each hospital's internal NSQIP directory. The primary outcome was death and serious morbidity (DSM) and secondary outcome was 30-day readmissions. Separate mixed effects regression models were used to examine the association between perceived trainee autonomy and DSM or 30-day readmissions. Fixed effects were used to control for the effects of the training environment. The models were constructed to adjust for patient and trainee characteristics associated with each outcome independently. SETTING: This study was conducted at 7 general surgery training programs (5 academic medical centers and 2 independent training programs) with general surgery or colorectal surgery services. PARTICIPANTS: This study included a total of 63 residents and fellows rotating on surgery services that performed colorectal resections at the included 7 general surgery training programs from January until March 2016. RESULTS: The 63 trainees that participated in this study completed 417 surveys with over a 95% response rate. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patient records were available for 67% (n = 273) of completed surveys. The clinical year of the trainees were 6.1% PGY 1/2, 36% Post graduate year (PGY) 3, 40.9% PGY 4/5, and 17% fellows. Residents perceived their participation in the case to be that of an observer in 9.2% of surveys, an assistant in 51.6% of surveys, and the surgeon/teacher in 39.3% of surveys. About 50% of patients were male, 80% were White, the majority had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3, almost half had prior abdominal surgery, and over 80% of surgeries were elective. The primary operation types performed were laparoscopic (40.3%) and open (35.9%) partial colectomies. The rate of DSM in patients was approximately 24% when trainees perceived their role as observers, 23% when trainees perceived their role as assistants, and 18% when trainees perceived their role as surgeons/teachers. After adjustment for patient, trainee, and training environment, we found that the perceived level of trainee autonomy of a surgeon/teacher was associated with a 4-fold lower rate of DSM (odds ratio: 0.23, confidence of interval: 0.05-0.97, p = 0.045) compared to observers. The rate of readmissions was approximately 20% when trainees perceived their role as observers, 14% when trainees perceived their role as assistants and 9% when trainees perceived their role as surgeons/teachers. After adjustment for patient, trainee, and training environment, we found that the perceived level of trainee autonomy of a surgeon/teacher was significantly associated with a 10-fold lower rate of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio: 0.09, confidence of interval: 0.01-0.70, p = 0.022) compared to observers. CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between increased perceived trainee autonomy and improved patient outcomes, suggesting that when trainees identify with an increased role in the operation, patients may have improved care. Further research is needed to understand this association further.

Adherence to Inpatient Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Single Institution's Concurrent Review.

Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects morbidity and mortality and increases health care costs. Poor adherence to recommended prophylaxis may be a potential cause of ongoing events. This study aims to identify institutional adherence rates and barriers to optimal VTE prophylaxis. The authors performed patient and nurse interviews and a concurrent review of clinical documentation, utilizing a cloud-based, HIPAA-compliant tool, on a convenience sample of hospitalized patients. Adherence and agreement between different assessment modalities were calculated. Seventy-six patients consented for participation. Nurse documented adherence was 66% (29/44), 44% (27/61), and 89% (50/56) for mechanical, ambulatory, and chemoprophylactic prophylaxis, respectively. Patient report and nurse documentation showed moderate agreement for mechanical and no agreement for ambulatory adherence (κ = 0.51 and 0.07, respectively). Concurrent review using a cloud-based tool can provide robust, timely, and relevant information on adherence to recommended VTE prophylaxis. Iterative concurrent reviews can guide efforts to improve adherence and reduce rates of hospital-acquired VTE.

Quantification of Resident Work in Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine resident intraoperative participation, perceived autonomy, and communication patterns between residents and attending surgeons using a novel survey tool. DESIGN: This was a prospective multi-institutional study. Operative residents completed the survey tool immediately after each colorectal resection performed during the study period. Resident intraoperative participation was quantified including degree of involvement in the technical aspects of the case, self-perception of autonomy, and communication strategies between the resident and attending. SETTING: This study was conducted at 7 general surgery residency programs: 5 academic medical centers, and 2 independent training programs. PARTICIPANTS: Residents and fellows rotating on a colorectal surgery service or general surgery service. RESULTS: Sixty-three residents participated in this study with 417 surveys completed (range 19-79 per institution) representing a 95.4% response rate across all sites. Respondents ranged from clinical year 1 (CY1) to fellows. CY3s (35.7%) and CY5s (34.7%) were most heavily represented. Residents completed ≥50% of the skin closure in 88.7% of cases, ≥50% of the fascial closure in 87.1%, and t ≥ 50% of the anastomosis in 78.4% of the cases. Increasing resident participation was associated with advancing resident CY across all technical aspects of the case. This trend remained significant when controlling for site (p < 0.001). Resident self-perception of autonomy revealed learners of all stages: Observer (11.5%, n = 48), Assistant (53.7%, n = 224), Surgeon (33.8%, n = 141), and Teacher (0.96%, n = 4). Level of perceived autonomy increased with resident CY when controlling for site (p < 0.001). Residents who discussed the case before the day of surgery were twice as likely to rate themselves as Surgeon or Teacher (OR = 2.01) when controlling for CY (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Brief surveys can easily capture resident work in the operating room. Resident intraoperative involvement and perceived autonomy are associated with CY. Early communication with the attending is significantly associated with increased perception of autonomy regardless of CY.

Predicting the Risk of Postoperative Respiratory Failure in Elective Abdominal and Vascular Operations Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Participant Use Data File.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a Respiratory Failure Risk Score (RFRS) with good predictability for elective abdominal and vascular patients to be used in the outpatient setting for risk stratification and to guide preoperative pulmonary optimization. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative respiratory failure (RF), defined as ventilator dependency for more than 48 hours or unplanned reintubation within 30 days, is associated with increased mortality and hospital costs. Many tools have been previously described for risk stratification, but few target elective surgical candidates. METHODS: Our training sample included patients undergoing inpatient, nonemergent general and vascular procedures sampled for the American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012 Participant Use File. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent preoperative risk factors associated with RF, used to derive a weighted RFRS. We then determined goodness-of-fit and optimal cutoff values through receiver operator characteristic analysis and Youden indices to evaluate internal and external validity with a retrospective institutional validation sample (2013 and 2014). RESULTS: Multivariable analysis of 151,700 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identified 12 variables independently associated with RF. The RFRS showed good external prediction in the validation sample with a c-statistic of 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.79). With the highest Youden index, 30 was determined to be the optimal cutoff value with a sensitivity 0.62 and specificity of 0.75. Additional cutoff values of 15 and 40 optimized sensitivity (>0.80) and specificity (>0.80), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the preoperative setting, the RFRS can effectively stratify patients into low (<15), moderate low (15-29), moderate high (30-39), and high risk (>39) to assist in patient counseling and guide application of perioperative pulmonary optimization measures.

Higher Body Mass Index Increases Risk of HeartMate II Pump Thrombosis But Does Not Adversely Affect Long-Term Survival.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been correlated with various adverse events in patients who receive left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). In this study, we sought to further characterize the role of obesity in this patient population.Methods and Results:We performed a retrospective analysis of 164 patients implanted with a HeartMate II from August 2008 to December 2014. Patients were categorized into 2 BMI groups based on WHO guidelines: BMI 18.5-30 kg/m2(n=99) and BMI >30 kg/m2(n=65). Patient demographics, adverse outcome and long-term survival were compared between the 2 groups. For any outcome associated with BMI groups, we performed a Cox regression to identify confounding comorbidities. Preoperative demographics and comorbidities were similar. Patients with BMI >30 were younger (P=0.01) and had a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes (P=0.01). While rate of pump thrombosis was higher among patients with BMI >30 (P=0.02), overall survival at 2 years did not differ. The most common cause of death was hemorrhagic stroke in the obese group. On multivariable cox regression analysis, BMI was an independent risk factor of pump thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI does not reduce survival after VAD implantation but it does appear to increase the risk of pump thrombosis. Further studies to characterize the role of BMI in survival and thrombosis rates are warranted.

Dual Kidney Allocation Score: A Novel Algorithm Utilizing Expanded Donor Criteria for the Allocation of Dual Kidneys in Adults.

BACKGROUND Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) of expanded-criteria donors is a cost-intensive procedure that aims to increase the pool of available deceased organ donors and has demonstrated equivalent outcomes to expanded-criteria single kidney transplantation (eSKT). The objective of this study was to develop an allocation score based on predicted graft survival from historical dual and single kidney donors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data for 1547 DKT and 26 381 eSKT performed between January 1994 and September 2013. We utilized multivariable Cox regression to identify variables independently associated with graft survival in dual and single kidney transplantations. We then derived a weighted multivariable product score from calculated hazard ratios to model the benefit of transplantation as dual kidneys. RESULTS Of 36 donor variables known at the time of listing, 13 were significantly associated with graft survival. The derived dual allocation score demonstrated good internal validity with strong correlation to improved survival in dual kidney transplants. Donors with scores less than 2.1 transplanted as dual kidneys had a worsened median survival of 594 days (24%, p-value 0.031) and donors with scores greater than 3.9 had improved median survival of 1107 days (71%, p-value 0.002). There were 17 733 eSKT (67%) and 1051 DKT (67%) with scores in between these values and no differences in survival (p-values 0.676 and 0.185). CONCLUSIONS We have derived a dual kidney allocation score (DKAS) with good internal validity. Future prospective studies will be required to demonstrate external validity, but this score may help to standardize organ allocation for dual kidney transplantation.

Ventilator strategies for VV ECMO management with concomitant tracheal injury and H1N1 influenza.

Tracheal injury is a rare but highly morbid complication of endotracheal intubation. Recent reviews have advocated conservative management of these injuries without operative intervention. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be a useful tool in non-operative management of tracheal injury in the setting of severe respiratory failure and need for prolonged intubation. We present a morbidly obese 33 year-old-female with H1N1 influenza pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome and bacterial super-infection who sustained a post-intubation tracheal injury. Concomitant tracheal injury and acute lung injury pose a difficult ventilation dilemma. This patient was successfully managed by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, high frequency oscillator ventilation, proning position and tube thoracostomy. The venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventilator management were essential for this patient's recovery.