Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 24(10): 544-50, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23043040

RESUMEN

As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is being applied to higher-risk patients, ie, those with unprotected left main, multi-vessel disease, last remaining vessel, compromised left ventricular function, and ongoing ischemia, interventional cardiologists have used different percutaneous assist devices in an attempt to reduce procedure risk. The definition of high risk has varied among trials. There is no definitive evidence for superiority of the more invasive devices over the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP); furthermore, a prophylactic strategy of IABP insertion has not proven superior to a provisional strategy. The purpose of this report is to review the physiologic mechanism of action of the devices and discuss indications, limitations, and clinical outcomes during high-risk PCI.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia , Contraindicaciones , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA