RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience high levels of glycemic variability, which may be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, strategies that help pregnant women with T1D manage their glycemic control are of great interest. METHODS: We examined associations with or without remote monitoring of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) data by friends and family with indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability during pregnancies complicated by T1D in a pilot non-randomized trial (n = 28). During preconception or the first trimester, participants were placed in one of two groups based on device compatibility: (1) CGM Alone (n = 13): women without iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch; or (2) CGM Share (n = 15): women with iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch and followers with devices compatible for data viewing. Linear mixed models were used to compare indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability over time between groups. RESULTS: Participants using CGM Share had lower estimated HbA1c levels over time (p = .028), glucose management index (p = .041), and fewer glucose excursions >200 mg/dL in each trimester (p = .022) compared to those using CGM Alone. Participants using CGM Alone had higher high blood glucose index (p = .020), mean area under the curve (p = .026), and standard deviation (p = .046) compared to those using CGM Share. Other measures of glycemic variability did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: In this non-randomized pilot study, use of CGM Share was associated with improvements in several indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Control Glucémico , Hipoglucemiantes , Proyectos Piloto , Mujeres Embarazadas , Tecnología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados no Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Objective: We aimed to evaluate relationships between time-in-range (TIR 63-140 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and the glucose management indicator (GMI) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 27 women with type 1 diabetes were collected prospectively throughout pregnancy. Up to 90-days of CGM data were correlated with point-of-care HbA1c levels measured in the clinic at each trimester. GMI levels were calculated using a published regression formula. Liner models were used to compare TIR, HbA1c, and GMI by each trimester. Results: There was a significant negative correlation between TIR and HbA1c; each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c. The correlation between TIR and HbA1c was stronger (r = -0.8) during the second and third trimesters than during the first trimester (r = -0.4). There was good correlation between TIR and GMI during each trimester (r = 0.9 for each trimester). The relationship between GMI and HbA1c especially during second (r = 0.8) and third trimesters (r = 0.8) was strong. Conclusion: In the first trimester, the correlation between HbA1c level and TIR was relatively small, while that of TIR and GMI was very strong, thus GMI may better reflect glycemic control than HbA1c in early pregnancy. Each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c throughout pregnancy, which was lower than other published studies in nonpregnant populations reporting a 0.5%-0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between TIR and GMI and how GMI may affect maternal and fetal complications. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02556554.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Femenino , Glucosa , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
In exploratory analyses, we evaluated glycemic variability (GV) and gestational outcomes in pregnant women (n = 28) with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Gestational age at delivery was higher for women with lower glycemic measures, including estimated HbA1c (eHbA1c) (0.14% decrease in HbA1c per 1-week greater gestational age, P = 0.0035), mean sensor glucose (-3.9 mg/dL P = 0.0039), time spent >140 mg/dL (-3.1%, P = 0.0029), and higher time in range (TIR) of 63-140 mg/dL (3.2%, P = 0.0029). Third trimester measured HbA1c was significantly associated with gestational age at delivery (P = 0.0081). Preeclampsia was associated with less TIR in first (50.5% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.0034) and second trimesters (47.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.0025), but not with measured HbA1c. There were significant differences in other markers of GV (continuous overall net glycemic action, high blood glucose index, J-index, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions) with infant birth weight and gestational age at delivery. Thus, multiple markers of glycemia and GV were associated with gestational health outcomes in T1D pregnancies in this pilot study. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02556554.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Control Glucémico , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Mujeres EmbarazadasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To examine whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote monitoring by followers (family/friends) changes glucose management, follower interventions, and health outcomes compared to CGM alone in pregnant women with diabetes. METHODS: We prospectively stratified first trimester pregnant women with Type 1 Diabetes to CGM Share (remote monitoring) or CGM Alone. We enrolled a main follower per woman. We retrospectively acquired data for pregnant women who did not use CGM (no CGM). We compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between groups. We compared sensor glucose, follower interventions, and gestational outcomes between CGM Alone and CGM Share. Longitudinal mixed effects models were used for analyses of changes in outcomes over time. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased in all groups throughout pregnancy and was significantly lower over time in women using CGM Share (n = 15) compared to CGM Alone (n = 13) or no CGM (n = 8) (p = 0.0042). CGM Share users had lower median sensor glucose levels (p = 0.0331) and percent time spent >180 mg/dL (p = 0.0228) across pregnancy. There were no significant differences in maternal and fetal outcomes between groups. CGM Share followers had more alerts for hypoglycemia, but did fewer interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot study, use of CGM with remote monitoring improved some glycemic metrics in pregnant women with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Adulto , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemia , Estudios Longitudinales , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/instrumentación , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Miedo , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Embarazo en Diabéticas/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Embarazo en Diabéticas/psicologíaRESUMEN
Women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at increased risk for fracture. We studied the association of T1D and young age at T1D onset (T1D onset before 20â¯years) on bone structural quality. 24 postmenopausal women with T1D (mean age 60.9â¯years, mean T1D duration 41.7â¯years) and 22 age, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the lumbar spine, hip and distal radius. Bone mass, geometry and estimated bone strength were assessed at distal and shaft of non-dominant radius and tibia using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Postmenopausal women with T1D had lower trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) (LSM⯱â¯SEM; 166.1⯱â¯8.2 vs 195.9⯱â¯8.3â¯mg/cm3, pâ¯=â¯0.02) and compressive bone strength (24.6⯱â¯1.8 vs 30.1⯱â¯1.9â¯mg2/mm4, pâ¯=â¯0.04) at the distal radius compared to controls adjusting for age, BMI and radius length. At the distal radius, patients with young onset T1D had lower total vBMD (258.7⯱â¯19.7 vs 350.8⯱â¯26.1â¯mg/cm3, pâ¯=â¯0.02) and trabecular vBMD (141.4⯱â¯11.6 vs 213.6⯱â¯15.4â¯mg/cm3, pâ¯=â¯0.003) compared to adult onset T1D patients adjusting for age, BMI and the radius length. At the tibial shaft, young onset T1D patients had larger endosteal circumference (39.1⯱â¯1.2 vs 32.1⯱â¯1.6â¯mm, pâ¯=â¯0.005) with similar periosteal circumference (67.1⯱â¯0.9 vs 65.1⯱â¯1.2â¯mm, pâ¯=â¯0.2) resulting in reduced cortical thickness (4.4⯱â¯0.1 vs 5.2⯱â¯0.1â¯mm, pâ¯=â¯0.004) compared to adult onset T1D patients adjusting for age, BMI and the tibia length. There was no difference in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip and distal radius DXA-measured aBMD between subjects with T1D and controls. T1D is associated with lower trabecular vBMD at the distal radius. T1D onset before age 20 is associated with cortical bone size deficits at the tibial shaft.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/metabolismo , Índice de Masa Corporal , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Cuello Femoral/fisiología , Humanos , Radio (Anatomía)/fisiología , Tibia/fisiologíaRESUMEN
To understand the effect of type 1 diabetes (T1D) on bone mineral content (BMC) and bone density (BMD), we studied 125 T1D adolescents and 80 pubertal stage matched controls. T1D was associated with lower whole-body BMC and BMD compared to controls, even when adjusted for age, sex and sex hormones.